Sorry but we don't have the original Greek or Hebrew these days. Some can't understand English much less Greek or Hebrew. I do wish you would do some research before you start making ludicrous and deceitful statement like this. You again prove your lack of knowledge.
If someone decides to produce a "new Bible version", then they must also convince Christians that there is a NEED and a justifiable CAUSE for the new version. One of the deceitful excuses being used today for producing new versions is that the King James Bible has been revised several times since 1611, and that a new revision is needed once again. While spreading this piece of deceitful misinformation, the KJV critics hold their breath, hoping that no one will be intelligent enough to ask for specific details about these "revisions". The many revisions that have occurred since 1881 bear NO RESEMBLANCE to the various EDITIONS of the KJV prior to 1881. The modern revisors are just trying to justify their sins!
There were only FOUR actual EDITIONS of the King James Bible produced after 1611: 1629, 1638, 1762, and 1769. These were not translations (like the new versions SINCE 1881), and they weren't even "revisions".
The 1629 edition was simply an effort to correct printing errors, and two of the original King James translators assisted in the work.
The 1638 edition of the KJV also dealt with printing errors, especially words and clauses overlooked by the printers. About 72% of the textual corrections in the KJV were done by 1638, only 27 years after the first printing.
Keep in mind the fact that printing was a very laborious task prior to 1800. Publishing a flawless work was almost impossible. Even today, with computers and advanced word processors, printing errors are still frequently made. Imagine what it was like in the 1600's!
Then, in 1762 and 1769, two final editions of the KJV were published. Both of these involved spelling changes, which became necessary as the English language became more stabilized and spelling rules were established.
There were no new translations, and there were really no new revisions published in 1629, 1638, 1762, or 1769. These were simply EDITIONS of the 1611 KJV, which corrected printing errors and spelling. Those who try to equate these editions with the modern translations are just being deceitful or stupid--or both. The many other so-called "revisions" of the KJV that occurred in 1613, 1616, 1617, and 1743 are nothing more than running changes and touch-up work at the printers. The REAL revisions and translations do not start appearing until 1881 (RV) and 1901 (ASV). So if some textual know-it-all walks up with a smirky grin on his face and asks, "So which King James Bible do you have, the 1611, the 1629, the 1638, the 1762, or the 1769?", I simply state that I have a 1769 edition of the King James 1611 Authorized Version. The Textus Receptus hasn't been revised or altered. How many times has the NIV and all the rest been REVISED? Four, six times. Last account I had the Nestle/Aland text was up to it's 27th revision from the 23rd not many years back.
So, stop leadilng people astray with something you obviously know very little about. Read your JW bible where they "peddle" the word of God instead of corrupt it. No wonder they chose the word peddle so they wouldn't be concerned about corrupting it.
2 Corinthians 2:17(KJV) For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
(NIV, NWT, etc) Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.
If you were to get up in most churches I know with a smart- alec tone about you won't read this or that, they'd have you out of there before you could yell for Westcott and Hort! Such arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance of the bible corruptions.
I waited a long time to get this set! And I finally have it! I am so excited! :-D 
: