Then saith has he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! No thanks reference to the disciple he loves in this partSometimes you go too far Bible.
The disciple that Jesus loved IS John.
And rev 12?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Then saith has he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! No thanks reference to the disciple he loves in this partSometimes you go too far Bible.
The disciple that Jesus loved IS John.
Not so; you're reading your own misinterpretation of Scripture. It doesn't refer to "disciple"; it says, "So when Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing there..." That refers to John.Thank you it refers to disciple so it must apply to all disciples
Other wise it would use his personal name and only apply to John
That’s true but the part where he says behold thy mother only says discipleNot so; you're reading your own misinterpretation of Scripture. It doesn't refer to "disciple"; it says, "So when Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing there..." That refers to John.
John 13:25, "Then the disciple whom Jesus loved leaned back against Jesus’ chest and asked him, “Lord, who is it?”
John 19:26, "So when Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing there, he said to his mother, “Woman, look, here is your son!”
John 20:2, "So she went running to Simon Peter and the other disciple whom Jesus loved and told them, “They have taken the Lord from the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”
John 21:7, "Then the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, “It is the Lord!” So Simon Peter, when he heard that it was the Lord, tucked in his outer garment (for he had nothing on underneath it), and plunged into the sea."
John 21:20, "Peter turned around and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following them. (This was the disciple who had leaned back against Jesus’ chest at the meal and asked, “Lord, who is the one who is going to betray you?”)
Clearly and obviously, the disciple whom Jesus loved was John. It most definitely does not refer to all disciples.
Scripture is clear the Word of God is not limited to Scripture...God says differently: man does not live by bread alone but by every word of God - better than leaning on man's understanding - Proverbs 3:5-6 - Matthew 4:4 - Deuteronomy 8:3
Yes, as I have done multiple times in this forum. The "brothers" listed are identify a different Mary as their mother. Mary the wife of Cleophas (Clopas) is called the mother of James, Joseph, Simon and Judas in Matthew 13:55. Matthew abbreviates this list by naming (likely) the oldest two, James and Joseph in Matthew 27:56 as this Mary’s (Cleophas) sons. This Mary is stated to be the mother of James and Joses and is also present at the Cross per St. John's Gospel (John 19:25).Can you show me anywhere in Scripture where it says that they were not uterine brothers? Of course not, since it doesn't say that anywhere. If it does, please show us where...
Settle this for Christendom and simply provide the verse which lists all of Mary's supposed subsequent maternities.I don't really pay any attention to your private interpretation of Scripture; I believe what Scripture clearly says (and don't believe what it doesn't say).
Again, Scripture doesn't call Jesus "a" son of Mary. Remember, you believe "what the Scripture clearly says." It clearly says He is THE son of Mary.I am the son of my mother (and father), but I have siblings. So your statement that "Jesus is THE son of Mary, not A son of Mary" is meaningless. I am both the son of my mother and a son of my mother.
Are you aware Scripture does not confine the word of God to that which is written?Your (trite) expression that Scripture nowhere teaches sola Scriptura is meaningless. Have you ever read, "For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any double-edged sword, piercing even to the point of dividing soul from spirit, and joints from marrow; it is able to judge the desires and thoughts of the heart." It doesn't say that the extra-Biblical teachings of men are living and active that divide soul from spirit, and joints from marrow -- because they don't!
By adhering to sola Scriptura, you are living by something other than God's Word, as God's word never teaches it is confined to the Scriptures. The doctrine is self-refuting.If you want to live by something other than God's Word -- the Bible -- then you are following false teaching. Sola scriptura.
ExcellentYes, as I have done multiple times in this forum. The "brothers" listed are identify a different Mary as their mother. Mary the wife of Cleophas (Clopas) is called the mother of James, Joseph, Simon and Judas in Matthew 13:55. Matthew abbreviates this list by naming (likely) the oldest two, James and Joseph in Matthew 27:56 as this Mary’s (Cleophas) sons. This Mary is stated to be the mother of James and Joses and is also present at the Cross per St. John's Gospel (John 19:25).
Ergo, when James, Joseph, Simon and Judas are called Jesus’ “brothers” in Matthew 13:55, this cannot mean uterine siblings based on the fact that St. Matthew names a different Mary as their mother.
In Jewish antiquity, "brother" had a much wider meaning than we modern Westerners use. You cannot impose a 21st century Western nuclear family structure with our own use of “brother” to that of Jewish culture in antiquity. The term had a much broader use in antiquity.
By adhering to sola Scriptura, you are living by something other than God's Word, as God's word never teaches it is confined to the Scriptures.
You cannot even arrive at the Scriptura without violating the sola.
Keep your eyes fixed on her and she comes to lifeThis can't be real.
This modern day notion of Mary having subsequent maternities stems from a lack of understanding of the Incarnation.Excellent
Abraham and lot are called brothers
(Really uncle and nephew)
Matt 10:2 both James have a father other than Joseph
Jesus was 12 went to the temple scripture implies he was an only child
On the cross where are his brothers?
Please have a specific questionKeep your eyes fixed on her and she comes to life
This modern day notion of Mary having subsequent maternities stems from a lack of understanding of the Incarnation.
And fundamentalist brainwashingThis modern day notion of Mary having subsequent maternities stems from a lack of understanding of the Incarnation.
Why does Jesus going to the temple imply he was an only child?Excellent
Abraham and lot are called brothers
(Really uncle and nephew)
Matt 10:2 both James have a father other than Joseph
Jesus was 12 went to the temple scripture implies he was an only child
On the cross where are his brothers?
paul speaks to gentiles who know nothing of God's word as they were not raised on scripture or the covenants of God - so he had to spoon feed them what every jewish believer knewthe word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers.
tradition is talking about the Torah and God's words as given to moses and all the prophets2 Thessalonians 2:15 ---> So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught, whether by word of mouth or by letter from us.
I wonder if my fellow Protestants believe that Mary was born without a sin nature?Please have a specific question
be happy to explain
Biblical Mary:
Mother of God Lk 1:43
Immaculate conception (sinless) gen 3:15 enmity or total war none of satans works are found in Mary
Also Lk 1:28 full of grace lk 1:49 great things plural (immaculate conception of Mary and the miraculous conception of Jesus) Rev12:1 woman clothed with the sun. Immaculate purity
Lk 1:30 found favor with God (the salvation lost by Adam) mother of our salvation Lk 2:30
Perpetual Virgin Isa 7:14 matt 1:21
Lk 1:31-34
A good tree!
Matthew 7:18
A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
The fruit of the tree of Mary is our salvation! Lk 2:30 Jesus is our salvation!
Lk 1:30 Mary found our salvation!
You have an odd way of interpreting Scripture. "So when Jesus saw his mother and the disciple whom he loved standing there, he said to his mother, “Woman, look, here is your son!” It says "the disciple whom he loved" (with the definite article) not just "disciple".That’s true but the part where he says behold thy mother only says disciple
What about rev 12:17?
see as i said the Torah is the only Word of God at that time - everything God said was already written down by the prophets - the nt are the letters explaining Torah to the gentiles - if you notice the apostles to the jews did not have to post so much teaching because as per Acts15:21 every jew went to synagogue every shabbat to hear moses - they had done this their entire life - only gentiles had never heard the Words of God or the covenants of God or the promises of God as recorded in TorahLuke 10:16 ---> Whoever listens to you listens to me, and whoever rejects you rejects me, and whoever rejects me rejects the one who sent me.
Hebrews 13:7 ---> Remember your leaders, those who spoke the word of God to you...
Of course not. There is nothing in the Bible that says that Mary was sinless.I wonder if my fellow Protestants believe that Mary was born without a sin nature?
Anyone could reply.
Paul is speaking to believers in his epistle to the Thessalonians.paul speaks to gentiles who know nothing of God's word as they were not raised on scripture or the covenants of God - so he had to spoon feed them what every jewish believer knew
remember paul was sent to the gentiles and the other apostles were sent to the jews - context is very important
read the nt again - paul in acts is declared as the apostle to the gentiles and the other apostles are declared the apostles to the jewsPaul is speaking to believers in his epistle to the Thessalonians.
---> "...to the church assembled at Thessalonica in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ." (1 Thes 1:1)
Right.Of course not. There is nothing in the Bible that says that Mary was sinless.