Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Differences in the giving of the Holy Spirit between the OT/NT?

Ok. I am going to have to stop here for a second, I promise I am going to read the whole thing, but I think you are taking this out of context, and/or I did not word the statement the way I should have.



I did not mean to come across as saying, "the Spirit had no real direct work in relation to our Salvation". He does, but it is directed and focused on faith. 'Other than that', there is no direct relation to our Salvation. Make more sense? I sometimes missunderstand what people are saying too, especially when they go on and on and on and on and on....like me :D

Point taken. I was mentally "excepting" that (contextually) included point about faith that you made, because I was examining if the Spirit's work went beyond even that or not. Sorry if I did not make that clear or appeared to misconstrue your statement. I might edit the original post briefly to have an "aside from faith" clause because it does not affect the tenor of the post. Please continue reading at your convenience.

Thanks,

~Josh
 
Josh, excellent tone and good observations.

The "washing of regeneration" mentioned in Titus 3:5 is the same imagery found in Ezekiel, John 3, and many other passages. Even the woman at the well in John 4 was offered water that would be a "living water." Of course Christ spoke of the living water as a "well of water springing up unto eternal life."

Of course John 3:5 has the water imagery also. That verse mentions a new birth by water, and by the Spirit. There are actually a host of other writers that would equate water and regeneration.

I think there are two questions about the water imagery and regeneration that need to be answered.
...
[snipped for space considerations]
...
MY CONCLUSIONS
For this reason when I approach the OT, I do not accept that regeneration was not present in the OT saints. Without regeneration, you do not have faith and salvation. This of course creates some questions on my part. If the OT saints were saved by faith, and faith was caused by the ministry of the HS in regeneration, how do the prophets like Jeremiah and Ezekiel prophecy a "new covenant?" That is yet another question.

Hope all this stuff is not bothersome in any way.


Mondar, excellent response! I think you have understood my questions & concerns very well! I will agree that your reasoning up to your conclusion seems to be perfectly sound, without having yet had the time to examine the passages in John you mentioned myself. The relationship between regeneration and salvation is incredibly close. I mean, until really examining this issue I was wondering if they weren't even the same thing. This remains to be investigated.

As for your conclusion though I still have a question though regarding the relationship between the "giving" of the Spirit (a NT "fulfillment" promise [given in Ezekiel & Joel] - whereas "rested upon" in the OT seems more common place) and regeneration. Ezekiel 36 ties the giving (or "putting in you") of the Spirit to that regeneration, but how can we say that the regeneration by the giving of the Spirit in the NT is not different in some regard than what might be called regeneration in the OT? One of the issues I raised in an earlier post is the seeming lack of permanence of the Holy Spirit in the OT (there was even a "corporate" vision of the Spirit departing from the Temple & Israel in Ezekiel), and during the days of the Tabernacle God's presence was still largely external, with a future promise to "dwell among you" in the Pentatuech. So there is some relationship between the giving/habitation/dwelling of the Holy Spirit to NT saints that I do not think can be seen to the same degree of completeness in the OT. It seems that the Spirit residing in NT saints is a new thing, and that regeneration is its consequence. So how do you resolve this question? Do you at least see what I am getting at/where I'm coming from? I honestly want to hear you continue your thoughts along the same lines and insights that you have made so far in the above post in answer to these questions as well.

I am eager to hear your response.

God Bless,

~Josh
 
Only if you could make some sort of distinction between regeneration/born again and "salvation" could you say that they are separate. However though, I think it is outright misleading to say the Spirit is not involved in our salvation in any regard, for here plainly with Titus 3:5, as with Acts 19:2, John 3:5, 1 Cor 12:13, Romans 5:5, and more we see how closely the giving of the Holy Spirit to us joins us to God, His Body, His love, His promises, and even is the very agent of washing and regenerating us with a new heart and spirit as was promised long before in Ezekiel 36. I don't see how we can get around addressing Titus 3:5, and I would love to hear your thoughts about this.

And this isn't just another dry theological discussion for me, this is about as refreshing to me as drinking cool water when I am parched! My heart leaps when I read Titus 3:5! God renewed me, he gave me a new heart, made me a new creation, cleansed me and forgave me, put His Spirit in me, and empowered me (by grace) to live the Christian life! And how else could we ever live up to Jesus' elevated standards of the Sermon on the Mount? The Spirit empowers us by God's grace, not by the law, to do them! Grace is an even higher standard than the law (it's harder to not even think of doing something evil), which is a surprise to some! But we were not told to do something we could not accomplish, thus we were given the Spirit to help us by the power of Christ! Thus, I can do all things through Christ who strenthens me! And the Holy Spirit is integral in that picture. But more than just that, I also see the clear association of the Spirit even with our very salvation quite clearly.

Josh, it is my pleasure to enter into a discussion with you concerning the things of God. It too makes my heart sing with gladness when I can recall with another the great work He has done in us. And NO this is not just some super spiritual talk coming out of my head, its whats in my heart.

I hope with my previous post it clairifies the missunderstanding you are having with me. I agree with everything you said here, maybe not with all of that MacArthur guy's stuff :D, but the work of the Spirit is indeed what you just commented on. It would be very misleading, and is when someone says the Holy Spirit has no work in the born again believers life. It would also be misleading to say that He played no part in the OT saints lives.

We were on the topic of differences in Salvation from the giving of the Spirit, not just the giving of the Spirit. Let me see if I can clarify my position and belief with more light on the subject.

In OT times, God spoke through the Prophets by His Spirit. In these times, He has spoken to us through His Son. When Jesus went into heaven, He sent the Spirit to live in the life of every believer. In OT times before the temple was made, God spoke to man Himself. Dreams, visions, and even to Abraham in a physical way. The speaking brought about the ability for them to have "faith".

Fast forward a little in time. Moses came along. God spoke with Moses the same as He had with others, in a personal way. But then something happened.

Exd 2:23-24 "During those many days the king of Egypt died, and the people of Israel groaned because of their slavery and cried out for help. Their cry for rescue from slavery came up to God. And God heard their groaning, and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob."

The cry of 'bondage' and 'slavery' rose up to God. A mass cry. God choose this time to send Moses as a 'mediator' of a "covenant".

{{Hey, just taking a break here. Is it not interesting that God choose to confine the Hebrews under slavery? He made the prophesy long before that He was going to keep them in bondage under a foreign land Gen 15:13, and how Paul tells us that God choose to 'confine' all under sin?}}

And so it was, when God called Moses to go to the elders and give to them the word of God that they had been faithful all these years to keep.

Exd 3:16-18 "Go and gather the elders of Israel together and say to them, 'The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, has appeared to me, saying, "I have observed you and what has been done to you in Egypt, and I promise that I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt to the land of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, a land flowing with milk and honey."' And they will listen to your voice, and you and the elders of Israel shall go to the king of Egypt and say to him, 'The LORD, the God of the Hebrews, has met with us; and now, please let us go a three days' journey into the wilderness, that we may sacrifice to the LORD our God.'

I know this may seem like were getting off track, but stick with me here ;)

Exd 6:2-9 "God spoke to Moses and said to him, "I am the LORD. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them. I also established my covenant with them[the fathers] to give them the land of Canaan, the land in which they lived as sojourners. Moreover, I have heard the groaning of the people of Israel whom the Egyptians hold as slaves, and I have remembered my covenant. Say therefore to the people of Israel, 'I am the LORD, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will deliver you from slavery to them, and I will redeem you with an outstretched arm and with great acts of judgment. I will take you to be my people, and I will be your God, and you shall know that I am the LORD your God, who has brought you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians. I will bring you into the land that I swore to give to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob. I will give it to you for a possession. I am the LORD.'" Moses spoke thus to the people of Israel, but they did not listen to Moses, because of their broken spirit and harsh slavery."

Tacking? The 'covenant' God made, that He is continuing in this 'day', is the covenant made between Him and the 'fathers'. Because His Spirit had not been in 'contact' with the people under slavery, they would not listen to the "word of faith" brought to them by Moses. Ok, so God now makes all this clear. That He was the one taking them out of bondage, He was the one delivering them from slavery, and He was the one redeeming them with His own outstretched arm. We see that the people of Israel had NO part in it, they would not even listen to the grace that was being shown to them. They were 'spiritually dead'. (interesting to note that the reason they were spiritually dead is because of the broken spirit and harsh 'slavery')

Fast forward to the exodus. They came out of Egypt. They were all under the cloud, they all passed through the sea, they all ate the manna, and they all drank from the rock. THEN, they came to the mountain of the LORD.

Exd 19:1-8 "On the third new moon after the people of Israel had gone out of the land of Egypt, on that day they came into the wilderness of Sinai. They set out from Rephidim and came into the wilderness of Sinai, and they encamped in the wilderness. There Israel encamped before the mountain, while Moses went up to God. The LORD called to him out of the mountain, saying, "Thus you shall say to the house of Jacob, and tell the people of Israel: You yourselves have seen what I did to the Egyptians, and how I bore you on eagles' wings and brought you to myself. Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for all the earth is mine; and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. These are the words that you shall speak to the people of Israel." So Moses came and called the elders of the people and set before them all these words that the LORD had commanded him. All the people answered together and said, "All that the LORD has spoken we will do." And Moses reported the words of the people to the LORD."

They were now without excuse. They had 'seen' the working of God. They now could indeed have 'faith'. And what did they reply? "We believe". So, we see here that through Moses, the people were being spoken to from God. There had to be a way of 'brining' to them faith. Keep following me here, its going to be long.

Exd 19:9 And the LORD said to Moses, "Behold, I am coming to you in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with you, and may also believe you forever." When Moses told the words of the people to the LORD,

Catch that. The people would hear when God spoke with Moses, not them, and they would believe Moses, not God specifically. Please do not misunderstand what I am saying here. Just read the passage and see what it says. I am not saying that the people were not believing God, but that it was through the words of Moses to them that they would believe. The point is that there is a 'channel' that brings faith. In the OT, it was Moses. It is interesting that when Jews speak of the Law, they refer to it as "Moses".
 
-----Part 2-----​

Now fast forward to the tent.

Exd 25:8-9 "And let them make me a sanctuary, that I may dwell in their midst. Exactly as I show you concerning the pattern of the tabernacle, and of all its furniture, so you shall make it."

Up until the tent was made, the people lived solely on faith that God was there. And even after, the tent was in their 'midst'. Not 'in' them. But lest we get off track;

Exd 31:1-11 "The LORD said to Moses, "See, I have called by name Bezalel the son of Uri, son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah, and I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with ability and intelligence, with knowledge and all craftsmanship, to devise artistic designs, to work in gold, silver, and bronze, in cutting stones for setting, and in carving wood, to work in every craft. And behold, I have appointed with him Oholiab, the son of Ahisamach, of the tribe of Dan. And I have given to all able men ability, that they may make all that I have commanded you: the tent of meeting, and the ark of the testimony, and the mercy seat that is on it, and all the furnishings of the tent, the table and its utensils, and the pure lampstand with all its utensils, and the altar of incense, and the altar of burnt offering with all its utensils, and the basin and its stand, and the finely worked garments, the holy garments for Aaron the priest and the garments of his sons, for their service as priests, and the anointing oil and the fragrant incense for the Holy Place. According to all that I have commanded you, they shall do."

Interesting huh? God enables specific men, but fills a certain one with His Spirit. And this certain man was in charge of making the tabernacle exactly the way God prescribes it. Was it him alone that was doing the work? No. He had those who were helping Him. But they had to listen to what he said in order to get it done right.

What is the next thing we see? Ahhh...Moses interceding on behalf of them. See, while God was speaking directly to Moses, the people were going astray in their hearts. He brought back to remembrance the covenant God had made with the fathers. This was not without consequence. Please read on, because I am going to draw this to a conclusion in a moment. ;)

Exd 33:3-5 Go up to a land flowing with milk and honey; but I will not go up among you, lest I consume you on the way, for you are a stiff-necked people."...For the LORD had said to Moses, "Say to the people of Israel, 'You are a stiff-necked people; if for a single moment I should go up among you, I would consume you. So now take off your ornaments, that I may know what to do with you.'"

We see here that God was not able to dwell in the midst of them, they had the word of faith, they had the law, they had the knowledge of God. But because they were stiff-necked, hard hearted people, God could not dwell among them.

Exd 33:7 Now Moses used to take the tent and pitch it outside the camp, far off from the camp, and he called it the tent of meeting. And everyone who sought the LORD would go out to the tent of meeting, which was outside the camp.

Stop here. Think about the story line here. God made laws. Before Moses could even give it to them, they were in the process of breaking them. Then we see this whole exchange. And Moses pleading not once, but twice on behalf of the people. Then we see the laws again written and given to Moses.

Exd 34:9-11 "And he said, "If now I have found favor in your sight, O Lord, please let the Lord go in the midst of us, for it is a stiff-necked people, and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us for your inheritance." And he[God] said, "Behold, I am making a covenant. Before all your people I will do marvels, such as have not been created in all the earth or in any nation. And all the people among whom you are shall see the work of the LORD, for it is an awesome thing that I will do with you. "Observe what I command you this day. Behold, I will drive out before you the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites.

Exd 34:27-28 "And the LORD said to Moses, "Write these words, for in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel." So he was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights. He neither ate bread nor drank water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments.

Now, before anyone thinks that I am somehow degrading the Ten Commandments, I am not. I am not taking away from them at all. But, God made a 'new' covenant with Moses and Israel. What was the covenant before, the one with Abraham, Issac, and Jacob? It was a covenant of faith in the Mighty work of God, to give the land as an EVERLASTING POSSESSION. In other words, ETERNAL. That covenant was enacted by God, and God alone. On the basis of Faith and Faith alone.

This 'new' covenant was not meant to take the place of the previous covenant, but to "ensure" that He would be with them in their midst forever. On a side note. Leviticus 26 speaks of those who break the covenant, and it is harsh, but at the same time you see the Love of God.

Now....lol....fast forward to Jeremiah.


Jer 11:7-8 "For I solemnly warned your fathers when I brought them up out of the land of Egypt, warning them persistently, even to this day, saying, Obey my voice. Yet they did not obey or incline their ear, but everyone walked in the stubbornness of his evil heart. Therefore I brought upon them all the words of this covenant, which I commanded them to do, but they did not."

Jer 31:31-34 "Behold, the days are coming, declares the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the LORD. But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, 'Know the LORD,' for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more."

Ok, so track with me here. So far we have just seen three different covenants. One with the Fathers of Faith. One with the children of Israel when He took them out of the land. And then this new one. Ahhh....now we can start to get a glimpse of what the Spirits role is in the NT verses the OT, right? Right! The first one, "Covenant of Faith". The second one, "Covenant of The Law". And now we know the third one, "Covenant of Grace".

Got it? Now, Bible quiz time. Which one(s) are an “everlasting†covenant? Yes you…in the front row…what is your answer???

Gen 17:3-7 “Then Abram fell on his face. And God said to him,… And I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offspring after you.â€

Jer 32:39-40 “I will give them one heart and one way, that they may fear me forever, for their own good and the good of their children after them. I will make with them an everlasting covenant, that I will not turn away from doing good to them. And I will put the fear of me in their hearts, that they may not turn from me.

Eze 37:24-28 “They shall not defile themselves anymore with their idols and their detestable things, or with any of their transgressions. But I will save them from all the backslidings in which they have sinned, and will cleanse them; and they shall be my people, and I will be their God. "My servant David shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd. They shall walk in my rules and be careful to obey my statutes. They shall dwell in the land that I gave to my servant Jacob, where your fathers lived. They and their children and their children's children shall dwell there forever, and David my servant shall be their prince forever. I will make a covenant of peace with them. It shall be an everlasting covenant with them. And I will set them in their land and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in their midst forevermore. My dwelling place shall be with them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Then the nations will know that I am the LORD who sanctifies Israel, when my sanctuary is in their midst forevermore."
 
-----Part 3----​


So. We have come a long ways, and even though we have left the topic so it seems, we have to set a foundation. See the work, and role of the Spirit is the ‘seal’ of this new covenant. The one before had a mediator between God and man, and he was man. The new one has a Mediator and He is Jesus. This is also where the ‘trinity’ comes into play because we must understand that just as Jesus is fully God, so too is the Spirit fully Jesus.

So the Spirit inside of us is the mediator. Take all of this in for a second. Then read this next part with open eyes.

Heb 8:1-2 “Now the point in what we are saying is this: we have such a high priest, one who is seated at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, a minister in the holy places, in the true tent that the Lord set up, not man.â€

Heb 8:5-10 “They serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things. For when Moses was about to erect the tent, he was instructed by God, saying, "See that you make everything according to the pattern that was shown you on the mountain." But as it is, Christ has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old, as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises.†For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second. For he finds fault with them when he says: "Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will establish a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt. For they did not continue in my covenant, and so I showed no concern for them, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.â€

Heb 8:13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

Now, before we go any further we have to understand what He is saying. The old covenant of the law is the one He is making obsolete. But He still has an ‘eternal’ covenant in place with Abraham, He did back then, and He does even still today. It is different from even this 'new' covenant. And this ‘new’ covenant?

Heb 9:1 “Now even the first covenant[covenant of law] had regulations for worship and an earthly place of holiness.

So catch that, the first(actually second if we are really counting, but you will see why the writer calls it the first later) covenant had regulations. So to the second(third if we are counting, but second in relationship to our role) too has regulations. The writer of Hebrews then goes on to talk about the shedding of blood, and how the first was inaugurated with it, and likewise the second also by Jesus blood.

The first one could not make the ‘conscience’ of the person clear, because it was never a ‘perfect’ sacrifice. But the second makes the conscience of the person clear because it is perfect. And now, we come to the work and role of the Spirit inside a believer. The difference between the OT and NT.

Heb 10:14-23 “For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified. And the Holy Spirit also bears witness to us; for after saying, "This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws on their hearts, and write them on their minds," then he adds, "I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more." Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin. Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain, that is, through his flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful.

What we must realize is that this new covenant we are under, it is like the old in a way, it is to confine us under faith. But it is not the eternal one that He speaks about. The eternal one is the one that is coming when Jesus comes to rule and reign forever. When He banishes all sin from Jacob, and cleanses all impurities from Israel. We still live in unredeemed flesh, the earth is still not yet been redeemed, we are not under the eternal covenant…..EXCEPT for the one that is intact right now….the one of FAITH.

This ‘current’ covenant, #3, or #2 if we are talking about ‘temporary’ ones. Is this one we are under, that of Grace. The covenant which says He is in our hearts by the Spirit bearing witness to us of that which is to come. The Spirits work is to bring about a continuance of Faith in the life of a believer.

Heb 10:28-29 “Anyone who has set aside the law of Moses dies without mercy on the evidence of two or three witnesses. How much worse punishment, do you think, will be deserved by the one who has spurned the Son of God, and has profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has outraged the Spirit of grace?â€

According to Ezekiel 37, we "could not" set aside the eternal covenant. Because under it there is absolute no sin. We know that there is still sin around us. Not only that, but we do not live in the 'land' as of yet. But we still have complete confidence. It is just the confidence that comes through faith. Just like that of Abraham's.

This ‘current’ covenant is one that says we are free from ritualistic things. We are free to serve God with a clear conscience. That is the Spirits role. To purify our minds through the word of faith. So that we serve Him with all that is in us. Looking on to the end of our faith, the redemption of our bodies, and the fulfillment of the eternal covenant.

Heb 10:35-36 “Therefore do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward.†For you have need of endurance, so that when you have done the will of God you may receive what is promised. For, "Yet a little while, and the coming one will come and will not delay{{EVEN SO, COME LORD JESUS COME!!!}}; but my righteous one shall live by faith(Heb 11:1), and if he shrinks back, my soul has no pleasure in him." But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who have faith and preserve their souls.â€

The promises we have now, the covenant we have now, is to enable us to continue in faith. We get this ‘covenant’ mixed up with the eternal covenant. Where it does foreshadow the eternal covenant, it is only a shadow of things to come. The better is still waiting for us. The reason for the Spirit to come 'in' us, is to enact the ‘new’ covenant under grace. And through this grace we enter faith upon faith. So that those who were far off can now be brought near.

I hope this makes sense. There is a lot too it, in fact, I have always said that you have to take the whole Bible into consideration when dealing with Salvation because Salvation is a person not a thing, and we know that the whole of Scripture was to point to that Person, Jesus the Christ.
 
Bravo, Nathan! Wonderful exposition of Scripture. There is no approach to Scripture like a thorough one. I read every bit of it. You seem to have a very good understanding of the covenant from the OT to NT and how they interacted. I too agree with each of your points, and I find your point particularly salient that it is by the Spirit that we have access to the heavenly tabernacle, as you quoted in Hebrews, and to the holy of holies behind the veil (acting as the Spirit of Christ to us in the mystery of the Trinity). Surely this is what the seal of the Spirit is in our lives, to authenticate that we have come under this covenant (a treaty, and agreement) with God by grace. This aspect of what you have said I have never thought otherwise of, and it is the Spirit's continuing role in the life of the believer and of the corporate Body of Christ. And saving faith has never left this picture, for one must carry it unto the end to live the Christian life and to be ultimately saved in the end.

Now, however (moving on), what can we also say of the Spirit's work of regeneration in Titus 3:5 at the moment we believed as I pointed out above? What can we say of the Spirit's work at that moment to regenerate us at the beginning of our faith?

You perhaps were stalled or tripped up by my mention of some "one-time" things that I saw you had asked me about, and by all means I understand your point & possible hesitation (the most) about salvation not just being "one event" in the past, but indeed I understand the nuance that salvation is spoken of in the past, present, and future tense all in Scripture. That is also undeniable. But for the purposes of what I am trying to discuss we must also affirm the undeniable truth that there is a particular past sense of "saved" that happens immediately upon believing (and, by happenstance, Titus 3:5 is one of those passages that speaks of "saved" in past tense, though there are several scriptures that used "saved" as well). But, lets leave "salvation" for a moment so that I can clear up what I mentioned as "one-time" things. I will do this in the form of questions.

Will you not agree that we are only justified once? Would you agree that we are only Baptized by the Spirit once, which also encorporates us into the Body of believers (1 Cor. 12:13)? Would you also agree that we are regenerated (Titus 3:5) only once, though as we are commanded we are always to be sanctifying and "renewing" our heart and mind?

If you do agree, then I would say that you can now understand to what I refered as "one-time" things. Now beyond that point I only mean to point that out in relation to "when" (chronlogically) this happens, not for some kind of theological idea that "We get it all in one deal, and then we're done bubby!" type thing. It never even entered into my mind! I made my point for chronlogical considerations only (as Mondar picked up and explicated quite well by asking whether regeneration comes before or after "salvation" - and that was along the lines of what I was asking). Edit: Also see below my tweak of "one-time" to "one moment" terminiology.

You can now see my response to Mondar's post above, if you would like to bounce some more discussion off of that, but now that you see we are in full agreement on that wonderful three part post you just made (that is a starting point of agreement for us), I want to ask you to also consider whether the Spirit has a role also in our salvation (as it relates to regeneration). I still have not entirely resolved that regeneration and salvation are different at all, they are inseperable at the very least (to the point that I would say, "If you have one, you have the other"). Thus with this line of reasoning I can say very clearly, from what I understand of Titus 3:5, "The Spirit upon our profession of saving faith in Christ Jesus regenerates us, gives us a new heart, transfers the imputation of Christ's blood to us (therefore justifying us), and (as God) inhabits us, incorporates us into the Body of Believers, all thereby saving us upon our profession of faith." This is what I wanted your thoughts on. And if you would please quote that specific area of my post where I dealt with Titus 3:5 above, just so I know what in particulr you are commenting on, that would be great.

But do you see all of that I just italicized about what I believe the Spirit does for us all in one moment when we first believe? I gather all this especially from all the evidences in Acts of where people have gone (in literally one sitting) from being unbelievers (even if seekers like John's disciples in Acts 19:2), to hearing the word of God, to professing their faith in it (and sometimes immediately thereafter water baptized), and then immediately indwelt by the Spirit and filled and brought into God's family (including being saved, justified, regenerated, and filled by means of the Holy Spirit). In the case of the Gentiles this was evident that all this had happened at that moment when Peter said, "Can anyone keep these people from being baptized with water? They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have" (Acts 10:47) and also, later, more fully recounted the full truth of what had happened at that moment of faith:

15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them just as He did upon us at the beginning.
16"And I remembered the word of the Lord, how He used to say, 'John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.'
17"Therefore if God gave to them the same gift as He gave to us also after believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God's way?"
18When they heard this, they quieted down and glorified God, saying, "Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life."

So here we see that they received the Holy Spirit, were baptized in the Holy Spirit, and were granted repentance (thus saved & justified) that leads to (eternal) life (through the Spirit - as Jesus spoke of the living water welling up to eternal life, which was the Spirit) right after/upon believing. And Peter compared all this to what had happened also for them "at the beginning" (which is a statement of what had happened at one time in the past) at that one moment that they first had faith all these riches were given to them to usher them into the kingdom. Did it stop there? Absolutely not! But did it start there? You bettcha! :) So perhaps further discuss with me if you agree about the Spirit's role in regeneration and salvation all at this moment, upon believing. So more than focusing on my "one-time" point (which I tried to clarify was a chronological concern) perhaps focus on the more clear "one moment" (which implies the "time" component). And not that time is as all important, but rather that all these things (salvation, regeneration, justification, baptizing by the Spirit) happen upon believing, and that (I believe, according to Scriptures) the Holy Spirit has the central role in affecting this in us (as the very Spirit of Jesus, in the mystery of the Trinity).

That is what I would like to get your thoughts on. And please feel free to comment on my post above about Titus 3:5 and my understanding of it.

God Bless!

~Josh
 
And why do I even care when or if this all happens when a new person believes, if you care to ask me? So that I can expose and present the whole council of God unto the new believer in telling them confidently that when they believed that all these things were done and granted unto them by their Heavenly Father by means of His grace, by the Power of Jesus' blood and His power of an indestructible/eternal Life (Hebrews 7:16), and through the working of the Holy Spirit who now indwells them as God's Temple and has regenerated them, given them gifts of the Spirit, and empowers them now to do good works for the glory of God.

This I wholeheartedly believe and affirm.

Soli Deo Gloria.
 
Surely this is what the seal of the Spirit is in our lives, to authenticate that we have come under this covenant (a treaty, and agreement) with God by grace.

You nailed it dude! Although I would say 'authority' of 'positional standing' instead of 'treaty or agreement'.

But for the purposes of what I am trying to discuss we must also affirm the undeniable truth that there is a particular past sense of "saved" that happens immediately upon believing (and, by happenstance, Titus 3:5 is one of those passages that speaks of "saved" in past tense, though there are several scriptures that used "saved" as well)

Right on! And yes, I probably was tripped up...:nono2 Its a weakness of mine to let something 'dwell' on my mind when I should just look past it and move on. I am working on it. He is still working on me..:yes

Will you not agree that we are only justified once? Would you agree that we are only Baptized by the Spirit once, which also encorporates us into the Body of believers (1 Cor. 12:13)? Would you also agree that we are regenerated (Titus 3:5) only once, though as we are commanded we are always to be sanctifying and "renewing" our heart and mind?

Completely, absolutely, 100%, not a thought otherwise. You and I are ONE in mind on this. But I bet we are not the only ones. ;)

I want to ask you to also consider whether the Spirit has a role also in our salvation (as it relates to regeneration). I still have not entirely resolved that regeneration and salvation are different at all, they are inseperable at the very least (to the point that I would say, "If you have one, you have the other").

Ok, I am starting to grasp your thoughts now. I am so sorry Josh, I can be very slow sometimes...

Thus with this line of reasoning I can say very clearly, from what I understand of Titus 3:5, "The Spirit upon our profession of saving faith in Christ Jesus regenerates us, gives us a new heart, transfers the imputation of Christ's blood to us (therefore justifying us), and (as God) inhabits us, incorporates us into the Body of Believers, all thereby saving us upon our profession of faith."

This is a tuff one Josh. And I do not mean to nit pick words. I hope you understand. Let me break it down if I may.



The Spirit upon our profession of saving faith in Christ Jesus regenerates us...

Yes. 2Corinthians 5:17 leaves NO wiggle room to say that we are not 'new' creations. This is where a good understanding of who 'we' are comes into play, but I have dealt with that in the past and am not going into in right now.

...gives us a new heart...

This is where I am falling short. I have said it before, that we indeed get a new one, but after some good study and thorough exposition of Biblical passages, I am actually starting to lean toward the idea that we have not received a 'new' heart as such. Its hard for me to say that, but let me explain why.

That 3 page discourse...lol. Josh, until today, I have never thought of the covenants as such myself. I just looked at them with faith. I had never drawn it all together like that. I was amazed, and like you mentioned before, I was completely satisfied with the living water that I found flowing from the passages. Until today, I did not have a very good understanding of the differences in the Covenants. I just was provoked by mondars post, at the 'discourse' is the fruit of it. Praise God.

But here is what I am seeing. I think we are 'mixing up' the fulfillment of the 'eternal covenant' with the 2nd 'temporal' covenant. I use the word temporal very loosely. I trust that you understand what I mean.

Jeremiah speaks of a covenant that God establishes when He 'writes the law on our hearts, and in our minds'. The new heart covenant is found in Ezekiel. Is it the same covenant? While there are similarities, I cannot say with absolute certainty.

Here is what gives me pause to the 'absolute new' heart.

Heb 10:22 "let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water."

Ok. So, if we had a 'new' heart, why would it need to be sprinkled clean? This is in reference to the ceremonial sprinkling of the blood. This is not the same as having a 'completely different new heart'. Do you see why I have pause now?

Heb 13:9 "Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them."

If our new hearts were new and complete, as the prophecy of the covenant in Ezekiel proclaims, then why would it need to be 'strengthened'? But this could just be a issue of word usage. But this, along with the previous, and then along with all the other mentions of our 'heart' in the NT now gives me pause to say that we have been indeed given this new heart. I think it is still yet to come. Does that lead to a bad train of thought, to believe that?

...transfers the imputation of Christ's blood to us (therefore justifying us)...

Yes. We have been 'washed' in the blood. Romans 5:9 and;

1 Jn 1:7 "if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin."

...and (as God) inhabits us, incorporates us into the Body of Believers, all thereby saving us upon our profession of faith.

Yes, He inhabits us by the Spirit. And yes, He 'brings' us to a 'body' that is 'knit' together by Him. But again, where I have to take issue with words is with the word "saving". So many people take it to mean so many different things.

It would take pages upon pages to list out everything, and the different combinations of 'being saved'. But this is what we do know for sure.

Eph 2:5-6 "even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— 6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus"

Are we really sitting up there with Christ? Well, obviously not literally, but we are positionally. And how is this possible? Through faith.

Eph 2:8 "For by grace you have been saved through faith."

You know. I think that the little dude named Jude...:)...said it best;

Jude 5 "Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe."

I think that we confuse the 'absolute' saved condition of our sins being paid for in full, with the 'future' saved condition of eternity.

That is not to say we should fear, or worry, or doubt. We do 'have' all these things through faith. Faith is the channel through which everything flows. We have these things now, but only through the eyes of faith. Which is why it is IMPERATIVE to have the Spirit to dwell in our lives, and to not grieve Him. For it is by Him we have this faith 'given' to us. Its a constant flow of faith flowing into us by the Living Word of God.



So perhaps further discuss with me if you agree about the Spirit's role in regeneration and salvation all at this moment, upon believing. So more than focusing on my "one-time" point (which I tried to clarify was a chronological concern) perhaps focus on the more clear "one moment" (which implies the "time" component). And not that time is as all important, but rather that all these things (salvation, regeneration, justification, baptizing by the Spirit) happen upon believing, and that (I believe, according to Scriptures) the Holy Spirit has the central role in affecting this in us (as the very Spirit of Jesus, in the mystery of the Trinity).

lol. I think I understand your 'one-time' thing now. No worries.

You are, in my mind, on the right track with the above bolded statement. One more thing to consider about the work that is ongoing in our lives.

Heb 10:8-10 "When he said above, “You have neither desired nor taken pleasure in sacrifices and offerings and burnt offerings and sin offerings” (these are offered according to the law), 9 then he added, “Behold, I have come to do your will.” He abolishes the first in order to establish the second. 10 And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all."

Ok, so you got this in mind? Now look at what the writer says on down a few verses;

Heb 10:12-14 "But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, 13 waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. 14 For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified."

So which is it? We have 'been' sanctified? Or we 'are being' sanctified? Is it double talk? No, I do not think so. Because it is a sure thing in the eyes of faith. Faith see's it afar off, and is assured by it. Faith is confidence that because God said it, He will do it. But I think that where this all comes down to a head is with the work of the Spirit in our lives.

So it is a very, very good thing that you are bringing this up and studying it. I wish I could go on. And I will study more myself. It saddens me to a extent because tomorrow I am going out of town and will not be closer than 10 miles from electricity, much less a computer, much less internet access. lol. But I am going to pray earnestly that He will speak to me in a mighty way out there and I will have much to share when I return. I look forward to hearing the rest of your studies on this. I know it has helped me immensely.
 
When one is IN CHRIST Rom. 8:1, he is perfect with NO CONDEMNATION, OK? It matters not if it was O.T. or N.T. Heb. 11:13. Now: as you have said over & over again, we [GO FORWARD] Rom. 8:14's LEADING. And what has happened to the [New Heart]? It either MATURES into [[[[MATURE]]]] Perfection, or it matures into James 1:15's MATURE [HEART REJECTION]. (one or the other of 1 John 5:16-17) That final thought is that Adam + Lucifer as I see it, needed NO Born Again heart, they were both created with it! The requirement of the Godhead was for Their created PERFECT creation that was not CREATED MATURE PERFECT TO BECOME MATURELY PERFECT. But [ALL] the perfect provisions were theirs to use. Phil. 4:13

Which was the 'Perfect' Eternal Ten Commantment Covenant for these ones Standard of The Godheads Requirement! The 'Epistle' of Christ! 2 Cor. 3:3. (from Eternity to Eternity!)
So 'OUR BORN AGAIN HEARTS' daily need re/WASHING as we slowly move forward.


--Elijah

Heb 10:22 "let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water."

Ok. So, if we had a 'new' heart, why would it need to be sprinkled clean? This is in reference to the ceremonial sprinkling of the blood. This is not the same as having a 'completely different new heart'. Do you see why I have pause now?

Heb 13:9 "Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them."

If our new hearts were new and complete, as the prophecy of the covenant in Ezekiel proclaims, then why would it need to be 'strengthened'? But this could just be a issue of word usage. But this, along with the previous, and then along with all the other mentions of our 'heart' in the NT now gives me pause to say that we have been indeed given this new heart. I think it is still yet to come. Does that lead to a bad train of thought, to believe that?
 
When one is IN CHRIST Rom. 8:1, he is perfect with NO CONDEMNATION, OK? It matters not if it was O.T. or N.T. Heb. 11:13. Now: as you have said over & over again, we [GO FORWARD] Rom. 8:14's LEADING. And what has happened to the [New Heart]? It either MATURES into [[[[MATURE]]]] Perfection, or it matures into James 1:15's MATURE [HEART REJECTION]. (one or the other of 1 John 5:16-17) That final thought is that Adam + Lucifer as I see it, needed NO Born Again heart, they were both created with it! The requirement of the Godhead was for Their created PERFECT creation that was not CREATED MATURE PERFECT TO BECOME MATURELY PERFECT. [U


I hope I am not taking you out of context, let me know if I am. But this is exactly what I am leaning toward, the fact that the 'new' heart is still yet to come. I have never considered it a maturing of the current state. But what I do believe is that when we are 'matured', and in the resurrection, when we receive our new 'bodies' we also receive the 'one heart' as described in Ezekiel.

The fact that God has now put the law into my heart and mind, it is constantly before me, 'perfecting' me. Or as we more commonly call it, sanctifying me. When that work is done I will become mature in Christ, and He will be fully 'formed in me'. Thus us becoming completely 'one'. Galatians 4:19

Gal 5:5 "For through the Spirit, by faith, we ourselves eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness."

Gal 6:7-8 "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life."

So the purpose of the indwelling Spirit now is to 'plant' those things that will eventually 'mature' into eternal life. 1 Corinthians chapter 15 has a lot to say about this.

1Pe 1:22-23 "Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart, since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God;"

We have been 'born again' by the Seed of God. There is your difference Josh, I think. The seed planted in the OT saints was not an 'abiding' seed. It had to be 'continually' renewed. The Seed that we have been 'born again' by is one that abides and grows deep inside us to produce those things that lead to maturity in the faith.

I dunno. There is a lot to think about. lol. I am signing off for a while. Looking forward to coming back and reading more discussion on this.
 
As for your conclusion though I still have a question though regarding the relationship between the "giving" of the Spirit (a NT "fulfillment" promise [given in Ezekiel & Joel] - whereas "rested upon" in the OT seems more common place) and regeneration. Ezekiel 36 ties the giving (or "putting in you") of the Spirit to that regeneration, but how can we say that the regeneration by the giving of the Spirit in the NT is not different in some regard than what might be called regeneration in the OT? One of the issues I raised in an earlier post is the seeming lack of permanence of the Holy Spirit in the OT (there was even a "corporate" vision of the Spirit departing from the Temple & Israel in Ezekiel), and during the days of the Tabernacle God's presence was still largely external, with a future promise to "dwell among you" in the Pentatuech. So there is some relationship between the giving/habitation/dwelling of the Holy Spirit to NT saints that I do not think can be seen to the same degree of completeness in the OT. It seems that the Spirit residing in NT saints is a new thing, and that regeneration is its consequence. So how do you resolve this question? Do you at least see what I am getting at/where I'm coming from? I honestly want to hear you continue your thoughts along the same lines and insights that you have made so far in the above post in answer to these questions as well.

I am eager to hear your response.

God Bless,

~Josh

Josh, you do raise thoughtful questions. Some of your questions would take a part of a book to answer adequately. It involves a massive amount of systematic theology, and also major issues in methods of approaching the OT and NT. I am not sure I can adequately answer the questions with the time I have available. Also, you are stretching the abilities I have to communicate what I believe.

Let me begin the discussion with a text. Acts 2 and Joel 2. I do not see Acts 2 as the "fulfillment" of Joel two. I do see Acts 2 as exactly what the language says.....
16 but this is that which hath been spoken through the prophet Joel:
Notice that the term is "this is that"
Now most readers would ask what is the difference between "this is that" and "fulfilled?"
*****Let me illustrate. If I (a multi-billionaire) have promise to give you $1 on Christmas, and then Thanksgiving comes and I give NathanielHooper $1, have I "fulfilled" my promise to you? No, of course not.
But can I say to NathanielHooper... "this is that which was spoken by me to cyberjosh?"
Is that a correct use of language?
Now let me also ask you if I broke my word to you on Thanksgiving? No, I can still wait until Christmas and give you the $1 and that would "fulfill" my promise.

So then, my first conclusion, is that while Gods OT promises were to a specific group of people (Israel) and will be "fulfilled" in a specific way, this does not limit God to giving the HS to only Israel. You could say his grace superabounded to we Gentiles today.

Now let me ask another question. If I am correct, and God never really promised the HS to Gentiles today, and yet he chose to give the HS to gentiles, and if that is fair, then what would keep him from giving the HS as he chooses to OT saints? Can God's grace superabound that far?

Maybe the question is how far can Gods grace abound? Is Gods grace limited in any way by his promise? Can he give the HS to all he chooses? I would say as long as he does not promise not to give the HS he is free to give the HS in any way he chooses at any time. God did promise the HS to the a specific group of Jews that are returning back to the land in Ezekiel. But he did not promise them that they will be the only group of people to receive grace or the HS.

Now let me ask another question.... is there any evidence of the promises of the HS occuring in the OT. What do the psalms mean when David says "take not you Spirit from me." What does the OT mean when God says David is a man "after Gods own heart?"

It seems logical to me to accept the NT as an explicit "Fuller Revelation" of the things mentioned implicitly in the OT. I say this, referring to G Vos, and his book, "A Biblical Theology." In that book, Vos suggested a methodology of "progressive revelation." In that book, the concepts of scripture are progressively revealed. So then, understanding the ministries of the HS in that way would mean nothing has changed between NT and OT. On the other hand, the later language of scripture might not be the same as the earlier language.

So then, OT terms like "poured out," or "filled with the Spirit" or "came upon" can refer to a variety of later ministries of the HS. It can include a temporary "filling" of the Spirit for ministry, or can refer the NT ministry of regeneration. As you look at the OT terms, when there is a NT reference explaining the OT term, you can take that as an explicit reference to a certain ministry of the HS. But I would not agree that if one prophetic passage in the OT uses a term like "filled" to refer to regeneration, or some specific ministry of the HS, that all and any reference to "filled" refer to the same thing.

Josh, may God be with you as you seek to understand the scriptures.
 
nathaniel said:
So it is a very, very good thing that you are bringing this up and studying it. I wish I could go on. And I will study more myself. It saddens me to a extent because tomorrow I am going out of town and will not be closer than 10 miles from electricity, much less a computer, much less internet access. lol. But I am going to pray earnestly that He will speak to me in a mighty way out there and I will have much to share when I return. I look forward to hearing the rest of your studies on this. I know it has helped me immensely.

Well God bless you Nathan for sincerely entering into this study with me! I think we all will learn many things from this. I will respond to the rest of your post, but I don't want to do it without a Bible on hand (I'm at work on lunch break now) and I want some time to soak in some of these ideas tonight and continue my study. Maybe time to absorb this over the weekend will be good for both of us. But I will come back and respond to this when I have more time.

P.S. Same for you Mondar. I want to continue our conversation as well.

God Bless!

~Josh
 
Hi Guys! Thank you again for helping me tackle this issue after so many years (as the OP indicated, it was an older curiosity/question of mine). I'm glad I brought it back up. I never realized how important Ezekiel 36-37 was on this matter and after reading some commentaries the last couple days by competent scholars and theologians on Ezekiel I have come to realize that there is in fact lots of material available that is dedicated to exploring, debating, and answering this problem of the differences between the Spirit's operations in the OT & NT. And thank you Mondar for taking a sympathetic approach to my questions in the way that you did! It has given me peace of mind and motivation to continue digging in Scripture for the true answers.

mondar said:
Josh, you do raise thoughtful questions. Some of your questions would take a part of a book to answer adequately. It involves a massive amount of systematic theology, and also major issues in methods of approaching the OT and NT.

Indeed, and in fact I would love to read any material that does explore this systematically. I was going to ask if you knew of any resources for this, and the question is still open? In the mean time, as I said above, I have been looking at commentaries and other resources and I came across this book entitled "He Who Gives Life: The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit" by Graham A. Cole, and on this page he asks the question of whether the OT saints were regenerated. I am especially appreciative of the footnotes that acknowledge previous works that discuss this, and his first footnote on that page (fn. #54) mentions his indebtedness to an article by James Hamilton called "Old Covenant Believers and the Indwelling Spirit: A Survey of the Spectrum of Opinion" (which, as you can see from the link, I was luckily able to find through google) and it looks excellent - I haven't gotten around to reading all of it yet though. In another footnote he mentions another article (which I have not been able to find a PDF for yet) entitled, "Was the Holy Spirit active in Old Testament Times? What was New about the Christian Experience of God?" by John Goldingay, which sounds like precisely the question I have been asking! I hope I can find that one as well. If you find it please give me a link to it. So anyway, I have found some resources on this and definitely will be investigating more in the upcoming days or weeks (even).

This will end up being an on-going Bible study for me probably, but I will try to summarize my findings here as I discover new things on the topic. I don't know if this conversation will go to a minimum while I'm off studying these things, but we can always revive it at a later time when any of us are better prepared to address those specific questions of the HS's operations in a systematic fashion. Anyway, Mondar tell me what you think of those two articles on this topic. I haven't finished reading them myself yet, but I thought I'd pass it on while it was still fresh on my mind.

Edit:
- Here is another article I found by James Hamilton that seems to correspond to the above article: Were Old Covenant Believers Indwelt by the Holy Spirit?
- More bibliographical sources, one of which is the Goldingay article, among others, for this topic are here: See footnote #17.

God Bless,

~Josh
 
Well I am back. I was expecting to be overwhelmed with information. But I can see that the wheels are turning hard at the mill, and I am looking forward to 'eating some bread' from their work.

On that note. I find it somewhat interesting at times. Think about it. We often times talk about the Holy Spirit as some 'mystical' force. I mean, in our heart of hearts we believe...but do we? I mean, if we really believed without any doubt, would that not be manifested in our nature of being able to discern the different roles that He, Himself, has played in past times?

I mean, if He is the same yesterday, today, and forever (which He is) then would that not dictate that the very fact that He is constantly abiding in us mean that we have that knowledge at hand if He so chooses to give it? I have to sit back in amazement at the fact when Peter was baptized in the Spirit, how he stood up and gave a speech like he did compared to how he was before it.

Anyways, what I am getting at is why do we look to other people for information about things like this? Please do not take that the wrong way. I know it could sound bad on the screen...lol. Please understand my tone of voice is very much sincere. I do understand why we talk about things like this among ourselves, but in all reality, would you not agree that seeing how we both have the same exact Spirit living in us, that He could not 'supernaturally' bring wisdom and understanding on something like this? And while I am not saying He cannot, or will not, use discussion like this among ourselves to bring about the understanding; would you not agree that the answer is to the question at hand is contained in the Bible?

I dunno. Maybe its just me, subconsciously, trying to provoke you to go deeper Spiritually...lol. Please, again, do not take this negatively. I just found it interesting that we are studying the very Person that lives in us, and found it somewhat ironic and similar if the president was standing in the room and we were talking about him...batting ideas about his actions before he was president verses after he was president...all the while he is standing right there in the midst of us. Which does not mean that this kind of study does not promote good thought processes, it just seemed like that hit me this morning.
 
I hope I am not taking you out of context, let me know if I am. But this is exactly what I am leaning toward, the fact that the 'new' heart is still yet to come. I have never considered it a maturing of the current state. But what I do believe is that when we are 'matured', and in the resurrection, when we receive our new 'bodies' we also receive the 'one heart' as described in Ezekiel.

The fact that God has now put the law into my heart and mind, it is constantly before me, 'perfecting' me. Or as we more commonly call it, sanctifying me. When that work is done I will become mature in Christ, and He will be fully 'formed in me'. Thus us becoming completely 'one'. Galatians 4:19

Gal 5:5 "For through the Spirit, by faith, we ourselves eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness."

Gal 6:7-8 "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life."

So the purpose of the indwelling Spirit now is to 'plant' those things that will eventually 'mature' into eternal life. 1 Corinthians chapter 15 has a lot to say about this.

1Pe 1:22-23 "Having purified your souls by your obedience to the truth for a sincere brotherly love, love one another earnestly from a pure heart, since you have been born again, not of perishable seed but of imperishable, through the living and abiding word of God;"

We have been 'born again' by the Seed of God. There is your difference Josh, I think. The seed planted in the OT saints was not an 'abiding' seed. It had to be 'continually' renewed. The Seed that we have been 'born again' by is one that abides and grows deep inside us to produce those things that lead to maturity in the faith.

I dunno. There is a lot to think about. lol. I am signing off for a while. Looking forward to coming back and reading more discussion on this.

Hi Elijah here:
Was Lucifer a flawed creation of God at his start? Perfect Eze. 28 states 'until..' OK: he was a free moral agent of the highest order. (no programed robot) Was he created with PERFECT MATURITY? If so why did he fall? Did the forum get that question?? Being Rom. 8:1 Perfect with NO CONDEMNATION is not being Maturely Perfect! If so, why even have a verse 14 of being [LED] of the Holy Spirit??

Now we come to Adam & Eve. The Word says created VERY GOOD. And unless one does think that the Godhead created flawed creations, they also were Perfect. (structure, IQ +) Even in the Image of God. Even as with what Moses saw as His hand & hindparts. Not His Face!

But here is the point. In the VERY MIDST OF THE GARDEN there was the forbidden Tree! Why??
Testing! Maturing purpose! As we see in Heb. a chapter 5 & then if 'we are able' a chapter 6.
And children?? Heb. 12:4-8. (and verse 8 is loaded with KNOWLEDGE! ;))

And I will quit on this one here. But Cain in Gen. 4:4-8 surely was maturing from childhood up until near this time where Christ talked with him persoaly. Never do we ever have a verse otherwise until now. There is a [mature] time (Lev. 17:8-9) that maturing is a serious matter. (as David was inspired to pen in Ps. 19:13) It seems that satan also was wanting the COMPLETE Cain for his own. You can read or re/read what took place. But do not miss the MATURING process that went the opposite that Christ wanted it to. He even asked Cain if he did what was right, would he not be accepted? And of course he would have been! And sure, the Godhead knew in eternity what this freedom of Worship would cost them, from their enormus cost of Christ death, to the Eternal Loss of Lucifer + Cain and [ALL OF satans ETERNAL LOST Desirees].
And you can be sure that ALL OF THESE ONES HAD THE HOLY SPIRIT AT ONE TIME! Acts 5:32 (see Saul in 1 Sam. 10:6-9)
 
Hi Nathan!

Nathan said:
This is where I am falling short. I have said it before, that we indeed get a new one, but after some good study and thorough exposition of Biblical passages, I am actually starting to lean toward the idea that we have not received a 'new' heart as such. Its hard for me to say that, but let me explain why.

I'd be very glad to discuss this with you. I'm pretty sure that I saw another thread that you posted in about this (was it with StoveBolts?) where you mentioned you had been studying the "new heart" topic. Perhaps we can discuss it there if you can direct me to it, because it certainly deserves to be discussed but is a whole topic of its own. Also, as I will elaborate in another post below, I think you could benefit from reading that article by James Hamilton. I found that as I was reading it it openned up so many trains of thought on this topic and also drew upon things related to the Spirit such as regeneration, the new heart, salvation, indwelling, etc and it got really rich! At one point I remember James giving a particularly cogent point about the change of heart in the OT and I thought to myself, "I should let Nathan know about that, that might help him with his question!" but now I've forgotten which page. I might go back and look.

Nathan said:
That 3 page discourse...lol. Josh, until today, I have never thought of the covenants as such myself. I just looked at them with faith. I had never drawn it all together like that. I was amazed, and like you mentioned before, I was completely satisfied with the living water that I found flowing from the passages. Until today, I did not have a very good understanding of the differences in the Covenants. I just was provoked by mondars post, at the 'discourse' is the fruit of it. Praise God.

And you did a marvelous job! See? That's why I do like studying things like this. At the least, they provoke us to dig deeper in the Word of God(!), no? This is why I like collaborative discussion. It can be very edifying among those who believe when they share in the truths of the Word of God! This is my version of fellowship (minus the Baptist potlucks ;-) ).

God Bless,

~Josh
 
Anyways, what I am getting at is why do we look to other people for information about things like this? Please do not take that the wrong way. I know it could sound bad on the screen..lol. Please understand my tone of voice is very much sincere. I do understand why we talk about things like this among ourselves, but in all reality, would you not agree that seeing how we both have the same exact Spirit living in us, that He could not 'supernaturally' bring wisdom and understanding on something like this? And while I am not saying He cannot, or will not, use discussion like this among ourselves to bring about the understanding; would you not agree that the answer is to the question at hand is contained in the Bible?

I dunno. Maybe its just me, subconsciously, trying to provoke you to go deeper Spiritually. Please, again, do not take this negatively. I just found it interesting that we are studying the very Person that lives in us, and found it somewhat ironic and similar if the president was standing in the room and we were talking about him...batting ideas about his actions before he was president verses after he was president...all the while he is standing right there in the midst of us.

I understand completely what you are saying Nathan, but please look at it another way with me. Yes, we indeed know this truth of the Spirit who is abiding in us and can teach us all things, and as I have already said this is no dry intellectual exercise for me, but the Scriptures were also meant for discussing and edifying one another among the saints. Some believers are even given gifts of teaching, preaching, and prophecy which allow them to expound the Scripture in clearer ways than others, and it can edify the Body by nurturing them in God's truth! Paul among the Greeks used to go to their public buildings and reason with them and discuss important matters. Some accepted the truth of his teaching, others rejected it, and we have the same choice when encountered with the Word of God, but there is much to be gained from collaborative discussion. I have heard people, when distorting the principle to an extreme, use the "The Spirit is in me and I have knowledge of God and have no need for anyone to teach me" (paraphrased from 1 John) to justify a position that there is "no need" to attend a Church or congregation of believers, because they can "teach themselves" (I'm not implying you were taking that position at all though - just making a related point). Not only is there no accountability or checks and balances against incorrect private interpretation, but they also consequently cut themselves off from the very life which the Spirit has corporately baptized them into when he grafted them into the full Body of Believers. This is why the author of Hebrews says that we should not forsake the gathering of ourselves together. I see these boards also as an extension of that fellowship, and it has personally been very valuable to me over the years.

I have even had incorrect views corrected on this board before, and have also found strengthening as well and supporting insights to things that I already held to be true and evident from Scripture. Both have helped keep me doctrinally on track, and I am very appreciative for this community. :)

Also, as you could tell from what I've said in this thread, this issue has been unresolved in my mind for almost 3 years now, and I decided that now is a time to settle the truth of the matter for myself. Do you know how maddening that can be when you feel you are on the precipice of something big, deep, and fundamental in your spiritual understanding but cannot quite grasp it? I cannot just sit in my chair and ask God to download the knowledge to me if I in turn put forth no effort to seek it myself. I DO read my Bible, and I do pray for understanding, but often seeking advice of others (and for me, being young, often from my elders) who have spiritual wisdom from experience the rich fruit of their own studies in Scripture, and in their own life, can open up immesurable riches of understanding and consolation to the one earnestly seeking the knowledge of truth. I believe God blesses such discussions if they are edifying. It certainly has helped me recently just discussing this matter, and getting it off my mind and chest. It's a releif, really, to bring it to a community who shares my own heart in seeking after God.

It is hard for me to describe how big this present question is for me, because (as I have often found in my own study of Scriptures) asking a question about one theological truth impacts our understanding about another theological truth and so on, and it can have a ripple effect. If our thinking is off, even slightly (and mine has been before in certain areas, and thankfully it was corrected to be back on track), it misaligns other truths which can then impact our understanding of yet other truths, whereas a correct understanding brings them all into alignment. They need to be in alignment so that we can rightly divide the Word of Truth when we relay it to someone else. Thus why we discuss such things.

----------------------------

I am a Computer Science major, and an IT guy by profession, and I find an analogy akin to my thoughts on this matter which may help you understand what I'm trying to say. I learned when I started studying algorithms (predefined patterns of code to calculate or accomplish some result - such as say a sorting algorithm) that you can write (as per my example) a "sorting" algorithm to take 1,000 numbers in random order and step through each one and compare the two and swap each number in the right direction until the 1,000 numbers are organized in ascending or descending order. A neat trick I learned is that for those algorithms that are notoriously hard to write you can write a partly working algortihm that can more simply sort (but not completely sort - it fails at some point to complete it correctly), say, 90% of the numbers in correct order - but there will be a remaining 10% of the numbers roughly dispersed through the (now mostly sorted) list of 1,000 numbers that are then still out of order. Sometimes we learned that in the real world (depending on the application) this may be "good enough", if you only needed to see the main trend (and not the outliers) of the number values, but still you leave 10% unaccounted for/unsorted/unfinished. Similarly, I have found that by practical experience that even a basic yet naive/not-fully-matured understanding of the Bible's truths can indeed overlap and agree with the convictions of someone who has chewed on the meat of the Word and has a developed understanding of God's Word for a while (maybe they have even up to "90%" [as per my anaology] the same understanding on certain issues - often less though), but only up to a point, and then at some point they start to diverge in their understanding. I would say that between any two Christian denominations this overlap of belief exists up to a point and then they begin to diverge in their understanding. Sometimes we think that the other group would not even have such misunderstandings if they had the right foundation in doctrine in the first place (of course, though, they all say that :)). Anyway...

Let me further illustrate. Have you ever begun building or putting something together, and it seems to actually have been put together correctly thus far almost until the very last step and then you realize you did something slightly wrong but (because of it) cannot continue unless you go back and start it all over again? This is what happens when you build things on a faulty or even slightly faulty foundation. Yeah, it may work for a while, and even last as only half-done for a while, but up to a point when you want to complete it you find you were infact off to begin with. This is what happens each time I start down a road when my understanding of God's truths are slightly off and I wont notice it sometimes for even years because my very simple/basic understanding of the foundations of Christianity (yet simple enough and sufficient for saving faith! this is not something that is "eternally" impacting per se, not impacting on whether I'm saved or not) is solid and I will go on agreeing with every other Christian for a protracted period, until one digs real deep on a particular issue to examine a true understanding of what something means, and then I may realize my view is at odds with someone else and I have to figure out "Why?", if I believe what the bible says and so does the other person. Someone one must have sincerely misunderstood it. Much of this has come from rather innocent yet solid Baptist upbringing for me, but the thing is they instill certain assumptions in you that you seldom think about until it comes to a fork in the road that forces you to examine it. Thus why, to this day, I still find some of my former ways of thinking reformed as I read more and more Scripture (And shouldn't this be the reality for all Christians as we mature in our faith and understanding?) When something big becomes revealed I "reform my thinking" to adjust to the truth of Scriptures as best I can. And it is not necessarily always me who is off either: sometimes I come to the fork and realize that I took the right road and the person I'm talking with took the other road, and I need to try to correct their thinking (with gentleness and love, as Peter tells us) according to Scripture.

...continued below...
 
Anyway, I'm all about testing what we have heard, because it can ultimately reveal deeper truths of Scriptures to us.

P.S. Nathaniel, I think you would enjoy the discussion of how many different perspectives there are on the topic of this thread in James Hamilton's article (as it turns out there are 5 major views, including some who see unconditional absolute continuity in the operation of the HS between the OT & NT [meaning nothing at all changed, not even in manifestations], or close to the opposite [interestingly though he shows that no one actually takes the complete opposite view in saying that there is NO continuity at all] in that they believe that there is more discontinuity than continuity meaning the HS has indeed done a new work but still has some continuity with what He has always done in the OT saints, and then there are those in the middle with varying degrees of where they lean. All the views are thought provoking and reveal a different aspect of the truth of Scripture on this matter. I had the Bible study of my life after I read that article! I spent four hours yesterday comparing my thoughts to some other things francisdesales and TanNinety had said in that thread 3 years ago to my new musings (after taking some ideas from James Hamilton's article) about whether it can indeed be found to be true that indwelling and regeneration are in fact not the same, and I wrote ten pages of notes with different questions and their implications on the rest of Scripture. That's how deep I'm taking this. It's not some idle musing.

I ultimately came to the point where (foreseeing the ripple-effect consequences of either way I land on the issue) I realized an interesting connection between this issue about the operations of the HS and the theme in the NT of "Christ in you the hope of glory", and that unless THAT DOCTRINE is also examined then our understanding of the HS is incompelte. If you are scratching your head as to how I connected those two ideas :D, then all I can say is, "Study this for four hours like I did and see if you don't also see how far ranging the implications of this topic can be". We cannot study the Bible out of context, so sometimes one theological principle affects another, and it is all these various branches off the initial study of the HS that I am exploring now. It may take me a while but I am enjoying uncovering new depths to God's Word.

In the mean time I found out that James Hamilton wrote an entire book on this subject (a theology of pneumatology) which is a revised version of his Doctoral Dissertation at Theological Seminary and I purchased it on Amazon (Mondar might like this since he mentioned a systematic approach). It will be in the mail soon. It looks very interesting and may be instrumental in this study. The book is shown here if you would like to look at it: God's Indwelling Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Old and New Testaments. I'll let you know what I find.

God Bless,

~Josh
 
Anyway, I'm all about testing what we have heard, because it can ultimately reveal deeper truths of Scriptures to us.

P.S. Nathaniel, I think you would enjoy the discussion of how many different perspectives there are on the topic of this thread in James Hamilton's article (as it turns out there are 5 major views, including some who see unconditional absolute continuity in the operation of the HS between the OT & NT [meaning nothing at all changed, not even in manifestations], or close to the opposite [interestingly though he shows that no one actually takes the complete opposite view in saying that there is NO continuity at all] in that they believe that there is more discontinuity than continuity meaning the HS has indeed done a new work but still has some continuity with what He has always done in the OT saints, and then there are those in the middle with varying degrees of where they lean. All the views are thought provoking and reveal a different aspect of the truth of Scripture on this matter. I had the Bible study of my life after I read that article! I spent four hours yesterday comparing my thoughts to some other things francisdesales and TanNinety had said in that thread 3 years ago to my new musings (after taking some ideas from James Hamilton's article) about whether it can indeed be found to be true that indwelling and regeneration are in fact not the same, and I wrote ten pages of notes with different questions and their implications on the rest of Scripture. That's how deep I'm taking this. It's not some idle musing.

I ultimately came to the point where (foreseeing the ripple-effect consequences of either way I land on the issue) I realized an interesting connection between this issue about the operations of the HS and the theme in the NT of "Christ in you the hope of glory", and that unless THAT DOCTRINE is also examined then our understanding of the HS is incompelte. If you are scratching your head as to how I connected those two ideas :D, then all I can say is, "Study this for four hours like I did and see if you don't also see how far ranging the implications of this topic can be". We cannot study the Bible out of context, so sometimes one theological principle affects another, and it is all these various branches off the initial study of the HS that I am exploring now. It may take me a while but I am enjoying uncovering new depths to God's Word.

In the mean time I found out that James Hamilton wrote an entire book on this subject (a theology of pneumatology) which is a revised version of his Doctoral Dissertation at Theological Seminary and I purchased it on Amazon (Mondar might like this since he mentioned a systematic approach). It will be in the mail soon. It looks very interesting and may be instrumental in this study. The book is shown here if you would like to look at it: God's Indwelling Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Old and New Testaments. I'll let you know what I find.

God Bless,

~Josh

Elijah here: No checks or balances??? Just a couple are seen in Isa, 8:20 + 1 John 2:4. And nothing personal is meant! But then Jer. 17:5 is brought into my mind by the Holy Spirit. Rom. 8:14
 
Also, as you could tell from what I've said in this thread, this issue has been unresolved in my mind for almost 3 years now, and I decided that now is a time to settle the truth of the matter for myself. Do you know how maddening that can be when you feel you are on the precipice of something big, deep, and fundamental in your spiritual understanding but cannot quite grasp it? I cannot just sit in my chair and ask God to download the knowledge to me if I in turn put forth no effort to seek it myself. I DO read my Bible, and I do pray for understanding, but often seeking advice of others (and for me, being young, often from my elders) who have spiritual wisdom from experience the rich fruit of their own studies in Scripture, and in their own life, can open up immesurable riches of understanding and consolation to the one earnestly seeking the knowledge of truth. I believe God blesses such discussions if they are edifying. It certainly has helped me recently just discussing this matter, and getting it off my mind and chest. It's a releif, really, to bring it to a community who shares my own heart in seeking after God.

Just started reading your reply post(s). And I had to take a moment and just encourage you, and let you know you are also not alone in this matter. Most importantly, with limited words of being able to express what I feel, let it suffice to say that I in NO way think that bringing this kind of topic to the forum for discussion is a bad thing. I would be a hypocrite to say it is, and then turn right around and do the same thing with my searches for understanding. Like I said, its hard to express in words, but I just want to make sure we(all of those on the forum) do not neglect the very One from which all wisdom flows. I think that we understand each other though, so I will leave it at that.

Good stuff Josh.
 
Back
Top