• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Heb 10:14 teaches eternal security

Here is another verse that speaks of eternal security:
Heb 10:14
because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy. NIV

"has made perfect" is in the perfect tense, which means a completed action in the past with continuing results. Then, the writer added "forever" to seal the deal. The completed action of being made perfect goes on FOREVER.

And to whom is this describing? To "those who are being made holy". Present tense.

The phrase 'those who are being made holy' refers to believers and the progressive sanctification process of spiritual growth.

So, even as believers are "being made holy" via the sanctification process, they are ALREADY MADE PERFECT.

So, to those who still think that salvation can be lost, please explain how this verse doesn't teach eternal security.

Or, just explain what it does teach.
Correct me if I am wrong Freegrace. I see this verse talking about positional sanctification exclusively. And not about our ongoing sanctification. I think the NASB brings it out more clearly.

New American Standard Bible
For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.

Tell me if I need to explain better please........ the moment we believe, we are those who are(presently) being sanctified by Him(passive voice) and perfected forever(perfect tense)

So those who believe, at this present time, are those who are sanctified and perfected forever.

Is progressive or ongoing sanctification in this verse? I just see positional truth.
 
\
No, it doesn't. I've learned that there is no point in attempting to do so. If salvation can't be lost show me a verse that says so.
Gladly. I'll show 2 of them.
John 3:16
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. NIV
John 10:28
I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. NIV

Anything other than a statement from Scripture is just one person's interpretation.
And I fully agree. Which is why I continue to challenge the anti-eternal security folk to show any verse that says that salvation or eternal life can be lost.

Since you haven't provided a passage of Scripture that states salvation can't be lost, you're just giving us your interpretation of the passage.
I just did. 2 of them, in fact.

Please tell me why I should accept your interpretation of the passage over anyone else's. In addition please tell me why I should accept your interpretation when you have taken a single verse of Scripture, pulled it from it's context and imposed your belief on it.
This hasn't been shown to be true. It's only your "interpretation" of what you think.

Using the very same argument that you've used here I could post a passage of Scripture to "prove" that one can lose their salvation.
Uh, what verse would that be?
 
Once again, you have indulged in the vivisection of scripture in order to excise a scrap of from the body which you can use to fabricate a facade for the "eternal security" nonsense.
Prove your claim.

You completely miss the point of that verse because you have removed that snippet from its context of the teachingof the entire chapter that Christ's sacrifice for sin was done once foll all the sins of all mankind from Adam to the last man to commit the last sin before the return of Christ.
Prove otherwise from the passage.

So, if you intend to force that piece of scripture which you have ripped from the corpus to support that salvation is permanent then you must also take what comes along with your snippet, that it is for all mankind.
Of course salvation is for all mankind. But salvation is by grace through faith. But no one is excluded from believing. Your view sounds thoroughly Calvinistic. Jesus Christ is the Savior of the world, not of the elect.

So if that one verse proves eternal security (which it certainly does not) then it must also prove universal salvation (which it also certainly does not.)
How one would come to this strange conclusion is a real mystery. In no way does eternal security lead to universal salvation.

You also completely miss the irony of lifting that "proof-text" out of the very same letter which explicitly states, in so many words, that salvation can, indeed, be lost.
There's the problem: "in so many words". How about specific, straightforward, and plain words? Huh?

Heb 6:4-8 (NKJV) For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
For the earth which drinks in the rain that often comes upon it, and bears herbs useful for those by whom it is cultivated, receives blessing from God; but if it bears thorns and briers, it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned.


The word "enlightened" is the 1st century Greek word used by Christians as the equivalent of our modern English usage of the word, "Saved." It is made clear that the author is talking about a "once and no longer saved" person by stating that the apostate person had been "a partaker of the Holy Spirit" who had "tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come". Those are the experiences only of those who have been saved.
Yes, I agree those described were believers.

That passage specifically addresses the situation of one who had been saved and has fallen from the state of salvation: "it is rejected and near to being cursed, whose end is to be burned.."
Yeah, right, "in so many words". Those specific words are part of a farming or agricultural metaphor. It is to be understood in THAT WAY.

btw, what is to be "burned" is the fruit of the land, NOT the land itself. So I'd suggest taking more careful time when reading Scripture.

We read the same subject in 1 Cor 3:14-15 about what is being burned.

But, that's what happens when you look for "proof-texts" thinking you can, by their employment, prove your case. It is sloppy exegesis that produces poor results. I this case, you only proved that you missed the message of the passage from which you improperly snatched a piece.
You've just demonstrated a total misunderstanding of Scripture.

I'd say, "Nice try." but it didn't even come close.
Back atcha.
 
if this writer added the word "forever" rather than being inspired by God to write "forever" into the verse.
The writer WAS inspired by God. I was noting what the AUTHOR of Hebrews put AFTER "being made perfect".

then how many more verses have been added to by other writers we could have a Bible that is not inspired if so.
Your comment is totally irrelevant. The author of Hebrews included "forever" in the original text.
 
Its the perfect tense brother. Let me ask this. Does the writer have the authority to add "forever" to this verse?......."forever" is not technically in there but the perfect tense is, so "forever" can and should be added.
Heb 7:28~~New American Standard Bible
For the Law appoints men as high priests who are weak, but the word of the oath, which came after the Law, appoints a Son, made perfect forever.

teleiow ~~5048 perfect tense/ pas/ acc s mas-Ptc I am completing

The same word and perfect tense used in Heb 10:14.

New American Standard Bible
For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.

teleiow ~~5048 perfect tense/ act/ ind 3s ---verb *he hath perfected
My interlinear shows the Greek word for "forever" and my lexicon shows it also. How is it not technically there?
 
Correct me if I am wrong Freegrace. I see this verse talking about positional sanctification exclusively. And not about our ongoing sanctification. I think the NASB brings it out more clearly.

New American Standard Bible
For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified.

Tell me if I need to explain better please........ the moment we believe, we are those who are(presently) being sanctified by Him(passive voice) and perfected forever(perfect tense)

So those who believe, at this present time, are those who are sanctified and perfected forever.

Is progressive or ongoing sanctification in this verse? I just see positional truth.
I believe the verse addresses both positional and progressive sanctification.

The phrase "has perfected for all time" refers to our positional sanctification, and "who are being sanctified" refers to our progressive sanctification.
 
My interlinear shows the Greek word for "forever" and my lexicon shows it also. How is it not technically there?

I stand corrected. There it is staring me right in the face.

New International Version
For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

FOREVER~~diénekés: carried through, continuous
Original Word: διηνεκής, ές
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: diénekés
Phonetic Spelling: (dee-ay-nek-es')
Short Definition: continuous, continually
Definition: continuous, continually, unbroken.
 
I believe the verse addresses both positional and progressive sanctification.

The phrase "has perfected for all time" refers to our positional sanctification, and "who are being sanctified" refers to our progressive sanctification.
Thanks FreeGrace.
 
I agree.

This is why almost nothing is ever gained from having this kind of theological discussion. We can offer each other our own interpretations, and not much more.

That's the point that I can't seem to get across to many of these guys. Many think this is what the Scriptures teach when in actuality it is simply their interpretation of a passage. In order to say the Bible teaches xyz, one must be able to show where it is stated in the Bible, not where they have inferred it from the Bible. For instance Paul teaches that one is justified by faith. And, we find that stated plainly in the Scriptures.

28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. (Rom. 3:28 KJV)


There it is plain as day. Now one can say that the Bible teaches justification by faith. There is no interpretation needed.
 
Gladly. I'll show 2 of them.
John 3:16
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. NIV
John 10:28
I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. NIV


And I fully agree. Which is why I continue to challenge the anti-eternal security folk to show any verse that says that salvation or eternal life can be lost.


I just did. 2 of them, in fact.


This hasn't been shown to be true. It's only your "interpretation" of what you think.


Uh, what verse would that be?

Neither of those passages say that one can't lose salvation. Look at the words. What they say is that the believer will not perish. The believing is present tense which is a continuous action. The passages don't address anyone who chooses to stop believing, those who turn away.

Additionally, the word translated "forever" is the Greek word "diēnekēs" and it means continuous or perpetual. It doesn't mean forever.

You see, you're proving my point about interpretation. Neither of the passages that you posted state that a person can't lose their salvation. That you posted them shows that you interpret them as evidence that salvation can't be lost, but, as I said, neither states any such thing. The only address the one who is presently believing.
 
Last edited:
That's the point that I can't seem to get across to many of these guys. Many think this is what the Scriptures teach when in actuality it is simply their interpretation of a passage.
Here's a suggestion. If one can adequately explain a verse or passage presented by the opposing side to show that it doesn't teach what is being claimed, then one must consider that explanation.

Here are the facts from this and other forums regarding eternal security vs non ES. Those who believe in eternal security have provided very adequate explanations of ALL the verses/passages of the anti- side, yet, the anti-OSAS side has not provided any adequate explanation of verses/passages used for eternal security. They generally ignore or dismiss those verses, but do NOT provide adequate explanations.

For example, Rom 11:29 says that the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable. And Paul noted 3 specific gifts that are of God previously in Romans: spiritual gifts, justification and eternal life. The anti-OSAS side claims that 11:29 refers ONLY to Israel, thus excluding the gifts that Paul specifically described within that same letter to the Romans. This is NOT adequate to explain 11:29. The statement has NOT been proven to apply only to Israel, even though that's the claim.

What is clear is that God's gifts are irrevocable. And that eternal life is one of God's gifts; therefore, irrevocable. It couldn't be more clear, yet the anti-OSAS side refuses to be reasonable and simply claims 11:29 is not about any of the previously described gifts of God by Paul in that same letter. That is unreasonable.



In order to say the Bible teaches xyz, one must be able to show where it is stated in the Bible, not where they have inferred it from the Bible. For instance Paul teaches that one is justified by faith. And, we find that stated plainly in the Scriptures.

28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. (Rom. 3:28 KJV)


There it is plain as day. Now one can say that the Bible teaches justification by faith. There is no interpretation needed.[/QUOTE]
 
Neither of those passages say that one can't lose salvation.
That isn't reasonable. Jesus said that those who believe will never perish. That's a very long time, wouldn't you agree?

Look at the words. What they say is that the believer will not perish. The believing is present tense which is a continuous action. The passages don't address anyone who chooses to stop believing, those who turn away.
You want one of those, huh? Sure. 1 Thess 5:4-10.

4 But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. 5 You are all sons of the light and sons of the day. We do not belong to the night or to the darkness. 6 So then, let us not be like others, who are asleep, but let us be alert and self-controlled. 7 For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, get drunk at night. 8 But since we belong to the day, let us be self-controlled, putting on faith and love as a breastplate, and the hope of salvation as a helmet. 9 For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ. 10 He died for us so that, whether we are awake or asleep, we may live together with him. NIV

Here, Paul contrasts the lifestyle of unbelievers (darkness, night, asleep) with the lifestyle of believers (sons of light and day, alert, self controlled). Then he concludes with v.10 "whether we are awake (proper Christian walk) or asleep (improper Christian walking like unbelieving Gentiles), we may live together with Him.

Additionally, the word translated "forever" is the Greek word "diēnekēs" and it means continuous or perpetual. It doesn't mean forever.
Sheesh! The word "forever" actually means "perpetual" and "continuous". Your claim is not reasonable.

You see, you're proving my point about interpretation. Neither of the passages that you posted state that a person can't lose their salvation.
Your claim was not proven. There was no evidence for your claim. In fact, to NEVER PERISH does mean eternal security. Just a claim to the contrary doesn't prove the contrary.

That you posted them shows that you interpret them as evidence that salvation can't be lost, but, as I said, neither states any such thing. The only address the one who is presently believing.
One is free to believe whatever they want to believe. Or, as Scripture says, "whatever their itching ears want to hear". 2 Tim 4:3
 
Here's a suggestion. If one can adequately explain a verse or passage presented by the opposing side to show that it doesn't teach what is being claimed, then one must consider that explanation.

Here are the facts from this and other forums regarding eternal security vs non ES. Those who believe in eternal security have provided very adequate explanations of ALL the verses/passages of the anti- side, yet, the anti-OSAS side has not provided any adequate explanation of verses/passages used for eternal security. They generally ignore or dismiss those verses, but do NOT provide adequate explanations.

That's bogus. I personally have addressed quite a few of the passages you've presented.

For example, Rom 11:29 says that the gifts and calling of God are irrevocable. And Paul noted 3 specific gifts that are of God previously in Romans: spiritual gifts, justification and eternal life. The anti-OSAS side claims that 11:29 refers ONLY to Israel, thus excluding the gifts that Paul specifically described within that same letter to the Romans. This is NOT adequate to explain 11:29. The statement has NOT been proven to apply only to Israel, even though that's the claim.

Again, you're using passages out of context. The gifts that Paul is referring to in Rom 11:29 are the promises made to Abraham,note the olive tree parable immediately before verse 29. Yes, those promises do go to the Gentiles. However, if you study those promises you'll see that there are conditions on them. There is not a blanket promise to Israel that every single physical Jew will be saved. You see, Rom 11:29 is the culmination of Paul's explanation of the promises that he began to explain in the beginning of chapter 9

What is clear is that God's gifts are irrevocable. And that eternal life is one of God's gifts; therefore, irrevocable. It couldn't be more clear, yet the anti-OSAS side refuses to be reasonable and simply claims 11:29 is not about any of the previously described gifts of God by Paul in that same letter. That is unreasonable.

God's promises are irrevocable to Abraham. God swore an oath to Abraham, that's why His promises are irrevocable.

11 And the angel of the LORD called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I. 12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me. 13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. 14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen.1 15 And the angel of the LORD called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, 16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the LORD, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;1 18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice (Gen. 22:1 KJV)

Because Abraham obeyed God, God swore an oath to Abraham. God promised to multiply his seed, that his seed would possess the gate of His enemies, and that all of the nations would be blessed through Abraham's seed. These are the promises that Paul is talking about in Romans 11:29. Paul begins this explanation in Romans 9.

I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. 3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:1 4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;1 5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen. 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. 9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. 10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) 12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger (Rom. 9:1 KJV)

These are the promises that Paul is talking about. It is an explanation of what he said in Romans 8:28-30. It is how God had made promises to Abraham and because Abraham obeyed God, God swore an oath by Himself, because there was nothing greater to swear it on, that He would fulfill those promises to him. What Paul is saying in Romans 11:29 is that these promises to Abraham are irrevocable. They are irrevocable because God swore an oath, by His own name, that He would do them for Abraham.
 
Last edited:
That isn't reasonable. Jesus said that those who believe will never perish. That's a very long time, wouldn't you agree?

Those who "are believing" will never perish. The passage doesn't address those who stop believing.


You want one of those, huh? Sure. 1 Thess 5:4-10.

4 But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. 5 You are all sons of the light and sons of the day. We do not belong to the night or to the darkness. 6 So then, let us not be like others, who are asleep, but let us be alert and self-controlled. 7 For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, get drunk at night. 8 But since we belong to the day, let us be self-controlled, putting on faith and love as a breastplate, and the hope of salvation as a helmet. 9 For God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ. 10 He died for us so that, whether we are awake or asleep, we may live together with him. NIV

Here, Paul contrasts the lifestyle of unbelievers (darkness, night, asleep) with the lifestyle of believers (sons of light and day, alert, self controlled). Then he concludes with v.10 "whether we are awake (proper Christian walk) or asleep (improper Christian walking like unbelieving Gentiles), we may live together with Him.;

I would argue that "asleep" means dead not improper Christian walk. However, this passage doesn't address those who stop believing. Look at verse 4, "but you brother". He's addressing believers.


Sheesh! The word "forever" actually means "perpetual" and "continuous". Your claim is not reasonable.

The definition can be found in a lexicon easily enough.


Your claim was not proven. There was no evidence for your claim. In fact, to NEVER PERISH does mean eternal security. Just a claim to the contrary doesn't prove the contrary.

Sure, "never perish" can be understood that way. However, "never perish" isn't the question. The question is "is believing" The promise to "never perish" is to the one who "is believing". There is no promise in the Scriptures that says, "he who used to believe will never perish."
 
That's bogus. I personally have addressed quite a few of the passages you've presented.
Where any of them addressed to me? I don't generally involve discussions with others.

Again, you're using passages out of context. The gifts that Paul is referring to in Rom 11:29 are the promises made to Abraham,note the olive tree parable immediately before verse 29.
This just proves my point. The argument is NOT reasonable, for Paul did NOT say God's gifts TO ISRAEL. Without adjectives, Paul clearly referred to all of God's gifts. At least the ones he had already described within that same letter.

Yes, those promises do go to the Gentiles.
And Paul specifically described both justification and eternal life as gifts of God.

However, if you study those promises you'll see that there are conditions on them.
Sure. The gifts are based on believing. So what? Once given, they are irrevocable. There is NO condition on being irrevocable, as you're tying to SPIN IT.

There is not a blanket promise to Israel that every single physical Jew will be saved.
This NEVER has been an argument about a promse to be saved. It's a promise that gifts that God gives are irrevocable. Your argument isn't even reasonable.

You see, Rom 11:29 is the culmination of Paul's explanation of the promises that he began to explain in the beginning of chapter 9
I see it very clearly. God's gifts are irrevocable. Once given, He will NEVER revoke.

God's promises are irrevocable to Abraham. God swore an oath to Abraham, that's why His promises are irrevocable.
These aren't promises that are irrevocable. That is unreasonable.

Please show any verse that describes ANY promise of God as a "gift". I can save a lot of time by just saying that no where in Scripture is that said.

The argument that the gifts mentioned in 11:29 refer to promises made is just absurd. Gifts are NOT promises. Where would anyone get that notion??

11 And the angel of the LORD called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I. 12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me. 13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. 14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen.1 15 And the angel of the LORD called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time, 16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the LORD, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son: 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;1 18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice (Gen. 22:1 KJV)
I read every single word in this passage and did NOT find the word "gift" or "gifts" anywhere in the passage.

So, what's the relevance of this passage to Rom 11:29? Nothing.


Because Abraham obeyed God, God swore and oath to Abraham. God promised to multiply his seed, that his seed would possess the gate of His enemies, and that all of the nations would be blessed through Abraham's seed. These are the promises that Paul is talking about in Romans 11:29. Paul begins this explanation in Romans 9.
Once again, the gifts of 11:29 are NOT promises.

I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. 3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:1 4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;1 5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen. 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. 9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. 10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; 11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) 12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger (Rom. 9:1 KJV)
OK, I found "promise/s" twice, but so what? There was NO mention of "gift/s".


These are the promises that Paul is talking about.
Paul was speaking directly about GIFTS, NOT promises in 11:29. Apparently, you're not reading very clearly. But it's plain as day.

It is an explanation of what he said in Romans 8:28-30. It is how God had made promises to Abraham and because Abraham obeyed God, God swore and oath by Himself, because there was nothing greater to swear it on, that He would fulfill those promises to him. What Paul is saying in Romans 11:29 is that these promises to Abraham are irrevocable. They are irrevocable because God swore and oath, by His own name, that He would do them for Abraham.
I will repeat: Paul was NOT referring to any promises in 11:29. He was plainly speaking about the gifts of God. Not the promises of God.

Such an argument thoroughly weakens your position. You've not even got the right words from the text. No wonder your position is so unbiblical.

You're arguing the WRONG WORD.
 
Where any of them addressed to me? I don't generally involve discussions with others.
They were in other threads. I just enetered this thread.

This just proves my point. The argument is NOT reasonable, for Paul did NOT say God's gifts TO ISRAEL. Without adjectives, Paul clearly referred to all of God's gifts. At least the ones he had already described within that same letter.

It's determined by context. In Romans 9-11 Paul is speaking of specific promises. He said the promises are the fathers, meaning Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. He said, this is the word of promise and he goes on to explain it.

And Paul specifically described both justification and eternal life as gifts of God.

That doesn't necessitate that every occurrence of the word gifts refers to those specific gifts. He explained that gifts that he was talking about.

Sure. The gifts are based on believing. So what? Once given, they are irrevocable. There is NO condition on being irrevocable, as you're tying to SPIN IT.

If you study the promises you'll find otherwise.

This NEVER has been an argument about a promse to be saved. It's a promise that gifts that God gives are irrevocable. Your argument isn't even reasonable.

The argument is not only reasonable, it's right there in the context.

I see it very clearly. God's gifts are irrevocable. Once given, He will NEVER revoke.

God's promises are irrevocable to Abraham. God swore an oath to Abraham, that's why His promises are irrevocable.

These aren't promises that are irrevocable. That is unreasonable.

It's not unreasonable. It's the context. That why I keep asking for the passages to be explained in context.

[/quote]Please show any verse that describes ANY promise of God as a "gift". I can save a lot of time by just saying that no where in Scripture is that said.[/quote]

The word Charisma means favor or to bestow favor. Those promises are God bestowing favor on Abraham.

The argument that the gifts mentioned in 11:29 refer to promises made is just absurd. Gifts are NOT promises. Where would anyone get that notion??

Paul didn't write the word "gifts," he wrote charisma. It means favor. Giving a gift to someone is showing them favor, thus the word is translated gifts.

I read every single word in this passage and did NOT find the word "gift" or "gifts" anywhere in the passage.

So, what's the relevance of this passage to Rom 11:29? Nothing.
Once again, the gifts of 11:29 are NOT promises.

OK, I found "promise/s" twice, but so what? There was NO mention of "gift/s".

Paul was speaking directly about GIFTS, NOT promises in 11:29. Apparently, you're not reading very clearly. But it's plain as day.

I will repeat: Paul was NOT referring to any promises in 11:29. He was plainly speaking about the gifts of God. Not the promises of God.

Such an argument thoroughly weakens your position. You've not even got the right words from the text. No wonder your position is so unbiblical.

One of the promises to Abraham was the Land promise.

14 And the LORD said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward:

15 For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever.
16 And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.
17 Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it unto thee. (Gen. 13:14-17 KJV)


God had promised this land to Abraham. However, he never received it during his life. The land was promised to Abraham and his seed. The same promise was made to Isaac and Jacob.

And there was a famine in the land, beside the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And Isaac went unto Abimelech king of the Philistines unto Gerar.

2 And the LORD appeared unto him, and said, Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of:
3 Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I sware unto Abraham thy father;
4 And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed;
5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws. (Gen. 26:1-5 KJV)



And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.
2 Arise, go to Padanaram, to the house of Bethuel thy mother's father; and take thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother's brother.
3 And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude of people;1
4 And give thee the blessing of Abraham, to thee, and to thy seed with thee; that thou mayest inherit the land wherein thou art a stranger, which God gave unto Abraham. (Gen. 28:1-4 KJV)


Here Isaac blessed Jacob and he said, 'and God give the blessing of Abraham, to thee, and to thy seed with thee; that thou mayest inherit the land.' The "blessing of Abraham", as we see here is to inherit the land that God promised to Abraham. This phrase only appears twice in Scripture. Once here and once when Paul applies it to the Gentiles.

9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.
10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.
13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.1
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.(Gal. 3:9-29 KJV)


We can see from what Paul said here that, "the blessing of Abraham," the land, comes to the Gentiles through faith in Christ. In verse 16 Paul points out that the promise was made to Abraham and His Seed who is Christ. The inheritance of the land belongs to Christ and Abraham. Paul said that those who are of faith in Christ are Abraham's seed and heirs according to the promise. The inheritance is a gift. No believer has any right to it other than God has given it to those who would believe on Christ. Everything that God has promised to Abraham is a gift. God didn't own Abraham anything.
 
Heb 6:4-8 Actually teaches eternal security. But it ain't pretty for that believer..It was specifically talking about Jews who were saved and reverted back into their religion and sacrificing animal's.
So he was talking about people who were saved (Jews, like the entire original church) who lost their salvation.
So you affirm that it is possible to loose one's salvation.
Thank you.
 
They were in other threads. I just enetered this thread.
OK. Give me your best verse that plainly teaches that one can lose salvation, and I'll show you that it doesn't.

It's determined by context. In Romans 9-11 Paul is speaking of specific promises.
And...11:29 doesn't mention promises. It specifically mentions GIFTS.

In fact, NO WHERE in Scripture are promises described as gifts.

He said the promises are the fathers, meaning Abraham, Issac, and Jacob. He said, this is the word of promise and he goes on to explain it.
Since 11:29 isn't about promises, but ACTUAL gifts, your analysis is incorrect.

That doesn't necessitate that every occurrence of the word gifts refers to those specific gifts. He explained that gifts that he was talking about.
OK. Show me EXACTLY where Paul "explained that gifts that he was talking about" in ch 11.

I said this:
"Sure. The gifts are based on believing. So what? Once given, they are irrevocable. There is NO condition on being irrevocable, as you're tying to SPIN IT."
If you study the promises you'll find otherwise.
Didn't you read my comment? I said "the gifts are based...". I said nothing about promises. Why do you consider promises to be gifts??

The argument is not only reasonable, it's right there in the context.
No one has shown that. It's been claimed, sure. But not shown.

I said this:
"I see it very clearly. God's gifts are irrevocable. Once given, He will NEVER revoke.

God's promises are irrevocable to Abraham. God swore an oath to Abraham, that's why His promises are irrevocable.

These aren't promises that are irrevocable. That is unreasonable."
It's not unreasonable. It's the context. That why I keep asking for the passages to be explained in context.
There is NOTHING in the context that shows that ANY promise is a gift. Gifts are gifts, 3 of which Paul specifically noted.

The word Charisma means favor or to bestow favor. Those promises are God bestowing favor on Abraham.
So what? The Bible NEVER describes any promise of God as a gift, or favor. You've got no point.

Paul didn't write the word "gifts," he wrote charisma. It means favor. Giving a gift to someone is showing them favor, thus the word is translated gifts.
Well, guess what!! Eternal life is a favor as well. Rom 6:23. And God's FAVORS are irrevocable.

One of the promises to Abraham was the Land promise.

14 And the LORD said unto Abram, after that Lot was separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, and look from the place where thou art northward, and southward, and eastward, and westward:

15 For all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever.
16 And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth: so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered.
17 Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it unto thee. (Gen. 13:14-17 KJV)


God had promised this land to Abraham. However, he never received it during his life. The land was promised to Abraham and his seed. The same promise was made to Isaac and Jacob.
None of this is relevant, since the Bible never describes any promise as a favor/gift.
 
Here is another verse that speaks of eternal security:
Heb 10:14
because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy. NIV

"has made perfect" is in the perfect tense, which means a completed action in the past with continuing results. Then, the writer added "forever" to seal the deal. The completed action of being made perfect goes on FOREVER.

And to whom is this describing? To "those who are being made holy". Present tense.

The phrase 'those who are being made holy' refers to believers and the progressive sanctification process of spiritual growth.

So, even as believers are "being made holy" via the sanctification process, they are ALREADY MADE PERFECT.

So, to those who still think that salvation can be lost, please explain how this verse doesn't teach eternal security.

Or, just explain what it does teach.

Keep reading:

26 For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries. 28 Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,”says the Lord. And again, “The Lord will judge His people.”31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. Hebrews 10:26-31

Please read to the end of the Chapter, for a contextual understanding.

35 Therefore do not cast away your confidence, which has great reward. 36 For you have need of endurance, so that after you have done the will of God, you may receive the promise:

37 “For yet a little while,
And He who is coming will come and will not tarry.
38 Now the just shall live by faith;
But if anyone draws back,
My soul has no pleasure in him.”

39 But we are not of those who draw back to perdition, but of those who believe to the saving of the soul.
Hebrews 10:35-39



JLB
 
The phrase 'those who are being made holy' refers to believers


Amen, it refers to believers.

Are those who believe for a while, then fall away, still somehow believers? :lol

11 “Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God. 12 Those by the wayside are the ones who hear; then the devil comes and takes away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.13 But the ones on the rock are those who, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, who believe for a while and in time of temptation fall away. 14 Now the ones that fell among thorns are those who, when they have heard, go out and are choked with cares, riches, and pleasures of life, and bring no fruit to maturity. 15 But the ones that fell on the good ground are those who, having heard the word with a noble and good heart, keep it and bear fruit with patience. Luke 8:11-15



JLB
 
Back
Top