Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Are you taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

  • Depending upon the Holy Spirit for all you do?

    Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic

    https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • How are famous preachers sometimes effected by sin?

    Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject

    https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042

Hell Fire

dadof10 said:
Then what do these quotes mean if not that the remnent of their "burning" ascends FOREVER?

"No, not at all and in fact it substantiates the view that once the "fire is out" that is once the wicked are no longer in the presence of that which causes the flames, the Lamb and the Holy Angels, their "torment" ascends forever."

"It is fairly obvious from scripture that the "light" that is provided emanates from the Lamb, Jesus. It is that light that destroys those who know they are unworthy to be apart of it."

"The torment is forever (as in permanent), not the torment "ing."

In relation to the fact that they have already been explained to you? Just what they say.

Then maybe you could explain to me how you think I took Rev 21:23 and Rev 7:15 out of context then. Rev 21:23 says specifically that the Lamb, Jesus, is the Light of the city of New Jerusalem and because of that there is no need for a sun or moon. Now certainly the sun provides 'direct' light and the moon provides 'reflected' light.

You stated I took something out of context and I'd appreciate you showing me how I did that.

Here is the position you are supposed to be defending:

"It is fairly obvious from scripture that the "light" that is provided emanates from the Lamb, Jesus. It is that light that destroys those who know they are unworthy to be apart of it."

"Being that they are no longer in the presences of Jesus means that they are no longer "in the light" and it is that light that sustains life."


As far as I can understand you, you are saying the Damned are burned up and cease to exist because they are in the Presence of "the light of Christ". Here are the passages you claim uphold that position.

"Rev 7:15 Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them. 16 They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat. 17 For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes."

"Rev 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb [is] the light thereof. 24 And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it."

Where does it say that that those not in the "light of Christ" cease to exist? Please show me how these verses bolster your case.

I've shown you several verses that confirm the point that those outside of Christ's will are in "darkness."

Again you are misunderstanding a clear metephor. The word "darkness" here and elsewhere in Scripture does not mean annihilation. Remember, this is the point you are trying to make.How can someone "walk in darkness" if "darkness" is annihilation? Maybe it will clear it up if we look at other verses that use the same metephor:

"Therefore do not pronounce judgment before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then every man will receive his commendation from God. (1Corinthians (RSV) 4)"

"If we say we have fellowship with him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not live according to the truth; 7 but if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin. (1John (RSV) 1)"

These are clear references to sin as in Jn. 8 above. Darkness refers to remaining in sin, not being annihilated.

So what happens to those that "remain" in darkness when they are exposed to the light of the Lord? In a literal sense on earth their "old man" is burned up and created new in the image of Christ. What happens if that conversion never on earth happens? What would happen to them once they finally see the glorious presence of the Lord and are not prepared for it?

Darkness BTW is metaphorical not for just being in sin but being outside the will of God.

2Sa 22:29 For thou [art] my lamp, O LORD: and the LORD will lighten my darkness.

1Jo 1:5 This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. 6 If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth:

Decisions are permanent? They can have permanent CONSEQUENCES, but they are not, in and of themselves, permanent.

Yes, decision are permanent. Obviously you've never said, "My decision if final" to anyone.

With all due respect, this is one of the most absurd, illogical analogies I have read on these forums. It begs SO MANY questions, I'll only list four:

Because it makes so much sense?

1) Your whole house of cards either stands or falls on whether we remember these punishments. How are we to remember the "punishment" forever if we cease to exist? Does God remember? Does He keep reliving it over and over? What does that say about His compassion?

Haven't you heard? The "wicked" are resurrected after the 1,000 year millennium to be judged by the righteous.

Rev 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and [I saw] the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received [his] mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This [is] the first resurrection.

2) You assume we remember all the punishments in our lives. What about the ones we forget? Are those still "eternal"?

Of course. There are beatings I received as a child as a result of some sort of punishment I received that has long been forgotten.

3) All punishments are simply events in a person's life. Are all events eternal, also? What about joyful, sorrowful, luminous, or glorious events in our lives? Are all remembered events eternal?

Rev 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

I am certain that in the new heaven and new earth that "former things" such as sorrow, crying, pain and death will indeed pass away.

4) Honestly, do you think this is what Jesus meant when He said that the wicked will "go into eternal punishment"?...Really?

Yep.

No, not really. If it ever does, I'll start questioning my sanity :) .

Sorry to hear that.

I don't have much time anymore. I'll have more time after the first of the year to respond. This topic is getting old anyway and it's not what I want to think about at this joyous time of year. I'll give you the last word.

God Bless and Merry Christmas to you and your family,

Thanks Mark but I don't celebrate Christmas...Christ was born is September.
 
RND wrote: "So you believe Jeusus is and the Angels are in hell watching the wicked being tortured in flames. God it." No RND, you "ain't" "Got it." You put words in my mouth to build your strawman. Ps.68:2 and Rev.14:10,11 reads "PRESENCE." Now you tell us RND do you believe what the Bible says on that?? Tell us what the word "presence" means. I believe Heb.8:1 and Rev.3:2. Oh yes, don't forget Ps.139.

RND wrote of JN.3:13: "Then if no man has ascended there has been no judgment. No judgment, no toasting." Should you like to know the time of His ascension please read Acts 1:9-11. And, do you know some manuscripts read "which is in heaven" referring to the Christ? Thus we have Jesus speaking to Nicodemus on earth and yet at the same time Jesus is in heaven. What does that tell us about "presence"??

RND wrote: "Whi is Jesus talking about in Lk.16:31 Duval? keeping in mind that "no man has "ascended " to heaven." RND if you will please read the context the rich man wants Lazarus to be sent back to earth to warn his brothers. That would require Lazarus to be raised. The rich man is told they would not believe though one be raised from the dead.

kRND wrote: "Neither Lazarus nor the rich man went anywhere." The inspired word says the rich man went to hades and Lazarus went to Abraham's bosum. Read the text RND.

RND wrote: "Sent back from where? Where Lazarus didn't go?" Again, RND, Lazarus at death went to Abraham's bosum. Read the Bible not something written to bolster a false doctrine.
 
Hey! Did I read that RND said Jesus was born in September??? I didn't know that. Don't think RND does either.
 
RND said:
....Thanks Mark but I don't celebrate Christmas...Christ was born is September.
Its about the birth, not the date. Nobody knows what month he was born in, and that includes you. And it doesn't matter. What matters is:

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men." (Luke 2:10-14)

THAT is what Christimas is about, and THAT is something to celebrate!!!

(I even used the KJV in my quote, just to show I'm a nice guy.)
 
duval said:
Hey! Did I read that RND said Jesus was born in September??? I didn't know that. Don't think RND does either.
I know this is off topic, but this can be worked out very easily using the Bible and a little knowledge of the Jewish calendar and old Jewish customs concerning when their priests are supposed to serve at the Temple.
 
St Francis said:
Its about the birth, not the date.

What did Jesus tell us to do to remember Him?

Nobody knows what month he was born in, and that includes you. And it doesn't matter.

Actually loads of people know when Jesus was born, including me! He was born during Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement since it is obvious He came to atone for our sins. Right after He atones for out sin we "tabernacle" with Him in that He comes to "dwell" with us. That's why knowing, learning and understanding the feasts and holy days is so important.

What matters is:

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men." (Luke 2:10-14)

THAT is what Christimas is about, and THAT is something to celebrate!!!

No, Christmas is all about the pagan holiday called Saturnalia that owes it's history to ancient Babylon.

(I even used the KJV in my quote, just to show I'm a nice guy.)

Tell me something. Would a woman blessed with by God to carry the Messiah be so ignorant as to place a baby in a manger in "swaddling clothes" in the middle of winter? Would shepherds be in the fields with their flocks?
 
vic C. said:
I know this is off topic, but this can be worked out very easily using the Bible and a little knowledge of the Jewish calendar and old Jewish customs concerning when their priests are supposed to serve at the Temple.

Right you are Vic. Jesus was conceived during Chanukah, the feast of lights - when the "light of the world" came into being. He was born during Yom Kippur, which falls either during late September or early October.
 
St Francis said:
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men." (Luke 2:10-14)

THAT is what Christimas is about, and THAT is something to celebrate!!!

RND said:
No, Christmas is all about the pagan holiday called Saturnalia that owes it's history to ancient Babylon.

Tell me something. Would a woman blessed with by God to carry the Messiah be so ignorant as to place a baby in a manger in "swaddling clothes" in the middle of winter? Would shepherds be in the fields with their flocks?

The bible itself says that Mary placed Jesus within a manger....I am not so certain this makes her ignorant. More like trusting in God to be their provider? After all...was there not any room for them in the inn? Due to the events going on at the time, which I do believe involved a Roman census...a great number had gathered in the area at that time. It was a miracle in itself that they were able to find any form of comfort at all in the stables or with the animals out there.

Just my oppinion...but I do not believe the bible to be a story book written solely for our enjoyment.

As far as the date of Jesus' birth, should the exact date matter? Is not the idea of celebrating His birth enough? For are any one of us certain in regards of the exact day He rose from the dead? I doubt it...though likely a number of scholars may have made some educated guesses. That is about all any of us can do. God alone knows the exact time, so in truth, I do not see how that even relates to the subject at hand.
 
LostLamb said:
The bible itself says that Mary placed Jesus within a manger....I am not so certain this makes her ignorant. More like trusting in God to be their provider? After all...was there not any room for them in the inn? Due to the events going on at the time, which I do believe involved a Roman census...a great number had gathered in the area at that time. It was a miracle in itself that they were able to find any form of comfort at all in the stables or with the animals out there.

It would be helpful to quote me fully. This way you'd understand I wasn't calling Mary ignorant. No woman in her right mind would place a baby in swaddling clothes in the middle of winter. None.
Just my oppinion...but I do not believe the bible to be a story book written solely for our enjoyment.

That's true.

As far as the date of Jesus' birth, should the exact date matter?

I think so.

Is not the idea of celebrating His birth enough?

Is that a scriptural command? How did Jesus say to remember Him?

For are any one of us certain in regards of the exact day He rose from the dead? I doubt it...though likely a number of scholars may have made some educated guesses.

I am.

That is about all any of us can do. God alone knows the exact time, so in truth, I do not see how that even relates to the subject at hand.

I know, let's get back on track!
 
RND said:
It would be helpful to quote me fully. This way you'd understand I wasn't calling Mary ignorant. No woman in her right mind would place a baby in swaddling clothes in the middle of winter. None.

I did quote you fully. I just did not like the idea that you implied that she was at all ignorant or that mother would be in light of her present situation. For regardless of the season, nights get cold. No child realisticaly should be out in the cold without proper warmth. Then....God is capable of a number of miracles. Perhaps that is where her trust was. That is all I am saying.

In regards to the issue of date...I could not begin to count the number of people who have made claims such as they know the exact day Jesus was born, or when He rose from the dead....yet much of the same tend to do so with the day the world is to end....and somehow...all have been wrong. Still, to each their own I suppose.

Jesus spoke of remembering Him by the breaking of bread and partaking of the cup, or more or less what a number of us today I believe, call communion. Saying Drink and Eat in remembrance of Him. Just the same...I do NOT believe it is a sin to celebrate Christmas with the intent to glorify Jesus rather than idolize the commercialism of it all or a man formerly known as Saint Klaus who did good unto mankind. Then...again...to each their own.

Yes...it is time this thread got back on track...though like one or two others...I say...this topic is getting old seeing as a number of us may and very likely will not come to agree and see things differently.
 
LostLamb said:
I did quote you fully.

You comment regarding what I said did not include my reference to winter. A warm September night is considerably different than a cold winter's night.

I just did not like the idea that you implied that she was at all ignorant or that mother would be in light of her present situation.

That's just it, I never implied Mary was ignorant. I implied it would be ignorant to leave a baby outside in the winter in "swaddling."

For regardless of the season, nights get cold.

Not in the desert where I live. Nights are routinely in to high 70's to low 80's even at night. The Mojave desert is quite similar to Israel's desert.

No child realisticaly should be out in the cold without proper warmth. Then....God is capable of a number of miracles. Perhaps that is where her trust was. That is all I am saying.

Yes, I see what you are saying. Now, instead of guessing maybe we can use the Bible to give us our much needed answers.

In regards to the issue of date...I could not begin to count the number of people who have made claims such as they know the exact day Jesus was born, or when He rose from the dead....yet much of the same tend to do so with the day the world is to end....and somehow...all have been wrong. Still, to each their own I suppose.

I have no desire to set dates when Jesus will return. But God does give us clues just as He did in Daniel for when the Messiah would come. In that sense we can surely know when Cjrist was born - it is not a "mystery."

Jesus spoke of remembering Him by the breaking of bread and partaking of the cup, or more or less what a number of us today I believe, call communion. Saying Drink and Eat in remembrance of Him. Just the same...I do NOT believe it is a sin to celebrate Christmas with the intent to glorify Jesus rather than idolize the commercialism of it all or a man formerly known as Saint Klaus who did good unto mankind. Then...again...to each their own.

I think the day is less and less about Jesus.

Yes...it is time this thread got back on track...though like one or two others...I say...this topic is getting old seeing as a number of us may and very likely will not come to agree and see things differently.

I'm having a great time with this topic. If it's not your cup of tea......
 
RND said:
... Actually loads of people know when Jesus was born, including me! He was born during Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement since it is obvious He came to atone for our sins. Right after He atones for out sin we "tabernacle" with Him in that He comes to "dwell" with us. That's why knowing, learning and understanding the feasts and holy days is so important.
Yes, it's off topic again, but you bring out a good point. What He does actually is, tabernacle (dwell) with us!

John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Oh, the feast right after Yom Kippur is... The Feast of Tabernacles. :amen
 
OK, lets calm down now. It was all just a misunderstanding. RND, thanks for clarifying. I understood you were debunking the idea of Mary doing these things in wintertime, in the desert, not that she didn't do them at all. Yes, the Bible says what she did, but doesn't directly say when she did them.

So without further adieu... back to Hell Fire (no pun intended). :yes
 
vic C. said:
OK, lets calm down now. It was all just a misunderstanding. RND, thanks for clarifying. I understood you were debunking the idea of Mary doing these things in wintertime, in the desert, not that she didn't do them at all. Yes, the Bible says what she did, but doesn't directly say when she did them.

So without further adieu... back to Hell Fire (no pun intended). :yes

Thanks Vic.
 
Here is something for you guys to meditate on:
If we were to use analogies to describe heaven and hell, it would be more apt to say that heaven is fire and hell is frozen.

God is a consuming fire. The angels that stand next to God are called the Seraphim: A word from Hebrew which literally means "the burning ones". They burn from the fire that is God.

Those in hell are not in God's presence. I have heard it said the the saints in heaven would freeze in the "fires" of hell. I thought that was interssting.
 
St Francis said:
Here is something for you guys to meditate on:
If we were to use analogies to describe heaven and hell, it would be more apt to say that heaven is fire and hell is frozen.

God is a consuming fire. The angels that stand next to God are called the Seraphim: A word from Hebrew which literally means "the burning ones". They burn from the fire that is God.

Those in hell are not in God's presence. I have heard it said the the saints in heaven would freeze in the "fires" of hell. I thought that was interssting.

I think this is a point that i have tried to make in this thread as well. Nice touch.
 
RND said:
A God of a "love me or else" mindset is a god I do not serve nor choose to serve.

It's not "love me or else" but rather "I can have nothing to do with sin because I, God, am holy and separate from all that is unholy and evil. In addition to that, I must punish all violations of my law because I am just."

A god who does not have the above qualities is not a god worthy of my worship and devotion.

I serve a God so full of love that He would provide His enemies with the means to salvation and reconciliation without even asking for it! I serve a God that is full of mercy and love for: "He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love." - 1 John 4:8

It seems that you're making the same mistake so many others make regarding this subject: You accept only the attributes of God that are pleasing to us while rejecting the others that seem not so pleasant, such as holiness, justice and wrath. Be careful: By accepting only the divine attributes of love and mercy while denying these others, you are essentially fashioning a god to fit your own design. That is idolatry. It's okay to struggle with how all these attributes can coexist in God--after all, ultimately there will always be something about God that we can't understand, since we are mere humans. To embrace some while rejecting others, however, is to go too far.

YM
 
YM,
Out of curiosity, why would God tell us to love our enemies, yet He will torture His for eternity? Why would a mere human who is sane, never want their children to suffer forever, no matter what they have done, yet we are supposed to believe a God of love will allow His children to suffer forever?
Grace, Bubba
 
One question please for those against the idea of an ongoing eternal punishment...
How do you perceive the punishment? What will be the method of torment other than just saying roasting and toasting?
 
Back
Top