What's new
By:
Filters
Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I am a JW, why should I consider becoming a C

S

Solo

Guest
I am a Jehovah's Witness, why should I consider becoming a Christian?


Question: "I am a Jehovah's Witness, why should I consider becoming a Christian?"

Answer: Perhaps the most important commonality between Evangelical Christians and Jehovah’s Witnesses is our belief and trust in the Bible as the ultimate authority inspired by God, on issues concerning God and his expectations for us. While we may understand things differently, Jehovah’s Witnesses are to be highly commended for their dependence on and diligence in studying the Holy Scriptures to know God and His will. Like the Bereans, we would be wise to examine all things in life, in light of the Scriptures. To that end, we shall examine verses of the New World Translation (the version of the Bible published by their Watchtower Society) to clear up some common misunderstandings.

A Rose by any other name…

Christians get their name from being followers and worshipers of Jesus Christ, first called “Christians†in Antioch during Paul’s ministry (Acts 11:26). Paul repeatedly made it clear that to be a Christian was to be a witness to men concerning the person of Christ, to be a witness to the words and works of Christ. Jehovah’s Witnesses, on the other hand, believe that we are to focus our worship exclusively on God the Father (who is sometimes referred to in the Bible as “Jehovahâ€Â.) This name, however, was a hybrid name created by Christians by adding vowels to the tetragrammaton “YHWH,†which was the original rendering which we now know as “Yahweh†in the Hebrew and “Jehovah†in the Greek. Evangelical Christians understand Jesus to be God in all His fullness, equal in deity, but different in function from that of God the Father. Christians acknowledge that one of the names for God the Father is Jehovah; however, there are many other names and titles which the scriptures use in reference to God the Father.

Jehovah’s Witnesses understand Jesus to be Michael the Archangel, and categorically deny His deity. As we shall see, if we understand Jesus to be anything other than God, many verses present obvious contradictions. However, we know that God’s Word is inerrant and does not contradict itself. Therefore, we must understand the truth of God’s Word in a way that is consistent and faithful to His revelation. You will notice that these same verses lack any contradiction if we understand Jesus to be God the Sonâ€â€the fullness of God in bodily formâ€â€who surrendered His rights to be the suffering servant and sacrifice for our sin. (All verses were quoted directly from the Jehovah’s Witnesses New World Translation. Bold type emphasis added.)

God’s Glory

(Verses regarding God the Father)
Isaiah 42:8 “I am Jehovah. That is my name; and to no one else shall I give my own glory, neither my praise to graven images.â€Â

Isaiah 48:11 “…And to no one else shall I give my own glory.â€Â

(Verses regarding Jesus)
John 8:54 “…It is my Father that glorifies me, he who you say is YOUR Godâ€Â

John 16:14 “That one will glorify me…â€Â

John 17:1 “…Father, the hour has come; glorify your son…â€Â

John 17:5 “So now you, Father, glorify me alongside yourself with the glory that I had alongside you before the world was.â€Â

Philippians 2:10 “so that in the name of Jesus every knee should bend of those in heaven and those on earth and those under the groundâ€Â

Hebrews 5:5 “So too the Christ did not glorify himself by becoming a high priest, but [was glorified by him] who spoke with reference to him; ‘You are my son; I, today, I have become your father.â€Â

The Savior

(About the Father)
Isaiah 43:3 “For I am Jehovah your God, the Holy One of Israel your Savior.â€Â

Isaiah 43:11 “I am Jehovah and besides me there is no savior.â€Â

Isaiah 45:21 “Is it not I, Jehovah besides whom there is no other God; a righteous God and a Savior, there being none excepting me?â€Â

(About Jesus)
Luke 2:11 “because there was born to you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord…â€Â

Acts 13:23 “From the offspring of this [man] according to his promise God has brought to Israel a savior, Jesus.â€Â

Titus 1:4 “…May there be underserved kindness and peace from God [the] Father and Christ Jesus our Savior.â€Â

Whose name are we to have faith in?

(said about Jesus or by Jesus)
John 14:12 “Most truly I say to YOU, He that exercises faith in me, that one also will do the works that I do…â€Â

Acts 4:12 “Furthermore, there is no salvation in anyone else, for there is not another name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved.â€Â

Acts 26:18 “…and inheritance among those sanctified by [their] faith in me.â€Â

Revelation 2:13 “I know where you are dwelling, that is where the throne of Satan is, and yet you keep on holding fast my name, and you did not deny your faith in me…â€Â

John 20:28 “In answer Thomas said to him: My Lord and my God!†Jesus said to him: Because you have seen me have you believed?

John 20:31 “ But these have been written down that YOU may believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God, and that, because of believing YOU may have life by means of his name.â€Â

Acts 2:38 “Peter [said] to them: ‘Repent, and let each one of YOU be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ...â€Â

1 John 3:23 “Indeed, this is his commandment, that we have faith in the name of his Son Jesus Christ…â€Â

Created or Creator?

Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that Jehovah created Jesus as an angel, and that Jesus then created all other things. What do the scriptures say?

(About the Father)
Isaiah 66:2 “Now all these things my own hand has made, so that all these came to be.â€Â

Isaiah 44:24 “…I, Jehovah, am doing everything, stretching out the heavens, by myself…â€Â

(About Jesus)
John 1:3 “All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.†If all things came into existence through Jesus, He could not have been created because He is included in the “all things.â€Â

Status, Names and Titles of Jesus and Jehovah

Isaiah 9:6 “For there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us, and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder. And his name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.â€Â

Revelation 1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,†says Jehovah God, “the One who is and who was and who is coming, the Almighty.â€Â

Revelation 1:17-18 “…I am the First and the Last, and the living one, and I became dead, but, look! I am living forever and ever, and I have the keys to death and of Hades.â€Â

Revelation 2:8 “…These are the things that he says, ‘the First and the Last, who became dead, and came to life [again]â€Â

Revelation 22:12-16 “Look! I am coming quickly, and the reward I give is with me, to render to each one as his work is. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end…I, Jesus, sent my angel to bear witness to you people of these things for the congregations. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright morning star.â€Â

Revelation 21:6-7 “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To anyone thirsting I will give from the fountain of the water of life free. Anyone conquering will inherit these things, and I shall be his God and he will be my son.†If Jehovah is the Alpha and Omega (the first and last Greek letters), then the “first and the last†must refer to Jehovah, so the Witnesses claim. But when did Jehovah become dead? The only “first and last†who died and lived again is Jesus.

Hebrews 1:13 “But with reference to which one of the angels has he ever said ‘Sit at my right hand, until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet�

Truth and Unity

Jesus’ substitutionary atonement was accepted for one reason: God accepts only His own righteousness. The righteousness of a man or an angel is insufficient to hold up to the holy and perfect standard of God’s righteous law. Jesus was the only suitable sacrifice because He was the righteousness of God, and as God’s law required shed blood, Jesus took on flesh so that He might be a ransom for all who believe in His name.

Notice that if we understand Jesus to be God incarnate, then all the above verses can be understood to be true and mutually consistent in their claims. They can also be understood clearly with plain reason, taken at face value. However, if we attempt to suggest that Jesus is something less than Godâ€â€Michael the archangelâ€â€then these verses are mutually exclusive and cannot both be true, when taken in their natural context. Therefore, the truth of God’s Word necessitates that we must come to another understanding in which all Scripture is unified, interconnected, interdependent, inerrant and true. That unifying truth can be found only in the person and deity of Jesus Christ. May we see the truth revealed in Scripture as it is, not as we would each have it to be and may God receive all the glory.

If you have any questions about Jesus as God incarnate, please ask us. If you are ready to place your trust in this God incarnate Jesus, you can speak the following words to God: "Father God, I know that I am a sinner and am worthy of your wrath. I recognize and believe that Jesus is the only Savior, and that only by being God, could Jesus be the Savior. I place my trust in Jesus alone to save me. Father God, please forgive me, cleanse me, and change me. Thank you for your wonderful grace and mercy!


If you have any questions, please use the question form on our Bible Questions Answered page.


Recommended Resource: Jehovah's Witnesses Answered Verse-by-Verse by David Reed.

Retrieved from http://www.gotquestions.org/Jehovah-Wit ... stian.html
 
Hello, I am also being Bible studied by some great JW's. ( My wife introduced me to the truth)
I had a big misunderstanding about not going to Heaven and the Soul issue. But after scripture evidence was pointed to my direction, I saw that Christianity deceived me from Biblical truth even though it was staring at me all the time, even KJV if read properly would clarify everything NWT has in its teachings. I was just blind and misleaded by fasle preaching of churches I used to attend.
I have a clear understanding that Adam was literally meant to live for ever on Earth and the rest of his ascendants.Jesus role was to be the Last Adam and give us our Paradise Earth back after Armageddon and live the way Jehovah wanted Adam to live.
Now that is really something to look forward to and every Christian must know about this wonderful revelation
'The meek will inherit the Earth' (not heaven)
 
:rolling :big lol The New world translation is a joke! It is horribly flawed and changed to match the very unbiblical beliefs of the JW's. You need to read a real bible try the NKJV or the NIV or even the KJV all are far superior to the NWT. You need to see the real truth of GOD he is one father son ans spirit, he died for you and you can go to heaven if you trust in him heaven is not full.
 
Charles Taze Russell was a charlatan who denied the existence of Hell, the Trinity and the deity of Christ. He believed the whole world was wrong and that he alone could interpret scripture.

In light of this, he predicted the world would end in 1914. Duh! So much for his infallibility. Similarly his followers have believed that the world would end on several occasions. There is a pattern here. False revelation = no revelation. You are playing guessing games and anybody who believes that you know anything is stupid.

There is no dissent allowed in the church. You can't think for yourself. If you do then you are disfellowshipped and cut off from friends and family. That's why you travel in pairs door to door. You don't trust anyone. They are debriefed after their door to door calls so they can perfect their brainwashing techniques. Some church.

I know that the Holy Spirit is real. I don't need a bumpkin like Charles Taze Russell to tell me that he is not. I know that Jesus is Lord. He is also real to me. So there we have two parts of the Trinity. The third would be God, the Father. One, two and three parts of God spells T-R-I-N-I-T-Y.

I don't know what your Bible says but all Christian Bibles say that Jesus is our high priest and is God.

Hebrews 5: 15For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we areâ€â€yet was without sin.

Colossians 2: 9For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form, 10and you have been given fullness in Christ, who is the head over every power and authority.

You have invented things such as soul sleep, earthly and heavenly classes and distort the idea of the 144000 to mean heavenly spirit brothers. It is all very convenient that you have your own Bible. Nowhere does the word Jehovah appear in the Bible. It is a distortion of the Hebrew, YWHW, just as your religion is a distortion of the Word of God. How anyone can fall for this tripe is beyond me?

By the way when you come to my door, don't expect a warm welcome. You'll have to wait Jesus till returns. He believes in Hell.

You should become a Christian because God loves you and Satan does not.

P.S. I don't suppose that you read that you cannot post other than mainstream Christianity. This is not mainstream. J.W.s reject orthodox Christianity and call it satanic.
 
Wrong, my friend, Christianity has never been referred to as Satanic by Jehovah's Witness.
and we all worship Christ and God just as much as you do.
We have the Bible as evidence!!

I don't know what your Bible says but all Christian Bibles say that Jesus is our high priest and is God

“Such a high priest as this was suitable for us, loyal, guileless, undefiled, separated from the sinners, and become higher than the heavens.â€Ââ€â€Heb. 7:26.
That is fron NWT... Yes Jesus is High Priest but not The God, (a god or lesser deity)

John 1:1 In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.

Jehovah is YHWH, just as much is Pedro to Peter, Miguel to Michael.
Each language has their own way of saying is even Spanish say Jesus but as 'Hesoos'
Yahweh is common also, not a good argument for me on this one

Misfit,

If Adam never sinned and Eve were in harmony wih God what then,
I tell you what then, Cain and Abel would of been best buddies and they will still be alive even now, with a perfect paradise earth, cultivated by their sinless perfect offspring and offspring.
That IS God's purpose and WILL be God's purpose, Humans were designed to live on Earth forever and not go to Heaven. - BIBLICAL FACT
 
The Greek Manuscripts of John 1:1 with a word for word translation below the Greek text:

  • ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: WH / NA27 / UBS4 with Concordance
    á¼Âν á¼€ÃÂÇῇ ἦν ὠλÌγοÂ, καὶ ὠλÌγο ἦν ÀÃÂὸ Äὸν θεÌν, καὶ θεὸ ἦν ὠλÌγοÂ.
    in beginning was the word, and the word was with the God, and God was the Word.

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Ed. with Strong's Numbers
    Ἐν á¼€ÃÂÇῇ ἦν ὠλÌγοÂ, καὶ ὠλÌγο ἦν ÀÃÂὸ Äὸν θεÌν, καὶ θεὸ ἦν ὠλÌγοÂ.
    In beginning was the word, and the word was with the God, and God was the word.

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Byzantine / Majority Text (1995) with Strong's Numbers
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ
    in beginning was the word, and the word was with God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Greek Orthodox Church
    Ἐν á¼€ÃÂÇῇ ἦν ὠΛÌγοÂ, καὶ ὠΛÌγο ἦν ÀÃÂὸ Äὸν ΘεÌν, καὶ Θεὸ ἦν ὠΛÌγοÂ.
    In beginning was the word, and the word was with the God, and God was the word.

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Stephanus Textus Receptus (1550, with accents)
    Ἐν á¼€ÃÂÇῇ ἦν ὠλÌγο καὶ ὠλÌγο ἦν ÀÃÂὸ Äὸν θεÌν καὶ θεὸ ἦν ὠλÌγοÂ
    In beginning was the word and the word was with the God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Greek NT: WH / NA27 / UBS4
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ
    in beginning was the word and the word was with the God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Westcott/Hort
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ
    in beginning was the word and the word was with the God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Ed.
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ
    in beginning was the word and the word was with the God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Byzantine/Majority Text (2000)
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ
    in beginning was the word and the word was with God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Textus Receptus (1550)
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ
    in beginning was the word and the word was with the God and God was the word

    ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑÎÂÃŽÂΗΠ1:1 Greek NT: Textus Receptus (1894)
    εν αÃÂÇη ην ο λογο και ο λογο ην ÀÃÂο Äον θεον και θεο ην ο λογοÂ[]
    in beginning was the word and the word was with the God and God was the word


English Bible Translations of John 1:1:

  • International Standard Version (©2008)
    In the beginning, the Word existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    New American Standard Bible (©1995)
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
    In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    King James Bible
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    American King James Version
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    American Standard Version
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Bible in Basic English
    From the first he was the Word, and the Word was in relation with God and was God.

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Darby Bible Translation
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    English Revised Version
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Webster's Bible Translation
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Weymouth New Testament
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    World English Bible
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Young's Literal Translation
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

The ONLY translation that uses the indefinite article "a" in the translation of John 1:1 is the New World Translation; and the indefinite article "a" does not exist in any of the Greek Manuscripts:

  • New World Translation
    In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.

What spirit is behind the altering of the text of God's Word from the truth to a lie? Let us look to God's Word for the answer:

  • 1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

    4 Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. 5 They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. 6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.     1 John 4:1-6
 
Mosesjoel said:
Wrong, my friend, Christianity has never been referred to as Satanic by Jehovah's Witness.
and we all worship Christ and God just as much as you do.
We have the Bible as evidence!!

I don't know what your Bible says but all Christian Bibles say that Jesus is our high priest and is God

“Such a high priest as this was suitable for us, loyal, guileless, undefiled, separated from the sinners, and become higher than the heavens.â€Ââ€â€Heb. 7:26.
That is fron NWT... Yes Jesus is High Priest but not The God, (a god or lesser deity)

John 1:1 In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god.

Jehovah is YHWH, just as much is Pedro to Peter, Miguel to Michael.
Each language has their own way of saying is even Spanish say Jesus but as 'Hesoos'
Yahweh is common also, not a good argument for me on this one

Misfit,

If Adam never sinned and Eve were in harmony wih God what then,
I tell you what then, Cain and Abel would of been best buddies and they will still be alive even now, with a perfect paradise earth, cultivated by their sinless perfect offspring and offspring.
That IS God's purpose and WILL be God's purpose, Humans were designed to live on Earth forever and not go to Heaven. - BIBLICAL FACT
Click to expand...

Wrong to you buddy! Jesus IS GOD!!!!!
 
Hello Misfit,
I am confused about your statement Jesus IS GOD!!!!!

I need more proof, as The Bible cannot condradict itself.

Here is a good argument

Matthew 3:16 After being baptized Jesus immediately came up from the water; and, look! the heavens were opened up, and he saw descending like a dove God’s spirit coming upon him.
17 Look! Also, there was a voice from the heavens that said: “This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved.â€Â

Too someone who believes God is Jesus then this would occur:
Then Jesus went into a trance, and left his body in spirit form and then acted as the voice in Heaven, which is impossible

You have a vague understanding of the Bible, my friend.
Jesus is indeed very much mistaken as God but of God he has only in the LIKENESS and PERSONALITY of him, but seperate beings regardless, As he is The Son of God.

That is why when Jesus says in the Scriptures,
You have seen the Father through me,
My Father and I are as one.
These are explainations that he is the closest in all creation which resembles The Father as he has his Likeness and Personality. He is i extreme close UNION with God which has confused alot of Christians regardless.
Also mentioned Jesus refers he is not equal to The Father and submissive to him,
Prayers he makes are to someone else 'The Father, not back to himself, that would make Jesus crazy, which he is indeed not, Like having multiple person disorder. But again The Bible proves he had no mental illness and Jesus sincerely prayed to His Father in heaven.

I have a 5 year son Moses, he has the likeness of me but he isnt me, Otherwise he would be like a conjoined twin and he is not. Jesus is not a conjoined twin of God also. But also his Son.
 
Here's the thing though you and I are of two very different faiths, and we use two very very different Bibles. So since your Bible has been changed it's unlikely to agree with mine. So I can give you things from the Bible that proves Jesus is GOD but your "Bible" will not agree therefor you most likely will not agree. Here you go anyway...

John 1:1 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
John 1:14 - "And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth."
John 5:18 - "For this cause therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God."
John 8:24 - "I said therefore to you, that you shall die in your sins; for unless you believe that I am He, you shall die in your sins."
Note: In the Greek, "He" is not there.
John 8:58 - "Jesus said to them, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.'"
Exodus 3:14 - "And God said to Moses, 'I AM WHO I AM'; and He said, Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’"
John 10:30-33 - "I and the Father are one." 31The Jews took up stones again to stone Him. 32Jesus answered them, "I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?" 33The Jews answered Him, "For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make Yourself out to be God."
John 20:28 - "Thomas answered and said to Him, "My Lord and my God!"
Col. 2:9 - "For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form."
Phil. 2:5-8 - "Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9Therefore also God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, 10that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those who are in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth, 11and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."
Heb. 1:8 - "But of the Son He says, "Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever, and the righteous scepter is the scepter of His kingdom."
Quoted from Psalm 45:6, "Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever; a scepter of uprightness is the scepter of Thy kingdom."
Jesus is worshipped - Jesus said to worship God only, yet He receives worship.
Matt. 4:10 - "Then Jesus *said to him, 'Begone, Satan! For it is written, "You shall worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only."’"
Matt. 2:2 - "Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east, and have come to worship Him."
Matt. 2:11 - "And they came into the house and saw the Child with Mary His mother; and they fell down and worshiped Him; and opening their treasures they presented to Him gifts of gold and frankincense and myrrh."
Matt. 14:33 - "And those who were in the boat worshiped Him, saying, "You are certainly God’s Son!"
Matt. 28:9 - "And behold, Jesus met them and greeted them. And they came up and took hold of His feet and worshiped Him."
John 9:35-38 - "Jesus heard that they had put him out; and finding him, He said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?" 36He answered and said, "And who is He, Lord, that I may believe in Him?" 37Jesus said to him, "You have both seen Him, and He is the one who is talking with you." 38 And he said, "Lord, I believe." And he worshiped Him."
Heb. 1:6 - "And when He again brings the first-born into the world, He says, 'And let all the angels of God worship Him.'"
Jesus is prayed to
Acts 7:55-60 - "But being full of the Holy Spirit, he gazed intently into heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God; 56 and he said, "Behold, I see the heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God." 57But they cried out with a loud voice, and covered their ears, and they rushed upon him with one impulse. 58And when they had driven him out of the city, they began stoning him, and the witnesses laid aside their robes at the feet of a young man named Saul. 59And they went on stoning Stephen as he called upon the Lord and said, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit!" 60And falling on his knees, he cried out with a loud voice, "Lord, do not hold this sin against them!" And having said this, he fell asleep."
1 Cor. 1:1-2 - "Paul, called as an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother, 2to the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who have been sanctified in Christ Jesus, saints by calling, with all who in every place call upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, their Lord and ours." (The phrase, "to call upon the name of the Lord" is a phrase used to designate prayer.)
1 Kings 18:24 - "Then you call on the name of your god, and I will call on the name of the Lord, and the God who answers by fire, He is God." And all the people answered and said, "That is a good idea."
Zech. 13:9 - "And I will bring the third part through the fire, refine them as silver is refined, and test them as gold is tested. They will call on My name, and I will answer them; I will say, ‘They are My people,’ and they will say, ‘The Lord is my God.’"
Rom. 10:13-14 - "for 'whoever will call upon the name of the Lord' will be saved." 14 How then shall they call upon Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him whom they have not heard?" (Paul is speaking of calling upon Jesus. (The phrase "Call upon the name of the Lord" is a quote from Joel 2:32).
Joel 2:32 - "And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered: for in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the LORD hath said, and in the remnant whom the LORD shall call." (LORD here is YHWH, the name of God as revealed in Exodus 3:14. Therefore, this quote, dealing with God Himself is attributed to Jesus.)
First and Last
Isaiah 44:6 - "Thus says the Lord, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the Lord of hosts: ‘I am the first and I am the last, and there is no God besides Me."
Rev. 1:17 - "Do not be afraid; I am the first and the last, 18and the living One; and I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of death and of Hades."

I really pray you come to know the ONE and ONLY TRUE GOD. Ditch the lighthouse and follow Jesus, my savior, my creator, my GOD!
 
I met some Jehovah's Witnesses who actually knew the Bible. I was quite impressed :yes
 
THe JW's had THE REAL BIBLE, not some pagan catholicized version.
Question answered!! :wall
 
Mosesjoel said:
THe JW's had THE REAL BIBLE, not some pagan catholicized version.
Question answered!! :wall
Click to expand...

The New World Translation

New Testament, 1950. Frederick W. Franz, ed., New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures Rendered from the Original Language by the New World Translation Committee. Brooklyn: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, 1950.

Bible, 1961. Frederick W. Franz, ed., The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, rendered from the Original Languages by the New World Bible Translation Committee. Revised A.D. 1961. Brooklyn: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, 1961. The Old Testament was originally published in parts from 1953 to 1960. The whole was revised for the one-volume edition in 1961, and subsequently revised in 1970 and 1984.

The publisher of this version has never made public the names of the translators. But former members of the Governing Body of the Jehovah's Witnesses organization have identified the members of the committee as Nathan H. Knorr (President of the organization), Frederick W. Franz (Vice-President), George D. Gangas, and Albert D. Schroeder. According to Raymond V. Franz, the "principal translator of the Society's New World Translation" was Frederick W. Franz. (1) According to M. James Penton, "to all intents and purposes the New World Translation is the work of one man, Frederick Franz." (2) Franz afterwards became the President of the organization, from 1977 to 1992, and was responsible for the revisions.

The Forward to the first edition of the New Testament (1950) explained the need for the version, and also indicated the reason for its name: "It befits the significant time of transition from the old world to the righteous new world that translations of the Scriptures today should as far as possible eliminate the misleading influence of religious traditions which have their roots in paganism." (p.7, emphasis added.)

The New Testament adheres to the text of Westcott & Hort. It is a fairly literal translation, for the most part, but it does have some peculiar non-literal renderings. These are the result of the committee's efforts to conform the version to the doctrines of the Jehovah's Witnesses. "Jehovah" is given as a translation for kurios (Lord) in the New Testament whenever the Father is meant, but not when it refers to Christ, the Son. "Torture stake" is put instead of "cross" because the Jehovah's Witnesses believe that the cross is an idolatrous symbol introduced by the Roman Catholic Church. And because this sect teaches that Jesus Christ was merely an angel, the version reflects a Unitarian bias in several places.

Examples of Unitarian bias:

  • Gen. 1:1-2. "In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of [the] watery deep; and God's active force was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters." The ruach elohim ("Spirit of God") of the Hebrew is interpreted "God's active force" in order to avoid the Trinitarian understanding of the "Spirit."
    [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Zech. 12:10. "...they will look upon the one whom they have pierced..." Here the Hebrew "look upon me whom they have pierced," in which God is the speaker, has been altered in order to avoid the implication that the one who is to be pierced (on the cross) is God.
    John 1:1. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god." Instead of the literal "the Word was God," we have "a god," which the sect interprets as "an angelic being."
    [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Col. 1:15-17. "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist." Because the sect teaches that Christ was a created being rather than eternal God, the word "other" is inserted several times. The first edition of the translation did this without brackets.
    [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Heb. 1:8. "God is your throne forever" (a nonsensical statement) is put intead of "your throne, O God, is forever," because this statement refers to Christ.
    Because the Jehovah's Witnesses teach that men exercise "free will" in accepting or rejecting Christ, the version also has such forced interpretations as:
    [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Acts 13:48. "When those of the nations heard this, they began to rejoice and to glorify the word of Jehovah, and all those who were rightly disposed for everlasting life became believers." Here "rightly disposed" (a human inclination) replaces "ordained" (a divine appointment).[/*:m:zmuirutm]

In his book Crisis of Conscience Raymond Franz, a former member of the Governing Body of the Jehovah's Witnesses, describes some interesting conversations that he had with the principal translator of the version, who happened to be his uncle. He recounts that between 1965 and 1971, while engaged in preparing a Bible dictionary (published in 1971 under the title Aid to Bible Understanding), he sought guidance on a number of questions from Frederick Franz, who "was acknowledged as the organization's principal Bible scholar." We reproduce below several paragraphs from Crisis of Conscience (pages 21-24) for the light they shed upon the New World Translation and one of its translators, and also for the wise observations of the author concerning the interpretation of the Bible.

  • The Society's vice president, Fred Franz, was acknowledged as the organization's principal Bible scholar. On a number of occasions I went to his office to inquire about points. To my surprise he frequently directed me to Bible commentaries, saying, "Why don't you see what Adam Clarke says, or what Cooke says," or, if the subject primarily related to the Hebrew Scriptures, "what the Soncino commentaries say." Our Bethel Library contained shelf after shelf after shelf filled with such commentaries. Since they were the product of scholars of other religions, however, I had not given much importance to them, and, along with others in the department, felt some hesitancy, even distrust, as to using them. As Karl Klein, a senior member of the Writing Department, sometimes very bluntly expressed it, using these commentaries was "sucking at the t-ts of Babylon the Great," the empire of false religion according to the Society's interpretation of the great Harlot of Revelation.

    The more I looked up information in these commentaries, however, the more deeply impressed I was by the firm belief in the divine inspiration of the Scriptures the vast majority expressed. I was impressed even more so by the fact that, though some were written as early as the eighteenth century, the information was generally very worthwhile and accurate. I could not help but compare this with our own publications which, often within a few years, became "out of date" and ceased to be published. It was not that I felt these commentaries to be without error by any means; but the good certainly seemed to outweigh the occasional points I felt to be mistaken.

    When the subjects of "Older Man [Elder]" and "Overseer" were assigned to me, research into the Scriptures themselves soon made evident that the congregational form of supervision employed by us did not conform to the first-century arrangements. (We had no bodies of elders in our congregations; one man in each congregation was the sole "overseer.") Somewhat disturbed, I approached my uncle with the evidence. Again his response took me by surprise. "Don't try to understand the Scriptures on the basis of what you see today in the organization," he said, and added, "Keep the Aid book pure." I had always looked upon the organization as God's one channel for dispensing truth and so this counsel sounded unusual to say the least. When I pointed out that the Society's New World Translation rendering of Acts, chapter fourteen, verse 23, evidently inserted the words "to office" in connection with the appointment of elders and that this somewhat altered the sense, he said, "Why don't you check it in some other translations that may not be as biased." [Later editions of the New World Translation dropped the added phrase. The first edition had read: "Moreover, they appointed older men to office for them in the congregation and, offering prayer with fastings, they committed them to Jehovah in whom they had become believers."] I walked out of his office wondering if I had actually heard what I had heard. In future days I was to remind him of these statements on more than one occasion during Governing Body sessions.

    That conversation strongly affected my approach to Scripture. I deeply appreciated the integrity toward Scriptural truth his remarks indicated. I began to appreciate more than ever before how vitally important context was in discerning the meaning of any part of Scripture, and that realization seemed to be true of others of the group who were working regularly on the Aid project. We also came to realize the need to let the Bible define its own terms rather than simply taking some previously held view or letting an English dictionary definition control. We began to make greater use of the Hebrew and Greek lexicons in the Bethel library, and concordances that were based on the original language words rather than on English translations.

    It was an education and it was also very humbling, for we came to appreciate that our understanding of Scripture was far less than we had thought, that we were not the advanced Bible scholars we thought we were. I personally had been on such a "treadmill" of activity over the previous twenty-five years that, although reading through the Bible several times, I had never been able to do such serious, detailed research into the Scriptures, in fact never felt great need to do so since it was assumed that others were doing it for me. The two courses at Gilead School I had attended were so tightly programmed that they gave little time for meditation, for unhurried investigation and analysis.

    Now having both time and access to the extra Bible helps, the lexicons, commentaries, Hebrew and Greek concordances, and so forth, was an aid. But above all it was seeing the need always to let the context guide, always to let the Scriptures themselves control, that made the major difference. There was no overnight change of viewpoint but, over a period of years, a gradual deepening of appreciation of the crucial need to let God's Word speak for itself to the fullest extent possible. I could see why those one-hundred and two-hundred-year-old commentaries in our Bethel library were comparatively timeless in their value. The very fact of their verse-by-verse approach more or less obligated them to stay within the contextual meaning and thereby considerably restricted them from taking excursions into sectarian views or interpretive flights of fancy.

    Thus the material in the Aid book relating to elders and the congregational direction in Bible times was very different from the position then held by Jehovah's Witnesses, where a more or less "monarchical" arrangement had prevailed. The Scriptural arrangement of bodies of elders had been summarily ended in 1932 by Judge Rutherford due to a lack of cooperation on the part of some elders with the Society's programs and policies. His position as President gave Rutherford the necesary authority to take such a stand and all congregations were invited to vote for the disbanding of bodies of elders and their replacement by a Society-appointed "Service Director." For the next forty years there were no bodies of elders in the congregations. That is why the New World Translation of the Bible published by the Society in the 1950's regularly used the rendering "older men" rather than "elders," a then officially discredited term.

Bibliography

  • Robert H. Countess, The Jehovah's Witnesses' New Testament: a Critical Analysis of the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures (2nd ed. Phillipsburg, New Jersey: Presbyterian and Reformed Pub. Co., 1987). [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Bruce M. Metzger, "The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures." The Bible Translator 15/3 (July 1964), pp. 150-153. [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Bruce M. Metzger, "The Jehovah's Witnesses and Jesus Christ: A Biblical and Theological Appraisal." Theology Today 10 (1953): 65-85. [/*:m:zmuirutm]
  • Raymond V. Franz, Crisis of Conscience (Atlanta: Commentary Press, 1983). Contains a number of interesting remarks on the New World Translation.[/*:m:zmuirutm]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Raymond V. Franz, Crisis of Conscience (Atlanta: Commentary Press, 1983), p. 50. The author, Raymond V. Franz, was from 1971 to 1980 a member of the Governing Body of the Jehovah's Witnesses, and a nephew of vice-president Frederick W. Franz. He wrote Crisis of Conscience after being expelled from the organization. On page 50 of the book he adds the following information in a footnote: "Other members of that Committee were Nathan Knorr, Albert Schroeder and George Gangas; Fred Franz, however, was the only one with sufficient knowledge of the Bible languages to attempt translation of this kind. He had studied Greek for two years in the University of Cincinnati but was only self-taught in Hebrew."

2. M. James Penton, Apocalypse Delayed: The Story of Jehovah's Witnesses (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985), p. 174.

2. M. James Penton, Apocalypse Delayed: The Story of Jehovah's Witnesses (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985), p. 174.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forward to the 1984 Edition

It is a very responsible thing to translate the Holy Scriptures from their original languages of Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek into modern speech. Translating the Holy Scriptures means rendering into another language the thoughts and sayings of Jehovah God, the heavenly Author of this sacred library of sixty-six books that holy men of long ago were inspired to write down for our benefit today.

That is a very sobering thought. The translators of this work, who fear and love the Divine Author of the Holy Scriptures, feel toward Him a special responsibility to transmit his thoughts and declarations as accurately as possible. They also feel a responsibility toward the searching readers who depend upon a translation of the inspired Word of the Most High God for their everlasting salvation.

It was with such a sense of solemn responsibility that over the course of many years this committee of dedicated men have produced the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures. The entire work was originally released in six volumes, from 1950 to 1960. From the start it was the desire of the translators to have all these volumes brought together into one book, inasmuch as the Holy Scriptures are in actuality one book by the One Author. While the original volumes contained marginal references and footnotes, the revised one-volume edition, released in 1961, contained neither footnotes nor marginal references. A second revision was released in 1970 and a third revison with footnotes followed in 1971. In 1969 the committee released The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, which presented under the Greek text revised by Westcott and Hort (1948 reprint) a literal word-for-word translation into English. During the past 34 years the New World Translation has been translated in part or in its entirety into ten other languages, with a total printing and distribution surpassing 39 million.

This new edition is not just a refinement of the translated text beyond its already previous revisions, but it has been expanded to include a complete updating and revision of the marginal (cross) references that were initially presented in English, from 1950 to 1960.

This 1984 revision has been released by us to the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania for printing, translation into other leading languages and distribution. We thus make it available with a deep sense of gratitude to the Divine Author of the Holy Scriptures, who has so privileged us and in whose spirit we have trusted in producing this revision. We pray for his blessing upon those who use this translation for spiritual advancement.

New World Bible Translation Committee
June 1, 1984, New York, N.Y.

Retrieved from http://www.bible-researcher.com/new-world.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Statistical Comparison of Editions
of the Greek New Testament


Using a database of various readings, I compared Scrivener's Textus Receptus (representing the readings underlying the King James Version) with four critical texts, and identified 4165 translatable differences adopted by either Tregelles 1857, Tischendorf 1869, Westcott & Hort 1881, or Nestle-Aland 1979.

For a complete reading of the article go to A Statistical Comparison of Editions of the Greek New Testament

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Westcott & Hort vs. Textus Receptus: Which is Superior?

  • The New Testament was inspired by God, and came from the pens of its writers or their amanuenses in infallible form, free from any defect of any sort, including scribal mistakes. However, God in His providence did not choose to protect that infallible original text from alterations and corruptions in the copying and printing process. Scribes and printers made both accidental (usually) and deliberate (occasionally) changes in the Greek text as they copied it. As a result, the surviving manuscript copies of the New Testament differ among themselves in numerous details.

    Many attempts have been made (even as early as the second century A.D.) to sort through the manuscripts of the New Testament and weed out the errors and mistakes of copyists, in order to restore the text to its original apostolic form. Those who have made such attempts have differed one from another in the resources at their disposal, their own personal abilities as text editors, and the principles followed in trying to restore the original text of the New Testament.

    The two most famous attempts at restoring the original text of the New Testament are the Textus Receptus, dating from the Reformation and post-Reformation era, and the Greek text of B. F. Westcott and F. J. A. Hort, first published in 1881. These two texts were based on differing collections of manuscripts, following differing textual principles, at different stages in the on-going process of the discovery and evaluation of surviving New Testament manuscripts, and, not surprisingly, with often differing results. (1) There is much dispute today about which of these texts is a more faithful representation of the original form of the Greek New Testament, and it is this question which will be addressed in this study: Which is the superior Greek New Testament, the Textus Receptus/"Received Text" or the "Critical Text" of Westcott and Hort?


For more information on the Westcott Hort text go to Westcott & Hort vs. Textus Receptus: Which is Superior?.
 
Thank you Solo!! I doubt it will help, but thank you nice post. :thumb :clap :clap


And Mosesjoel, I see you have no reply to my verses proving Jesus is GOD, why is that?
 
So Many Mislead

It is truly sad that so many people are mislead by false leaders, false teachers, false prophets, false apostles, false preachers ....

Yes, the New World Translation is a perverted book, not a holy book .... !!! I have no respect for a distorted and false translation, like the New World Translation that the JW's use.

Jesus is God, and there is no way around that. Scripture is clear, the Greek is clear. Jesus is not a god, or a little god. Jesus is God Almighty. Jesus is Creator. Jesus is Lord. Jesus is Savior. Jesus is the only way that you can get to heaven.

Everyone will bow to the name of Jesus, even if not while you are alive now ... You will bow to Jesus someday ... Why not bow to Jesus, and accept Jesus as your Lord, God and Savior, right now, before it's too late?

You will not have a second chance .... Don't miss out on the best gift that you could ever receive ... Jesus is waiting with open arms, to receive you as one of His children ....
 
vja, :clap :clap

I live in Utah I'm surounded by Mormons and feel the same way about them and the JW's. It's saddeds me to see so many led astray by false teachings of man.
 
Funny mosesjoel accused me on a different topic of not having scripture to back up my claims, yet on this very topic I posted a ton of scripture and he has yet to respond I wonder why.
 
Best advise I ever found rejecting JW teachings was this which is:

"The first verse is Revelation 1:8. I am reading from the Jehovah's Witness Bible, and it reads, "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says Jehovah God. Ask the Witness, "What does Alpha and Omega mean?" They'll reply,"The beginning and the end." Then ask them, "How many Alphas and Omegas can you have?" They'll answer, "Only one." Make sure you get this point across, there is only one Alpha and Omega.

Then turn to Revelation 22:12-13 which says, "Look I am coming quickly, and the reward I give is with me....I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." Ask the Witnesses, "Who do you say the Alpha and Omega is?" They will say, "Jehovah." Now take a careful look. The Alpha and Omega in verse twelve is coming quickly. Let's see who is speaking in verse twelve.

Look at verse sixteen, "I Jesus, sent my angel to bear witness to you people of these things for the congregations. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star." It is Jesus speaking in verse twelve. If there is any doubt go to verse 20 which says, "He that bears witness of these things says, 'Yes; I am coming quickly' Amen come Lord Jesus." So it is clear that the Alpha and the Omega in verse twelve is Jesus. Here is a strong proof text that Jesus is God because both Jehovah and Jesus are called the Alpha and the Omega.

Another pair of verses that are effective when used together are Isaiah 44:6 and Revelation 1:17-18. Isaiah 44:6 says, "This is what Jehovah has said, 'The king of Israel and the Repurchaser of him, Jehovah of armies, I am the first and I am the last.'" Ask the Witnesses how many firsts and lasts can you have? It's obvious to anyone you can only have one first and one last. Ask them, "Who is the first and the last?" They will say, "Jehovah." Now turn to Revelation 1:17-18 which says, "Do not be fearful; I am the First and the Last, and the living one; and I became dead but look! I am living forever." Who is speaking here? Obviously, it is Jesus for He died but is now alive, and guess what? He is called the First and the Last. Here again we see Jesus is God. "

source: http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/jw-trin.html
 
Mosesjoel said:
Hello Misfit,
I am confused about your statement Jesus IS GOD!!!!!

I need more proof, as The Bible cannot condradict itself.

Here is a good argument

Matthew 3:16 After being baptized Jesus immediately came up from the water; and, look! the heavens were opened up, and he saw descending like a dove God’s spirit coming upon him.
17 Look! Also, there was a voice from the heavens that said: “This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved.â€Â

Too someone who believes God is Jesus then this would occur:
Then Jesus went into a trance, and left his body in spirit form and then acted as the voice in Heaven, which is impossible

You have a vague understanding of the Bible, my friend.
Jesus is indeed very much mistaken as God but of God he has only in the LIKENESS and PERSONALITY of him, but seperate beings regardless, As he is The Son of God.

That is why when Jesus says in the Scriptures,
You have seen the Father through me,
My Father and I are as one.
These are explainations that he is the closest in all creation which resembles The Father as he has his Likeness and Personality. He is i extreme close UNION with God which has confused alot of Christians regardless.
Also mentioned Jesus refers he is not equal to The Father and submissive to him,
Prayers he makes are to someone else 'The Father, not back to himself, that would make Jesus crazy, which he is indeed not, Like having multiple person disorder. But again The Bible proves he had no mental illness and Jesus sincerely prayed to His Father in heaven.

I have a 5 year son Moses, he has the likeness of me but he isnt me, Otherwise he would be like a conjoined twin and he is not. Jesus is not a conjoined twin of God also. But also his Son.
Click to expand...


I could understand your confusion if you do not believe that God can be more than one place at a time. However, I believe that our Almighty Creator can be any place at any time in all time. He consumes all of time and space and yet is outside of all time and space. If Jesus was only created in the likeness of the Father then he would not be the ONLY begotten Son of God. We read in the very beggining that God created Adam in his image and likeness. If your understanding is correct, then Adam would be every bit as equal to God as Jesus. However, we read in 1 Cor 15:45 that the first Adam was made a living soul and the last Adam (refering to Jesus) was made a quickening (life giving) spirit. What are their similarities? What are their differences? They are similar in the state that Adam and Jesus are the only two humans that came into this earth with God's image AND likeness. Meaning that in them dwelt the Spirit of God incased in a body of flesh. After Adam sinned, he literally he was cursed with sickness and death (spritually and physically). All humans after him were born in Adam's likeness. Which is why Jesus said you must be born again. Because although we are alive to the flesh, we are dead to the spirit of God unless His spirit is born in us by the Holy Spirit. I believe that we all understand that Jesus was born without sin because he was literally begotten of the Holy Spirit. So he was fully alive in the Spirit as well as in the flesh. What makes Jesus different from Adam, is the fact that the Spirit of God within him is not just a spirit of God, but actually THE Spirit of God himself (which makes him the only begotten of the Father). Now because the spirit of God himself dwelt in the body of a mortal man and defeated the curse of sin and death, the debt has been paid for all of mankind to be redeemed from that curse brought upon us through Adam's sin. Man had to pay for the sins of man to satisfy God's justice and Holiness. Which is why the Word had to become flesh. Back to my original point.

Now just because God descended out of glory to take the place of a mortal man, does that mean that the scales of space and time were left uncontrolled for 33 years while he walked this earth? Absolutely not. Because God is a spirit and is eternal, he is eternally on the throne. Jesus is the bodily manifistation of Jehovah to us, and God himself is the only one who can give life. If Jesus is not God, than how can he be the life giving Spirit?

Thanks to God in all his glory that we can now be conformed once again into his image AND likeness through the life that Jesus gives. We can truly be born again in the Spirit and must be,if we are to ever see the Kingdom of Heaven and have the relationship with God that he intended.

In Christ,
Denton
 
MISFIT said:
Funny mosesjoel accused me on a different topic of not having scripture to back up my claims, yet on this very topic I posted a ton of scripture and he has yet to respond I wonder why.
Click to expand...
Most cults require their membership to isolate themselves from all who are not of their cult. They are under bondage to the teachings of their cult leadership, and all else is considered satanic; quite the opposite of the teachings of the Word of God.

The Jehovah's Witnesses who are not born again will only witness Jehovah when he tells them to depart for He never knew them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top