Las Vegas, Nevada where it's 113ºF in the shade.
Everything we say about God has to be anthropomorphistic.
It has to be. Our understanding of everything is based in our experience. (Our 5 senses by which we experience the world)
Or do we really think we understand God...
We can only understand what God has revealed of Himself. The rest is beyond our understanding.
The Trinity was not a man?I guess you mean that there was not a human in the Trinity until the second person became a man.
Yes
The Trinity is the creator. Man is one of God's creatures.
The Trinity is eternal, having no beginning or end.
The Logos (Word), at a point in time, about 2020 years ago, became flesh and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) The Son of God, the Logos, the second person of the Trinity, was born a man by the working of the Holy Spirit and the cooperation of the Virgin Mary.
That is Jesus Who is both God and Man.
Since that time, the second person of the Trinity (Logos, Word, Son, Jesus) has been both God and man.
When Jesus was on Earth, was the 2nd person in heaven??
What say you?
My head just exploded..............
2 That's a tough question
OK, Here's my thinking (or whatever it is that goes on in there):
The Trinity (God) is not something that can be divided into separate parts like a puzzle. (As in: Piece #1 is Father, piece #2 is Son, piece #3 is Spirit. stick them together you get the whole thing...)
In the Creed, the Holy Spirit is said to be "everywhere present and filling all things."
So "God" is everywhere.
So the Father, the Son and the HS are all everywhere. Right?
The problem is that we cannot accurately define God. God is beyond our ability to comprehend.
We experience reality in 4 dimensions (length, width, height, and time) but, as I heard one astrophysicist say, God must exist in at least 11 dimensions because that is the number of dimensions that physicists have so far determined exist in the universe so God, being the creator, would have to exist in at least as many. (uh....O Kaaaay....)
Your question contains the question, "Did the incarnation allow for the 2nd Person to continue to be everywhere present?"
I would think it did.
We'll have to ask Him when we see Him.
iakov the fool