• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

autocratic wives

a smart person will take instruction wherever he can learn

Your statement is true, however, I do believe that you misunderstood the question. He was n't speaking of instruction, as in the proper way to do something. He was asking about should a man let his wife dictate his life for him. Like a dictator, 'you do what I say!' (Autocratic).

The answer is no. But the smart and Godly man will not say no in an autocratic way of his own. That's rude and not loving her in the way that Christ loved the church. It would also breed contention which never helps. There is a way to compromise and to have a partnership, and to be a leader to the wife, that does not use a scepter. Men should not be pushed around by women, but at the same time, they should not push the women around. A loving leadership.

In extreme circumstances, where there is not time for an in depth planning session, then the quick decision should be made by the husband and the wife should follow. But that's in an extreme circumstance. The man and woman are one and this reality just screams partnership in general.
 
Just wanted to know a general view regarding such scenario - where a woman turns out to be the lion. A lot of women I know are just way too harsh towards their husbands. In most cases..it is their nature. A friend of mine told me: a man must be 'man' at home. How does that help remedy the tempest in such a family? Fire vs fire = destruction. Another woman, a preacher, is of the opinion men must must stand stand their ground. (I don't subscribe to the 50/50 stuff. If someone wants to be the lion I will be the mouse...and if someone is such a mouse then I will lion her up in love.).
You have to have love in a marriage.Someone who is harsh does not come off as a loving spouse.
 
Just wanted to know a general view regarding such scenario - where a woman turns out to be the lion. A lot of women I know are just way too harsh towards their husbands. In most cases..it is their nature. A friend of mine told me: a man must be 'man' at home. How does that help remedy the tempest in such a family? Fire vs fire = destruction. Another woman, a preacher, is of the opinion men must must stand stand their ground. (I don't subscribe to the 50/50 stuff. If someone wants to be the lion I will be the mouse...and if someone is such a mouse then I will lion her up in love.).

The 50/50 stuff is an illusion brother. It's not a contract where she gets to have her say and there is nothing you can do to shut her up. That would be 51/49 (nod to woman) and not right. Just like feminism, that too is an illusion. They shout equality, but the goal is superiority. Because it is not a love based movement.

So the man who wants to be the loving leader, must lead her in such a way that she can comprehend 50/50 partnership, and feel good about it, even though it is an illusion. When it comes right down to it, the man is the leader, but it wont make anyone feel good if he rules with an iron scepter. He could not if he is to lead in love and love his wife as Christ loved the church. Who care what restaurant we go to tonight? What movie we watch. If she can pick the restaurant, or choose how she wants to decorate the house, what is that to the man? Nothing. it makes her feel good, and validated, and the house is her domain anyway, where she spends most of her time, so she should be able to fix it up so she likes it. These are minor issues. She will see the compromise and love within his letting her do very much of what she wants, and life will be good.

Many times, men will quote the scripture that the woman is to submit to the man, and leave out the context of as Christ loved the church. Shades of an iron scepter and will not be received well. These may be insecure men and probably will not have a happy marriage. It is only in extreme circumstances that the man would need to make the decision and that's final. Not very often, but the wife will go along at this time if she can comprehend that he does this in love at that time. She will remember all the other non-critical times and know that he loves her...and stand down.

Jesus didn't let the women push Him around. Yet he made sure that they got what they wanted. Jesus mother said...they're out of wine. (perhaps with an air of expectation?) Jesus said, 'What is that to me?' and didn't go down that road. That could have set a bad precedent. Jesus is not a vending machine. She picked up on this, and stood down, submitted to his position of authority, when she turned and said to the men...'Do what he says.'

Then they got their wine. You see the difference?
 
Yes,sometimes couples do not like compromise they want one to be the winner.

Exactly. And that is usually an illusion too. One can go off on their ego trip and dog the other until they are 'the winner', but they do they really win? Or does she carry this attitude in the back of her mind and build up resentment towards him?

OTOH, in most circumstances, why do you have to win? Can you not find a way to let the other feel like a winner and still lead to a good leadership and outcome?

Here's one I did for my wife. I told her that she didn't have to work. I was the man and responsible for paying the bills...but that if she chose to work, that she could keep the money for herself, and I stuck to it. Even to the point that when all the bills were caught up and I made 'extra' money...I would hand her a fistful and share the wealth! So what? It's only money. In this way, she felt like the winner. But in reality, i was the winner, because who cares about money, I wanted a happy wife, so that I could have a happy life with no contention. It worked. And during short times, when I did not have enough money to cover everything, she would offer to help. She knew it would come back around. She wasn't greedy, I wasn't greedy. We didn't fight about money.
 
Exactly. And that is usually an illusion too. One can go off on their ego trip and dog the other until they are 'the winner', but they do they really win? Or does she carry this attitude in the back of her mind and build up resentment towards him?

OTOH, in most circumstances, why do you have to win? Can you not find a way to let the other feel like a winner and still lead to a good leadership and outcome?

Here's one I did for my wife. I told her that she didn't have to work. I was the man and responsible for paying the bills...but that if she chose to work, that she could keep the money for herself, and I stuck to it. Even to the point that when all the bills were caught up and I made 'extra' money...I would hand her a fistful and share the wealth! So what? It's only money. In this way, she felt like the winner. But in reality, i was the winner, because who cares about money, I wanted a happy wife, so that I could have a happy life with no contention. It worked. And during short times, when I did not have enough money to cover everything, she would offer to help. She knew it would come back around. She wasn't greedy, I wasn't greedy. We didn't fight about money.
Money is another issue.If you have two givers in a marriage it is a great marriage,if you have two taker in a marriage it is a nightmare.If you have a giver and a taker in a marriage it might be ok but it could be better.
 
Back
Top