Enlightenedtruth
Member
God said "be fruitful"; there was an actual Purpose in Him saying that in Genesis (the beginning). For Christ to not take a wife; he was kind of a busy man, and there was a Purpose in that.Wasn't Jesus celebate?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
God said "be fruitful"; there was an actual Purpose in Him saying that in Genesis (the beginning). For Christ to not take a wife; he was kind of a busy man, and there was a Purpose in that.Wasn't Jesus celebate?
Hey All,God said "be fruitful"; there was an actual Purpose in Him saying that in Genesis (the beginning). For Christ to not take a wife; he was kind of a busy man, and there was a Purpose in that.
I do agree.There is, of course, much that has really happened that is not in any standard history textbook, but this doesn't mean one can just assert any old thing as having occurred that one wants to assert.
I do agree that would make sense; but the Son of Man was not here to propagate the human race.Yeah, but if it is a command, wouldn't Jesus have to abide by it?
As a matter of fact, neither Jesus nor any of his original 12 disciples had any biological children, neither did Paul, Timothy or any other prominent apostle. Back in Genesis, childbearing was an idol the matriarches and patriarches worshiped, a woman's value was fully hinged upon the heirs she produced, they were obsessed with childbearing, you can see this attitude in Sarah, Leah and especially Rachel - "Give me children, or else I die!" (Gen. 30:1) Ironically, she did die in the birth of Benjamin. God promised Abraham of numerous descendants, yet he tested his faith by ordering him to sacrifice his only (legitimate) son Isaac. If Isaac were indeed sacrificed, where could these numerous descendants come from? Through Ishmael? There was an infamous fertility doctor, Donald Cline, who inseminated many of his patients with his own sperm, now he may have a hundred children, is that our role model to follow? Therefore it is wrong and naive to take "be fruitful and multiply" as a command of having lots of children. Our calling is to make DISCIPLES in all nations, not babies.God does not "ask", He doth Command. There is a reason God did say "be fruitful".
I am curious, where in the Bible does it state that men should refrain from such relations for a short time? I do not recall ever reading that, of course I haven't read every version of the Bible either.
Does that give them salvation apart from christMatthew 7:21
Romans 2:13-14
Gentiles who do not know the law, but still abide by the law.
Hey All,I do agree that would make sense; but the Son of Man was not here to propagate the human race.
Even today there are people who can not have children because of physical issues; but they do not "disobey God" because of that, God took their physical ability to have children for a reason. Everything does serve God's Purpose, whether we understand it all or not.
Who condemns Peter because he was married?Hi Enlightenedtruth
While I agree that the story may not be accurate in describing the idea of celibacy for the pastors and teachers, we do all know that Peter had a wife. I find it amazing that there is a branch of the faith that claims Peter to be the beginning of their faith, and then go and make rules that would condemn him because he was married.
God bless,
Ted
Under the current 'rules' of Catholicism, the pope cannot be married. That organization holds that Peter is their first pope.Who condemns Peter because he was married?
Oh.Under the current 'rules' of Catholicism, the pope cannot be married. That organization holds that Peter is their first pope.
God bless,
Ted
Hi GodsGraceOh.
Well, actually, marriage was allowed by the clergy until the 12th or 13th century, cant remember.
Anyway, Peter having been married means nothing in the Catholic faith. Peter is honored, not condemned by that church.
Ted,Hi GodsGrace
Yes, and all of that is just another reason that I question the validity of the teachings of the Catholic organization.
Apparently, God has changed His mind about priests and bishops and popes being married and also whether we can eat meats on Friday. Kind of reminds me of Jesus' caution to those who 'sway like a reed in the wind'. God's word is immutable truth. If it is against His will for us that we not eat meat on Friday, then it has and always will be, against His will. If it is His will that those serving His flock in the positions of leadership not be married, then that will always be the case. Unfortunately, what I'm seeing here is that I'm wrong. His will changes, maybe daily, with the strictures of the Catholic organization.
So, and I don't mean to 'bash' anyone for whatever practice of faith they choose to follow, but I see often, in the Catholic version of christian practice, much the same thing that I have read that Jesus condemned the Jewish leaders for in his day. They have established the laws of man to be above the law of God. It really seems just that simple to me.
I can't find anywhere in all of Scripture that eating meat on Friday was considered any kind of sin or uncleanness. I can't find anywhere in all of the Scriptures that God ever places any restrictions on those who serve Him as leaders of His people that they shouldn't or can't be married. The only mention of one not getting married is as a personal and individual decision that they would choose to make based on their ability to forego having sexual relations in their life. Otherwise, God's word tells us that everyone should be married so that sexual lusts don't lead them to sin. Which is exactly what is being modeled for us with so many of the Catholic organizations leaders falling into the many, many, many sexual sins that they do. God doesn't tell anyone that they can't marry!!! But the Catholic organization does. And again, God addresses that matter also.
Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times (that is exactly the time we have been in since Jesus ascended to the Father) some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.
Honestly, as I read that, it paints the perfect picture of exactly what the Catholic organization is doing. I mean, to me, this passage is pointing a direct finger to these issues that the Catholic organization has begun to teach. Just as the description in the Revelation of a woman riding a beast clothed in purple and scarlet. They are pursuing the doctrines of deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons and speaking lies in hypocrisy, by forbidding some to marry and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.
Now I understand that you may not see it that way. But I'd just caution you to be very, very careful that you're not understanding as you do because that's how you've been taught to understand by an organization that claims of itself to be a Christ like organization; and not by understanding the truth of God's word on these matters. There are literally at least a dozen practices of that organization that are just not what God's word tells us on these matters. Just like Jesus condemned the leaders in Israel in his day. Be careful my friend and do as God's word tells you. Study everything with the mind of Christ. Watch out for deceiving doctrines established by men, even though they will tell you that it's 'their' interpretation of what God's word says. You don't know their hearts... but God does.
God bless,
Ted
It's your setting.Hi GodsGrace
Yes, I see it all. Perhaps you should seek some help from stovebolts or one of the technicians.
Is anyone else having trouble seeing all my post #52?
God bless,
Ted
After you used red for the color, are you sure you clicked back to black?Hi GodsGrace
Yes, I see it all. Perhaps you should seek some help from stovebolts or one of the technicians.
Is anyone else having trouble seeing all my post #52?
God bless,
Ted
Yeah, I looked it up, turned out celibacy was the solution for rampant nepotism. The pope couldn't allow the church to become a family business. Keep it mind that most noble families' older children inherited family's title and property, youngers often ended up in the Catholic church, evitably they brought in their family's influence.Oh.
Well, actually, marriage was allowed by the clergy until the 12th or 13th century, cant remember.
Anyway, Peter having been married means nothing in the Catholic faith. Peter is honored, not condemned by that church.
Right.Yeah, I looked it up, turned out celibacy was the solution for rampant nepotism. The Calothic church was not meant to be the clergy's family business.
I fixed it.Hi GodsGrace
Yes, I see it all. Perhaps you should seek some help from stovebolts or one of the technicians.
Is anyone else having trouble seeing all my post #52?
God bless,
Ted
Hi GodsGrace
Yes, and all of that is just another reason that I question the validity of the teachings of the Catholic organization.
Apparently, God has changed His mind about priests and bishops and popes being married and also whether we can eat meats on Friday.
Kind of reminds me of Jesus' caution to those who 'sway like a reed in the wind'. God's word is immutable truth. If it is against His will for us that we not eat meat on Friday, then it has and always will be, against His will. If it is His will that those serving His flock in the positions of leadership not be married, then that will always be the case. Unfortunately, what I'm seeing here is that I'm wrong. His will changes, maybe daily, with the strictures of the Catholic organization.
I wouldn't say it's above the law of God.So, and I don't mean to 'bash' anyone for whatever practice of faith they choose to follow, but I see often, in the Catholic version of christian practice, much the same thing that I have read that Jesus condemned the Jewish leaders for in his day. They have established the laws of man to be above the law of God. It really seems just that simple to me.
I can't find anywhere in all of Scripture that eating meat on Friday was considered any kind of sin or uncleanness. I can't find anywhere in all of the Scriptures that God ever places any restrictions on those who serve Him as leaders of His people that they shouldn't or can't be married.
The only mention of one not getting married is as a personal and individual decision that they would choose to make based on their ability to forego having sexual relations in their life. Otherwise, God's word tells us that everyone should be married so that sexual lusts don't lead them to sin. Which is exactly what is being modeled for us with so many of the Catholic organizations leaders falling into the many, many, many sexual sins that they do. God doesn't tell anyone that they can't marry!!! But the Catholic organization does. And again, God addresses that matter also.
Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times (that is exactly the time we have been in since Jesus ascended to the Father) some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.
Honestly, as I read that, it paints the perfect picture of exactly what the Catholic organization is doing. I mean, to me, this passage is pointing a direct finger to these issues that the Catholic organization has begun to teach. Just as the description in the Revelation of a woman riding a beast clothed in purple and scarlet. They are pursuing the doctrines of deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons and speaking lies in hypocrisy, by forbidding some to marry and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.
Now I understand that you may not see it that way. But I'd just caution you to be very, very careful that you're not understanding as you do because that's how you've been taught to understand by an organization that claims of itself to be a Christ like organization; and not by understanding the truth of God's word on these matters.
Maybe this should be in the Catholic Forum, but what doctrines do you believe are so demonic?There are literally at least a dozen practices of that organization that are just not what God's word tells us on these matters. Just like Jesus condemned the leaders in Israel in his day. Be careful my friend and do as God's word tells you. Study everything with the mind of Christ. Watch out for deceiving doctrines established by men, even though they will tell you that it's 'their' interpretation of what God's word says. You don't know their hearts... but God does.
God bless,
Ted