Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Arnold Murray of Shepherd's Chapel - False Teacher?

I personally don't believe these attacks, have anything to do with what he teaches. He refers to Jesus a divine. The rich man said to Jesus he's good and wise. But Christ rebuked him and said there is none good but God. The whole the point is that he says Christ gets his authority from God, and does His will not his own! Which is why his miracles were a sign as his proof that he was sent and is the one. As opposed to Satan's who's miracles will be called wonders, which are just displays of his power acting as God himself. A. Murray get may respect he's been at it a long time, and isn't a reed shaken in the wind! His son is worthy also to take his place! God bless you Arnold Murray!

Revelation 22:8-9 And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me these things. Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book: worship God.
 
:-D

Since this thread is still 'sort of' alive, I'd like to dredge up an older post and quote:

destiny said:
Vic C. wrote:
Moon pretty much teaches the same, spectulative garbage concerning Genesis. Bah! God had no problems telling us when one person "knew" another. Why not just come out and tell us Eve "knew" Satan? Why make up things that just aren't there?


Funny you should mention that, it's exactly what I asked my friend the "Branhamite".
I found a really informative site which refuted the serpent seed doctrine step by step through scripture, so I copied it and went to her house.
What I was told was that a person had to reach a certain level of maturity in order to have revelation of this doctrine. :o

*snipped for space*
Question:

If Eve eating the fruit was analogous to having sex with the serpent... and Adam eat this same fruit, does this mean Adam ALSO had sex with the serpent? :o

I'm seriously asking folks, in the name of consistancy.
 
Vic C. said:
:-D

Since this thread is still 'sort of' alive, I'd like to dredge up an older post and quote:


Question:

If Eve eating the fruit was analogous to having sex with the serpent... and Adam eat this same fruit, does this mean Adam ALSO had sex with the serpent? :o

I'm seriously asking folks, in the name of consistancy.
My husband and I had a good laugh about that, because it is so CRAZY and leaves a lot to the imagination!! :o :lol:
Not ony that, but wouldn't the serpent be considered a 'he', and wouldn't that produce a double wammy for Adam? :o :o
 
Back
Top