Jesus said look at the fruit.
There is no doubt that CS Lewis was crazy about Jesus.
This is Taken From
http://thinklings.org/?p=490
Q Was Lewis a Taoist?
A This is perhaps the dumbest charge made (see another article in the web site linked to below in which this specific claim is made).
No, Lewis was not a Taoist. I assume people see him using the word and promoting the idea of ?the Tao? in The Abolition of Man and just assume he is espousing Eastern mysticism. This is akin to seeing the phrase ?meditation on the Word? and accusing the author of Buddhism.
The Tao of Lewis has nothing to do with the Eastern religion Taoism. I am not certain, but I don?t think the word ?Taoism? even appears in the book. What Lewis has in mind by ?Tao? is the English translation ?Way,? which is what he uses for the concept of universal, moral absolutes. Every Christian should believe this. Moral absolutes are what bind society together; they are what our laws are ultimately based upon.
It has nothing to do with Eastern mysticism and everything to do with absolute truth. Here is what Lewis writes:
This thing which I have called for convenience the Tao, and which others may call Natural Law or Traditional Morality, . . . is not one among a series of possible systems of value. It is the sole source of all value judgements. If it is rejected, all value is rejected. If any value is retained, it is retained.
– from The Abolition of Man
Also:
[The Tao is] the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, and others really false, to the kind of thing the universe is and the kind of things we are.
– from The Abolition of Man
Lewis?s Tao is just a fancy way to say objective and absolute truth.
I hope these answers, some in Lewis?s own words, may suffice in responding to the theological criticism of him. (Also see Bill’s fine comments in the blog comments thread below).
Lewis never claimed to be a systematic theologian, nor even a minister. He converted to Christianity as an adult and much of his ideas of faith was refined from the point of view of a literary scholar and philosophical mind. I happen to think he excelled at all he undertook.
Many of these charges are based on ambiguous prooftexts, brief passages in works of fiction, vague lines in personal correspondence, or ? most often ? misunderstandings of what he is really saying.
I have always in my books been concerned simply to put forward ?mere? Christianity.
– from Letters of C.S. Lewis