R
Runner
Guest
Alan has changed his theology as time goes on. As he researches new information, takes it to Elohim for better understanding understanding, yes he has changed what he's teaching. My hat is off to him because he's man enough to apologize and explain why he's changed.
You'd have to watch up to date videos instead of picking apart teachings in the early 2000s.
Well, I simply looked for what was available. The videos posted were from 2009, 2011 and 2014 and the website is current. Since we just entered 2018, is it reasonable to call those dates the "early 2000s" as though they were ancient history? All the videos are all still up on YouTube, which seems odd. It is certainly fair for anyone to change his theology as he grows in knowledge and understanding - mine has changed drastically over the past 48 years since I became a Christian. But then again, I am not promoting books and videos, encouraging Paypal "donations," claiming to receive guidance from "Elohim" or otherwise posturing myself as a spiritual leader. I thought his 2009 video was quite good. I have no problem gaining knowledge and understanding from any source, but I do place a premium on discernment and would never uncritically "attach" myself to someone like Horvath as you seem to have done; that, to me, is a seriously dangerous path, but I am certainly not asking you to substitute my discernment for your own.
Interestingly, the take of Alexei Osipov (mentioned in my first post) on the significance of Judaism and the OT for Christians is at least 179 degrees removed from the Hebrew Roots movement. This is not to say Osipov is right and the Hebrew Roots movement is wrong, but Osipov does have genuine theological credentials (he has long been a professor at Moscow Orthodox Theological Seminary) and he happened to articulate very clearly the conclusions that I had previously reached on the same subjects.