I'm just trying to figure out given the data why they pushed so hard for at least a 90% general jab rate when it was basically those in the higher risk age group and the more vulnerable or those with underlying conditions or immunecompromissed who were being hospitalised and would have needed it the most if it helped, given they made up the mass majority of 2% of all people that were hospitalised or critical going on the data before the jab was even available and rolled out as 98% of all people got mild symptoms and recovered.
It was stay home save lives to protect the most vulnerable, then when the jab was available they said it saves lives and helps people get less sick if they get infected, then somehow everyone was either forced no jab no job, or, told or pressured they needed to get it out of fear like all the young, fit and healthy was at high risk and could overwhelm the health system or be hospitalised or critical when the data already showed who was most at risk that would have needed the jab if it could help a demographic apparently overwhelming the system.
I don't know, maybe becauae the state cannot discriminate based on age as one factor they wouldn't use it. Like they can't say only those over 60 must have a jab or no job and everyone else is free. That would be classed as discrimination.