The mechanism is 'debt'. And debt results in higher interest rates, taxes, and loss of jobs.
Got it, you don't understand.
I want you to tell me, due to your statement, 'still have some', which ones we had, and which ones we still have.
Seriously? The bill of flipping rights. Now what rights have we lost? You have yet to answer.
That just means that you can extradite criminals and that a person is secure in their property in each recognized state. This is property rights, not slavery.
You don't understand the Dred Scott decision. The Dred Scott decision was made by the Supreme Court who interprets the Constitution.
You mean it was heard and reviewed by the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court doesn't pass legislation.
It declared the Missouri Compromise was null and void.
Nope, it did not reverse the decision for Missouri to be a slave state and the creation of Maine as a free State. You know, what the compromise actually was.
The Southernor or any slave owner could take his slaves into any state of the U.S. and any territory of the U.S., and expect protection under the Constitution.
That is based in property rights. Dredd Scott made it that African people could not be citizens and slaves could not sue for their freedom.
The point being, the Southern whites didn't have to make up anything to present some 'lost cause' propaganda, as you claimed.
Eugenics was a whole bunch of made up hogwash that was used to justify the slavery of the black peoples of Africa.
The Southern whites had the Constitution on their side. And yes, slaves were not citizens. Price you pay for being a slave.
Ots funny you are saying it's abprice paid when people were forced into slavery. It was a price forced onto them and their children.
You can despise slavery all you want. That is immaterial. My point is that it is from God. My point is that it was protected under the Constitution.
My stance is that you are despicable for defending slavery.
The Southernor didn't need to justify slavery. It was already justified in the Bible and protected by the Constitution. Thus your claim that the Southernor just twisted things to make it appear just, is false.
It's almost like there was an entire war and industry based around it. Almost like you want to pretend that history doesn't exist because it's inconvienent.
Blacks, negros, are the descendants of Ham. That is what you questioned.
You still have not demonstrated this. Your 'proof' is literally a name of a descendants and a possibility that the grand cjildbwasb"etheopian" but it causes problems because Etheopia and Egypt ( The land of Cannan) were nuebian. You have stated in the past the nuebians were not black.
And that is what I proved to you. Ethiopians. Cush. First son of Ham. Which means they as a race are under the curse. Which means the more poltical power blacks exercise over a people and area, the more the curse come into play. The curse and blessings have never been revoked.
The big problem here is that Jesus lifted generational curses and this entire spiel also forgets that Native Americans and asians don't fit into the three sons model. It's almost like human lineage is more complicated than 8 people on a boat.
You can blame anyone you want for the negro's inability to govern themselves.
What are you talking about. Multiple empire and world leaders were and are ran by Black people.ussolini got his butt handed to him when he tried to invade Etheopia. Morocco was and is a magor trade center. Egypt demonization Noth East Africa for centuries. Mali was the richest empire of the entire world. Kenyans Nigeria has had major impacts on world politics. Etc. You literally have no idea what you are talking about.
The fact is, they can't change it.
Odd, considering every time intelligence and aptitude is checked and studied amongst whites and blacks, there is no noticeable difference when sociology economic factors are controlled for.
It goes back to Ham. It goes back to God. And, you can blame God for the blessing of the Semitic and white race also.
Show me the exact line in the Bible where it says God blessed the "white" race!. You can't because The white race doesn't exist. What we call the white race today is a collection of loose ethnic groups that weren't always included. Most Romans, eastern Europeans,.Germans, and The Irish were not considered white until the later half of the 20th century.
For that is the only reason they have developed as they have. Blame whoever you like. But you can't change it. Houses are cheap in Detroit. And just because the U.S. disagrees and pushes the blacks to the forefront to lead, doesn't change it. It will prove it.
Odd how it hasn't. Odd how it's quite the opposite. The "IQ" differences are becoming indistinguishable as infrastructure improves. More people of African decent are earning degrees and going to college. Etc. Its getting better and "white" people aren't suffering because of it.
You just claimed it was white people's fault. Western imperialism.
The west doesn't mean white. Considering half of the west wasn't considered white for a long time.
Actually that is the best thing that happened to blacks.
Forced labor, destroyed lineages, torture, dehumanization, several centuries of constant laws to handicap black people? How is that better?
Just look at South Africa. A civilization was created by the white folk imperialist's. Blacks have taken it over. Now watch it crumble. The same will happen to the U.S. You can disregard God, but you can't change His decisions.
South Africa is not crumbling, also are you seriously using a State that segregated the black population until recently with ghettos, bans on black people becoming educated, holding certain job rolls. Etc. Its quite funny how there has to be all this oppressive legislation in these countries and the south to handicap black people if they are supposed to be inferior.i wonder why.
Statues of Americans are being pulled down.
You mean statues erected by the Daughters of the confederacy of treasonous individuals that were erected during the cibal rights era to intimidate black people demanding equality under the law? Huh, I wonder why.
Christian symbols and practices are being removed.
From where? Churches? No homes? No. Oh you mean the ones built after world War 2 as a middle finger to a country that doesn't exist.
MLK streets are being labled in every city in America. Statues of blacks are being raised.
Awesome
It doesn't matter the percentage of population. The tail is wagging the dog. Bringing the U.S. under the curse. And just like with that first empire built by Cush, blacks, Nimrod and Babylon, wickedness rules. (Gen. 10:8-10)
I just checked and it look at all those medertarain cultures. The Akadians, nuebians, etc. All descendants of Ham. The Philistines were light skinned. Etc. Man you should really double check your sources.
No, you're the one trying to attribute what I say to the 50's, not me. I am talking about a Christian America that was established as white and Christian from it's very beginning. From God.
You don't have the historical evidence.
A third world country is a third world country.
A third world country is a country without allegiance to The Usa or The USSR. That's why the term is no longer used.
We see them outside our border trying to get in.
You mean people to our southern border?
Gee, no white folks out there.
You mean people from the central climates?
It is my opinion that the 'third world country' identification has it's roots in the prophecies concerning the three sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Ham being identified as 'third world'.
The problem is there are definitions to the terms first world ( United States and its allies), 2nd world ( The USSR and its allies) and Third world ( niether)
My point is that conservatism and Christian are not the same. Yes, most white Christians are conservative. But I wouldn't say that of black Christians. Black Christians will support a black in the U.S. no matter what he is, as long as he is black. Blacks will turn O.J. lose because he is black.
Quantrill
racist nonsense
