journeymanisnothing
Member
That would upd be a change.I agree with that answer! And it plays right in with the explanation I will give in Part 2.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
That would upd be a change.I agree with that answer! And it plays right in with the explanation I will give in Part 2.
That would upd be a change.
Yes, but I was talking to a JW recently who seemed to disagree with what I showed him. I also disagree with how mainstream christianity portrays God and his gospel.LOL, have we not agreed in the past?
Yes, but I was talking to a JW recently who seemed to disagree with what I showed him. I also disagree with how mainstream christianity portrays God and his gospel.
So it's a good change.
I believe Jesus preached repentance for the forgiveness of sins. I believe he showed grace toward people who egregiously sinned against him, fulfilling the OT scriptures which teach how God is a merciful God who will forgive any sin, no matter how bad (and nothing is worse than what sinners did to him at Calvary. For this reason, there is no such thing as penal substitution.Looks as though we may have some things in common.
Not many want to admit that what sinners did to Jesus, they were doing to God.I've talked to many JW's over the years, and seem to have the same problem with them, lol.
I believe Jesus preached repentance for the forgiveness of sins. I believe he showed grace toward people who egregiously sinned against him, fulfilling the OT scriptures which teach how God is a merciful God who will forgive any sin, no matter how bad (and nothing is worse than what sinners did to him at Calvary. For this reason, there is no such thing as penal substitution.
Not many want to admit that what sinners did to Jesus, they were doing to God.
Let me ask you my friend, where.did John or anyone else say our Father was satisfied by his Son suffering in place of sinners?I believe that Christ suffered and took upon Himself the worst way of death know in that day, in order to pay for the worst sins committed. He was the satisfaction for all sin, just as John said.
Let me ask you my friend, where.did John or anyone else say our Father was satisfied by his Son suffering in place of sinners?
I can show you from every writer of scripture how our Father was pleased that his Son endured sin against himself and showed great mercy to those sinners, bearing the sins committed against him with great patience... like our Father has throughout all history.
The Bible says throughout, Gods' wrath is reserved for unrepentant sinners. Never the righteous. Especially not the Son who well pleased him.
As Hidden In Him said, I hope you are seeking answers and not baitingMatt. 15:21-28
"Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.
And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour."
The apostles did not recognize that not only did this Gentile woman receive healing for her daughter, but she was saved by Grace through faith at that very moment!
The Jews referred to anyone who was not another Jew (Gentiles) as dogs, they believed they were the only ones God would accept, in other words, they were the only ones who would be saved! Christ confirmed that in Matt. 15:26. He also said that He had only come for the "lost sheep of Israel." So at this point, we the Gentiles are left out, so it seems to the Jews. But later "the mystery of the Ages" would be revealed to all mankind, that God has granted salvation to the Gentiles also!
Of course, God had salvation in mind for the Gentiles from the very beginning, but He kept it from the Jews, His chosen.
In case you are not aware, the nation of Israel today believes that all Gentiles are dogs, and they only are accepted of God! But we are not to shun Israel because of this! As Paul said, "all of Israel will be saved," and they will be our Brothers and Sisters in Christ in the future. Even though today "they are the enemies of the Cross" as Paul also said.
So what does all of this mean? Coming up in Part 2.
As Hidden In Him said, I hope you are seeking answers and not baiting
But nevertheless, I believe since the gentiles were regarded as the worldly heathens or the ones living in deliberate sin. Although Jesus didn't say her specifically as a dog, she belonged to a group that is like a present day godless person with no respect, recognition, or close to any reverence for God. Not cause of there race, but their hearts but they didn't know better, unlike the Israelites who did.
God's wrath was satisfied because the penatly was paid. The wages of sin is death, and it doesn't care who's pays it, it can be us, or Jesus.Let me ask you my friend, where.did John or anyone else say our Father was satisfied by his Son suffering in place of sinners?
I can show you from every writer of scripture how our Father was pleased that his Son endured sin against himself and showed great mercy to those sinners, bearing the sins committed against him with great patience... like our Father has throughout all history.
The Bible says throughout, Gods' wrath is reserved for unrepentant sinners. Never the righteous. Especially not the Son who well pleased him.
I'll answer the scripture you cited, but I would like you to comment on what I write specifically. I want you to look at what the law says,1 John 2:2
"My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
Of course our Father was satisfied.....that his Son showed great mercy to sinners by turning the other cheek.And he is the propitiation (satisfaction) for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world."
Actually, his mercy endures forever to anyone who believes the gospel. God took no satisfaction in how his Son was abused,The satisfaction is as wide as the sin, for the whole world. If man doesn't benefit from it, the problem is with man.
Hello Soldiers.God's wrath was satisfied because the penatly was paid. The wages of sin is death, and it doesn't care who's pays it, it can be us, or Jesus.
No it wasn't, because the law allows no killing against an innocent man at all.The sentence we deserved and the wrath we provoked was fully paid for on the cross,
Please go read the Psa.22 without the preconceived idea that """Jesus was forsaken!!!!!!"""in other words, satisfied, not because Jesus sinned, but because he took on sin. That's why "And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" - Matthew 27:46.
Well, I know the One who got nailed to a cross is sitting on the Throne now and still will be when people who didn't repent of it will be standing in judgement before him.Since God can't dwell where sin is (hence why we were kicked out of the garden and why God's Spirit cannot cause anyone to sin or be in anyone who sins) and there was a payment due, Jesus took that payment. And excecution was ordered, but Jesus stood in his way to take it. Now all we have to do is accept his offer and stand behind Jesus so that instead of God seeing our sinful selves, he sees His Son, who has already paid for our sin, but those who rebel stand away from Jesus, and then God looks away from Christ and sees us and delivers the blow since we aren't behind Jesus for Him to take it. But once the blow was delivered, and Jesus was raised, there was no more wrath or extra need to pay anything, for the debt had been satisfied. And remember, we were all once sinners and unrepentant until Christ brought us into His love, no one was born of God (Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.") So we all were automatically subjected to wrath, but the only one not born of or in sin was Christ. The only perfect One was Christ, so He took on our sin so He, the Innocent one, may be punish and satisfy our debt.
As one human to another I would probably misunderstand those words.Excuse me, but as one human being to another, If I came to you pleading for help for my kid and you said, "It isn't right to give what belongs to children to dogs"...
there is nothing in common with the event.
Jews thought of gentiles as unclean animals. Any gentile in 1st century Israel would have understood a Jew calling her a dog as derogatory.As one human to another I would probably misunderstand those words.
The truth remains that Jesus did not call her a dog.
Separate truth from feeling.
And it was a common event... happens at my house almost every day.
Dogs get the scraps from the table all the time.
We don't need to clean the floors very often.
Except by the very reading of the text Jesus did not call her a dog.Jews thought of gentiles as unclean animals. Any gentile in 1st century Israel would have understood a Jew calling her a dog as derogatory.
But this is a good example of theologians who can't separate truth from feeling, who don't want the gospel to offend anyone by teaching, "Jesus meant she was a happy little puppy dog."
Jesus called her a dog to humiliate her. To show us her humbleness,
I understand that God looks at Jews and gentiles all the same. I understand yhat Jesus himself didn't think of Jews as superior to gentiles.Except by the very reading of the text Jesus did not call her a dog.
The language does not say what you are saying.
I am not saying that Jesus called her a puppy.
I am saying the text does not say Jesus called her a dog.
Implied is not stated.
Why not just accept the text as written?
Why are you changing the text?
Where did Jesus say that???I understand that God looks at Jews and gentiles all the same. I understand yhat Jesus himself didn't think of Jews as superior to gentiles.
I'm saying, The womans perception and how she responded is what mattered.
She understood our Lords' words to her that her daughter was an unclean animal, a dog that returns to its own vomit.
In answer to your question Charlie, he didn't. It wasn't her time to receive the Kingdom message yet was what was being stated. That would come shortly after his death.Matt. 15:21-28
"Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.
And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour."
The apostles did not recognize that not only did this Gentile woman receive healing for her daughter, but she was saved by Grace through faith at that very moment!
The Jews referred to anyone who was not another Jew (Gentiles) as dogs, they believed they were the only ones God would accept, in other words, they were the only ones who would be saved! Christ confirmed that in Matt. 15:26. He also said that He had only come for the "lost sheep of Israel." So at this point, we the Gentiles are left out, so it seems to the Jews. But later "the mystery of the Ages" would be revealed to all mankind, that God has granted salvation to the Gentiles also!
Of course, God had salvation in mind for the Gentiles from the very beginning, but He kept it from the Jews, His chosen.
In case you are not aware, the nation of Israel today believes that all Gentiles are dogs, and they only are accepted of God! But we are not to shun Israel because of this! As Paul said, "all of Israel will be saved," and they will be our Brothers and Sisters in Christ in the future. Even though today "they are the enemies of the Cross" as Paul also said.
So what does all of this mean? Coming up in Part 2.
Part 2Matt. 15:21-28
"Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.
And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.
But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.
But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.
And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.
Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour."
The apostles did not recognize that not only did this Gentile woman receive healing for her daughter, but she was saved by Grace through faith at that very moment!
The Jews referred to anyone who was not another Jew (Gentiles) as dogs, they believed they were the only ones God would accept, in other words, they were the only ones who would be saved! Christ confirmed that in Matt. 15:26. He also said that He had only come for the "lost sheep of Israel." So at this point, we the Gentiles are left out, so it seems to the Jews. But later "the mystery of the Ages" would be revealed to all mankind, that God has granted salvation to the Gentiles also!
Of course, God had salvation in mind for the Gentiles from the very beginning, but He kept it from the Jews, His chosen.
In case you are not aware, the nation of Israel today believes that all Gentiles are dogs, and they only are accepted of God! But we are not to shun Israel because of this! As Paul said, "all of Israel will be saved," and they will be our Brothers and Sisters in Christ in the future. Even though today "they are the enemies of the Cross" as Paul also said.
So what does all of this mean? Coming up in Part 2.