Bible Study Who's telling the truth?

[Corn Pop]

Do you think He grew inside her? Like placenta and all being connected to her uterus?

Just as the first seed of life come to be on this earth, nothing is impossible with God, it had to come from somewhere other there would be no life on earth, well God cannot break physics but works with it as its his creation. So sure, why can't God create life and grow a human inside a human from scratch. Everything is there for it to grow.

 

[Pegasus]

Yes, but i think Christ was conceived by the Spirit of God only and Mary just carried. She was not his real Mother but adoptive Mother like Joseph was his Dad.

Jesus had a real body right? If God's intent was to just create another human without the use of an egg from a female, then He really did not need a human mother.

The central importance of the Incarnation cannot be over emphasized. What we have from the Incarnation is Christ being fully human and fully God as One Person. One Person with two natures.

What better way could God reconcile us to Him but come to earth as the One Person Jesus Christ?

Simply amazing and frankly beautiful.

https://carm.org/dictionary-incarnation

 

[Corn Pop]

Jesus had a real body right? If God's intent was to just create another human without the use of an egg from a female, then He really did not need a human mother.

The central importance of the Incarnation cannot be over emphasized. What we have from the Incarnation is Christ being fully human and fully God as One Person. One Person with two natures.

What better way could God reconcile us to Him but come to earth as the One Person Jesus Christ?

Simply amazing and frankly beautiful.

https://carm.org/dictionary-incarnation

It would be lot easier for a human to help even if he did not need a human egg, because how else would it grow into a human, it still needs the whole process to take place inside the womb so a baby can grow. God planted the seed and Mary carried the baby.

If God did use her egg, that would mean the Holy Spirit had a baby with a human and its adultery because its Josephs wife. And if Christ is a part of the One God, it means God had a baby with a mans wife and God had a baby with his own Mother, yet God doesn't have a Mother.

It just doesn't seem right. I can understand God using Mary's womb to bring forth a child, but not using her egg and having a baby with a mans wife.

 

[Pegasus]

It would be lot easier for a human to help even if he did not need a human egg, because how else would it grow into a human, it still needs the whole process to take place inside the womb so a baby can grow. God planted the seed and Mary carried the baby.

If God did use her egg, that would mean the Holy Spirit had a baby with a human and its adultery because its Josephs wife. And if Christ is a part of the One God, it means God had a baby with a mans wife and God had a baby with his own Mother, yet God doesn't have a Mother.

It just doesn't seem right. I can understand God using Mary's womb to bring forth a child, but not using her egg and having a baby with a mans wife.

Its sounds just as crooked as Jehova telling Hosea to have a baby with a Harlot, yet sleeping with harlots I thought was an abomination to the Lord. So Jehova told Hosea to sin, unless its ok for people to sleep with harlots in God's eyes.

Well it's true we do not know the mechanics involved.

However it is fact Jesus had a human mother in Mary.

From that earliest stage of conception Jesus was truly God and truly human.

 

[Chopper]

Wow Dan, you sure got me scratching my head on this one, hmm. You pose some very interesting questions, hmm. All I can say is, hmm.

Love You Dan.

 

[Corn Pop]

Wow Dan, you sure got me scratching my head on this one, hmm. You pose some very interesting questions, hmm. All I can say is, hmm.

Yea i know im a bit out there with all this bible study stuff but its all in good faith, if i am to be corrected I will be corrected, if i make a mistake well I make a mistake. 2

It is complicated. Trying to put all the pieces together. I mean, if a verse says 'Jesus is that Spirit', then how can Jesus not be that Spirit?.

Its full of Flowers and Thorns. Good and Evil. Light and Darkness. Truth and Lies. Ink and paper.

And then from witness, too ink, too changed language, that only gives a million versions.

 

[Chopper]

It is fun trying to figure out exactly what the Scriptures are really saying about the Person of the Christ of God, Jesus. Look at these verses....
Colossians 1:16 "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
Col 1:17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
Col 1:19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
Col 1:20 And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven."

So, from what you and I are saying, is that Jesus appears to be Spirit and the flesh of mankind. He was Spirit because He was divine and conceived by the Holy Spirit in the womb of Mary. From Mary, Jesus became a man. I like Colossians 1:19 (in red) because it shows us that Jesus was fully divine, while being fully man. He had to take on a human body, otherwise there would have been no crucifixion. Hmm, does that make sense?