Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I'm not talking about verifying anything.Verify the the phonies? ... or verify the healings?... i have witnessed both the real and phony ...
A high school kid made a pulpit for the church.... the little cross on the front was not straight... Dad used that pulpit .... it had come from a heart caused a big tado
all the stories of healing I have heard were shown to factual by the x-ray/mri. where they went into see where the cancer is and then didn't find it.I'm not talking about verifying anything.
There was a time when people either had faith that God did a healing and that was it.
Now, it seems we need a doctor's certificate of healing in order to prove that the person was actually healed.
What makes the doctor qualified to say if God healed someone or not?
It's all a matter of faith, nothing else.
I would prefer to have someone tell me they are healed by God and never have gone to a doctor, period.
It's because of all the fakes out there, that's why it's needed for anything that can't be obviously seen. Not many doctors would confirm that God performed a miracle anyway. They will normally only confirm that a patient had something wrong and now it's gone with no medical explanation. Besides, if the miracle was indeed real, why should anyone fear scrutiny?I'm not talking about verifying anything.
There was a time when people either had faith that God did a healing and that was it.
Now, it seems we need a doctor's certificate of healing in order to prove that the person was actually healed.
What makes the doctor qualified to say if God healed someone or not?
It's all a matter of faith, nothing else.
I would prefer to have someone tell me they are healed by God and never have gone to a doctor, period.
The verification of the doctor had nothing to do with my faith or the faith of the guy that was healed, or anyone else present in the small group where it happened. I was the person who told him that God could heal him, and at his request I was the elder who laid hands on him and asked God to heal him. He was crippled before that, but ran several blocks to his house after. I knew him personally for a long time so knew his condition was true and not faked. The guy already had a weekly doctors appointment for the next day for treatment so he went anyway, mainly to show the doctor what had happened. The verification from the doctor serves to try to convince skeptics, and turns out to be needed in these days as I have more than once been called a liar for telling of this.And can you have the same faith if a doctor does not verify it?
I'm not talking about verifying anything.
There was a time when people either had faith that God did a healing and that was it.
Now, it seems we need a doctor's certificate of healing in order to prove that the person was actually healed.
What makes the doctor qualified to say if God healed someone or not?
It's all a matter of faith, nothing else.
I would prefer to have someone tell me they are healed by God and never have gone to a doctor, period.
Except that, from the start, God has never wanted people to come to Him because they had some positive proof to hold in their hands. He has always stressed that it HAS to be based upon faith in that which you cannot comfortably rest, being positive because of scientific "proof".Like the other posters said, with all the skeptics around (and evil in the world), I think it would be good to get the healing into the medical records and have official documentation of it. A lot of people are searching for truth and God and also must be shown signs and wonders with proof. And this is the sort of proof that some would accept and it may be enough to tip the scales to where they would turn to God.
When the Lord reset my dislocated hip bone, I let my doc know about it. I don't know, but I hope it made it into the records. He knows that i had a seizure and fell from a 10 ft ladder and dislocated my hip. He's the one I asked where could I go to get it xrayed. So next visit, he asked my my leg was doing so I told him. I don't know if he believed me, being a doctor and all, but even if he didn't, it didn't affect my faith. I know God healed it. It woke me up and I felt it.
The Lord did not heal my back though, yet. When He does, I expect the metal implants will dissolve or otherwise disappear. I have metal in my back and in my right shoulder, and this is a matter of record. I have the xrays showing it in both places. That will be medical proof of a miracle.
I have heard of metal implants disappearing before.
But then, how much more positive proof can God provide than to walk among us in the flesh; fulfilling hundreds of prophesies, healing the sick, restoring the lame, controlling the weather, resurrecting the dead....?Except that, from the start, God has never wanted people to come to Him because they had some positive proof to hold in their hands. He has always stressed that it HAS to be based upon faith in that which you cannot comfortably rest, being positive because of scientific "proof".
I agree. But even back then the Pharisees doubted, and wanted to see proof. Remember when they called both the healed blind man and his parents in for questioning, and tried to get them to provide some demonstrative verification of the background and legitimate basis of the healing?But then, how much more positive proof can God provide than to walk among us in the flesh; fulfilling hundreds of prophesies, healing the sick, restoring the lame, controlling the weather, resurrecting the dead....?
Except that, from the start, God has never wanted people to come to Him because they had some positive proof to hold in their hands. He has always stressed that it HAS to be based upon faith in that which you cannot comfortably rest, being positive because of scientific "proof".
I always thought this was the most outlandish........ When the girl (Rhoda, was it) came and told the disciples Jesus was risen like He said..... They scoffed, and told her she had seen a ghost, as I recall.
The problem isn't that the proof wasn't or isn't there. The problem is that we refuse to see it and accept it.I agree. But even back then the Pharisees doubted, and wanted to see proof. Remember when they called both the healed blind man and his parents in for questioning, and tried to get them to provide some demonstrative verification of the background and legitimate basis of the healing?
And they, of course, claimed Jesus was working with the devil by doing healing. (Sound familiar?)
As it was in the case I shared.Except that, from the start, God has never wanted people to come to Him because they had some positive proof to hold in their hands. He has always stressed that it HAS to be based upon faith in that which you cannot comfortably rest, being positive because of scientific "proof".
The problem isn't that the proof wasn't or isn't there. The problem is that we refuse to see it and accept it.
As in the story of the rich man and Lazarus, Luke 16: NKJV
30 "And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’
31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’”
The proof is in the pudding. Someone did in fact come back from the dead and the majority of us still will not accept it.