Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Did Jesus Die And Get Buried On A Friday ?

Lewis

Member
Did Jesus Die And Get Buried On A Friday ? Let me hear what you people have to say about this.

How could there be three days and three nights from late Friday afternoon until early Sunday morning? At the most, there could only be two nights, one day, and a part of another! Had the Scriptures only said three days, we could have understood them to mean a part of three days, since both in and out of the Scriptures we use the word to mean only a portion of a day. However, the Scriptures specify "three days and three nights," and thus verbal inspiration demands three twenty-four hour days.

It is good for us to note the difference in the Roman day, the Jewish day, and our present day. THE ROMAN DAY began at 6:00 A.M. and closed at 6:00 the next morning. THE JEWISH DAY began at sunset and closed at the next sunset (or from about 6:00 P.M. to the next 6:00 P.M.). OUR DAY begins at midnight and closes the next midnight.

The Lord Jesus was placed on the cross about 9:00 A.M. our time and was there until about 4:00 P.M. It was on Wednesday! He was taken down from the cross and placed in the tomb before sunset-- before the beginning of the sabbath. Note that this was not the beginning of the regular weekly sabbath at sunset on Friday, but a "high sabbath"--a Passover sabbath which came on Thursday that week! [See Lev. 23:5-7, where we find that the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread was a sabbath day.] At about sunset on Thursday He had been in the grave one day and one night. At about sunset on Friday, He had been in the grave two days and two nights. Then, just after the three full days and nights, He arose. He arose as it began to dawn the first day of the week (just after sunset Saturday, our time). The women came early Sunday morning, our time, but He was already gone. The expression "on the third day" in the Gospels referring to His resurrection would be "after the third day" in our way of saying it.

Many have sunrise services commemorating the resurrection, and we see nothing wrong with that. It would be fine to have a high noon service commemorating His resurrection. But maybe we should have a sunset service.

He arose about sunset on Saturday. And that was sunset for our sins--because they were gone forever. Hallelujah!!! [Used by permission from Maranatha!!!, April 1982, Westside Baptist Church, P.O. Drawer 1425, Natchez, MS 39121]

The following question and answer from Bible Questions Answered by William Pettingill offers more about the timing of the resurrection:

Question: "I have a problem which you might help me with, if you will. You stated that the crucifixion of our Lord took place on Wednesday, basing the statement on Mt. 12:40 and other passages. This is reasonable, but even more often is the resurrection referred to as on the third day. Remembering that the Jews reckoned their days from evening to evening, if Christ were crucified on Wednesday, the resurrection would be on at least the fourth day after. I believe in the verbal inspiration of the Scriptures, and hence believe that there must be some explanation, although I do not understand it."

Answer: It is true that the resurrection day is often referred to as the third day. But it is also referred to as "after three days" (Mk. 8:31); "within three days" (Mk. 14:58); "in three days" (John 2:19); and after "three days and three nights" (Mt. 12:40).

I, too, believe in the verbal inspiration of the Scriptures, and our problem is to find the harmony between all these expressions.

That harmony, as I believe, is to be looked for in connection with idiomatic expression. You know that there is such a thing as usage, and as some one has said, "Any usage is good usage if there be enough of it." In our English language we fall into usage which at first seems to be entirely contrary to grammar, and yet we go on using expressions which finally find their place in our English dictionaries because the usage becomes so common.

Now, then, if it can be found that "on the third day" was an expression used among the Jews as equivalent to "within three days" or "in three days" or "after three days and three nights," then our problem is solved. And I think there is just such a solution to be found in the Word of God itself. Please look at Esther 4:16, where Queen Esther is quoted as saying: "Go, gather together all the Jews that are present in Shushan, and fast ye for me, and neither eat nor drink three days, night or day." Now look at the first verse of chapter 5: "Now it came to pass on the third day, that Esther put on her royal apparel, and stood in the inner court of the king's house." You see here the expression "on the third day" is equivalent to "after three days and three nights."

Now look again at II Chron. 10:5, where Rehoboam said: "Come again unto me after three days." And yet in the 12th verse it reads: "So Jeroboam and all the people came to Rehoboam on the third day, as the king bade, saying, Come again to me on the third day." Here you will see that "after three days" is the exact equivalent, according to the Hebrew usage and idiom, of "the third day."

Now, does not this warrant us in saying that the expression in Mt. 12:40, "So shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth" is to be regarded as equivalent to the language of Lk. 24:21, "To-day is the third day since these things were done?" (Pettingill, Bible Questions Answered).
August 5, 2001 (Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061-0368, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org) - The following study is by Dr. James D. Crumpton, founder, Maranatha Baptist Mission, Natchez, Mississippi:
 
I can't reveal my sources ('cause I can't remember where I read this) but according to Jewish tradition any part of a day was considered a "day." So part of Friday, all day Saturday, and part of Sunday would be three days. If I have time I'll do a little research.
 
day

ttg said:
I can't reveal my sources ('cause I can't remember where I read this) but according to Jewish tradition any part of a day was considered a "day." So part of Friday, all day Saturday, and part of Sunday would be three days. If I have time I'll do a little research.
Somebody already explained what a "day" consisted of. I don't know where you got your info but as usual it is twisting the prophecy to make what you believe valid. Here we have Matt 12:38-40 which clearly indicates that three days and three nights Jesus was supposed to be in the grave. Even by your faulty reasoning you have to come up with the third NIGHT which you haven't accounted for.

"Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three night in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth" Matthew 12:38-40.

Mark 8:31 tells us:

"And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again."
Even the bible is clear on what constitutes a day.
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night . . . " Genesis 1:5. (Compare Genesis 1:14-18; 8:22.)
 
I don't think the actual day/date matters. Maybe he really rose on a Tuesday. Maybe he was really born in January. Does a day or number (date) really matter? What is important is that we know the true meaning of WHY we're celebrating. If we have the day wrong, so what? In my heart, I know that tomorrow I'm celebrating the day that Jesus rose from the dead...whether he actually arose on a Sunday or not is not of importance to me. What is important is that he arose from the dead!!!!
:angel:
 
Nikki said:
I don't think the actual day/date matters. Maybe he really rose on a Tuesday. Maybe he was really born in January. Does a day or number (date) really matter? What is important is that we know the true meaning of WHY we're celebrating. If we have the day wrong, so what? In my heart, I know that tomorrow I'm celebrating the day that Jesus rose from the dead...whether he actually arose on a Sunday or not is not of importance to me. What is important is that he arose from the dead!!!!
:angel:
I think it matters because, a lot of people believe the wrong thing. So it does matter.
 
I was just pointing out that the DAY really isn't as important as what people make it out to be. It's the REASON we're observing a certain day (whether it be Friday, Tuesday or Saturday) that is important.
 
An equivalent phrase "after eight days" or "eight days later" (John 20:26) means Sunday to Sunday. Only part of the Sundays are required for "eight days." Same with "after three days" (Mark 8:31, etc) only part of Friday and part of Sunday is required for "three days."

So "three days and three nights" equals "after three days" or "on the third day." From W.E. Vine Expository Dictionary of Biblical Words (a Protestant Hebrew/Greek dictionary) :

"In Mark 9:31 and 10:34 the best texts have -meta tresi hemeras-, 'after three days,' which idiomatically expresses the same thing as -te trite hemera- 'on the third day,' which some texts have here as, e.g. the phrase 'the third day' in Matt 17:23; 20:19; Luke 9:22; 18:33, where the repetition of the article lends stress to the number, lit. 'the day the third'; 24:7,46; Acts 10:40." (Vine, page 631)

The scholarly Theological Dictionary of the New Testament referred to as TDNT, edited by Gerhard Kittel, under "DAY" :

"The difficulty has often been advanced that there is a discrepancy between the ['on the third day'] of Matthew, Luke, and Paul and the usual ['after three days'] of Mark. But in this connection it has to be remembered that difficulties always arise in the reckoning of days according to Jewish usage. Thus

'in Halachic statements PART of a day is reckoned as a WHOLE day'

[Footnote has rabbinic source Str-B I,649 and the original Hebrew 'part of a day counts as a whole day' e.g. bNazir 5b; Pes 4,2]

"and already in the first century A.D. we read: 'A day and a night constitute a -onah- ([Hebrew for] a full day), and part of a -onah- counts as a whole -onah-' (jShab 12a,15,17)

"IT IS IN THIS LIGHT THAT WE ARE TO UNDERSTAND MATTHEW 12:40...Thus the Marcan narrative ['after three days'] means that Friday and the night up to the resurrection are each counted as a day, while Matthew, Luke and Paul...use a mode of expression ['on the third day'] which would be regarded as more correct by Greeks. Both forms are found in close proximity in Matthew 27:63f..." (Theological Dictionary of the New Testament [TDNT], volume 2, page 949f)

[Footnote 30 also refers to Josephus "inclusive" reckoning of days and references are given: Antiquities 7:280f; 8:214/218; 5:17]


For a longer version with charts and pretty colors: http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/num56.htm#THREEDAYS
 
And another answer:

When Scripture indicates that Jesus rose on the first day of the week, therefore, it means that he rose on the day that began at sunset on Saturday and lasted until sunset on Sunday. Since we are told his tomb was found empty "after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week" (Matt. 28:1), he must have risen between sunset Saturday and dawn Sunday. Whether this was before or after midnight Scripture does not say. He might have risen either Saturday night or Sunday morning before dawn, though, for purposes of determining when he was crucified, it doesn’t matter.

In the Bible, parts of time units were frequently counted as wholes. Thus a king might be said to have reigned for two years, even if he reigned for only fourteen months. In the same way, a day and a night does not mean a period of twenty-four hours. It can refer to any portion of a day coupled with any portion of a night. The expression "three days and three nights" could be used as simply a slightly hyperbolic way of referring to "three days."

As Protestant Bible scholar R. T. France notes: "Three days and three nights was a Jewish idiom to a period covering only two nights" (Matthew, 213).

Similarly, D. A. Carson, regarded as one of the deans of conservative Protestant Bible exegesis, explains: "In rabbinical thought a day and a night make an onah, and a part of an onah is as the whole. . . . Thus according to Jewish tradition, ‘three days and three nights’ need mean no more than ‘three days’ or the combination of any part of three separate days" (Expositor’s Bible Commentary, 8:296).

If Jesus was crucified and died Friday afternoon, that would be the first day; at sundown on Friday the second day would begin; then at sundown on Saturday the third day would begin. So Jesus was indeed "raised on the third day" (Matt. 20:19).

Scripture repeatedly tells us that Jesus was crucified on "the day of preparation," which was the first-century Jewish way of referring to Friday, the day of preparation for the Sabbath. This is why the women were not able to anoint his body before he was buriedâ€â€because Jesus was hurriedly buried late in the afternoon, just as the Sabbath was beginning. The women thus had to rest until the Sabbath was over (Luke 23:56).

We are also told that the Jewish leaders asked Pilate to order the legs of the crucifixion victims broken so they would die faster (from asphyxiation due to an inability to push themselves up on their crosses and take a breath), "in order to prevent the bodies from remaining on the cross on the Sabbath" (John 19:31).

Some advocates of a Wednesday crucifixion concede that Jesus was crucified on the day before a Sabbath, but deny that this was the regular, weekly Sabbath. In later times, the phrase "day of preparation" came to be used to refer to the day before Passover and, this argument goes, Passover counted as a Sabbath in the sense that it was a day of rest, even though it usually did not fall on the weekly Sabbath. Thus Jesus was crucified on the day before Passover and had to be buried hurriedly on that account.

But this explanation will not do. In the first century, "the day of preparation" referred to Friday, not the day before Passover. Further, we know from Scripture that the Sabbath following Jesus’ crucifixion was the regular, weekly Sabbath, the seventh day of the week: "Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the sepulcher" (Matt. 28:1).

We can thus reconstruct the chronology of the crucifixion, death, and Resurrection of Christ as follows:

Friday, the Day of Preparation: Jesus is crucified with two thieves. From noon to three in the afternoon, a darkness covers the land (Matt. 27:45). Then, "ince it was the Day of Preparation, in order to prevent the bodies from remaining on the cross on the Sabbath . . . the Jews asked Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away" (John 19:31). Then Joseph of Arimathea obtains Jesus’ body and buries it: "It was Preparation Day [that is, the day before the Sabbath]. So as evening approached, Joseph of Arimathea, a prominent member of the Council, who was himself waiting for the kingdom of God, went boldly to Pilate and asked for Jesus’ body" (Mark 15:42-43, NIV).

Saturday, the Sabbath: "On the Sabbath they [the women] rested according to the commandment" (Luke 23:56b). Also on this day, "that is, after the Day of Preparation, the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered before Pilate" and asked for a guard to be placed on the tomb (Matt. 27:62).

Sunday, the first day of the week: "Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the sepulcher" and found that Jesus had risen from the dead (Matt. 28:1).

Those anti-Catholics who allege that the Church commemorates Christ’s death on the wrong day are themselves in the wrong. The appropriate time for Christians to gather to commemorate Christ’s death is indeed Good Friday, not a hypothetical Crucifixion Wednesday.
 
no way

Sorry TTG but it doesn't fly. Why is it that the wording and definition can be twisted here to suit you but in other places it can't? Are you part of that Burger King crowd that believes you can have it your way?
 
Did Jesus Die And Get Buried On A Friday ?

No. It was on a Wednesday. Passover.
Interred at sundown the start of Nissan 15 (next day) to fulfill Unleavened Bread. Three days later as Nissan 18th commenced, (at sundown) he arose fulfilling Firstfruits.

Thus, we have the prophetic feast days fulfilled at their proper dates at the appointed times, plus he was in the tomb a whole 72 hours. No other "schedule" mathematically and prophetically fits as well no matter how one tries their darndest to fit it.
 
If I post on a Fri. :fadein: & the post gives me a fit? I can count the posts that come up if I go back to look. If there are more than one of the same reply? I can go back & delete one or two or three.. 'days'. :wink:

And, by the way, can the Godhead change their mind? Romans 4:17's last part of the verse is a interesting Truth about what God can do & we cannot do??

---John
 
Re: no way

Thessalonian said:
reznwerks said:
Sorry TTG but it doesn't fly. Why is it that the wording and definition can be twisted here to suit you but in other places it can't? Are you part of that Burger King crowd that believes you can have it your way?

Why the need for ad hom? You can't rebut him without insulting? He quoted Protestant scholars, rebut them. Have you done a study of Jewish language and culture such that you are more athoritative than they. Hebrew and Greek do not easily translate in to English. Do you think you might not be enough of an expert to speak so boldly and in such an insulting fashion. What are your credentials?
OH YE of thin skin, if I have insulted anyone here I apologize to thee and ask thy forgivness. Now on a more serious response and let this be the end of the discussion unless you want to admit here and now the bible has errors. The original post argued that Jesus was not crucified on Friday because the "three days"issue is not fulfilled. The three nights issue is not fulfilled on the Wednesday arguement either. Thessalonian I don't need to know Hebrew Greek etc and I don't need to study the culture. According to the bible Jesus was crucified on Friday and here is why. The key phrase here is "the day of preparation" which is the day before the Jewish sabbath which is a Friday.
Matthew 27:62 "Next day, that is, after the Day of Preparation, the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered before Pilate"
John 19:14 "Now it was the Day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about the sixth hour. He said to the Jews, 'Behold your King!'"
John 19:31 "Since it was the Day of Preparation, in order to prevent the bodies from remaining on the cross on the sabbath (for that sabbath was a high day), the Jews asked Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away."
John 19:42 "So because of the Jewish Day of Preparation, as the tomb was close at hand, they laid Jesus there."
 
Re: no way

OH YE of thin skin, if I have insulted anyone here I apologize to thee and ask thy forgivness. Now on a more serious response and let this be the end of the discussion unless you want to admit here and now the bible has errors.

No thin skin here. I've had far worse attacks than your trite burger king line. I just think it is a poor way of arguing and wreaks of prideful self assertion and condesention. That's all. If he is not at the same level of learning and understanding (I'm not saying that is the case) why do you feel he needs to be ridiculed and demeaned. Do I think the Bible has errors, Nope.

The original post argued that Jesus was not crucified on Friday because the "three days"issue is not fulfilled. The three nights issue is not fulfilled on the Wednesday arguement either. Thessalonian I don't need to know Hebrew Greek etc and I don't need to study the culture. According to the bible Jesus was crucified on Friday and here is why. The key phrase here is "the day of preparation" which is the day before the Jewish sabbath which is a Friday.

Now, I'm confused. You lashed out at TTG, but I am pretty sure he agrees that Jesus was crucified on Friday. His information supports that. You say you don't need to know hebrew or greek or the cultures. That's the problem these days. We have people running around as Bible scholars who don't know Hebrew and Greek or the culture. Sure, you can get many things right without it. But Greek and Hebrew do not translate easily to English. That is a fact. Things are lost in the translation. Idioms and ways of thinking are not always translated with the full Jewish understanding. As an example let's say that I had no understanding of the British language and someone said, "what a bloody mess". I might think there had been some sort of a masacre with guns or knives. You don't think the Jews had any idioms or ways of looking at things or saying things that differed from the way we look at them? You don't think that understanding the language and culture would contribute to Biblical understanding and answer some difficult questions from the english translation. Hate to tell you but the Bible was not written in English and yes culture and language had an influence on what was written.


Blessings
 
Re: no way

Thessalonian said:
OH YE of thin skin, if I have insulted anyone here I apologize to thee and ask thy forgivness. Now on a more serious response and let this be the end of the discussion unless you want to admit here and now the bible has errors.

No thin skin here. I've had far worse attacks than your trite burger king line. I just think it is a poor way of arguing and wreaks of prideful self assertion and condesention. That's all. If he is not at the same level of learning and understanding (I'm not saying that is the case) why do you feel he needs to be ridiculed and demeaned. Do I think the Bible has errors, Nope.

[quote:60b1c]The original post argued that Jesus was not crucified on Friday because the "three days"issue is not fulfilled. The three nights issue is not fulfilled on the Wednesday arguement either. Thessalonian I don't need to know Hebrew Greek etc and I don't need to study the culture. According to the bible Jesus was crucified on Friday and here is why. The key phrase here is "the day of preparation" which is the day before the Jewish sabbath which is a Friday.

Now, I'm confused. You lashed out at TTG, but I am pretty sure he agrees that Jesus was crucified on Friday. His information supports that. You say you don't need to know hebrew or greek or the cultures. That's the problem these days. We have people running around as Bible scholars who don't know Hebrew and Greek or the culture. Sure, you can get many things right without it. But Greek and Hebrew do not translate easily to English. That is a fact. Things are lost in the translation. Idioms and ways of thinking are not always translated with the full Jewish understanding. As an example let's say that I had no understanding of the British language and someone said, "what a bloody mess". I might think there had been some sort of a masacre with guns or knives. You don't think the Jews had any idioms or ways of looking at things or saying things that differed from the way we look at them? You don't think that understanding the language and culture would contribute to Biblical understanding and answer some difficult questions from the english translation. Hate to tell you but the Bible was not written in English and yes culture and language had an influence on what was written.


Blessings[/quote:60b1c]
Good post Thess.
 
ttg said:
I can't reveal my sources ('cause I can't remember where I read this) but according to Jewish tradition any part of a day was considered a "day." So part of Friday, all day Saturday, and part of Sunday would be three days. If I have time I'll do a little research.

Oh I like this topic and have posted about it several times in the past.

The problem with a Friday or Wednesday crucifixion is this:

Mat 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

The keys here are "three days and three nights.There MUST be three days AND three nights in the equation or else Jesus is a liar and false prophet.

I will use a Thursday as the day of crucifixion. We know Jesus gave up His spirit on the ninth hour. (3 PM)

Luke 23:44 And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour.
Luke 23:45 And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.
Luke 23:46 And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.


We also know that HE was gone from the tomb at or just before sunrise of the first day of the week.

Mat 28:1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
Mat 28:2 And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.
Mat 28:3 His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow:
Mat 28:4 And for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men.
Mat 28:5 And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
Mat 28:6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.


So lets count...

Thursday, from 3 PM 'til sunset is day one. (part of a day was considered a day to them in the first century) Sunset 'til sunrise Friday is night one. Friday sunrise 'til sunset is day two. Sunset Friday 'til sunrise Saturday is night two. Sunrise Saturday 'til sunset was day three. Sunset 'til sunrise (or just before) on Sunday is day three.

Three days and three nights... just like Jesus foretold. :wink:

A Wed. gives us one extra day and night. A Friday leaves us one day and night short of Jesus' proclamation.


See also:

http://www.tedmontgomery.com/bblovrvw/G ... index.html
 
Nikki said:
I don't think the actual day/date matters. Maybe he really rose on a Tuesday. Maybe he was really born in January. Does a day or number (date) really matter? What is important is that we know the true meaning of WHY we're celebrating. If we have the day wrong, so what? In my heart, I know that tomorrow I'm celebrating the day that Jesus rose from the dead...whether he actually arose on a Sunday or not is not of importance to me. What is important is that he arose from the dead!!!!
:angel:
Nikki, it matters greatly. There is an unesacapable relation between the Passover lamb of the OT and the Lamb of God (Jesus) and it's blood and the shed blood of Messiah. Passover was a foreshadow of things to come.
 
vic said:
Thursday, from 3 PM 'til sunset is day one. (part of a day was considered a day to them in the first century) Sunset 'til sunrise Friday is night one. Friday sunrise 'til sunset is day two. Sunset Friday 'til sunrise Saturday is night two. Sunrise Saturday 'til sunset was day three. Sunset 'til sunrise (or just before) on Sunday is day three.

Three days and three nights... just like Jesus foretold. :wink:

A Wed. gives us one extra day and night. A Friday leaves us one day and night short of Jesus' proclamation.

Noble attempt, but not quite. That's 3 days and 3 nights in the heart of the earth., i.e. the grave--- the whale's belly symbolized the grave being dark and confining. If he was interred at sundown, that's really the start of the next day. We cannot count from the death at 3:00 PM until sundown as the first day. Thurs night-day is one, Friday night-day is two, and Saturday night-day is three. Then as Saturday closed, Sunday (the Firstfruits) commensed.

One other thing. Nissan 14th (Passover) never falls on a Thursday according to calendar rules.

I'm a Wednesday guy.
 
vic said:
Nikki said:
I don't think the actual day/date matters. Maybe he really rose on a Tuesday. Maybe he was really born in January. Does a day or number (date) really matter? What is important is that we know the true meaning of WHY we're celebrating. If we have the day wrong, so what? In my heart, I know that tomorrow I'm celebrating the day that Jesus rose from the dead...whether he actually arose on a Sunday or not is not of importance to me. What is important is that he arose from the dead!!!!
:angel:
Nikki, it matters greatly. There is an unesacapable relation between the Passover lamb of the OT and the Lamb of God (Jesus) and it's blood and the shed blood of Messiah. Passover was a foreshadow of things to come.

Well, I guess this is one of those areas where I'm ignorant. I've never claimed to be perfect or understand everything. I can partially understand why you're saying having the right day is perfect, but the other part of me just thinks it's not THAT big of a deal.
 
Back
Top