frank ledford said:The fact that I acknowledge that Jesus raised his own body leads to evidence that more than the body of Christ was dead. Why? Because Paul introduced himself at the beginning of his epistle to Galatians thus....Paul, an apostle—sent not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him from the dead—
Since Jesus promised he would raise his own body then the fact is that God the Father must have raised something else from the dead besides the body of Jesus.
Indeed. I agree that Jesus stated he would "raise the temple" in three days "speaking of his body" ... but it was his Father, God, who restored his life itself. Perhaps once alive again in a spiritual form, Jesus assumed the form of his human body when talking to his disciples after death. Perhaps it could have meant something else. But apart from him saying that he would "raise the temple" the entire rest of the bible repeatedly states that it was his Father, God, who restored Jesus from death. Not Jesus defeating death by his own power while he was dead. If he had the power to do anything (including "defeating death" ... he obviously could not have been "dead." Meaning he would have never "died" for us, and therefore we would have no hope.)
How can Jesus take on the punishment that man is supposed to take and live at all?
If punishment for man is hell...
and hell is eternal...
and Jesus died to take on our punishment and sin...
then how is he not in hell for all of eternity?
Paradox, eh?
Because the God said "the wages of sin is death." ... not "hell." Revelation even shows that "death and hades will be thrown into the lake of fire" at the final judgement. So, obviously if "hades" referred to anything beyond a common grave, it would still be done away with at judgement. The fact that Jesus paid for our sins by dying (not by being tortured with hellfire for eternity) shows that God was telling the truth that "death" is the wage of sin.