Stormcrow
Member
I believe according to Mr. Stormcrow the Lake of Fire and destruction of satan and devils events already transpired. Correct that if it's wrong.
Can't refute the evidence presented so change the subject, eh? :toofunny
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Join Elected By Him for a devotional on Ephesians 6:14-15
https://christianforums.net/threads/devotional-selecting-the-proper-shoes.109094/
I believe according to Mr. Stormcrow the Lake of Fire and destruction of satan and devils events already transpired. Correct that if it's wrong.
Again, most people will be able to look at the difference between our views and decide for themselves which better reflects serious "theological studies."
I do find it interesting, however, that a recitation of the pertinent O.T. verses to Revelation appear as nothing more to you than "wild strawmen tales."
Interesting, indeed.
Can't refute the evidence presented so change the subject, eh? :toofunny
The Word is only understood in historical context.
The Word is primarily understood in historical context.
I have both examined and debated for my own studies, full preterism with much better presenters than yourself.
Some however, would rather not have it seen in any context at all. That way, whatever fantasies their mind can devise, they can get others to believe.
It's the way cults are formed.
Except where voided by doctrine. You keep wanting to make this an argument about doctrine. I have shown you the evidence against your position from the Word of God as you claim is "fully true and fully applicable", yet you reject the Word and sound teaching. Why?I accept every Word of God as fully true and fully applicable.
Off-topic and - if you ask again on this thread - I'll take it as harassment and report it as such.I also asked you to address your position on the devil.
Again, further proof of my claim that you just want to knock down a doctrine and not deal with the scriptural evidence I presented here:Full preterism is a cult.
Off-topic and - if you ask again on this thread - I'll take it as harassment and treat it as such.
One might think that where the DEVIL is stated in Revelation in the same line at Babylon it might be VERY relevant. Except when that might not suit your intended spinning.
s
Many christian sites do not allow those views and they do so for good causes.
While I am aware of some of the other beliefs some preterist carry along with them and don't believe they should be able to promote them, those who are against the basic eschatological views of preterism should be able to refute them. They should be able to do so without resorting to insults or disallowing preterism altogether.Full preterism is a cult. Many christian sites do not allow those views and they do so for good causes.
Except where voided by doctrine. You keep wanting to make this an argument about doctrine. I have shown you the evidence against your position from the Word of God as you claim is "fully true and fully applicable", yet you reject the Word and sound teaching. Why?
So you have a problem with me then. Nice to know.Why is because you take a position and force it to mean only what you think.
No. It discounts other views because they are - quite simply - wrong.It's called a logical fallacy because it discounts other potential views.
I have put the scriptures themselves on the table. You keep wanting to discuss doctrine. Sorry. I'm simply not interested in doctrine.I have put some of the other views on the table and found yours to be missing in action.
You also believe that the devil and his messengers were sent to the Lake of Fire in 70 a.d. DO YOU NOT? You are 'welcome' to clear this matter up for my understanding of your 'real' position.
So you have a problem with me then. Nice to know.
It makes no difference to me what positions you hold SC. I will say that 'factually' there are more possibilities to discourse than what you put on the table.No. It discounts other views because they are - quite simply - wrong.
I have put the scriptures themselves on the table. You keep wanting to discuss doctrine. Sorry. I'm simply not interested in doctrine.
Get back to me when you want to have a real discussion on the Bible and not simply an exchange over "your views."
Off-topic and reported for harassment.
I've already SHOWN WHY this is ON TOPIC. What is your problem?
Could it be that you don't want to discuss your position about THE DEVIL?
StormCROW: OFF TOPIC
Reported for being off-topic and personal. This subject isn't about ME or what you may perceive to be MY problems!
I'm tired of the personal stuff. Justify yourself to the mods from now on.