• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

[_ Old Earth _] expelled torrent ?

jmm9683 said:
johnmuise said:
Simply implying that Gay is immoral and wrong.

No, you were implying that something has changed, "point of no return," "moral compass broken." There has always been gay people, so what changed?

I meant that the world is so deluded that it is impossible for us to go back to a point were morals were more greatly acknowledged. instead of making Gay legal they should be jailed per say .

But who am i to judge. lets get back to the original post.
 
johnmuise said:
jmm9683 said:
johnmuise said:
Simply implying that Gay is immoral and wrong.

No, you were implying that something has changed, "point of no return," "moral compass broken." There has always been gay people, so what changed?

I meant that the world is so deluded that it is impossible for us to go back to a point were morals were more greatly acknowledged. instead of making Gay legal they should be jailed per say .

But who am i to judge. lets get back to the original post.

Yeah, that's moral, jail people for not committing any crimes... and no being gay isn't a crime nor should it be. Oh and let's go back to our "moral" times of segregation and women not being able to vote, weren't those some moral times?

Let's get back to the movie that has a lower rating than Good Burger, you couldn't pay me to watch this movie.
 
Let's get back to the movie that has a lower rating than Good Burger, you couldn't pay me to watch this movie.

This was not a discussion about the movie, there are plenty of other threads for that, this thread is just a request for the torrent of said movie, because its legal for me to download :wink:
 
jmm9683 said:
Let's get back to the movie that has a lower rating than Good Burger, you couldn't pay me to watch this movie.


Some brief movie reviews I enjoyed about it:

"The movie itself is an example of design by faith and emotion rather than intelligence, defined as rationality grounded in proof. " - Nell Minow, Chicago Sun-Times

"Embracing evolutionary theory will turn you into a close-minded, God-denying Nazi -- that's the upshot of this ludicrous propaganda piece. " - Reece Pendleton, Chicago Reader

"This is propaganda, a political rant disguised as a serious commentary on stifled freedom of inquiry." Claudia Puig, USA Today

"It shows us bogus security files, as if some cabal is spying on everyone. It shirks the facts. And it madly edits images to equate Darwin with Hitler, and Ben Stein with -- yes -- Ronald Reagan. Typical of all propaganda, it also distorts language." Stephen Whitty, Newark Star-Ledger

"This documentary purporting to examine the issue of freedom of expression in the debate between the competing arguments of 'intelligent design' and Darwinism squanders the potential fascination of its topic with its simplistic, heavy-handed approach." Frank Scheck, Hollywood Reporter

"Either the filmmakers suckered these [pro-Darwinist] participants under false pretenses, or the evolutionists are more open to debate than Stein suggests." Sean Means, Salt Lake Tribune

lol, the last one got me to crack up. He hit the nail on the head with that one.
 
The world has reached a critical point of no return in morality

Like stealing the intellectual rights of others? Stein might be a sleazeball; he might have no morals himself; but the movie belongs to those who made it, and taking it without compensation to the makers, is theft, even if it happens to be legal.
 
The Barbarian said:
The world has reached a critical point of no return in morality

Like stealing the intellectual rights of others? Stein might be a sleazeball; he might have no morals himself; but the movie belongs to those who made it, and taking it without compensation to the makers, is theft, even if it happens to be legal.

If the law states that its legal, then its legal. go home boy.
 
jmm9683 said:
Yeah, that's moral, jail people for not committing any crimes... and no being gay isn't a crime nor should it be. Oh and let's go back to our "moral" times of segregation and women not being able to vote, weren't those some moral times?

Let's get back to the movie that has a lower rating than Good Burger, you couldn't pay me to watch this movie.

At this point it is not even clear that you are Christian. Are you in fact Christian?

Bob
 
BobRyan said:
jmm9683 said:
Yeah, that's moral, jail people for not committing any crimes... and no being gay isn't a crime nor should it be. Oh and let's go back to our "moral" times of segregation and women not being able to vote, weren't those some moral times?

Let's get back to the movie that has a lower rating than Good Burger, you couldn't pay me to watch this movie.

At this point it is not even clear that you are Christian. Are you in fact Christian?

Bob

I know it's hard to believe that people can share a belief system and have a differing opinion, but it happens.

Christians bomb abortion clinics, and they are also pacifists. Accept it.
 
I would bomb them too, as long as i did not kill anyone in the process.

And with my knowledge of Pyrotechnics it would be as simple as a stop into a hardware store :wink:
 
Jayls5 said:
I know it's hard to believe that people can share a belief system and have a differing opinion, but it happens.

Christians bomb abortion clinics, and they are also pacifists. Accept it.

Is it your claim that JMM is a Christian?

I am just looking for "facts" please.

Normally this is something that "the actual person" has to admit to -- not sure you can admit "for them".

I am asking because the responses so far do not appear to hold to a Christian POV and if that is the case - some of the arguments used here would not apply.

Bob
 
BobRyan said:
Jayls5 said:
I know it's hard to believe that people can share a belief system and have a differing opinion, but it happens.

Christians bomb abortion clinics, and they are also pacifists. Accept it.

Is it your claim that JMM is a Christian?

I am just looking for "facts" please.

Bob

JMM Christian?. *gag* i just think i threw up in my mouth a little.
 
BobRyan said:
Jayls5 said:
I know it's hard to believe that people can share a belief system and have a differing opinion, but it happens.

Christians bomb abortion clinics, and they are also pacifists. Accept it.

Is it your claim that JMM is a Christian?

I am just looking for "facts" please.

Normally this is something that "the actual person" has to admit to -- not sure you can admit "for them".

I am asking because the responses so far do not appear to hold to a Christian POV and if that is the case - some of the arguments used here would not apply.

Bob

I was just saying that you seemed to imply that a certain moral belief would strip him of the title of Christianity. I was merely showing real world examples of ridiculous differences between Christians. I don't know if he was a Christian, and I think it's fair to say I wouldn't be audacious enough to speak for him.
 
If the law states that its legal, then its legal.

So, since homosexual behavior is legal, that's OK, too? I'm not sure a Christian should be setting his moral code by "it's legal."

go home boy.

Maybe it's time you came home. BTW, it's been about 45 years since I could be properly called a "boy", and I can tell from your prose that it's a few years yet before you can be called a man.
 
So, since homosexual behavior is legal, that's OK, too? I'm not sure a Christian should be setting his moral code by "it's legal."

I am not saying its "right" or "moral" and i certainly don't approve of homosexuality, but if we are to abide by the laws, i am doing nothing wrong, weather you or anyone finds it so.
 
I believe he's referring less to what your government thinks of your actions and more to what your god thinks. Is there some kind of written statement of God's stance on stealing? In stone, maybe?
 
Snidey said:
I believe he's referring less to what your government thinks of your actions and more to what your god thinks. Is there some kind of written statement of God's stance on stealing? In stone, maybe?


Personally i don't consider this stealing.
 
John, can you please point to the relevant Canadian law that states that it is perfectly legal for you to download pirated copies of copyrighted material.
 
:crazyeyes:
johnmuise said:
So, since homosexual behavior is legal, that's OK, too? I'm not sure a Christian should be setting his moral code by "it's legal."

I am not saying its "right" or "moral" and i certainly don't approve of homosexuality, but if we are to abide by the laws, i am doing nothing wrong, weather you or anyone finds it so.

!!! !!! DOUBLE STANDARDS ALERT!!! !!!
 
Deep Thought said:
John, can you please point to the relevant Canadian law that states that it is perfectly legal for you to download pirated copies of copyrighted material.


http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/03/20/080011.php

http://www.canadiancontent.net/commtr/c ... r_633.html

In Canada, it is not illegal to share materials (music, documents, images, etc.) as long as there is no financial gain to the downloader through resale. Three decisions by Canada’s Supreme Court have established clear precedents in this regard. The first in January decided that there was no refraction when in the Great Library of Osgood Hall Law School, University of Toronto, materials were copied for the reasonable purposes of study and legal work. A fine point of the decision which became an important precedent was that the established legal meaning of “distribution†in Canada did not infringe copyright laws.

A later decision this year decided that LimeWire-like sharing of music files was not illegal in the case of the suppliers of the software app, nor the end-users of the music downloaded in person-to-person [P2P] file-sharing arrangements.

A third decision decided that the organization of the music industry here, and the Songwriters Professional Association could not sue for recovery of loss of sales and royalties.

File-sharing is not wrong, and in Canada it’s not a crime.
 
Back
Top