I
I Reckon Sow
Guest
Must you try keep all 10 in order to be saved?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I Reckon Sow said:Must you try keep all 10 in order to be saved?
Somewhere in these posts this issue came up and it was stated that God does not judge on a sliding scale. Your claim is that God will probably use the 1 thru 10 gauge. At what point are you saved , greater or lesser than 5?If as you say your salvation is based on faith then why worry about sinning?Georges said:I Reckon Sow said:Must you try keep all 10 in order to be saved?
No! You must try and keep them because it is the right thing to do....Your salvation comes from your faith in God and your attitude concerning his wishes.
reznwerks said:Somewhere in these posts this issue came up and it was stated that God does not judge on a sliding scale. Your claim is that God will probably use the 1 thru 10 gauge. At what point are you saved , greater or lesser than 5?If as you say your salvation is based on faith then why worry about sinning?Georges said:I Reckon Sow said:Must you try keep all 10 in order to be saved?
No! You must try and keep them because it is the right thing to do....Your salvation comes from your faith in God and your attitude concerning his wishes.
ChristineES said:I think the biggest thing is that people seem to think that the 10 commandments are part of The Law, they are, but at the same time they are not. They seem to be more ten rules in order to live with God and others better.
I think it is a good idea to obey them as best you can. We all sin, that is why Jesus died for us. The 10 commandments are not that hard to follow! They are not unreasonable!!! For example, do people find it hard not to murder or commit adultery? Is it so hard to find one day or rest out of seven? Is it impossible to not say the Lord's name in vain or not worship any other Gods? I could go on.
They were not abolished!!!!
I agree the law of God has not been abolished; scripture makes that very clear as it is written. However, of the five references you gave concerning the commandments of God, one of them is incorrectly given.The 10 commandments are not that hard to follow! They are not unreasonable!!! For example, do people find it hard not to murder or commit adultery? Is it so hard to find one day or rest out of seven? Is it impossible to not say the Lord's name in vain or not worship any other Gods? I could go on.
They were not abolished!!!!
I have never read a single verse in the entire Bible that states the fourth commandment is to “rest one day out of seven.†Nor have I ever read in the Bible that we are to “find†a day of rest ourselves. Perhaps you didn’t mean to express it as you did in this post.Is it so hard to find one day o[f] rest out of seven?
I Reckon Sow said:Must you try keep all 10 in order to be saved?
R7-12 said:The Sabbath day from Almighty God is the seventh day of the week and the fourth of the Ten Commandments. If a person does not observe this command (or any of the pothers) they are in breach of the law and therefore sin continually without repentance and are therefore excluded from mercy. Forgiveness of sin follows repentance.
Ok, so what's the problem you seem to be inferring with this statement?One cannot abide in all the law to perfection as Christ did it.
What I said was, if someone does not observe the commandments they are in breach of the law and therefore sin continually without repentance and are therefore excluded from mercy. In other words, if someone lives contrary to the law they obviously have not repented for breaking the law and therefore remain in their sins being unrepentant.Being in breach of the law is sin but it does not excluded us from God's mercy.
The offer of forgiveness is there as you have rightly said, but forgiveness is dependant upon our willingness to repent for breaking the law and then we must start living according to the commandments of God.For Christ died so that mankind could be offered forgiveness in sin.
As I said, mercy is excluded where there is no repentance, therefore disobedience without repentance is continual sin and therefore without mercy which is a biblically correct statement. If I am mistaken, please provide the texts that say a lawbreaker or evil person or sinner is granted mercy without first coming before God in fear with a broken and contrite heart, trembling at His word, seeking mercy.We are to respect the law and abide in it as much as we can; and we should teach that it is good to abide in the law as you have just done. But to say that disobedience is continual sin without mercy from God is in serious err, for sin is even in our very flesh. Every day we live we are in continual sin and it was the mercy of God which offered mankind grace through Jesus in the first place.
That may be your opinion and you're entitled to it but I am only interested in the word of God. You may not recognize it but the quoted statement above is actually rather self-righteous. The thought is that since God is such an incredible provider I will worship Him on the Sabbath day out of love from my heart and out of reverence from my perception of things – surely the actions I choose from my heart is what keeps it holy.If one is to obey the law of the Sabbath, it should be out of love and reverence for an incredible provider. Surely the heart of the action is what keeps it holy?
I (somewhat grudgingly) cannot deny the force of this statement. I suspect that N. American Christian culture has tried to create a kind of clean distinction between faith and obedience that just does not work Biblically. My understanding of the Scriptures is that we need to accept God's gift and repent in order to attain life. Perhaps I should reword - the very act of accepting God's gift really entails repentance. Without actual repentance, all we have left is mental assent to a proposition about a theory of atonement. My gut tells me, even aside from Scriptural arguments, this cannot really be enough.R7-12 said:In other words, if someone lives contrary to the law they obviously have not repented for breaking the law and therefore remain in their sins being unrepentant.
R7-12, I presume that you believe that it is within the capability of people to indeed repent. I assume that you therefore disagree that sin is 'unavoidable' after the act of 'accepting' the sacrifice made on the cross. My question, and I apologize if you have dealt with this, is "Do you think that such obedience is achieved through good old-fashioned "sweat and determination" or does God give us "resources" to help us?R7-12 said:If one does not repent for sin they remain sinners and are without mercy because they have not asked for it and don’t wish to change their behaviour.
I would agree with your assessment at the end of the paragraph above.In other words, if someone lives contrary to the law they obviously have not repented for breaking the law and therefore remain in their sins being unrepentant.
I (somewhat grudgingly) cannot deny the force of this statement. I suspect that N. American Christian culture has tried to create a kind of clean distinction between faith and obedience that just does not work Biblically. My understanding of the Scriptures is that we need to accept God's gift and repent in order to attain life. Perhaps I should reword - the very act of accepting God's gift really entails repentance. Without actual repentance, all we have left is mental assent to a proposition about a theory of atonement. My gut tells me, even aside from Scriptural arguments, this cannot really be enough.
It is the goodness of God that leads one to repentance but this is not without having first been given knowledge of what sin is and at least a starting point for obedience.R7-12, I presume that you believe that it is within the capability of people to indeed repent.
I assume that you therefore disagree that sin is 'unavoidable' after the act of 'accepting' the sacrifice made on the cross.
The covenant of God is an agreement. In it God has promised to fulfill those things which He has promised to do. Likewise we are expected to fulfill what we have (supposedly) promised to do. What was the first thing God asked of Abraham?My question, and I apologize if you have dealt with this, is "Do you think that such obedience is achieved through good old-fashioned "sweat and determination" or does God give us "resources" to help us?
Assuming that you believe that God helps us to achieve obedience, I am wondering if you can tell me how this actually works - can you provide a more detailed story about how such divine 'assistance' is actually experienced by the dedicated Christian?
What I said was, if someone does not observe the commandments they are in breach of the law and therefore sin continually without repentance and are therefore excluded from mercy. In other words, if someone lives contrary to the law they obviously have not repented for breaking the law and therefore remain in their sins being unrepentant.R7-12 said:Hi klee shay,
You said,
Ok, so what's the problem you seem to be inferring with this statement?One cannot abide in all the law to perfection as Christ did it.
Because we have all sinned, no one is or can be in the flesh perfect as Christ was. However, when we repent for our past sins, we are forgiven and the slate is wiped clean, the sin is removed. We are declared justified on account of Christ’s blood through faith.
No problem, just stating a fact. One cannot abide in all the law to perfection as Christ did.
[quote:91b14]Being in breach of the law is sin but it does not excluded us from God's mercy.
The offer of forgiveness is there as you have rightly said, but forgiveness is dependant upon our willingness to repent for breaking the law and then we must start living according to the commandments of God.For Christ died so that mankind could be offered forgiveness in sin.
As I said, mercy is excluded where there is no repentance, therefore disobedience without repentance is continual sin and therefore without mercy which is a biblically correct statement. If I am mistaken, please provide the texts that say a lawbreaker or evil person or sinner is granted mercy without first coming before God in fear with a broken and contrite heart, trembling at His word, seeking mercy.We are to respect the law and abide in it as much as we can; and we should teach that it is good to abide in the law as you have just done. But to say that disobedience is continual sin without mercy from God is in serious err, for sin is even in our very flesh. Every day we live we are in continual sin and it was the mercy of God which offered mankind grace through Jesus in the first place.
That may be your opinion and you're entitled to it but I am only interested in the word of God. You may not recognize it but the quoted statement above is actually rather self-righteous. The thought is that since God is such an incredible provider I will worship Him on the Sabbath day out of love from my heart and out of reverence from my perception of things – surely the actions I choose from my heart is what keeps it holy.If one is to obey the law of the Sabbath, it should be out of love and reverence for an incredible provider. Surely the heart of the action is what keeps it holy?