Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Many who believe in the early date of revelatiin and the fullfilled peespectives find the fulfillment of the 1000 yrs in the lifespan of jesus 70 yrs with a particular ephasis of the aposolic generation from @30-@70 Ad. The battle of Gog/magog could thus describe the bar kochabah revolt of @ 100 yrs after the cross....7 Now when the thousand years have expired, Satan will be released from his prison 8 and will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle, whose number is as the sand of the sea. 9 They went up on the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. And fire came down from God out of heaven and devoured them. Revelation 20:7-9
After the 1000 years!
JLB
Many who believe in the early date of revelatiin and the fullfilled peespectives find the fulfillment of the 1000 yrs in the lifespan of jesus 70 yrs with a particular ephasis of the aposolic generation from @30-@70 Ad. The battle of Gog/magog could thus describe the bar kochabah revolt of @ 100 yrs after the cross....
The 1000 yrs ending @70 AD can be subtantiated in at least 2 meanungs as well as being a phrase symbolizing a trial that has just past, ps:90:4,, or the "day" of a man's given lifespan.
By the way, which of the churches listed as addressees are yiu or any of us a participant or congregant????
I'm sure anyone who has not been Baptized in the Holy Spirit can come up with just about anything in scripture.
JLB
I think they were among the ones who twisted Pauls letters as they also did the scriptures.
But tat didn't answer the question as to which of the originally addressed first century churches you are associated with.
Can you answer; what occurred @1000 yrs before the ross and @1000 yrs before 70AD in national Israels history?
2ndly, If we allow that Jesus accomplished thae latter 40 yrs of his 70 yr allotted lifespan under law in a spiritual body and through the indwelling of his followers, How much short of 1000 is 70yrs?? If Jesus is referred to as the second Adsm in 1cor 15 and Rom 3,4 how could Jesus fulfill and redeem the life of mankind effected by ignorance and the tempter??
you do have a way of avoiding interaction and questions.Speculating what Jesus would/could accomplish if He lived another 40 years is the seed bed of Heresy.
Do you claim Jesus Christ has come already and the resurrection is past?
JLB
Can you answer; what occurred @1000 yrs before the ross and @1000 yrs before 70AD in national Israels history?
2ndly, If we allow that Jesus accomplished thae latter 40 yrs of his 70 yr allotted lifespan under law in a spiritual body and through the indwelling of his followers, How much short of 1000 is 70yrs?? If Jesus is referred to as the second Adsm in 1cor 15 and Rom 3,4 how could Jesus fulfill and redeem the life of mankind effected by ignorance and the tempter??
you do have a way of avoiding interaction and questions.
Thus the "day of vengeance is associated with the destruction of the temple and against his and the believers enemies. It is part of the acceptable year or lifespan of the lord!!! A persons "day" is the same as his "year" or lifespan which under mosaic law was 70-80 yrs. Furthermore 40 yrs coincides with the age of David during his reign and the length of both his and solomons reign. Fulfilled TRUTH is the opposite of heresy.!!!!
I'm confused; I thought it was an agreed upon belief that Jesus rose from the dead, but you imply that he wasn't alive at the tme of 70 ad which is only the length of a generation. (Heb 3:10)
Its great to have these topics.
... the beauty of the lives of the believers to replace the ashes and sorrow of the loss of the temple.It is not speculation but affirming what was propecied about his ckming. Isaiah 61:2,3 for example talks about the beauty of the lives of the believers to replace the ashes and sorrow of the loss of the temple.
Was Titus destroyed? NoThus the "day of vengeance is associated with the destruction of the temple and against his and the believers enemies.
There is a threadin the carm forums in the preterist sectiin of the religious movements forum section.This is numerically interesting. I'm not sure I'm buying what your selling, but it is interesting. I love parallels.
Under the laws of Hebrew parralelism, the acceptable year of the lord is inseperable from the 'day' of vengeance of our God. Jesus closed the book to emphasize the positive acceptence and belief in him.
Jesus affirmed this principle in john 3 saying that he had not come to condemn the world, but to save the world, and that he who didn't believe in (accept) him (or the reality of living trancendant father and maker of life) was 'condemned' already. They were under the law of sin/death ( or law of moses) or in ignorance. Did the jews all believe, or did they continue to believe in Moses? Was a 'vengeance' and accounting of ones life prophecied and neccessitated to cease the persecution and oppression from the disbelieving majority in deut 18:15-19 and Acts 3:22-24? as also described in deut 32 and Isaiah 59.
In john 5:24,25 the principle is further supported that he who believed (accepted; Is 61)had already crossed over fro m death to life and would not come into condemnation, wrath, vengeance. (IS 61:3) When,?? the time then was when the dead were hearing the voice of the son of msn and living.
Re: the romans as the enemy. There is a difference in deut 32 and Isaiah 59 between 'the enemy" (Deuteronomy 32:27,42; Isaiah 59:19) also called 'our enemies' in deut 32:29 which are the romans; AND "MINE enemies of Deuteronomy 42:41 (compare Is 65:5, Heb 9:28) and Isaiah 59:18. who are the remaining disbelieving unaccepting from those of mosaic covt Israel and enemies of the gospel of his generation addressed as 'Jeshurun' earlier in Deut 32:15.
The carnage continued among both groups of people about 60 yrs later.
Thanks for the topic.
Under the laws of Hebrew parralelism, the acceptable year of the lord is inseperable from the 'day' of vengeance of our God. Jesus closed the book to emphasize the positive acceptence and belief in him.
Tribulation will be over by May 14, 2018 or earllier unless the current Israel is no the real one. If it isn't, then we may be looking at about 1,000 years from now.
The reason for their faulty perception here is that in Hebrew thought the messiah would come "once" to the temple and restore the kingdom to Israel.
They didn't understand that The Messiah would come first as the "Lamb" only to return as "The Lion" and take "vengeance" upon His enemies.
That is why He stopped at the phrase - the acceptable year of the Lord
19 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord." 20 Then He closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant and sat down. And the eyes of all who were in the synagogue were@fixed on Him. 21 And He began to say to them, "Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing."
It was not time for the vengeance of God. That time will be fulfilled when He returns.
JLB
You'll have to provide suppprt for that perspective.
As far as it not being time for the vengeance of god, what did John say to the scribes and pharisees? Who told you to flee the wrath to come? Jesus said thst the blood of the prophets since the world began would be poured on that generation, meaning within the 40 yr "froward" generation.of Deut 32. Note again the warning of Peter in Acts 3: 22-24 of their needing to give account with their lives for disbelieving at the time of his and their visitation. Did Peter misunderstand?
Numerous other affirmations of the vengeance coming uponthe disbelievers and haters.of the christians from that generation could be and have been cited. The "gap" between Isaiah 61:2,3 is nonexistent other than it being postponed to the end of Jesus' lifespan to allow as many as would, to come to faith, before the vengeance and wrath was poured out.
Your response is remained in disagreement. The previous post is reaffirmed in stating that Isaiah 61 is fulfilled in continuity during the first century.
Thanks again for the topic; but again, this countering of statements attemps no resolution. Restating your dogma and present understandings as fact does nothing to attempt to understand the different viewpoint.
If you seek information, preteristarchive hasa lot of various perspectives.:
That depends on how you define return and resurrection. There are many ways to do that without crossing into heresy.
That depends on how you define return and resurrection. There are many ways to do that without crossing into heresy.
13 But I do not want you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning those who have fallen asleep, lest you sorrow as others who have no hope. 14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who sleep in Jesus. 15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord will by no means precede those who are asleep. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord. 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17
Like Paul defined it here for us -
For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.
Claiming this has happened is Heresy!
JLB