Now, many of you may know me and know that I believe in a Torah lifestyle (as you learn and grow and repent). Many of you may not. But regardless, whatever you believe about me or believe yourself, I need some logic presented to me.
I believe that the lifestyle of a believer should be such that they should be an active seeker of truth. And if that means tossing out what one currently believes, then so be it. I have not always lived up to this. I still struggle (no one said a believer's walk would be easy).
I also do not like to come across as a know it all and a "Judaizer", considering all Christians as lawless, pagan, heathen (although I do sometimes, though I don't mean to). Still, I see problems that don't compute in my head about certain beliefs (one of them being we don't have to be obedient to Torah).
So, in light of this, I'd like to ask a question:
When Yahweh spoke to Israel in the wilderness, was this what he said to them true?
Exodus 20:2 I am יהוה thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Now, I was going to be subtle and wait for your answer, which I don't doubt would be "yes". But I want to go ahead and answer that for you and go on to the next point. I want to be honest with no hidden motives. Straight forward is where we'll go.
If the above is true, then observing Torah cannot be bondage. If Yahweh delivered them out of the house of bondage (Exodus 12:27; Exodus 18:8; 1 Samuel 10:18), did he bring them back into bondage when he gave them the Torah?
When I analyze Paul's writings, many people accuse me of twisting his words, since the outcome is never "Don't keep the Torah, it is not to be kept or heeded by Christians. It's just good to read and get historical backround and a foundation for all the rest of the scriptures to know what they are talking about". Many people accuse me of being "legalistic" and a "Judaizer" and of promoting "another religion" and preaching "another gospel" and of teaching "false doctrine".
So my question is, if one read's Galatians and get's from it that the "law" is bondage and that Christ has freed us from that "yoke", how do you explain the above?
At what point does it become bondage? Upon acceptance of Messiah? At what point does it become "weak and beggarly" (Galatians 4:9)?
How do Paul's words take precedence over some one's like David, a man after Yahweh's own heart and who knew of the Messiah (Psalm 110:1) and yet said:
Psalm 119:44 So shall I keep thy Torah continually for ever and ever.
Psalm 119:45 And I will walk at liberty: for I seek thy precepts.
Not to bring glory to myself, or anything of that nature. But I do not consider myself "legalistic" and a twister of the New Testament writings because I want to stay faithful to the scriptures.
I'm not crazy, am I?
I believe that the lifestyle of a believer should be such that they should be an active seeker of truth. And if that means tossing out what one currently believes, then so be it. I have not always lived up to this. I still struggle (no one said a believer's walk would be easy).
I also do not like to come across as a know it all and a "Judaizer", considering all Christians as lawless, pagan, heathen (although I do sometimes, though I don't mean to). Still, I see problems that don't compute in my head about certain beliefs (one of them being we don't have to be obedient to Torah).
So, in light of this, I'd like to ask a question:
When Yahweh spoke to Israel in the wilderness, was this what he said to them true?
Exodus 20:2 I am יהוה thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Now, I was going to be subtle and wait for your answer, which I don't doubt would be "yes". But I want to go ahead and answer that for you and go on to the next point. I want to be honest with no hidden motives. Straight forward is where we'll go.
If the above is true, then observing Torah cannot be bondage. If Yahweh delivered them out of the house of bondage (Exodus 12:27; Exodus 18:8; 1 Samuel 10:18), did he bring them back into bondage when he gave them the Torah?
When I analyze Paul's writings, many people accuse me of twisting his words, since the outcome is never "Don't keep the Torah, it is not to be kept or heeded by Christians. It's just good to read and get historical backround and a foundation for all the rest of the scriptures to know what they are talking about". Many people accuse me of being "legalistic" and a "Judaizer" and of promoting "another religion" and preaching "another gospel" and of teaching "false doctrine".
So my question is, if one read's Galatians and get's from it that the "law" is bondage and that Christ has freed us from that "yoke", how do you explain the above?
At what point does it become bondage? Upon acceptance of Messiah? At what point does it become "weak and beggarly" (Galatians 4:9)?
How do Paul's words take precedence over some one's like David, a man after Yahweh's own heart and who knew of the Messiah (Psalm 110:1) and yet said:
Psalm 119:44 So shall I keep thy Torah continually for ever and ever.
Psalm 119:45 And I will walk at liberty: for I seek thy precepts.
Not to bring glory to myself, or anything of that nature. But I do not consider myself "legalistic" and a twister of the New Testament writings because I want to stay faithful to the scriptures.
I'm not crazy, am I?