• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

How does Pork Kill you?

Vic C. said:
Jesus did away with both of these, replacing them with a new kingdom model with new symbols (communion, baptism) and a new way of "being Israel". If one still thinks that Torah (e.g. the food laws) are still in force, it is hard to see how one has developed an understanding of how God's story is actually moving forward in time.

In short, to think the food laws are still in place is not to realize how history turns on the cross.
Drew, I honestly believe that ^ and Joe's post (and Dora's), should be our perfect ending to this topic and I am seriously thinking it has run it's course. I agree that proper obedience is to not take our eyes off the new and better Covenant God has laid down at the foot of the Cross, for that is where my reward awaits me.

Col 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
Col 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
Col 2:15 And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it.
Col 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:
Col 2:17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

You have my full support to close this - let all things be judged by 2 or 3 witnesses. Yes?
According to the wisdom that our Father grants to you, brother! It is yea and amen to me as you say -so it will be.

~Sparrow
 
I have been watching this topic, and I have not said anything, but if I may, thank you. I eat pork, not like I did in the past, but I still do, in moderation. When I get a taste for pork spare ribs, I will hunt them down, I still eat ham, and pork chops, and the occasional pigs feet. If the pig is corn fed, and raised properly, there is no problems. When I was coming up, they still fed pigs garbage, and that caused problems, but today it is different. God said don't call anything that He has made unclean. Below is a good article I found.

Monday, May 04, 2009
Why do Jews not eat pork?

Rabbi Eric Eisenkramer

The swine flu outbreak recently got me thinking about the Jewish views about the pig. Not consuming pork is a defining tradition in Judaism, one of main rules of keeping kosher, the Jewish dietary laws. When I learned of the swine flue, I wondered for a moment if Judaism got it right in prohibiting the consumption of the pig.

The laws of keeping kosher have been a central part of Jewish practice since Biblical times. In the book of Leviticus, God told the Israelites that they may eat any animal that has a cleft hoof and chews the cud: this includes ox, sheep, goats, deer and cows. However, God prohibits Jews from eating pork since it is an animal that has a split hoof but does not chew the cud. As with many of the laws of the Torah, there is no real reason given for why Jews cannot eat pork. The Bible only states that the pig is unclean. Here God tells us what we cannot do, and the reason seems to be: “Because I told you so!â€Â

Jewish commentators throughout the ages have tried to understand why God would prohibit the consumption of pork. Some scholars believe that the pig simply became taboo in Israelite culture early on and we have upheld that tradition until today. Other commentators suggest that even before there were doctors, Jews realized that the pig could be dangerous to eat as it spends most of the day in its own refuse. Or maybe we cannot eat pork because as the old joke goes: “It is hard to be Jew!†Whatever the reason for the prohibition of pork, it was a powerful practice that Jews have upheld for millennia.

I suspect that if you took a survey of American Jews today, the vast majority would say that they do eat pork. Ever since arriving on American shores, Jews have strived to assimilate and fit in with the larger culture. For many people that meant giving up specific Jewish practices that made them stand apart, like not working on Saturday and avoiding bacon and ham.



At Hancock Shaker Village in MA. I'll hold a piglet but not eat it!

Even in Israel, many secular Jews eat pork. They call it basar lavan, which means “white meat,†like tv commercial slogan: “The Other White Meat.†It is interesting that Israelis do not use the biblical word chazer, which means pig. Perhaps the Jewish stigma against eating pork can still remain strong, even for those who do choose to eat it.

I grew up eating pork like any good Midwestern American boy. In my family, we did not practice any of the kosher laws. We ate pork, pepperoni, ham and bacon. I grew up in a Reform Synagogue in St. Louis and was confirmed. However, it was not until I entered Tufts University that I became very interested in Judaism. Yet, I had no connection or background with the kosher laws. Like most American Jews I knew that pork was forbidden in Jewish practice, but I still kept eating pepperoni pizza.

Then one day I was in the dining hall and I saw a grilled ham and cheese, a sandwich that I had consumed a dozen times that year and always enjoyed. As I thought about eating that ham and cheese, I actually got a little bit nauseous. At that moment, I knew then that it was time for me to give up pork. I have not had a slice of ham or a piece of bacon since.

Looking back, it was my rising sense of Jewish commitment that was coming into conflict with my American lifestyle and dietary choices. I could no longer stomach the idea of eating pork if I was going to continue to move closer to Judaism. So I gave it up. Today, I practice a modified from of keeping kosher: I do not eat pork and shellfish, but I do mix meat and milk. This compromise works for me, and it is a very Reform way of approaching Jewish tradition.

Reform Judaism stresses the idea of informed choice. Reform Jews need to learn about the Jewish rituals and traditions and why they are important. Then we choose which traditions to follow in our lives, traditions that give us a sense of meaning and connection to Judaism. For me that meant that I do not eat pork, but I do not practice other kosher laws like separating meat an milk.

The beauty of Reform Judaism is that each person can choose his or her own level of ritual practice. The danger of Reform Judaism is that we must have some level of Jewish practice to keep our religion meaningful and alive. Informed choice does not mean wholesale rejection.

People sometimes ask me if I miss eating pork, and I always say: “Yes, sometimes I do.†But my refraining from pork is a way of acknowledging the laws of keeping kosher, and it makes me feel closer to my Judaism and Jews stretching all the way back to the Bible.

http://theflyfishingrabbi.blogspot.com/ ... -pork.html
 
Sparrowhawke said:
You have my full support to close this - let all things be judged by 2 or 3 witnesses. Yes?
According to the wisdom that our Father grants to you, brother! It is yea and amen to me as you say -so it will be.

~Sparrow

How about we all just walk away from this topic (until someone in the future feels the need to reflect or bring something new to the discussion)?

Ok, on three, one, two THREE!
-come on, let go... :rolling
 
Fembot said:
Sparrowhawke said:
You have my full support to close this - let all things be judged by 2 or 3 witnesses. Yes?
According to the wisdom that our Father grants to you, brother! It is yea and amen to me as you say -so it will be.

~Sparrow

How about we all just walk away from this topic (until someone in the future feels the need to reflect or bring something new to the discussion)?

Ok, on three, one, two THREE!
-come on, let go... :rolling
I just did, bring something new :yes
 
Lewis W said:
Fembot said:
Sparrowhawke said:
You have my full support to close this - let all things be judged by 2 or 3 witnesses. Yes?
According to the wisdom that our Father grants to you, brother! It is yea and amen to me as you say -so it will be.

~Sparrow

How about we all just walk away from this topic (until someone in the future feels the need to reflect or bring something new to the discussion)?

Ok, on three, one, two THREE!
-come on, let go... :rolling
I just did, bring something new :yes

I know I was writing my post at the same time...it happens...
 
Drew said:
Sparrowhawke said:
I am now pleading with my Christian Canadian to accept this token. It is a peace offering. A twig and not an arrow.
I appreciate the spirit of this, but I think it is the responsibility to each Christian to point out error.
  • Agreed but when we do we are wisely cautioned, "Look to yourselves first" < it could be a case of the log removing the splinter> and I need to heed this as much or moreso than any other (maybe?) well that aside, we all need to hear it.[/*:m:3vwl4l1l]
And, frankly, I think there is a clear and robust case that the Levitical food laws no longer apply to anyone.
  • I know this: You don't think food laws apply. Agreed. Wholeheartedly agreed. Stated many times, over and over and over again. But we don't stop there?? - shall we turn from the quote "levitical food laws" and consider the law as it speaks to greater things like idolatry? or like adultery? It would suite our purpose to agree that we are no longer talking about mr. porky pig here but the very law itself. I quickly apologize for the tone of that statement -- paul said it much better when he spoke about eating meat (it was an analogy) that were offered to idols -- this isn't idolatry (eating the thing offered) and I'm sure you will quickly agree that none of that stuff [the "idols"] can mean anything to us who serve the Almighty in Spirit and Truth. All things will pass away - only those things that remain are of Him. So there are no "real" idols - but can we then say, to those who refrain from worshiping idols in any way shape or form, that they are limiting the liberties of all men??? I hope you could hear that - but if not it is unimportant. I'll reply briefly in the comment below. [/*:m:3vwl4l1l]

You, and others may well wonder if this is worth arguing about. I think it is. Bad theology - even in respect to items that seem entirely disconnected with the content of "real life" - almost always has negative consequences.
  • I think we can all agree on this point. Let's also agree to sweep away the rhetorical and seek the end.[/*:m:3vwl4l1l]

It is important to understand that the food laws have been done away with to properly integrate the cross into the larger story of Israel and of humanity in general. Jesus did away with the written code in its entirety - food laws, ceremony, sacrifice in the temple, all of it. He came to fulfill Israel's destiny and in so doing pass judgement on two of the key elements of Jewish life: temple and Torah.
  • IN a spiritual sense, I agree with what you say. The law about "murder" is written into His temples -- our hearts. What was once law is not engraved but being engrafted into us. Our hearts then can never become "hardened like stone" but must remain pliant and willing before our King.[/*:m:3vwl4l1l]

Jesus did away with both of these, replacing them with a new kingdom model with new symbols (communion, baptism) and a new way of "being Israel". If one still thinks that Torah (e.g. the food laws) are still in force, it is hard to see how one has developed an understanding of how God's story is actually moving forward in time.

In short, to think the food laws are still in place is not to realize how history turns on the cross.
  • Agreed.[/*:m:3vwl4l1l]

Short and sweet because this thread is indeed coming to an end.
Read between the lines written by your brother and sister here.
I love the way that our sister "handy" made a brief statement, "because the Lord is doing a work within each of our hearts, dependent upon where each person is in their individual walk with God" and will spare you elaboration but only refer back to that post. < http://www.christianforums.net/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=38938&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&start=135#p472040 >

We all know and I hope agree that Jesus did not break the law.
The question becomes: Was Jesus One with the Father?
He is the same yesterday today and tomorrow. Is this not also true of Christ?
It is the job of the Holy Spirit to convict each person. Are we the greater? If so, how so?

These are the things we struggle with when we ask and peer into the Law itself.
If they are not heard then it is safe to consider that unto us is not given an ear to hear and let that be the conclusion. The blind shall not lead the blind because our trust is firmly placed in the only one who does not judge by the hearing and also not by what "appears" to his sight. He judges righteous judgment and we can all safely trust in him.

Drew, if you are stumbling on the word that I bring today - feel free to PM me. I am happy to search with you and discuss at any length how Jesus fullfilled the Law, how the Holy Spirit (Who by definition is 'holy' and utterly apart from sin) can use the law as a tool and convict sinners... They, while under the conviction of the Holy Spirit are being brought to grace, to the very cross for the unsaved -- or are being goaded by His Spirit to run to their Father for grace. It is this action that is seen here.

The type (pattern) that we who judge by our ear only is a mere reflection of what is true (and hidden).
If I were under conviction for sexual sin for example - but didn't want to talk about it because of my shame - and feared to be exposed... I could say, "My righteousness is that I follow the law better than ye all". Of course that is only filthy rags. But unto me it is the only thing that covers me. There is sin that leads to death (I don't say ye shall pray for that) and there is sin that does not: For that we simply ask our Father and He gives life. It is a sweet and abundant life as many here can say. In the garden both Adam and Eve hid from the Lord because they were naked. Today the "hiding behind false righteousness can be seen as a similar thing.

When we grab the filthy garment from our brothers hand and do not offer better - the full righteousness of Christ (in trade for nakedness) who is willing to trade His glory for our shame we are robbing God and violating the intent of the Holy Spirit who like handy said [and clearly does as seen in her actions --- (but I'm not thinking this to show how 'special' she is and know she won't take it that way -same true for all who are doers and not hearers only)] deals with us where we are.

Unto us who are given feet that are agile and swift is also given responsibility. If you love me? Obey me. If you love me? Feed (not spank) my sheep. The sheep hear his voice and WILL NOT follow another. Translated from Hebrew are the words from psalm 22: (23??) The Lord is my shepherd I will not fear.

  • Stare straight into the face of the translation now: Yahweh is my rah-'aw (leader) -- not chaser!
    The sheep understand the difference between being led to the sweet love they crave and being chased.
    Jesus never chases the sheep and doesn't use the rod nor staff except in the way that results in comfort.

    You are his sheep. I can not chase you (drive you / force you) in right spirit. I dare not go too far in front of you that you lose sight and cry --- you are a man, bah! Yes, it is true I am mere flesh as you. We each can bring to the other the truth.
I said I would be brief and mayhaps this is misspoken. It was the need for speed that compelled for I feared the thread would close and should have accepted the Lords assurances. Should have trusted the moderators here. I do fully agree with your most recent thought about what Paul wrote regarding the law making sin even more detestable. The statements you have made have enlightened me but more so it is because for some reason (and pardon the folly of my preaching to you here) ... it so because for some reason I was given peace to see it. The Lord is NOT my chaser. That sexual sin that I spoke of in analogy (by calling it pork) is the symptom. We struggle not against flesh and blood. We speak not about swine and blood. We speak here of sin and death and the resurrection and life. The law clearly states if we are guilty in one small point-- we are guilty of all. Beware though because the same one who says "love your brother" also says, "I am no respecter of persons". This is why when we go to reprove our brother (me) we must first consider ourselves so that we have a heart of understanding and can speak to him in a meek and quiet spirit as you have spoken to me this day.

My heart rejoices to see you standing next to me in the field that our Father has placed us in. Do not look at me - I am dark but lovely. I have been toiling in the direct light of the sun. My argument, my sin, my law, my God, my Grace and my brother and sister are One. May we conclude this discussion that shows my shame all too clearly to any who are given an eye to see?

Many thanks to all for their patience -- please understand how difficult it is for me to confess myself this way. Here though for your consideration the working within me, the struggle against sin of and for the redeemed, the chosen - even me.

~Sparrow

PS - It is my intent to go back though this thread an glean further depths of the truth [closed] or not --and I would invite all to do so with thanks in their hearts for this thread, this meal, these various "meats" that have been set before us today by our King.
 
No, it can stay open as long as people cooperate and not resort to personal attacks or pet name like... honey. Sorry Fem, but that sounded so, um, patronizing. :yes
 
Fembot said:
Agree to disagree and leave it at that. Like Handy said, there really are important things to be concerned with. If you agree that we all sin then you should also agree that some people are doing their best to obey God. Whether the law is outdated or not, those who choose live by God's laws will reap the benefits. You are being judgmental by taking sparrows "peace offering" and turning it into an "arrow."

God Bless Drew
According to scripture if you obey the law but fail in ONE point you are guilty of ALL.
Do you obey the WHOLE law ?
Shall we examine the 600+ laws to see if you do or not ?
If you miss even one then you are guilty of ALL.
Do you not understand this ?
 
Drew said:
Perhaps FoC will not agree, but I see Paul as saying that the Law actually increases the sinfulness of those who try to pursue it. Yes, I mean what I say and can add to the scriptural case I have begun in this post - to seek to be under the Law is to seek a state of increased sin.
Seeing that we are told that if we fail in even one point of the law in trying to follow that we are guilty of all, Id say I definitely agree that the law does exactly what youve said here.
Im amazed, as Im sure most of us are who understand our freedom in Christ, when some want to willingly take that yoke of bondage on themselves.
 
Follower of Christ, Fembot, Drew: Greetings and Peace (Shalom) to you <and to all> !

follower of Christ said:
Fembot said:
Agree to disagree and leave it at that. Like Handy said, there really are important things to be concerned with. If you agree that we all sin then you should also agree that some people are doing their best to obey God. Whether the law is outdated or not, those who choose live by God's laws will reap the benefits. You are being judgmental by taking sparrows "peace offering" and turning it into an "arrow."

God Bless Drew <<---- :amen
According to scripture if you obey the law but fail in ONE point you are guilty of ALL.
Do you obey the WHOLE law ?
Shall we examine the 600+ laws to see if you do or not ?
If you miss even one then you are guilty of ALL.
Do you not understand this ?

I've heard several times the mention of the 613 Mitzvots* and our question, "Shall we examine??"
Perhaps we shall - but may I suggest that this would be for another thread?

Cordially,
~Sparrowhawke

As always you are free to PM me with any questions or concerns.
_____________________
Footnotes /// Accreditation /// Sources /// Definiton(s)
*Mitzvah; Mitzvot: (lit. “commandmentâ€Â); one of the Torah’s 613 Divine commandments; a good deed or religious precept; according to Chassidut, the word mitzvah stems from the root tzavta = attachment, the mitzvah creating a bond between G-d who commands and man who performs.
Definition per: http://www.chabad.org
 
jasoncran said:
Mark62 said:
The verses in the NT as quoted above pretty much dispell any Biblical reasons not to eat pork.

So its really a matter of personal taste. Everything in moderation, as for me Ive eaten:

Kangaroo
Emu
Crocodile
Buffalo
Venison
and...
Pork, pork, pork...

Because Christ is described as the Lamb of God, does that mean we stop eating lamb?? What?? no more Rogan Josh!!!??? :gah
kangaroo eaten, dang it i never look at dot and the kangaroo the same again or emu as well, i've eaten turtles,gator tail, some have eaten racoons, possums ,armidillo,squirrels,goats, donkey,camels,

jason

mm so many ways to have kangaroo Jason... good for the environment, low in fat and as long as as you dont over cook it, very tender.

Oh and for all the squeamish ones out there, there are more kangaroos in Australia now than when white man came here over 200 years ago.

Had it in a Chinese restaurant once done with black pepper and ginger... mmmm

Armadillo?? got a recipe?? must say, don't see many wandering the streets of Sydney. Squirrel sounds interesting, not much meat I'd imagine on a little grey squirrel, more of a entree? Squirrel parcels?
 
Squirrel sounds interesting, not much meat I'd imagine on a little grey squirrel, more of a entree? Squirrel parcels?
Squirrel is excellent :)
I hunt pretty much every season, never take very many tho. I think I got three grays last year.
I like to cook them like a roast with potatoes, onions and carrots. Good eating. You do need at least one large Squirrel per person and thats if they dont have a huge appetite :)
 
Back
Top