dan9
Aside from the problematic translation of "mashiach", there is another problem with the translation of the term "davar" in v2 which is usually translated as "commandment" or "decree". The common and proper term for "davar" is "word". Commandment is rendered as "mitzvah", a term used hundreds of times in the Hebrew bible. A royal decree might be termed a "da'at" or perhaps as "davar melech" ie word of the king, but that is not what is stated in v2.
In order to understand the significance of this term in context one must examine dan9:2. Daniel was confounded because he believed the time for the end of the exile was at hand and was worried because no end seemed in sight. It was for that reason he "contemplated the calculations, the number of the years that the WORD ("davar") of the Lord had come to Jeremiah the prophet, since the destruction of Jerusalem seventy years."
The davar is not any human decree. It is the word of God through his prophet Jeremiah that Daniel was concerned about. In this regard there were 2 prophecies. The first was issued at the time of the initial exile of Jehoiakim at Jer25:12 and the second was at the time of destruction of the 1st Temple at Jer29:10. "For so said the Lord: For the completion of seventy years of Babylon, I will remember you, and I will fulfill my good word (davar) toward you, to restore you to this place."
Daniel was about 18 years too early in his estimation wrt the final end of the exile hence he was contemplating the calculations.
Christian bibles compress the time frames in v25 so as to create a single time period of 69 weeks of years. However a proper rendering of the text demonstrates this is incorrect. There are 2 separate times frames and they are not combined. v26 properly translated reads "and after THE sixty-two septets...clearly indicating a separation of this period from the seven septets.
Hebrew, like English uses a base ten when referring to numbers. The number "69" is expressed as "9 and 60" or "60 and 9", never as "7 and 62".An example is Gen5:27 where the years of Methusaleh are given as 969 and the breakdown of the "69" is with base ten ie "60 and 9".
Additionally, in the Hebrew Masoretic text, there is a symbol used at the end of the phrase "seven septets" called the atnach which functions as a semi-colon. This indicates that the first anointed comes after seven septets, while the second anointed comes much later, about 1 septet before the destruction of Jerusalem.
I am going to end this post by quoting from the original 1611 edition of the King James Bible to demonstrate how wrt to the atnach the translators were properly translating the text:"Know therefore and vnderstand, that from the going foorth of the commandment to restore and build Iersalem, vnto the Messiah the Prince, shall be seuen weekes; and threescore and two weekes, the street shall be built againe, and the wall, euen in troublous times." It was not until 1885 that the text was revised compressing the 2 time frames. :wink: