Star Wars v. Star Trek?
No contest. One is a good-versus-evil saga with a few silly characters. FWIW I liked Jar Jar Binks better than those irritating Ewoks who look like animal crackers, that Fishheaded admiral, that idiot bounty hunter (robot or cyborg? Who cares), that roaring hairy sidekick of the space pirate (though I did understand why the fanboy called unibrowed Brooke Shields a 'wookie' on Suddenly Susan), the squirrely sand people, etc., though I did like Princess Leia's buns in the first one. Binks was funny as the irritating stoned rastaman of dubious orientation, kind of like Doug E. Doug as Alec Baldwin's and Anthony Hopkins' sidekick in The Edge-you knew the bear was gonna have soul food for lunch and the white guys'd get away---nothing like that silly mincing villian in the black Nazi helmet (Rick Moranis as Dark Helmet in Spaceballs was better).
The other is a complex tale of military adventurers. I always like the original better than the spinoffs though I liked the first season of Enterprise because Jolene Blalock can glare at the dumb white guys mighty well. TNG was to me too eighties, too much management and diplomacy, too many irritating earnest characters (Riker, Crusher, Data, Geordi, Worf etc. were all pretty wooden. But Kirk was the perfect supercilious horny military commander, Spock was cooler than cool, and Scotty "I canna change the law of physics!" the cool blue collar guy with a heart of gold. Bonus: short skirts! Cool funny villians: Harry Mudd and Cyrano Jones (the one who brought the Tribbles). The only bad thing was too many episodes with a thing like a galaxy size amoeba trying to pull the Enterprise into it.
