9/11 Inside job or not? Poll.

[John]

Just a quick poll.

Please post what you voted for it will help me. :eyebrow

 

[John]

I voted yes quite obviously.

 

[GojuBrian]

Nope.

 

[Gabe]

No.

 

[Aero_Hudson]

No. I thought the conspiracy theory around 9/11 dies years ago. Personally, I think the idea is completely and utterly absurd.

 

[stovebolts]

Nope...

 

[Paidion]

I voted "no", and yet I don't think all was what it seemed. Planes going through the towers would not cause them to collapse in the way that they did. They collapsed in a way which was identical to the collapse of a building which is deliberately brought down by means of an explosion at the BASE of the building.

 

[jeremiahj13]

the biggest no in the world.

 

[Vic C.]

I voted "unsure" but I really don't care much either. My God tells me not fret over these sort of controversies nor be a part of conspiracies. Of course, I am human and don't always take His advice. I have my issues with the obvious things that are wrong with government.

 

[Caroline H]

Haven't we hashed this out already?? :crazy 2 :distorted :infinity :nag

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=33429&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=conspiracy+theory

 

[Pascal's Wager]

Just a quick poll.

Please post what you voted for it will help me. :eyebrow

I voted "NO".

America can't even keep it's nuclear weapon arsenal secrets, secret.

How much MORE would it be difficult to keep secret a conspiracy that killed over 3 thousand people, utilized several airplanes and would require the coordination of hundreds of experts in explosives.

Somebody would have talked, by now, and spilled ALL the beans (names, emails, receipts...the list goes on and on).

*edited by Staff. We do not like when members openly make such statements, it sounds arrogant*

 

[John]

11 to 2 interesting. Its good to know what kind of people are inhabiting this board.

 

[John]

I voted "no", and yet I don't think all was what it seemed. Planes going through the towers would not cause them to collapse in the way that they did. They collapsed in a way which was identical to the collapse of a building which is deliberately brought down by means of an explosion at the BASE of the building.

Should have voted "unsure" then ;)

There is so much data that points to 9/11 being an inside job that i can't believe even 1 person voted no. It gives the impression that the level of intelligence on this forum is very VERY weak.

 

[jeremiahj13]

11 to 2 interesting. Its good to know what kind of people are inhabiting this board.

People with their heads on straight. :amen

(no pun intended lol)

 

[handy]

It gives the impression that the level of intelligence on this forum is very VERY weak.

Or perhaps that there are folks here who are willing to make a judgment based upon what is credible evidence, rather than rumors, most of which have already been proven to be false.

 

[Vic C.]

... There is so much data that points to 9/11 being an inside job that i can't believe even 1 person voted no.

Then why ask if you are just going to ridicule those who disagree with you?

It gives the impression that the level of intelligence on this forum is very VERY weak.

Or it could mean what jeremiah and Dora said below. That was a low blow on your part, John. :naughty

 

[Dave Slayer]

I voted "no", and yet I don't think all was what it seemed. Planes going through the towers would not cause them to collapse in the way that they did. They collapsed in a way which was identical to the collapse of a building which is deliberately brought down by means of an explosion at the BASE of the building.

Then the planes were just a diversion then?

Either way, this is in the past. Not much we can do about it now. So why don't we stop chewing on yesterday's breakfast and move on, shall we?

 

[handy]

I voted "no", and yet I don't think all was what it seemed. Planes going through the towers would not cause them to collapse in the way that they did. They collapsed in a way which was identical to the collapse of a building which is deliberately brought down by means of an explosion at the BASE of the building.

Then the planes were just a diversion then?

Either way, this is in the past. Not much we can do about it now. So why don't we stop chewing on yesterday's breakfast and move on, shall we?

Paidion, you might want to read this:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... ge=4#steel

 

[jasoncran]

I voted "no", and yet I don't think all was what it seemed. Planes going through the towers would not cause them to collapse in the way that they did. They collapsed in a way which was identical to the collapse of a building which is deliberately brought down by means of an explosion at the BASE of the building.

a certified welder and bulding inspector who worked on skyscrapers explained that steels distempers at low temps and the weight of the bulding upper floors falling caused
th base to give out.

jason

nope as well

 

[Lewis]

Some years back I posted this stuff on another forum, just because it was out there. So check this stuff out, if you dare.

Welcome to Brads 911 Investigation,Pentagon WTC Photo and Video Analysis !
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/bradm/ ... tagon.html

The Two-Plane Theory
Surgical Strike by Fighter Combined with Overflight by Flight 77
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/an ... stman.html

9/11 conspiracy theories
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories