Carry_Your_Name
Member
- Oct 2, 2023
- 3,038
- 447
To be honest, women tend to be less stoic and more capricious, they are under the impact of hormonal ebbs and flows during their menstrual cycle, they are more sensitive to negative emotions; whereas men are generally more interested at things, their compositions and mechanisms, women are generally more interested at people, their feelings and relationships. This is a stereotypical assessment which applies to most women - not all women, but these qualities do put women in a disadvantage in regard of leadership. If your church preaches the true gospel of Christ and dares to expose the darkness, the lying narrative from the news, the evils spirits, to redpill the congregation, instead of generic "self help" motivational speeches with a Christian label, then be prepared for pushbacks from Satan, the trials and tribulations, you know, the immense pressure, the negative feedback, the vicious attacks, even political persecutions. True faith costs dearly, especially for the leader of a flock, not every woman can handle that.Here's where I came to rest on this. There is a history of corrupt male pastors in all denominations, so calling a male does not guarantee righteous leadership. I have not known a church that opposes female pastors including Catholic, Lutheran Brethren, Southern Baptist, and Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, that does not allow women to teach Bible studies, Sunday School classes, or fill other leadership roles in the church. I have to say this sure sounds hypocritical.
Last edited: