Novum said:
The fact remains that it is nonsensical and downright impossible to speak of a "true Christian", largely because most christians think that they are one and that some assorted group of others are not. So who are you - or I, or anyone - to say who "knows" god or who "knows" Christianity?
So, even if the atheist does not believe in god, why should that somehow invalidate his knowledge of the bible (or Qu'ran, or so forth)?
Thanks Novum.
I think we would agree on this that being an atheist or agnostic or Moslem or whatever does not invalidate knowledge of the bible should that person want to study it. However, knowledge is not the same as understanding. And understanding can only come if what is read is interpreted correctly.
Think about this.
A document has been produced that is deemed by many to contain the secret to life after death (eternal life).
Now many of course don’t believe in such a thing so it doesn’t bother them – “why read it,†they say.
Others also disbelieving, for one reason or another may read it and declare it contains nothing out of the ordinary and therefore conclude that it is no more significant than ‘winnie the pooh.’
Still other’s believe there is merit in the claims and they study it every which way and come to the conclusion that if they follow the things that are written in the book, then they will indeed obtain what is claimed.
And then there are those who seemingly are compelled to read it. In fact they find it the most profound thing they have ever read. Not only does it make sense, they find comfort, strength, confirmation and direction almost as though it is speaking directly to them.
You see it’s all about the same book and yet the response to it by each group is so different. So what is the difference between these groups? It is this. Only the last group has been given the key to understanding it. And what is the key? While others can read it and gain knowledge of God and things pertaining to his people, they can never really ‘know’ what it means unless they ARE one of God’s children. Because the book is FOR them. It can never be anything more than just information to those who are not God’s children. And even those who think they are God’s children (but are not) can only approach it as a set of rules or a guide. Now, God’s children are those who are born of the Spirit of God. Since it is the Spirit that has given them life, the same Spirit that has inspired the book, gives insight and understanding to things within it.
But let’s not forget. Those who have received the Spirit can in no way elevate themselves over others, taking pride in the fact that they have something that others don’t. Those who do, must accept that anything they have, hasn’t been earned. At the point they become puffed up with their own importance, they forget the grace of God and fall into self-righteousness - which unfortunately is all too prevalent in Christendom.
What do you think?