When was Jesus Christ really Born?

[tim-from-pa]

I haven't really studied it that deeply. As I understand it He was born on Rosh Hashanah

Yes that's correct. And your astronomical position is not that bad. I believe that torahcalendar.com believes he was born 3BC and crucified 34 AD. The latter I agree with because of the day of the week, but the difference between the dates is not 12240 days. But when I used that time span, I came to Sept 18, 1BC in which the astronomical position of the sun and moon was as good as or better than in 3BC.

Now... this I say that the dates I came up with are because of the 3 criteria I mentioned earlier. I have no love for these specific dates. It's just that IF those 3 criteria are correct, then those are the only dates possible, i.e. September 18, 1BC and March 24, 34AD. This means he was born the same day of the week he arose, late Sabbath! And, I was not even looking for that! I just noticed it after the fact (of the calculations) which dismisses the idea I was framing his birth/death on a preconceived idea.

I jokingly dub myself "Sir Isaac Newton lite". I found out that I am a strange mixture of theology, prophecy, mathematics, physics, and astronomy just as he was, but I'm not as smart, but similar in interests and personality. He (IMO) was the world's greatest theologian who knew the bible and languages better than most. And it takes a scientist and mathematician to give a life-giving and universal slant to "just theology".

 

[chessman]

When was Jesus Christ really Born?

25 Dec, 1 B.C.

 

[TOG]

When was Jesus Christ really Born?

25 Dec, 1 B.C.

Of all the dates proposed for Christ's birth, that's the one date that we can be positive he wasn't born on.

The TOG​

 

[chessman]

Of all the dates proposed for Christ's birth, that's the one date that we can be positive he wasn't born on.

The TOG​

It was a joke.

Then again, I'm sure several 6th Century bishops and monks were positive it was correct.

But they'd never met The TOG.

 

[TOG]

It was a joke.

Oh... :blush

Then again, I'm sure several 6th Century bishops and monks were positive it was correct.

But they'd never met The TOG.

Meeting the TOG can drastically change a person's life.

The TOG​

 

[Butch5]

Yes that's correct. And your astronomical position is not that bad. I believe that torahcalendar.com believes he was born 3BC and crucified 34 AD. The latter I agree with because of the day of the week, but the difference between the dates is not 12240 days. But when I used that time span, I came to Sept 18, 1BC in which the astronomical position of the sun and moon was as good as or better than in 3BC.

Now... this I say that the dates I came up with are because of the 3 criteria I mentioned earlier. I have no love for these specific dates. It's just that IF those 3 criteria are correct, then those are the only dates possible, i.e. September 18, 1BC and March 24, 34AD. This means he was born the same day of the week he arose, late Sabbath! And, I was not even looking for that! I just noticed it after the fact (of the calculations) which dismisses the idea I was framing his birth/death on a preconceived idea.

I jokingly dub myself "Sir Isaac Newton lite". I found out that I am a strange mixture of theology, prophecy, mathematics, physics, and astronomy just as he was, but I'm not as smart, but similar in interests and personality. He (IMO) was the world's greatest theologian who knew the bible and languages better than most. And it takes a scientist and mathematician to give a life-giving and universal slant to "just theology".

Where did you get the 12240 days from? You believe the story of redemption is told in the stars also, correct?

 

[tim-from-pa]

Where did you get the 12240 days from? You believe the story of redemption is told in the stars also, correct?

Yes, I do believe the story or redemption is told in the stars, and I also believe that there's some knowledge contained in the Great Pyramid, too. Some call it the pillar of Enoch, and technically would not be Egyptian. There is a very specific geometric triangle formed in that pyramid, where it's part of the chronograph. It is in the area of Christ's birth/death time frame but I will not get into great detail here as that's a subject in and of itself. Anyway, there's a side of the triangle, along the chronograph, that measures 33.512 pyramid inches (the chronograph is based on an inch per year) which when converted from years to days gives us 12240.

Now.... I don't make the pyramid the main source of my doctrine, but rather as a collaborating witness. Most here would probably not be convinced by the mathematics, as genius as they are, so I had to see if the bible states that same number, i.e. thru deduction, and it does. I already wrote about it here in this thread:

http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...birth-date-of-christ.54771/page-4#post-960437

 

[Butch5]

Yes, I do believe the story or redemption is told in the stars, and I also believe that there's some knowledge contained in the Great Pyramid, too. Some call it the pillar of Enoch, and technically would not be Egyptian. There is a very specific geometric triangle formed in that pyramid, where it's part of the chronograph. It is in the area of Christ's birth/death time frame but I will not get into great detail here as that's a subject in and of itself. Anyway, there's a side of the triangle, along the chronograph, that measures 33.512 pyramid inches (the chronograph is based on an inch per year) which when converted from years to days gives us 12240.

Now.... I don't make the pyramid the main source of my doctrine, but rather as a collaborating witness. Most here would probably not be convinced by the mathematics, as genius as they are, so I had to see if the bible states that same number, i.e. thru deduction, and it does. I already wrote about it here in this thread:

http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...birth-date-of-christ.54771/page-4#post-960437

Ok thank, I was wondering where you got the numbers from. Have looked at "The Time of the Engd" or "Mystery of the Mazzaroth" by Tim Warner?

 

[tim-from-pa]

Ok thank, I was wondering where you got the numbers from. Have looked at "The Time of the Engd" or "Mystery of the Mazzaroth" by Tim Warner?

I heard of it, but did not read it. My main star books include Bullinger, Seiss and E. Raymond Capt. I got another book from some fellow who I was not impressed with so much I forgotten his name, but I guess he wanted to jump the bandwagon. It seems there's only a few classics, and the rest are based off of them.

 

[Butch5]

I heard of it, but did not read it. My main star books include Bullinger, Seiss and E. Raymond Capt. I got another book from some fellow who I was not impressed with so much I forgotten his name, but I guess he wanted to jump the bandwagon. It seems there's only a few classics, and the rest are based off of them.

I have both. I've read "The Time of The End" it's really good. He shows a Biblical timeline for the 6000 years of mankind. I haven't read "Mystery of the Mazzaroth" however, I have listened to the audio series that the book is based on several times.