who or what is serpent seed as spoken in genesis?

[kingdavid]

53 And that was... See, that also proves the serpent's seed. It was a different race of people altogether. That was serpent's seeds. See? Now, that--that serpent's seed question's in here, so we're--we're going to get to it, and I want you to bear this in mind. See? Now, this will give this background. See, they were--they were Canaanites, these giants; and they were the sons of Cain, which was the son of the serpent. And the serpent was a giant man, great monstrous sort of a fellow, not a reptile at all, beautiful. He was the most subtle of all the beasts of the field. And he was the only... See, the--the genes from an animal into a woman will not breed at all. They tried it over and over; it's unfertile to the woman's sperm. And now, they can't find it. They take a chimpanzee, it's the closest thing they can find to the man, or the gorilla, or some of those close up to the man. As God in His great evolution begin to make fish; and then He made birds; and then He made other things, animals, and they kept coming on up, till one come out to a chimpanzee, and to a monkey, and on down to a gorilla, and then into the form of the serpent, and then from the serpent to a man.
QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS_1 JEFF_IN 08-23-64 Morning

 

[kingdavid]

140 And the next one to the human being was the serpent. The Bible said he was the most subtle of all the beast of the field. Smarter, he--he--he'd almost had a soul. He had a place for a soul, but what did he do? He sold out to Satan to deceive God, try to. How many gets it now that far? Satan, the serpent, almost had a soul. God knowed they'd look for those bones, and there's not a bone in a snake that looks like a man. He was... That's the curse of him. He stood upon his feet just like a man. Notice, then that seed, which was next to the human seed... Satan himself, the spirit, knew that that was the only seed that would pregnate the woman, 'cause the chimpanzee won't do it. They've mixed it and everything else; it won't do it. But he knowed that the germ of life that was in the chimpanzee, would not come to the field of the woman--egg; but he knowed the serpent's seed would do it, so he dealt with the serpent. And Adam had never knew that this act could be done. See? She was made a female. Certainly, she would've come to it later; but you see, the sovereignty of God to display Himself as Saviour and--and so forth, as I've explained many times...
QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS_3 JEFF_IN 08-30-64 Morning

 

[kingdavid]

141 But Satan knew this, for he come to her in the form of this serpent, which was the beast and--a--a beast, and came to her. And she was pregnated by Satan first. And if you'll notice, there was only two acts done, and there was three children born. Search the Scripture. She gave birth to twins. One of them was serpent's seed; the other one was Abel. She enticed her husband and told... See? Then she showed her husband what it was, and then he lived with her also, and she bore this child. And I want you--to show, she was pregnated with twins by two different... She was a... That's virgin woman. Their seed is strong. Like look here. Abraham married his own sister. Why, if a man'd marry his sister today, his children would be idiots. See? But the human... And here Jacob--or--or Isaac married Rebekah which was his own cousin, own blood cousin at that, blood relation (See?), Abraham's brother's child. Notice, notice now, on this (See?), there's--the human race was so strong. Now, if you notice it's always been twins all along. There was... Cain and Abel were twins, and Esau and Jacob were twins. Jesus and Judas come out of the same tribe and in the same church. And the--even the Holy Spirit and the antichrist is to be twins, so close that would deceive the very elected if possible. Have you got it? All right.
QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS_3 JEFF_IN 08-30-64 Morning

 

[kingdavid]

44 I knowed it in breeding dogs and things, and so forth, if it's right away. So Satan, that morning perhaps, met this evil one, which was the serpent, not a reptile, but a beast: most subtle, cunning, smart, of all of the beasts, just under man. And man is beast, himself, and we're--we're mammal, warm-blooded animal. And--and Satan was the next link here, this serpent was the next thing to a man, from a chimpanzee, stand between man and--and the chimpanzee. Now, science is looking for that missing link. And it's so hid by taking him down, and even not a bone in him looks like a man (See?), making him a reptile. Now, we find now that this fellow found Eve in the garden of Eden, this young woman that knowed no sin, knowed not what her nakedness was. And he knew. He was smart, subtle, wise. And he told her, "The--the seed, the--the--the fruit was pleasant and it was desirable," and when he lived with her that morning... And then (See?), then the afternoon she persuaded Adam to do the same thing, telling him what it was. And then Adam deliberately knowing he ought not to have done it, walked out with his wife and did this act.
POWER_OF_TRANSFORMATION PRESCOTT_AZ 10-31-65 Morning

 

[Osgiliath]

Kingdavid - It would be helpful if you could condense your entire point into a single paragraph, a summary if you will. What exactly are you saying, and what is your conclusion? It would help if you initially told us "what" you were going to determine, and "then" proceed with specifics. There's too much ambiguity going on in all of those posts for me to make sense out of anything. I'm not getting the whole; the serpent is not a reptile, but is between a chimpanzee and a man thing. It's obvious the serpent (Satan) in the Garden wasn't a literal "snake", but what exactly are you saying? Was he some sort of gifted Australopithecus?

 

[kingdavid]

Kingdavid - It would be helpful if you could condense your entire point into a single paragraph, a summary if you will. What exactly are you saying, and what is your conclusion? It would help if you initially told us "what" you were going to determine, and "then" proceed with specifics. There's too much ambiguity going on in all of those posts for me to make sense out of anything. I'm not getting the whole; the serpent is not a reptile, but is between a chimpanzee and a man thing. It's obvious the serpent (Satan) in the Garden wasn't a literal "snake", but what exactly are you saying? Was he some sort of gifted Australopithecus?

never heard of that last word you said b4 so i don't know what it is or means ????

this was many of the statements the man of God named wiliam branham made about the serpent and his seed. people always wondered where the giants came from, of course we know a group says it was when angels had sex with women in noahs day which is erroneous. the real truth is the serpent in the garden of eden had a seed. the Lord Himself said the serpent had a seed which means a child or son or sexual lineage. that son was cain. his father was the serpent which the devil entered or incarnated himself in this manlike beast. he was much larger and better looking than man was which is why eve fell for him or was beguiled/seduced by him.


people say that serpent seed was spiritual only and not natural. then the woman seed would have to be spiritual only and not natural and we know that is not true. Jesus came in the flesh which is natural not just spiritual to destroy the works of the devil or as the antedote to the poison the serpent injected into the human race in the garden of eden.


there is a spiritual application to this in the new testament but the revelation in genesis is not a spiritual one but a natural seed and a sexual act that took place. the book of revelations describes the spiritual side by describing the great whore/the appostate church living in pleasure by having an illicit illegal sexaul affair with the beastman/false prophet. he is smarter/wiser/more educated and has a huge organ-ization to seduce the masses of people with.



the scriptures say enoch was the seventh from adam, right? well had cain been adam son then enoch would be the eigth from adam and not the seventh. the lineage of adam never includes cain. even the apostles stated cain was of that wicked one. they sure weren't speaking of adam. they were talking about the serpent.

of course, many retractors/scoffers always bring up what eve said in genesis 4 that she got a child from the Lord. However, we know that the apostles said, eve was deceived. what are they talking about? do you want to believe and listen to what a decieved woman says? i know i don't, but the whole world seems to want to. there is a spiritual application to that one too but that is for another thread.

in summary, eve was beguiled/seduced by the serpent who was this great big goodlooking guy that eve had sexual intercourse with and defiled her womb so thus God punished the woman at the womb to have to give birth in travail and made her have a monthly cycle or santification process as a testimony to what eve did in the beginning. there was a CROSS of the blood lines where every man died by this sexual act and polluted our blood. that is why it took another Cross on calvary with a God/man born without sex and with pure blood as the antedote

 

[Vic C.]

Kingdavid - It would be helpful if you could condense your entire point into a single paragraph, a summary if you will. What exactly are you saying, and what is your conclusion? It would help if you initially told us "what" you were going to determine, and "then" proceed with specifics. There's too much ambiguity going on in all of those posts for me to make sense out of anything. I'm not getting the whole; the serpent is not a reptile, but is between a chimpanzee and a man thing. It's obvious the serpent (Satan) in the Garden wasn't a literal "snake", but what exactly are you saying? Was he some sort of gifted Australopithecus?

Osgiliath, you need to understand that this false teacher had a very subhuman view of woman and that Sun Myung Moon taught this very same 'serpent seed' nonsense. It seems to be a rampant teaching among many Christian cults.

"236 Now, there is a true woman, a true woman, virgin, that marries her husband, and lives, and she is a blessed thing to the man. If God could have give His son any better thing than a wife, He would have give that to him. 237 But she is designed to be a sex act, and no other animal is designed like that. No other creature on the earth is designed like that. That's the reason you see polygamy , because of that. That's what brought it in.
Marriage And Divorce, William Branham

"every sin that ever was on the Earth was caused by a woman ... the very lowest creature on the Earth"
The Spoken Word, Vol. III Nos. 12, 13, 14;, Branham: Spoken Word Publications, Jeffersonville, Ind. 1976; pp. 81-82

 

[Osgiliath]

Originally posted by Vic C.
Osgiliath, you need to understand that this false teacher had a very subhuman view of woman


[quote:3ue751rc]But she is designed to be a sex act, and no other animal is designed like that. No other creature on the earth is designed like that.

"every sin that ever was on the Earth was caused by a woman ... the very lowest creature on the Earth"

[/quote:3ue751rc]

Yikes! That’s just craziness. If it wasn’t for Rebekah, blind old Isaac would have blessed Esau :o

Genesis 27:5 “And Rebekah heard when Isaac spake to Esau his son. And Esau went to the field to hunt for venison, and to bring it.
6 And Rebekah spake unto Jacob her son, saying, Behold, I heard thy father speak unto Esau thy brother, saying,
7 Bring me venison, and make me savoury meat, that I may eat, and bless thee before the LORD before my death.
8 Now therefore, my son, obey my voice according to that which I command thee.
9 Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats; and I will make them savoury meat for thy father, such as he loveth:
10 And thou shalt bring it to thy father, that he may eat, and that he may bless thee before his death.â€Â

And if it wasn’t for Deborah, the wimpy Israelite MEN would have chickened out:

Judges 4:4 “And Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lapidoth, she judged Israel at that time.
5 And she dwelt under the palm tree of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in mount Ephraim: and the children of Israel came up to her for judgment.
6 And she sent and called Barak the son of Abinoam out of Kedeshnaphtali, and said unto him, Hath not the LORD God of Israel commanded, saying, Go and draw toward mount Tabor, and take with thee ten thousand men of the children of Naphtali and of the children of Zebulun?
7 And I will draw unto thee to the river Kishon Sisera, the captain of Jabin's army, with his chariots and his multitude; and I will deliver him into thine hand.
8 And Barak said unto her, If thou wilt go with me, then I will go: but if thou wilt not go with me, then I will not go.â€Â

And if it wasn’t for Huldah the prophetess, no one would have been able to understand God’s Word

2 Kings 22:10 And Shaphan the scribe shewed the king, saying, Hilkiah the priest hath delivered me a book. And Shaphan read it before the king.
11 And it came to pass, when the king had heard the words of the book of the law, that he rent his clothes.
12 And the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam the son of Shaphan, and Achbor the son of Michaiah, and Shaphan the scribe, and Asahiah a servant of the king's, saying,
13 Go ye, enquire of the LORD for me, and for the people, and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that is found: for great is the wrath of the LORD that is kindled against us, because our fathers have not hearkened unto the words of this book, to do according unto all that which is written concerning us.
14 So Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam, and Achbor, and Shaphan, and Asahiah, went unto Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe; (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the college;) and they communed with her.

Seems to me that women are always the decision makers in some of the most significant and pivotal moments in the Bible.

So, which gender has the last laugh? Women everywhere, rejoice!!! (and I am a man saying this - so there’s no bias).

 

[kingdavid]

Kingdavid - It would be helpful if you could condense your entire point into a single paragraph, a summary if you will. What exactly are you saying, and what is your conclusion? It would help if you initially told us "what" you were going to determine, and "then" proceed with specifics. There's too much ambiguity going on in all of those posts for me to make sense out of anything. I'm not getting the whole; the serpent is not a reptile, but is between a chimpanzee and a man thing. It's obvious the serpent (Satan) in the Garden wasn't a literal "snake", but what exactly are you saying? Was he some sort of gifted Australopithecus?

Osgiliath, you need to understand that this false teacher had a very subhuman view of woman and that Sun Myung Moon taught this very same 'serpent seed' nonsense. It seems to be a rampant teaching among many Christian cults.

"236 Now, there is a true woman, a true woman, virgin, that marries her husband, and lives, and she is a blessed thing to the man. If God could have give His son any better thing than a wife, He would have give that to him. 237 But she is designed to be a sex act, and no other animal is designed like that. No other creature on the earth is designed like that. That's the reason you see polygamy , because of that. That's what brought it in.
Marriage And Divorce, William Branham

[quote:gx4mu3er]"every sin that ever was on the Earth was caused by a woman ... the very lowest creature on the Earth"
The Spoken Word, Vol. III Nos. 12, 13, 14;, Branham: Spoken Word Publications, Jeffersonville, Ind. 1976; pp. 81-82

[/quote:gx4mu3er]


that moon guy did not teach serpent seed. he isn't even a christian and doesn't believe the bible so how could he preach serpent seed.

carnal minded christians like yourself like to ignorantly blaspheme that which ye know not even though the Lord fully declare it through a man of God like william branham. plus, you post something totally unrelated to the thread and take what he said totally out of context to suit your evil minded ways. you would rather hold to your maneur head thoughts that God doesn't prove anything you say or your ministers. if God doesn't vindicate a man's ministry with signs and wnders following then he was not sent of God

 

[Caroline H]

that moon guy did not teach serpent seed. he isn't even a christian and doesn't believe the bible so how could he preach serpent seed.

The same way someone professing to be a Christian can preach false teachings.

carnal minded christians like yourself like to ignorantly blaspheme that which ye know not even though the Lord fully declare it through a man of God like william branham. plus, you post something totally unrelated to the thread and take what he said totally out of context to suit your evil minded ways. you would rather hold to your maneur head thoughts that God doesn't prove anything you say or your ministers. if God doesn't vindicate a man's ministry with signs and wnders following then he was not sent of God

It is not blasphemy to deny something that has nothing to do with Scripture and is not supported at all. It is blasphemy to add things into Scripture that aren't there, so I would be careful.

 

[Vic C.]

that moon guy did not teach serpent seed. he isn't even a christian and doesn't believe the bible so how could he preach serpent seed.

Trust me, I know what I'm talking about. Let it be known also, that it's not you I'm attacking, it's the man you blindly follow. I do pray you come out from under his teaching.

Moon teaches "Through adultery, the archangel who became Satan stole the intended bride of heaven." (Sun Myung Moon, Today's World, May/June 1994, p. 22.) According to Unification doctrine, however, they failed in this mission as Eve succumbed to the seduction of the archangel, Satan, having sexual intercourse with him. Her eyes were then opened and, realizing what she had done, she attempted to correct this by having relations with Adam, prior to God's appointed time. Eve successfully seduced Adam and, after having sexual relations with her, his eyes were also opened and he felt fear and shame over what he had done. (Unification Theology and Christian Thought, pp. 60-63). (when she was 16-17 years old- Moon teaches that if she had only made it to the age of 21, then she would have been perfect- and her children with Adam would have been perfect ).

http://www.letusreason.org/moon2.htm

Serpent Seed: Doctrine that alleges Eve’s sin in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3) was sexual. Eve had intercourse with the Serpent and begot Cain, whose father is really Satan not Adam. Cain’s descendants were supposedly somehow perpetuated after the flood (usually through Noah’s son Ham). Diverse groups teach variations of this doctrine. Cain’s descendants are: Jews according to the Christian Identity Movement, Communists/Atheists according to the Unification Church, Whites according to the Nation of Yahweh, the lost according to William Branham, etc.

http://www.watchman.org/cat95.htm

carnal minded christians like yourself like to ignorantly blaspheme that which ye know not even though the Lord fully declare it through a man of God like william branham. plus, you post something totally unrelated to the thread and take what he said totally out of context to suit your evil minded ways. you would rather hold to your maneur head thoughts that God doesn't prove anything you say or your ministers. if God doesn't vindicate a man's ministry with signs and wnders following then he was not sent of God

I'll ignore your personal attacks for now because you are under this man's spell. But be warned, DO NOT make this a personal attack on me or any other member!

Clearly you are ignoring key passages that dispute your modern signs and wonders.

Mat 24:24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

2 Th 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
2 Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
2 Th 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

2 Cor 11:13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
2 Cor 11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
2 Cor 11:15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.


Your guy was unable to perform his signs and wonders unless his "angel' was with him. :shocked! That is totally scriptural and unBiblical. :gah

 

[kingdavid]

Your guy was unable to perform his signs and wonders unless his "angel' was with him. :shocked! That is totally scriptural and unBiblical. :gah[/quote]


______________________________________________________________________________________


i don't know what bible your reading but that is the way it always was with the true believer. the angel of the Lord appeared and was with moses, abraham, and many others in the old testament. the angel of the Lord was always very present with them. also in the Book of acts the angel of the Lord was also always very present with the apostles in supernatural manifestations, and in the book of revelations jesus himself testifies that he sent his angel to signify or testify the things which he said, and bring them to pass as given to john. if the angel of the Lord is not amongst ya then you are not in the faith because the angel of the Lord is always present with the true believer.

 

[kingdavid]

"kingdavid"that moon guy did not teach serpent seed. he isn't even a christian and doesn't believe the bible so how could he preach serpent seed.

_______________________________________________________________________________________


Trust me, I know what I'm talking about. Let it be known also, that it's not you I'm attacking, it's the man you blindly follow. I do pray you come out from under his teaching.
Moon teaches "Through adultery, the archangel who became Satan stole the intended bride of heaven." (Sun Myung Moon, Today's World, May/June 1994, p. 22.) According to Unification doctrine, however, they failed in this mission as Eve succumbed to the seduction of the archangel, Satan, having sexual intercourse with him. Her eyes were then opened and, realizing what she had done, she attempted to correct this by having relations with Adam, prior to God's appointed time. Eve successfully seduced Adam and, after having sexual relations with her, his eyes were also opened and he felt fear and shame over what he had done. (Unification Theology and Christian Thought, pp. 60-63). (when she was 16-17 years old- Moon teaches that if she had only made it to the age of 21, then she would have been perfect- and her children with Adam would have been perfect ). http://www.letusreason.org/moon2.htm

Serpent Seed: Doctrine that alleges Eve’s sin in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3) was sexual. Eve had intercourse with the Serpent and begot Cain, whose father is really Satan not Adam. Cain’s descendants were supposedly somehow perpetuated after the flood (usually through Noah’s son Ham). Diverse groups teach variations of this doctrine. Cain’s descendants are: Jews according to the Christian Identity Movement, Communists/Atheists according to the Unification Church, Whites according to the Nation of Yahweh, the lost according to William Branham, http://www.watchman.org/cat95.htm
______________________________________________________________________________________


carnal minded christians like yourself like to ignorantly blaspheme that which ye know not, even though the Lord fully declare it through a man of God like william branham. plus, you post something totally unrelated to the thread and take what he said totally out of context to suit your evil minded ways. you would rather hold to your maneur head thoughts that God doesn't prove anything you say or your ministers. if God doesn't vindicate a man's ministry with signs and wnders following then he was not sent of God


====================================================================================

again, as i stated. moon denied the bible for the foundation of what he taught and did not accept the word as his absolute. that is a billion, million miles from what bro. branham taught. plus, bro. branham was teaching serpent seed b4 this moon guy or maybe at the same time period that moon was saying what he did.

plus, you read yourself that moon believed eve had sex with an archangel not the serpent which is not correct. moon was just a scarecrow to throw people off to the truth but that is not possible for the very elect to be decived by carnal impersonators of truth.

 

[kingdavid]

I'll ignore your personal attacks for now because you are under this man's spell. But be warned, DO NOT make this a personal attack on me or any other member!

Clearly you are ignoring key passages that dispute your modern signs and wonders.

______________________________________________________________________________


you are going to reap what you sow, if you attack a man of God like william branham and call him a false prophet then you better be ready to take what coming to ya.

and clearly you are ignoring the prophecies of scripture that foretell that when the Holy ghost shall come, he will lead and guide you into all truth and show or foretell things to come and not speak in mysteries but thouroughly make them/the mysteries understood and will back up this revelation with signs and wonders as He always did. the angel of the Lord was always present with the true believers as a witness that what they said was true.

 

[Osgiliath]

Well, getting back to common sense; and to be fair and give you an honest hearing kingdavid, I am well aware of this doctrine, and quite knowledgeable on the subject; though I do not like to bring it up. Ancient Jewish Midrashic text and hundreds and hundreds of Jewish Rabbis first taught that Cain was the son of the union between the serpent and Eve. This doctrine has been taught for thousands of years, and Scripturally speaking, there is some merit for the teaching, even in the New Testament (i.e. 1 John 3:12, Genesis 3:15, Matthew 13 - “Parable of the Wheat and the Taresâ€Â, St. John 8:44, 1 Chronicles 2:55 etc. ). I personally don’t know, and I don’t believe enough is written about this to come to anything even remotely close to a Biblical conclusion. If it is true, how did this seed line make it through the flood? Why does Genesis 4:1 appear to be so emphatic about the origin of Cain? Granted, there is some very ambiguous Scripture that alludes to this doctrine, but there just isn’t enough for me get involved with any serious discussions relating to this. I don’t sweep it under the rug totally, because there is some mysterious Scripture that needs an explanation, but I don’t think anyone has one, and I think it is very unwise and even dangerous to endorse a doctrine that can amount to nothing more than speculation. There just isn't enough written, and what little is written is far too ambiguous to call, on either side of the coin - for or against. Just my two cents.

 

[kingdavid]

Well, getting back to common sense; and to be fair and give you an honest hearing kingdavid, I am well aware of this doctrine, and quite knowledgeable on the subject; though I do not like to bring it up. Ancient Jewish Midrashic text and hundreds and hundreds of Jewish Rabbis first taught that Cain was the son of the union between the serpent and Eve. This doctrine has been taught for thousands of years, and Scripturally speaking, there is some merit for the teaching, even in the New Testament (i.e. 1 John 3:12, Genesis 3:15, Matthew 13 - “Parable of the Wheat and the Taresâ€Â, St. John 8:44, 1 Chronicles 2:55 etc. ). I personally don’t know, and I don’t believe enough is written about this to come to anything even remotely close to a Biblical conclusion. If it is true, how did this seed line make it through the flood? Why does Genesis 4:1 appear to be so emphatic about the origin of Cain? Granted, there is some very ambiguous Scripture that alludes to this doctrine, but there just isn’t enough for me get involved with any serious discussions relating to this. I don’t sweep it under the rug totally, because there is some mysterious Scripture that needs an explanation, but I don’t think anyone has one, and I think it is very unwise and even dangerous to endorse a doctrine that can amount to nothing more than speculation. There just isn't enough written, and what little is written is far too ambiguous to call, on either side of the coin - for or against. Just my two cents.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

it made it thru the flood because of the blood line being sooooo polluted.

and again i say, to listen to a deceived woman like eve was and use her words in gen. 4:1 to contend with what a vidicated prophet said is dellusional. even the apostles said cain is of that wicked one.

of course the jews would be teaching it because it is what moses wrote in the torah but it was still not fully revealedor made known until this hour which is the dispensation of the holy ghost when all things shall be fulfilled and which the holy ghost would reveal all the hidden mysteries that all the holy prophets spoke and wrote about in a mystery.


that is the reason the angel of the Lord was sent, to be a witness and as a testimony that the things which were spoken or revealed in bro. branham's ministry are true. this ministry is the one John saw in the book of revelations and jesus said he would send his angel for a testimony to the true believers to believe this ministry and what is beng said.

 

[Osgiliath]

Originally posted by kingdavid

[quote:3cjnvy7k]Osgiliath wrote:

If it is true, how did this seed line make it through The Flood? Why does Genesis 4:1 appear to be so emphatic about the origin of Cain?

it made it thru the flood because of the blood line being sooooo polluted. [/quote:3cjnvy7k]

I don’t get it

. I thought The Flood was brought about to rid the world of corruption. Were some people too polluted even for The Flood? Did they float on water like an oil slick or something? I’m just not seeing it.

 

[kingdavid]

I don’t get it

. I thought The Flood was brought about to rid the world of corruption. Were some people too polluted even for The Flood? Did they float on water like an oil slick or something? I’m just not seeing it.[/quote]


__________________________________________________________________________________


the flood dealt with the corruption of the flesh, not the blood. that is why only jesus could take care of the corruption of the blood by offering his pure blood as the antedote