Okay, if you can't explain what a scripture means yourself, then you are forced, like so many other's, to refer to commentary.
Your opinion has no bearing on what I believe. I have simply deferred to the explanation of someone else, who has explained 1 Cor 15:1-2 very adequately, and is easily accessed in this thread.
Furthermore, there are no verses in the Bible that contradict any other verse, nor verses that "trump" any other verses .
And, I have already shown that Paul taught that eternal life is an irrevocable gift.
Scholars agree that the book of Romans has more theology than any other book. And Paul's teaching on eternal security is uncompromisingly clear and straight forward.
It is illogical to try to claim that eternal life is revocable, since Paul was so clear about it being irrevocable.
Please don't try are say that the scripture doesn't mean what it so plainly says, if you yourself have not been given any light from the Holt Spirit, to understand what a scripture means.
1 Cor 15:1-2 says that those who have believed the gospel possess the gospel and are saved by believing that gospel. It says nothing about having to continue to believe in order to continue to be saved.
IOW, how can you possibly say... your interpretation is not right?
Why would anyone say that their interpretation is "not right"?? The question doesn't make sense.
Yes Paul's teaching on the subject is so crystal clear that anyone can read the plain words he says and understand that:...
Was Paul clear about eternal life being a gift of God? Yes or no.
Was Paul clear about God's gifts being irrevocable? Yes or no.
What is not clear about eternal life being irrevocable? Please explain.
Christians who practice the works of the flesh, will not inherit the kingdom.
Christians who walk in unrighteousness are warned not to be a partaker of God's wrath.
Yes, these are very clear verses. And neither of these (nor any other verse) contradict the fact that eternal life is an irrevocable gift of God.
5 For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. 6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.7 Therefore do not be partakers with them. Ephesians 5:5-7
The bible warns us that God's people can indeed become a partaker of His wrath, if we live our lives in sin and unrighteousness, after having been forgiven and cleansed, and given the Holy Spirit, which is God's grace.
Correct. It's what I've been saying all along. To be a partaker of His wrath means to feel His divine discipline. Heb 12 speaks of punishment for His children. Would it be reasonable or logical to assume that only means a slight slap on the hand for being naughty? I think not.
Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them.
JLB
I really have no idea why anyone would think there is anything in Eph 5:5-7 that teaches loss of salvation.
In fact, Paul was clear about not having an inheritance IN the kingdom. He said nothing about not entering the kingdom, which is how I am "hearing" your interpretation of the verses.
It should be clear that there is a difference between entering the kingdom and having an inheritance in the kingdom. Why should anyone assume that they mean the same thing? Please explain.