I said it "completely debunks the idea that it is the equivalent of killing a baby". That means it's not the normal way it works and she said the chances of it not working as intended were "miniscule". It seems no one with knowledge considers this type of birth control as the equivalent of killing a fetus.
Is the matter of an implantation being equivalent to a baby the issue you say was completely debunked, or that an implantation can be aborted while on the pill is what is completely debunked?
...neither is your solution of self control a perfect one either...
Right, I made that point. Sex is for having kids, accept it. My advice to Christian couples, as one who has 'been there, done that', is to stop
focusing on looking for ways to avoid what God himself built into sex--having babies, and take responsibility for what he built into it by learning self-control.
I think it's misguided to
focus on ways to avoid exercising self-control in regard to marital sex, instead of
focusing on handling the responsibilities that God attached to having sex through the godly attribute and fruit of the Spirit 'self-control'. Generally speaking, I don't consider removing the need for self-control to be a very godly way to deal with sex and child bearing.
...and by your previous post even you had to take other measures by getting a vasectomy when your solution didn't work.
I'm pointing out that the right solution is to accept that sex is about having kids, and the godly way to deal with that reality is to learn self-control, not avoid it through surgery, pills, etc. Vasectomy will
almost 100% guarantee that you will no longer have to take the responsibility for God having attached child bearing to sexual activity, but it may also potentially take away the responsibility that God gave us to not let our bodily desires get out of our control and to rule over us. Remember...'done there, been that' (lol). I had MORE strife with my wife about 'due benevolence' AFTER my vasectomy because I no longer had God's built in restraint that the sex I just so badly gotta have, and which she 'owes' me, may result in another child.
...scripture never condemns birth control...
Right. But it does condemn killing a life that God has started on it's course in this world in the womb, and condemns not having control of your body. Where birth control comes in in regard to these two things is what determines how right or wrong it is for any one Christian couple.
...and never tells us that sex is only for creating children...
Right. And I did not say that it was. I'm saying it's as much a part of married sex as everything else sex is for in marriage.
Do yourself a favor, Christian couples struggling with this subject...ACCEPT IT, then move into godly ways to accept and take responsibility for the truth that sex is for babies (among other things) built into it by God himself.
...and even supports the idea of not denying your partner of sexual fulfillment, I see no reason for the unnecessary restrictions on a God given basic human desire that is unique in us as humans.
You may be bringing a child into the world you may or may not be prepared to deal with. And you think that's not a good reason to restrict God given human desire to reproduce, and to do that in a spiritual, rather than nonspiritual way?
On the other hand, I've seen people who claim all birth control is a sin, and then go on to produce far more babies than they can support causing them to be constantly relying on the goodwill of others to help and support them. This is an irresponsible position to take, lacking support in scripture.
I agree. Even though God can and will take care of us, we are not to foolishly tempt him. This is why I've been talking about self-control, not birth control, in general as the godly way to deal with what God himself has built into sexual activity.