Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

23 Miutes In Hell

As I listened to him speak, for over 40 mins, I get the idea that the words of Luke still hold true. I hate to call the guy a liar, so I will reserve judgment as well, but God is the one who "is the same yesterday, today and forever".

And remember, the verses I am referring to are used often by Christians to DESCRIBE hell similar to how he did. But those words ALSO assure (or seem to, to me) that God would never "send someone back from hell to tell the others".

I think one thing you're forgetting, is that passage about the rich man and Abraham is also referring to Christ (And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.'). Despite, Christ, rising from the dead, still other's don't believe. It's a bit of a Catch 22, because while many refuse to believe and consider the cross foolishness (1 Cor. 1:18), many are also believing as evidenced by us, who call ourselves believers. Just something to think about. :nod
 
How so, exactly? Are those verses there to describe hell for us or not? Or are they presenting a parable of Jesus?

It's an allegory. It's full of deep and rich layers of truth; v. 31 seems to be a foreshadowing of the death and resurrection of Christ, along with a description of hell.

In v. 31, Abraham tells the rich man, "If they hear not Moses and the prophets," who is the 'they'? Within the parable, it's simply referring to the rich man's five brothers, but as an allegorical symbol it's referring to the disobedient and unbelieving Jews of Christ's time (as well as unbelievers in general). If they refused to listen to and obey the Prophets of old, then "neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." So, it should be no surprise that many will reject Christ and remain in unbelief, despite, His death and resurrection. Our faith is not based on the death of Christ, but is built entirely on His resurrection. (1 Cor. 15:14)

Luke 16:19-31 said:
There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:

20And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores,

21And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.

22And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;

23And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.

24And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

25But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.

26And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.

27Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:

28For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.

29Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.

30And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.

31And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
 
I read this book a few years ago, and frankly, I did not find it believable. I do believe in an eternal hell where people are separated from God forever, having had their lives to acknowledge and respond to the Gospel, but I don't hold to the literal "fire". I've given my reasons in other threads, but I believe when Jesus described how bad hell would be, He was using descriptions that His listeners would relate to. It's hard to fully relate to someone how horrible an eternal existence void of any hint of the Lord's Grace would be; the despair, the regret, the "If I only would have...".

But that's not why I find this and other books about a wonderful after-life experiences difficult to believe. I just do not believe God would give someone a glimpse of His Kingdom simply to motivate them to a more faithful life.

John 3:13 "No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven--the Son of Man."
 
Honestly, I truthfully do not believe any of these stories. The Bible says Hell is forever this guy claims he went there and came back which is IMPOSSIBLE in Bible terms. Also these people have nothing they can do to justify their claim I mean I could say this exact thing.
 
The Gospel is not the good news of hell. It is about a Kingdom of belief in an eternal Love that rules in the hearts of men through faith in the Christ.
 
I have been struggling with some of these thoughts as well over the past week on several different levels. I have been struggling with why it has to be eternal inescapable torment that never, never, never ends. It breaks me to pieces and I frankly wish there were some other way. I struggle also with why there needs to be a hell, and why it has to be the way that it is described in scripture. I don't doubt that it is true...I just honestly question how it all works.

For example, how God can cope with sending his own creation to eternal damnation. For me to send one of my children, no matter how aweful, into that kind of punishment would be more than I could emotionally bear as a human being. I understand that God's essense is perfect love and that he is perfectly just. It is just very hard to reconcile all that in my little human mind. It makes it hard to understand why there was a creation in the first place, why our short time in this world really even matters, or why I should experience God's joy while knowing that there are millions who will suffer like this. I feel so horrible for the lost. It does become easy to go into denial and pretend like it isn't true, esp since the consequences are so bitter.
 
I'd like to say this about Hell;

Often, people who do not believe assert that they cannot reconcile the concept of an eternal Hell with the unconditional love and mercy of God. But they miss the mark entirely.

God doesn't send you to Hell, per say. He denies your access into Heaven. The gift of salvation is just that... a gift. If you deny it, then you have effectively said you do not want to be a part of the kingdom of Heaven. Thus you don't get in.

There are no other alternatives akin to hanging around the bar, visiting Saturn, or playing poker at the Luxor for eternity. Not going to Heaven means you are left outside of it, outside of God and the vastness of his kingdom, and subject to the only environment which is left... Satan's environment. He will then do as he wishes to you - which will likely not be pleasant - but it was ultimately your choice to stay outside of Heaven. The Holy Spirit is a perfect gentleman and will not interfere with your free will.

I also love how people say stuff doesn't 'make sense.' The same can be said about quantum physics, the properties of quarks and their sub-components, and even some aspects of electricity, certain biological organisms, or our own tax laws :)... we don't understand any of them thoroughly. They don't 'make sense' either. Yet we're so arrogant to say that if our minds can't grasp it, it must be illogical and false (might be true in the case of tax law). But for the rest THAT position doesn't make any sense.
 
Remember why Jesus came, if not to save man from spending the eternity in a place prepared for the devil and his angels then what? why did he come? Have you taken a "good look" at what he went through? Rather than read what the unbelievers say read the word of God.

turnorburn
 
I'd like to say this about Hell;

These are interesting points...

God doesn't send you to Hell, per say. He denies your access into Heaven. The gift of salvation is just that... a gift. If you deny it, then you have effectively said you do not want to be a part of the kingdom of Heaven. Thus you don't get in. [...] but it was ultimately your choice to stay outside of Heaven. The Holy Spirit is a perfect gentleman and will not interfere with your free will.

Sometimes, my son will hand something to me while I am not looking. Then he gets irritated that I haven't noticed it and taken it from him. and he puts it down. Then he blames me for not taking the thing that I couldn't see and that he never made sure I saw. Sometimes it might happen while I'm driving, and I put out my arm as far as I can, but again he blames me that my arm can't reach.

I think this is a misunderstanding many Christians have about non-believers; that we "reject" something that we can see, or that we understand perfectly well. But the reality is that we cannot see it. Ironically, when trying to talk about it, many of these very same people will say that of COURSE we don't understand the bible, because the Spirit is not in us. Spirit is not in us, so we can't understand the bible, can't understand the bible so we can't sense any god from it, can't sense any god from it so the spirit is not in us.

The method they tell us, is to open our minds like a little child and be ready to believe anything and the only thing that will come in is Yahweh and it will all be obvious. This does not seem to work for Hindus, who open their minds to gods and the ones that become believable are the ones of their parents. It also doesn't seem to work for Muslims who open their mind to gods and conclude that Jesus is not a son of god. It does not appear to work for Jehovah's witnesses who are scorned here on this site despite loving Jesus and believing fully in Yahweh.

So it follows that others who might have tried to study the bible and see what it contains have concluded that the contradictions are a barrier to understanding. The main contradiction being that Yahweh knows exactly what it would take to convince me of his existence (I hope we can agree that your definition of Yahweh does, indeed, know everything about how I think and reason things out), and has chosen not to enact that.



I also love how people say stuff doesn't 'make sense.' The same can be said about quantum physics, the properties of quarks and their sub-components, and even some aspects of electricity, certain biological organisms, or our own tax laws :)... we don't understand any of them thoroughly. They don't 'make sense' either. Yet we're so arrogant to say that if our minds can't grasp it, it must be illogical and false (might be true in the case of tax law). But for the rest THAT position doesn't make any sense.

And yet it is the very position taken right here on this board regarding evolution, isn't it.
One difference, though, evolution cannot know you mind and know exactly what it would take ot convince you or teach you but decline to do it. Evolution doesn't care whether you understand it. Physics doesn't care whether you understand it. Quarks - don't care. Are you sure you want to compare the reason you don't understand quantum physics whith the reason I don't understand your definition of your god? That he doesn't really care whether i understand?

That's the part that contains the flaw. That the definition of the god is that 1) he cares and 2) he is all powerful and despite 1) and 2) there are still people who don't get it. This problem is what makes no sense. Now, if you defined your god as not caring then it would be the same as physics, and that would make sense. I can't see it, it doesn't make sense, and since the god doesn't care and/or doesn't know how to make me understand, I continue to not understand.

My unbelief is not a "choice". It is a result. It is a clear and obvious result of what I observe and how my brain operates. It is not a matter of "free will" that your Holy Spirit does not speak my engineers' observation-based language. Observations and reason have convinced me of the repropducibility of the data that lets me understand quantum physics, quarks, imaginary numbers in electricity, biological organisms and, yes, even our tax law (I spent 5 years as an accountant before becoming an engineer). My ability to understand all of those things is a result of the "language" that my brain operates on. Does your Holy Spirit really have no skills in speaking that language?

It is not "arrogance that says it must be false". It is the inability to muster up a belief. It is not a rejection of something that we don't like. It is a lack of belief. The belief is just not there, we can't make it up, can't force it, can't make it compute.

And again, it is not like the arrogance of saying, "I can't understand evolution so therefore the people who can understand it are wrong" because evolution is not defined as all-powerful goal-oriented, caring Causer. Moreover Evolution doesn't punish you for failing to believe in it.

You Christians have defined your god as an entity that WANTS people to understand and also HAS THE ABILITY to make people understand and simultaneously has created people who don't understand who will be tormented by Satan (What was he thinking when he created Satan, anyway? Was he surprised by how Satan turned out? "Snap, I think I shouldn't have done that...").

Based on YOUR dfinition of your god, there is no reason why he cannot speak the language of scientists, and yet he does not, and again based on YOUR definition he then allows to be punished those who cannot hear him. And he is still defined as "all good". And this just doesn't compute. It's not arrogance, not a choice, it just doesn't make sense and we can't pretend it does.
 
And yet it is the very position taken right here on this board regarding evolution, isn't it.
One difference, though, evolution cannot know you mind and know exactly what it would take ot convince you or teach you but decline to do it. Evolution doesn't care whether you understand it. Physics doesn't care whether you understand it. Quarks - don't care. Are you sure you want to compare the reason you don't understand quantum physics whith the reason I don't understand your definition of your god? That he doesn't really care whether i understand?

That's the part that contains the flaw. That the definition of the god is that 1) he cares and 2) he is all powerful and despite 1) and 2) there are still people who don't get it. This problem is what makes no sense. Now, if you defined your god as not caring then it would be the same as physics, and that would make sense. I can't see it, it doesn't make sense, and since the god doesn't care and/or doesn't know how to make me understand, I continue to not understand.

My unbelief is not a "choice". It is a result. It is a clear and obvious result of what I observe and how my brain operates. It is not a matter of "free will" that your Holy Spirit does not speak my engineers' observation-based language. Observations and reason have convinced me of the repropducibility of the data that lets me understand quantum physics, quarks, imaginary numbers in electricity, biological organisms and, yes, even our tax law (I spent 5 years as an accountant before becoming an engineer). My ability to understand all of those things is a result of the "language" that my brain operates on. Does your Holy Spirit really have no skills in speaking that language?

It is not "arrogance that says it must be false". It is the inability to muster up a belief. It is not a rejection of something that we don't like. It is a lack of belief. The belief is just not there, we can't make it up, can't force it, can't make it compute.

And again, it is not like the arrogance of saying, "I can't understand evolution so therefore the people who can understand it are wrong" because evolution is not defined as all-powerful goal-oriented, caring Causer. Moreover Evolution doesn't punish you for failing to believe in it.

You Christians have defined your god as an entity that WANTS people to understand and also HAS THE ABILITY to make people understand and simultaneously has created people who don't understand who will be tormented by Satan (What was he thinking when he created Satan, anyway? Was he surprised by how Satan turned out? "Snap, I think I shouldn't have done that...").

Based on YOUR dfinition of your god, there is no reason why he cannot speak the language of scientists, and yet he does not, and again based on YOUR definition he then allows to be punished those who cannot hear him. And he is still defined as "all good". And this just doesn't compute. It's not arrogance, not a choice, it just doesn't make sense and we can't pretend it does.

That is an amazingly well written post.

You bring up some items that I struggle with to this day - after over 30 years as a Christian. But I think I have an answer - Christians, not all but many, harbor the arrogance and pride that they accuse the science-minded of having.

Fact is, God is a mystery to me. I don't have all the answers that so many on this board (and in the church in general) claim to have. And again, I've been a bible believing and reading Christian for over 30 years.

Why does God punish unbelievers (and according to some, those who have simply not heard) forever in dreadful ways, thru all eternity? My answer: I don't think that He does.

I would offer this advice to the non-believer: Stop listening to Christians, and CERTAINLY to the know-it-all Christians. Want to find God? Go looking for Him yourself. Pick up a Bible and read random parts of it. Pray that God would reveal Himself to you.

But above all, remember: any human you listen to is, by Christianity's own definition, a fallen person. You just can't put any faith in a person that you meet in this life.

I hope you do find God, Rhea. Or, I hope He reaches you! For now, I will just thank you for the most polite and well written, challenging post I've read here in a LONG time.
 
Thanks, Pizzaguy. ~blush~ I appreciate your willingness to hear my thoughts with an open heart. Fact is, I do think about these things humbly, despite being told I have "motives". I've read the bible quite a lot, and, thanks to the internet, in quite a few different versions (biblegateway's side-by-side is pretty cool). And when I read, I puzzle over it, wonder how it fits, try to see how it was written.

My conclusion so far is that your advice is sound. Any human I would hear is as human as me, and as prone to fault (laugh, despite them telling me I'm "not reading it right"). And from what I can tell, that includes the authors of the bible themselves. I know a lot of folks who are liberal Christians and they don't let the technicalities and problems of the bible get in the way of their loving Jesus. So there are definitely different ways to look at it.
 
Personally if I believed in things like 23 minutes in Hell and came back from Heaven stories I'd also haft to accept that aliens are real, Big Foot exists, and Planet Nuburu exists.
 
Don't buy it at all!!! Bill Wiese is now on my no go list. Did not know of him before, (thank God) and will warn others of him. THX
 
Back
Top