Shilohsfoal
Member
no they arent history said that the man antiochus ephines IV came and did what built the abonomation of desolation
alludes to.
antiochus ephines IV live after daniel
Antiochus Epiphanes was a great persecutor of the Jewish people. The apocryphal books of 1 and 2 Maccabees describe how he tried to stamp out Jewish religion, and in so doing slaughtered thousands of Jewish men, women, and children. In one of the worst acts in Jewish history, Antiochus desecrated the Temple by slaughtering a pig on the altar, forcing the priests to eat pork, and setting up an idol to Zeus. The Jews then abandoned the Temple, not wishing to go into a defiled place. That put a halt to the daily sacrifices (as predicted by Daniel 11:31), until the Jews regained control of the Temple during the Maccabean revolution.
no then if isreal is the beast problem
the book of revalation 4:1 says this come up hither and i will show things to come.
so that beast coming from the seas having the head was after the fall of revalation, since isreal already fell it can't be isreal since isreal was already done by the vision or writing of revalation thus that wound wasnt a past but a future thing.
things to come means this will happen in the future.
jerusalem fell by 70 and revalation was written by 100 ad.
as john had to send it to the 7 churches in achia.
The little nation that called itself Israel was not a nation when John said the beast isnt.Correct.
John wrote the beast was,and is not.
Meaning the beast had once exsisted but did not exist when ho wrote of it.
But he said the beast would exist once more when it rose up.
So the word of the Lord was correct and the beast that calls itself Israel is the proof.
But very few people know it and people such as yourself who love the beast deny that it is the beast.
Im curious about something.
Do you love the whore that is sitting on those seven mountains as well as the king who rules her?