Gary
Member
Correct, did I say that?
You insinuated that since the teaching was outlawed, it is no longer plausible.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Correct, did I say that?
Creationism is more so religious dogma, not really science. In fact it does everything it can to subvert the discoveries of modern science.How does one out law science?
The evidence contradicts Young Earth Creationism, therefore it isn't plausible. Being outlawed was just a recognition that Creationism is religious dogma, not science, and that Evolution is a much stronger theory for the origin of species.You insinuated that since the teaching was outlawed, it is no longer plausible.
What Fine Tuning in nature indicates that evolution is likely false? Can you reference anything in particular?There's fine tuning in nature to. Have you given that any thought?
Creationism is more so religious dogma, not really science. In fact it does everything it can to subvert the discoveries of modern science.
I did not say anything about creationism nor does your reply address the question..Creationism is more so religious dogma, not really science. In fact it does everything it can to subvert the discoveries of modern science.
How does one out law science?
Does this really require elaboration? Discoveries related to the Theory of Evolution, for instance modern DNA sequencing that demonstrates relationships between different species, or The Big Bang Theory being supported by observations such as background radiation and the expanding universe.Such as?
What Fine Tuning in nature indicates that evolution is likely false? Can you reference anything in particular?
Creationists believe that Dinosaurs and humans roamed together, no one else really does so that seemed implied.I did not say anything about creationism nor does your reply address the question..
You believe that Trilobites, Dinosaurs and humans existed together, only Young Earth Creationists believe that to my knowledge.
Do you believe the earth is young? If so, what in the fossil record causes you to believe that?
Are you not a Young Earth Creationist?
Do you think the existence of some ancient organisms that haven't evolved much over many millions of years is proof evolution is false? What's your point about this?
Please elaborate on how the Fine Tuning argument has anything to do with whether or not evolution is true. We have no answer, because it's an irrelevant argument. The Fine Tuning Argument is an argument for the existence of God.
Creationists believe that Dinosaurs and humans roamed together, no one else really does so that seemed implied.
I also made my statement to say that Creationism is not science, therefore science is not outlawed.
Certainly, Giraffes are related to other grazing mammals, such as goats, deer, antelope, etc. And many related species of Giraffes have gone extinct, such as the Samotherium and Bohlinia, and Giraffes that previously existed in Asia actually did go extinct.Explain the genetic makeup of the Giraffe and how it could've evolved into it's present form without becoming extinct.
We're talking about science. Perhaps you can go to the Apologetics forum and see how I defended the Trinity just this week. I don't treat the Bible as a scientific textbook as some here do, hence I don't quote it on this subforum.Check this out Doulos. You are Christian, and have stated that you believe the bible and that it is the divinely inspired Word of God...yet you never lift up God or His Word in your posts, or give God or His Word any validity. You denounce it. That's very curious to me and I don't understand it.
We disagree on the interpretation, how many times does this have to be stated?Who needs a fossil record when we have the Word of God? THAT should cause us to believe it.
I do not deny Fine Tuning of the universe, so I don't see how this is an argument against evolution.I posted it before. Without the fine tuning of the state of the earth, then life could neither exist or evolve. Would you like for me to post all that info again? I will, but it would have to be later, as I have to go to work here real quick.
Outlawing it from being taught in public schools, yes no problem with that.So outlawing Creationism is ok in your eyes because it's not a science?
I have to go eat lunch, but perhaps we can focus some more on Giraffes as I am only getting started.