Covid 19 virus plus vaccine was meant to kill us.

[Free]

Sure enough, you, and whomever you initially heard the idea from, have completely misunderstood what was stated. Did you even bother to read the document for yourself, or do you simply believe whatever you're told is the case, as long as it lines up with your already held beliefs? Note that the document is "CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel;" it's about RT-PCR tests. Note also that this document goes back to 2020.

A RT-PCR test was first developed, or at least announced, in England in January 2020 and rolled out the following month, according to Wikipedia. So, the tests, and others, had been in use for some time (see CDC and HERE), when the CDC decided to do studies to find the limit of detection.

Right on page 3 we have:

"Results are for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. SARS-CoV-2 RNA is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection withSARS-CoV-2 but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all results to the appropriate public health authorities."

Clearly, the virus exists, according to the CDC. So, what were they talking about on page 40? It's about "LoD studies determine lowest detectable concentration of 2019-nCoV at which approximately 95%of all (true positive) replicates test positive." That is, when the tests were first being made, in order to make sure they worked and could detect the virus, they had to use something, preferably the virus, but "no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted." Note that this was very early on in the pandemic, within the first year.

What it absolutely is not saying is that the virus doesn't exist. That is an utterly ignorant and nonsensical interpretation of what was stated. It just means that at that time, when the LoD was first being studied, no one had, up to that point, developed "quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV." That page then goes on to state what they did use to determine the lower limit of detection. However, even by the end of October 2020, many (hundreds) labs had isolated the virus (HERE).

And, so, the very document that you say states the "CDC admits they have no virus," is the very same "documentation that verifies [my] opinion."

 

[Rookie]

Oh no not this conversation again...

 

[Free]

Oh no not this conversation again...

It just can't seem to go away, as much as I wish it would.

 

[RedPill]

Just as you're unable to rebut the excess deaths reality, likewise you are unable to rebut the fact that CDC has no coronavirus sample.

[CDC's document] just means that at that time, when the LoD was first being studied, no one had, up to that point, developed "quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV."

CDC has had several years and 8 revisions of their document to pony up. But alas, NO ONE IN THE WORLD, least of all CDC, has any sample of the coronavirus.

Where is the coronavirus? The CDC's document says it isn’t available.

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word "isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.

Fact check: This CDC document does not say that that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.

lol @ the news agency Reuters' pseudo-fact check - scurrying to the perp's themselves for a solution to your crisis. Your prevarications have become totally predictable. Obfuscation and gaslighting are all that is left when you turn your back on the facts.

Truth was the first casualty in the war on COVID-19.

Trusted sources of medical information became propaganda outlets and when that wasn’t enough, governments that controlled the raw data on which medical analysis was based withheld and even falsified that data.

All along, we have been piecing together indirect evidence. It paints a picture of a devastating toll from vaccine injuries.

No drug product in the past has come close to causing injuries on this scale.

Direct evidence is not being collected, or it is being withheld by governments around the world. But the extent of the damage has been so devastating it cannot stay hidden.

This data presents a compelling story that incriminates the COVID-19 vaccine campaign as a significant factor in the rise in all-cause mortality - however, public health agencies continue to ignore this safety signal effortlessly. Why? Because "correlation is not causation." Causation can only be established by investigation. Without any investigation, any causation can be hidden indefinitely. There is every motivation not to do the most important research.

First, foia is only applicable to the United States. Second, requesting info in itself isn't evidence. Its a request.

FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.

Every institution failed to cite any record re purification of the imaginary "covid-19 virus" from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, or proof of "its" existence.

Freedom of Information responses from 90 institutions (including Public Health Agency of Canada, USA CDC, UK Department of Health and Social Care, Indian Council of Medical Research) in 20 countries/jurisdictions show that health/science institutions have NO RECORD of "SARS-COV - 2 and 19" isolation/purification from ANY patient sample, by ANYONE, ANYWHERE, EVER!

It's an absolute disgrace for Christians to be involved in believing such nonsense. Such people are not loving God with all their minds.

And now truth-seekers would be accused of "not loving God." This "name calling" propaganda trick continues to be your go-to slanderous accusation, from the onset, and it bodes very poorly for you. Name calling is one of the oldest propaganda techniques in the book. Name calling is when you call something or someone by a negative name in order to make them look bad. It’s a technique used to make a generalisation about something or someone without facts or data to back it up - and you clearly have neither the facts nor the virus.

Propaganda Technique #19. ad hominem ATTACK (also called Deflection): You attack the messenger, instead of the argument or evidence that is presented.

Propaganda Technique #22. Diversion: When a major issue comes up that is embarrassing or threatening, a diversion is created so attention is directed away from the issue.

So tenuous is the name-caller's position; there is every motivation for the deceived injected to scoff and malign and denigrate anyone who attempts to bring forth the facts, rather than perform due diligence and contribute in a forthright and honest manner in these forums. These people are afraid; they know something is very wrong, but they are unable to perform their own due diligence as the spirit of deception has a tight grip on their reality.

The language of deception thrives in a climate where people think they know more than the word of God. Deception reigns within unrighteous naysayers who refuse to love the truth, to pursue truth at all cost. Even yet, it is not too late for those so deceived. There is hope, if they, in faith, will humble themselves, admit that they were wrong in trusting their TV and not performing due diligence with the injection(s), that peradventure God would grant them repentance to the saving of their soul.

And, so, the very document that you say states the "CDC admits they have no virus," is the very same "documentation that verifies [my] opinion."

You can continue to "verify [y]our opinion" all day long, as opinions are sacrosanct. Meanwhile, the fact remains, there is no virus and we have astronomical excess deaths.

Still want that shot?

It just can't seem to go away, as much as I wish it would.

You can prop up a lie, but the truth stands on its own. Truth has always been and will always be - opinions notwithstanding.

Yet again, the OP has been tried and found worthy; the burden of proof was met long ago.

 

[Free]

Just as you're unable to rebut the excess deaths reality, likewise you are unable to rebut the fact that CDC has no coronavirus sample.

You need to learn how to read.

CDC has had several years and 8 revisions of their document to pony up. But alas, NO ONE IN THE WORLD, least of all CDC, has any sample of the coronavirus.

Where is the coronavirus? The CDC's document says it isn’t available.

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree.


lol @ the news agency Reuters' pseudo-fact check - scurrying to the perp's themselves for a solution to your crisis. Your prevarications have become totally predictable. Obfuscation and gaslighting are all that is left when you turn your back on the facts.

Truth was the first casualty in the war on COVID-19.

Trusted sources of medical information became propaganda outlets and when that wasn’t enough, governments that controlled the raw data on which medical analysis was based withheld and even falsified that data.

All along, we have been piecing together indirect evidence. It paints a picture of a devastating toll from vaccine injuries.

No drug product in the past has come close to causing injuries on this scale.

Direct evidence is not being collected, or it is being withheld by governments around the world. But the extent of the damage has been so devastating it cannot stay hidden.

This data presents a compelling story that incriminates the COVID-19 vaccine campaign as a significant factor in the rise in all-cause mortality - however, public health agencies continue to ignore this safety signal effortlessly. Why? Because "correlation is not causation." Causation can only be established by investigation. Without any investigation, any causation can be hidden indefinitely. There is every motivation not to do the most important research.


FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.

Every institution failed to cite any record re purification of the imaginary "covid-19 virus" from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere, or proof of "its" existence.

Freedom of Information responses from 90 institutions (including Public Health Agency of Canada, USA CDC, UK Department of Health and Social Care, Indian Council of Medical Research) in 20 countries/jurisdictions show that health/science institutions have NO RECORD of "SARS-COV - 2 and 19" isolation/purification from ANY patient sample, by ANYONE, ANYWHERE, EVER!


And now truth-seekers would be accused of "not loving God." This "name calling" propaganda trick continues to be your go-to slanderous accusation, from the onset, and it bodes very poorly for you. Name calling is one of the oldest propaganda techniques in the book. Name calling is when you call something or someone by a negative name in order to make them look bad. It’s a technique used to make a generalisation about something or someone without facts or data to back it up - and you clearly have neither the facts nor the virus.

Propaganda Technique #19. ad hominem ATTACK (also called Deflection): You attack the messenger, instead of the argument or evidence that is presented.

Propaganda Technique #22. Diversion: When a major issue comes up that is embarrassing or threatening, a diversion is created so attention is directed away from the issue.

There is every motivation for the deceived injected to scoof and malign and denigrate anyone who attempts to bring forth the facts, rather than perform due diligence and contribute in a forthright and honest manner in these forums. These people are afraid; they know something is very wrong, but they are unable to perform their own due diligence as the spirit of deception has a tight grip on their reality.

The language of deception thrives in a climate where people think they know more than the word of God. Deception reigns within unrighteous naysayers who refuse to love the truth, to pursue truth at all cost. Even yet, it is not too late for those so deceived. There is hope, if they, in faith, will humble themselves, admit that they were wrong in trusting their TV and not performing due diligence with the injection(s), that peradventure God would grant them repentance to the saving of their soul.


You can continue to "verify [y]our opinion" all day long, as opinions are sacrosanct. Meanwhile, the fact remains, there is no virus and we have astronomical excess deaths.

Still want that shot?


You can prop up a lie, but the truth stands on its own.

Yet again, the OP has been tried and found worthy; the burden of proof was met long ago.

This is some of the poorest, most biased, anti-science reasoning I have ever seen. What a disgrace to the name of Christ and the gospel.

 

[RedPill]

You need to learn how to read...This is some of the poorest, most biased, anti-science reasoning I have ever seen. What a disgrace to the name of Christ and the gospel.

Propaganda Technique #19. ad hominem ATTACK (also called Deflection): You attack the messenger, instead of the argument or evidence that is presented.

Propaganda Technique #22. Diversion: When a major issue comes up that is embarrassing or threatening, a diversion is created so attention is directed away from the issue.

 

[Corn Pop]

There are Covidians who supported mask and jab mandates who now think they are resisting tyranny.

 

[Corn Pop]

It just can't seem to go away, as much as I wish it would.

Freedom of speech, opinion and open discussion. It's a great thing.

 

[Free]

Freedom of speech, opinion and open discussion. It's a great thing.

It can be. Those things are why this thread isn't locked, despite promotion of downright dangerously and blatantly false information.

 

[RedPill]

There are Covidians who supported mask and jab mandates who now think they are resisting tyranny.

Indeed. As we have seen here and elsewhere, It has gotten so bad that "They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service." (John 16:2).

For those who do not love the truth, they get suckered in by the very perp's they've run to for their so-called "facts." For example,

Note that this was very early on in the pandemic, within the first year.

Wrong again. The CDC's document has been in continual revision, with the latest revision being #8 in July 2023! Yet CDC, after several years, is STILL, TODAY, unable to come up with that elusive sample of the nonexistent coronavirus.

Sure enough, you, and whomever you initially heard the idea from, have completely misunderstood what was stated.

For instance, the very Reuters "fact check" piece cited above as proof that CDC has the coronavirus craftily avoids addressing the real issue. If you simply read the gaslighting article critically, you will see that "...the CDC...used synthetically produced genetic material identical to that carried by the virus." IOW, CDC didn't use the coronavirus - because it doesn't have it and thus could never provide a sample of it to anyone. IOW, CDC simply ASSUMES the coronavirus exists, then goes on to play with its straw man, stroking its sleight-of-hand synthetic invention, rather than the non-existent real thing, which it does not possess. The truth of the matter is indeed revealed, but CDC knows the vast majority, especially the deceived and fearful injected, will not carefully read the wickedly crafted piece.

Freedom of speech, opinion and open discussion. It's a great thing.

That's not the reality, as censorship and personal agendas are being deployed. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. (Rev. 22:20).

...promotion of downright dangerously and blatantly false information.

Indeed. Propaganda Technique #6. PLAIN FOLKS: This is a way that a speaker convinces an audience that an idea is good because he believes they are the same ideas of the vast majority of people like yourself.

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! (Isa. 5:20-21).

 

[Corn Pop]

I think its becoming more acknowledged now that the risk of severe illness during the demic was extremely low that the benefits of the jab did not outweigh the potential harm for those who did not have medical conditions that could lead to severe illness for healthy 18 and under.

 

[follower]

I think its becoming more acknowledged now that the risk of severe illness during the demic was extremely low that the benefits of the jab did not outweigh the potential harm for those who did not have medical conditions that could lead to severe illness for healthy 18 and under.

Remember (or see) that all immunizations cause harm. Proven over and over for over a century. Published around 2017. Not admitted nor accepted by anyone "officially", or few there of anyway. They would lose too much money and/or their job and/or their life.

 

[follower]

For those who do not love the truth, they get suckered in by the very perp's they've run to for their so-called "facts."

Turning to Jesus , RUN to Jesus, for truth.
He warns about trusting the government or other officials - it brings a curse from God Himself to do so.

 

[Corn Pop]

Remember (or see) that all immunizations cause harm. Proven over and over for over a century. Published around 2017. Not admitted nor accepted by anyone "officially", or few there of anyway. They would lose too much money and/or their job and/or their life.

Many things medical have side effects and if the potential harm outweighs the benifits then it would not be recommended by a true good doctor or health professional,

It's like someone saying your risk level is low and you most probably will not get seriously sick or die as your healthy and don't have a condition that could lead to severe illness, but just take this product anyhow but it could cause you injury. That is a bit crooked.

 

[Free]

Indeed. As we have seen here and elsewhere, It has gotten so bad that "They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service." (John 16:2).

Which has zero to do with this discussion.

For those who do not love the truth, they get suckered in by the very perp's they've run to for their so-called "facts." For example,


Wrong again. The CDC's document has been in continual revision, with the latest revision being #8 in July 2023! Yet CDC, after several years, is STILL, TODAY, unable to come up with that elusive sample of the nonexistent coronavirus.


For instance, the very Reuters "fact check" piece cited above as proof that CDC has the coronavirus craftily avoids addressing the real issue. If you simply read the gaslighting article critically, you will see that "...the CDC...used synthetically produced genetic material identical to that carried by the virus." IOW, CDC didn't use the coronavirus - because it doesn't have it and thus could never provide a sample of it to anyone. IOW, CDC simply ASSUMES the coronavirus exists, then goes on to play with its straw man, stroking its sleight-of-hand synthetic invention, rather than the non-existent real thing, which it does not possess. The truth of the matter is indeed revealed, but CDC knows the vast majority, especially the deceived and fearful injected, will not carefully read the wickedly crafted piece.



Indeed. Propaganda Technique #6. PLAIN FOLKS: This is a way that a speaker convinces an audience that an idea is good because he believes they are the same ideas of the vast majority of people like yourself.

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight! (Isa. 5:20-21).

It's clear that you only want to believe what you already believe. I have shown how you, and your source(s), at best, have completely misunderstood the CDC document by completely ignoring context. It is possible that your source was purposefully spreading disinformation, knowing full well they were taking things out of context, leading astray those who lack the ability to think critically.

 

[RedPill]

Remember (or see) that all immunizations cause harm. Proven over and over for over a century. Published around 2017. Not admitted nor accepted by anyone "officially", or few there of anyway. They would lose too much money and/or their job and/or their life.

That's an incredibly hard truth for the mind controlled masses to understand, as Big Pharma's sorceries march on.
No one is able to provide any proof that any "vaccine" has saved even a single life.

He warns about trusting the government or other officials - it brings a curse from God Himself to do so.

Of course. But, as you pointed out, too many have too much inve$ted to want to change course.

It's like someone saying your risk level is low and you most probably will not get seriously sick or die as your healthy and don't have a condition that could lead to severe illness, but just take this product anyhow but it could cause you injury. That is a bit crooked.

Worse is that the plan doesn't call for the nanotech'd injected to die outright, although many have been unable to withstand the initial assault and have expired. That death card is part of a more sophisticated tactic to be played out later...

[John 16:2] has zero to do with this discussion.

It has everything to do with this discussion, even as you threaten with statements such as:

Those things are why this thread isn't locked, despite promotion of downright dangerously and blatantly false information.

You want it both ways - total control over the thread's "discussion" while claiming everyone else is wrong...
AND Millions are being killed via this scamdemic as per John 16:2.

I have shown how you, and your source(s), at best, have completely misunderstood the CDC document by completely ignoring context.

Rather, you ran to the media's fact checkers. Bottom line: You've posted no documentation to rebut the fact that CDC (and other CDC's and institutions worldwide) have no sample of the covid-19 virus.

 

[RedPill]

.

Those who live in the jungle must be laughing at us all.

Not all of us are laughing. While I enjoy my liberty off-grid here at New Zealand, the time is precious as so many have been damaged by the injections and are in need of serious help. The harvest truly is plenteous, but the labourers are few. (Mat. 9:37). Add to that the calls for deliverance, and the liberty to "just dance around a fire and sing songs having a good time and party while a succulent fresh roasted goat is cooking" flees.
.

 

[Free]

It has everything to do with this discussion, even as you threaten with statements such as:

How magnanimous of you! You want it both ways - total control over the thread's "discussion" while claiming everyone else is wrong. Now that is "a disgrace to the name of Christ and the gospel."
AND
Millions are being killed via this scamdemic as per John 16:2.

No, it has nothing to do with this discussion. You have taken that verse out of context, just like you have taken part of one sentence completely out of context in the CDC document and so arrive at an erroneous conclusion.

And, I have zero interest in 'total control over the thread's "discussion".' It is deeply disturbing when those who profess to follow Christ are so taken by a conspiracy that they spout dangerously false information and are, evidently, unable to use critical thinking. It brings the name of Christ and the gospel into disrepute and dishonours God by not loving him with all their mind.

Rather, you ran to the media's fact checkers in an attempt to pull yourself out of your mess. Bottom line: You've posted zero documentation to rebut the fact that CDC (and other CDC's and institutions worldwide) have no sample of the covid-19 virus.

No, I have clearly shown that you simply don't understand the document. It's pretty straightforward as to why your claim is false. Common sense and sound reasoning literally are the rebuttal to "your" claim.

Further, in my post #530 above, where I said, "If you simply read the gaslighting article critically, you will see...', you simply gaslighted me later, as you are wont to do in the absence of facts, by feeding back the same word "critical." You continue to regularly deploy other common buzzwords and gaslighting feedback loops to deflect, as well.

"You, however, now have no excuse since it has been explained to you."

I haven't done any gaslighting. The issue is that you have failed to take what the document says in context. You haven't shown any critical thinking about this whatsoever, further evidenced by the fact you didn't address the points I made in my explanation. Would you like it if I tried to show the issue with "your" claim again?

 

[RedPill]

you have taken part of one sentence completely out of context in the CDC document

Repeating that mantra won't make it true. Let's have another look at it.

Not all of us are "children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive." To illustrate, in 2021 (coincidental timing?), the Office of the President published its NNI, NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE STRATEGIC PLAN, wherein the word "nanotechnology" appears a whopping 342 times within its 44 pages.

The following is but a small sampling found within the Plan's first few pages, lest we be here all night (emphases mine):

"Since the launch of the NNI in 2000, nanoscience has transformed from an emerging area of research to a technology that is fueling real-world applications. For example, the COVID-19 vaccines developed in record time require nanomaterials for delivery." (third page, not numbered)

"The use of nanotechnology-enabled vaccines and diagnostics to help address the current global pandemic
clearly illustrates the power of small science." (p.8)

"...nanotechnology emerged as a key tool in the fight against COVID-19. Innovators are leveraging decades of investments in nanotechnology research to develop vaccines and other prophylactics..." (p.13)

"And this plan unveils the National Nanotechnology Challenges to mobilize the nanotechnology community to help solve critical world issues such as pandemic preparedness..." (third page, not numbered)

"Now, cancer nanomedicine is a dynamic and robust research area, and nanomedicine has expanded broadly to include efforts in... infectious disease..." (p.9)

"The early work has now advanced to a stage where nanotechnology is underpinning a rapidly growing range of economically important applications, including...drug delivery systems, and so on..." (p.11)

Even I became bored with all the gushing about vaccine nanotechnology. So I switched to another of the perp's pieces, THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S 2025 BUDGET. Alas, the word "nanotechnology" appears over 400 times within its 72 pages.

"[Nanotechnology] has led to revolutions in areas such as...artificial intelligence, powerful messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines..." (p.vi)

"...the LNP [Lipid NanoParticle] encapsulated COVID-19 mRNA vaccine." (p.29)

"NIH/NIAID [National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] is committed to advancing capacities to develop and manufacture nanoparticle vaccines around the world....This exchange will support efforts to produce...lipid nanoparticle formulations..." (p.36)

"To provide stronger and longer lasting protection against SARS-CoV-2, NIAID-funded scientists are developing an extended-release vaccine strategy that encapsulates protein nanoparticle vaccines with a biodegradable polymer." (p.25)

"NIAID continues its efforts to develop “universal” flu vaccines that display portions of influenza viruses on the exterior of a nanoparticle." (p.25)

"Several clinical trials for a ferritin nanoparticle-based influenza vaccine candidate have demonstrated that this vaccine platform is safe..." (p.25)

"Scientists are also assessing an investigational mosaic nanoparticle vaccine designed to provide consistent protection for multiple seasons in clinical trials." (p. 25)

And finally, from THE NATIONAL NANOTECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE SUPPLEMENT TO THE PRESIDENT’S 2024 BUDGET:

"Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) shells comprise a critical component of the two mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines
that were used during the pandemic and continue to be in use to prevent COVID-19."

Naysayers are forced to concede the covid "vaccine" utilizes nanotechnology in its construction, but would ignorantly claim the "vaccine" itself does not contain any nanotechnology. And such would be yet another faux pas, as per the documented facts above AND the hundreds of researchers and scientists (and counting) who have indeed discovered self-assembling nanotechnology in the covid "vaccines" - and have published their findings. For the diehard skeptics, shall we go there next?

[As if eating bugs and cheap candy is not enough: "Nanoparticle catalysts that can convert waste plastics into useful materials will help transition to a more circular economy where one person’s waste is another person’s feedstock." (p.31)]

 

[Corn Pop]

It just can't seem to go away, as much as I wish it would.

It's not going away. I think its day 3 of the Royal Commission of inquiry into the Cov response in NZ. What they did right and what they did wrong. The first public hearings into the covid response continue.

What was cruel and inhumane during the cov response was not allowing others to visit there dying family.

All they have to do is learn from there mistakes and don't do it again. I'm sure those who suffered tremendously being banned from saying goodbye to there loved ones and all the other trauma and mass psycological damages caused could forgive. Many just want it acknowledged and to be made sure things like that never happen again to anyone.

They did some things right but have to acknowledge also where went wrong, not just what was good.

The PM at the time of cov flee the country not long after, so shes not there, even she should have gone back and be there, but was probably too afraid for her safety.