• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Is Birth Control Sinful In Marriage?

like russian roulette but the revolver is always aimed at someone else ...

I hope you are joking.
If joking then: :D
If not joking, well then your thinking is quite irresponsible beause it's not really aimed at someone else. The kid may grow in someone else's body, but it's your kid. Either you'll have to be a father, or you'll never have a happy day ever again in your life knowing deep inside that you abandonned a woman and your own child.
 
that post doesn't make sense. righteous parents don't abandon nor put to death the life Yhvh has given.
any birth control, IF it may terminate a life, is unrighteous. "IF" there is a chance that a bullet is in the chamber, that the 'birth control' will terminate a life, that is the similarity to russian roullete.

oh, and if you meant one of the spouses is found unfaithful, or had sex outside marriage, the penalty for adultery or fornication is/should be very severe and Yhvh guarantees it is.
 
Last edited:
Biological parents do abandon their kids, that's the sad truth. Most people aren't righteous.
And birth control can be rather safe, if used correctly. Combinations of birth control methods (like using both pill and condoms, or rhythm method and condoms) are very safe. Having sex without any contraception would be like Russian roullette. With rightly used contraception the chances of a bullett hitting the target are incredibly small.
Anyway, my post was refering to the "aimed at someone else" bit of your previous post. Because thinking that a pregnancy is the woman's problem is weird an irresponsible. If you want to compare sex with a deadly game then you'd have to say the revolver is aimed both ways.
 
...... again your post is non-sequitor (doesn't follow) ... sex is not the deadly game in the previous posts . birth control is.



good point the first though - most people are not righteous. that's why Yeshua planned His Own Sacrifice for their sake, so they could be made righteous. if they turn Him down, they lose. (most of the world loses, is lost, and stays lost, according to Scripture).
 
(birth control may be 'safe' is some way, but if used to prevent pregnancy in sex outside Yhvh's instructions, it's not just the baby who dies)
He didn't start 'winking' at (ignoring) sin in the N.T. >>

1 Corinthians 6:18 NKJV - Flee sexual immorality. Every sin ...
Flee sexual immorality. Every sin that a man does is outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10New King James Version (NKJV)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
 
Last edited:
...... again your post is non-sequitor (doesn't follow) ... sex is not the deadly game in the previous posts . birth control is.
Oh well maybe I just misunderstood your analogy then.
 
trolling reba

I have spoken clearly
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Started getting tired in my old age raising kids....got a vasectomy. My advice to men...DO NOT GET A VASECTOMY. Take responsibility for your bodily urges, or they will take control of you. Free sex is a potential formula for disaster. God did not intend that for us. He intended for us to take control of our bodies, not relinquish control of them.
Well.......... I don't usually argue with your wisdom, but on the other hand, we ARE commanded to surrender our bodies to our spouse.

Do not deprive one another except with consent for a time, that you may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again so that Satan does not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 1 Cor 7:5

Paul mentions our lack of self control, and does not prescribe self control, but instead tells us to "take it out on our spouse".
Within the context of marriage, I am not so sure that GOD is as concerned about sex as we are. Sure, there are COUNTLESS admonishments to sex outside of marriage, but the tone sure seems to change when we are married.
 
The pill will cause a hormonal situation that resembles a pregnancy. Thus there will be no more monthly cycle, no more ovulation, and the cervix mucus will be impenetrable for sperm. One effect of a pregnancy is that the uterus will not allow for additional fertilised eggs to implant and grow in its tissue.
So in theory, if the pill somehow fails to supress an ovulation and also fails to lock sperms out it could happen that an egg gets fertilised but then will be unable to get into the uterus tissue and thus "be aborted". However, that's incredibly unlikely beause the pill is rather safe if taken the way it is meant to (and if for some reason a woman missed a day it's ommon knowledge that she'd need to use additional contraception for the rest of the month), and if the pill fails at the first two things I mentioned it's probably also gonna fail at preventing the implantation of a fertilised egg. So an abortion through the pill is such an unlikely event it's really more like a theoretical scenario.
Thanks for that great explanation that sheds a ton of light on how "the pill" really works and completely debunks the idea that it is the equivalent of killing a baby! For those like me that didn't know how it worked, just that it did, this helps a lot!
 
...on the other hand, we ARE commanded to surrender our bodies to our spouse.

Do not deprive one another except with consent for a time, that you may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again so that Satan does not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 1 Cor 7:5

Paul mentions our lack of self control, and does not prescribe self control, but instead tells us to "take it out on our spouse".
Within the context of marriage, I am not so sure that GOD is as concerned about sex as we are. Sure, there are COUNTLESS admonishments to sex outside of marriage, but the tone sure seems to change when we are married.
I keep forgetting to come back to this, lol. What I mean by God intending for us to have control over our bodies and not relinquish control over them, if that's the point you're addressing, is he did not intend for our sexual desire to be out of control and rule over us.

I used to hope my wife would finally get the message from God in the 1 Corinthians 7:5 verse you posted so she would be more cooperative about 'relinquishing control' of her body to me sexually (as I think you are understanding that phrase). But the message that came through from God was to me--that the reason Paul counsels believers to not deprive each other was "because of your lack of self-control". Hmm...not a very godly reason to want my wife to be obedient to Paul's counsel, I thought.

So, while it's good and godly for your spouse to not deprive you of sex, perhaps the reason we men want our wives to get that message from God is because we lack self-control. In other words, we need them to cooperate because we 'just gotta have it'. I decided that if I want my wife to get what God would say to her in the passage, perhaps I needed to get what God would say to me in the passage, that I need to recognize my lack of self-control, and that the pressure I put on my wife to not deprive me was because of it.
 
Thanks for that great explanation that sheds a ton of light on how "the pill" really works and completely debunks the idea that it is the equivalent of killing a baby! For those like me that didn't know how it worked, just that it did, this helps a lot!
Completely debunks the idea? I'm pretty sure she said it's unlikely, not that it's impossible. I would consult your wife's gynecologist before deciding that the pill absolutely does not allow implantation to occur while taking the pill and, therefore, removes the risk of having that implantation aborted by the pill. I personally don't know for sure if that's true, or not, but I do think Christian couples should do the homework about it.

Most of all, I believe Christian couples should 1) understand that sex is about having babies, accept it. And because that's true, 2) learn self-control in accordance with what you both agree about in regard to having children.
 
Completely debunks the idea? I'm pretty sure she said it's unlikely, not that it's impossible. I would consult your wife's gynecologist before deciding that the pill absolutely does not allow implantation to occur while taking the pill and, therefore, removes the risk of having that implantation aborted by the pill. I personally don't know for sure if that's true, or not, but I do think Christian couples should do the homework about it.

Most of all, I believe Christian couples should 1) understand that sex is about having babies, accept it. And because that's true, 2) learn self-control in accordance with what you both agree about in regard to having children.
I said it "completely debunks the idea that it is the equivalent of killing a baby". That means it's not the normal way it works and she said the chances of it not working as intended were "miniscule". It seems no one with knowledge considers this type of birth control as the equivalent of killing a fetus. Sure, if you want to consider miniscule chances of imperfection as a valid reason to completely avoid something, well then it's not perfect. But then, nothing in this world is completely perfect, so by your standards there isn't much in this life that you won't have to avoid. I'm quite sure you don't truly live this way that you are suggesting others have to live. But then neither is your solution of self control a perfect one either, and by your previous post even you had to take other measures by getting a vasectomy when your solution didn't work. Nothing in this world is completely perfect but it's been very well proven that relying on self control alone is far more risky then the pill. So much so that serious medical personnel don't even bother to consider it a serious comparison. Adding to this the fact that scripture never condemns birth control and never tells us that sex is only for creating children, and even supports the idea of not denying your partner of sexual fulfillment, I see no reason for the unnecessary restrictions on a God given basic human desire that is unique in us as humans. On the other hand, I've seen people who claim all birth control is a sin, and then go on to produce far more babies than they can support causing them to be constantly relying on the goodwill of others to help and support them. This is an irresponsible position to take, lacking support in scripture.
 
I said it "completely debunks the idea that it is the equivalent of killing a baby". That means it's not the normal way it works and she said the chances of it not working as intended were "miniscule". It seems no one with knowledge considers this type of birth control as the equivalent of killing a fetus.
Is the matter of an implantation being equivalent to a baby the issue you say was completely debunked, or that an implantation can be aborted while on the pill is what is completely debunked?

...neither is your solution of self control a perfect one either...
Right, I made that point. Sex is for having kids, accept it. My advice to Christian couples, as one who has 'been there, done that', is to stop focusing on looking for ways to avoid what God himself built into sex--having babies, and take responsibility for what he built into it by learning self-control.

I think it's misguided to focus on ways to avoid exercising self-control in regard to marital sex, instead of focusing on handling the responsibilities that God attached to having sex through the godly attribute and fruit of the Spirit 'self-control'. Generally speaking, I don't consider removing the need for self-control to be a very godly way to deal with sex and child bearing.


...and by your previous post even you had to take other measures by getting a vasectomy when your solution didn't work.
I'm pointing out that the right solution is to accept that sex is about having kids, and the godly way to deal with that reality is to learn self-control, not avoid it through surgery, pills, etc. Vasectomy will almost 100% guarantee that you will no longer have to take the responsibility for God having attached child bearing to sexual activity, but it may also potentially take away the responsibility that God gave us to not let our bodily desires get out of our control and to rule over us. Remember...'done there, been that' (lol). I had MORE strife with my wife about 'due benevolence' AFTER my vasectomy because I no longer had God's built in restraint that the sex I just so badly gotta have, and which she 'owes' me, may result in another child.


...scripture never condemns birth control...
Right. But it does condemn killing a life that God has started on it's course in this world in the womb, and condemns not having control of your body. Where birth control comes in in regard to these two things is what determines how right or wrong it is for any one Christian couple.

...and never tells us that sex is only for creating children...
Right. And I did not say that it was. I'm saying it's as much a part of married sex as everything else sex is for in marriage.

Do yourself a favor, Christian couples struggling with this subject...ACCEPT IT, then move into godly ways to accept and take responsibility for the truth that sex is for babies (among other things) built into it by God himself.


...and even supports the idea of not denying your partner of sexual fulfillment, I see no reason for the unnecessary restrictions on a God given basic human desire that is unique in us as humans.
You may be bringing a child into the world you may or may not be prepared to deal with. And you think that's not a good reason to restrict God given human desire to reproduce, and to do that in a spiritual, rather than nonspiritual way?


On the other hand, I've seen people who claim all birth control is a sin, and then go on to produce far more babies than they can support causing them to be constantly relying on the goodwill of others to help and support them. This is an irresponsible position to take, lacking support in scripture.
I agree. Even though God can and will take care of us, we are not to foolishly tempt him. This is why I've been talking about self-control, not birth control, in general as the godly way to deal with what God himself has built into sexual activity.
 
Last edited:
As I see it, it is a matter of obedience. It bis not hard to find the command to fill the earth and we have not done that yet, by any means. And no matter how many times I read through the scriptures I cannot find where God changed His mind. In fact the apparent contradictions the Lost Man finds must be understood in the light of all scripture and that includes Mal. 3:6 where God states that He never changes.

Some will argue that we have strained the Earth's ability to feed us, therefore claiming we have filled the earth but that is nonsense. The abandoned farm lands in the US, if opened up, once more, combined with the Factory Farms here can feed the entire population of the world. Then look at Africa. Africa has land available to feed several earth populations.

As I began, it is a matter of obedience and as a whole, we are a disobedient bunch of people. Jethro Bodine did explain the solution I would opt for, given the choice. Each of us has one question to answer, only one; "Will I obey God?"
 
I've seen people who claim all birth control is a sin, and then go on to produce far more babies than they can support causing them to be constantly relying on the goodwill of others to help and support them. This is an irresponsible position to take, lacking support in scripture.
How’s about we calling it what it appears to be: LUST. It appears some are driven by desires of the flesh instead of God, they have not learned to believe God for their deliverance; does that make them an unbeliever? Hmmmm? Are they lost at that moment? Oh those of little faith.

Oh yeah, Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves - -

to fasting; What’s this for? Forty days or more without sustenance will do wonders in changing your priorities? (Don’t see this in most bibles.)

and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency (self restraint). A Christian has problems with self restraint? Oh my? Could they really be a Christian?

To the question of birth control:
Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply (There is no excuse). Those weak in faith start counting the cost of one child; what? $245,340 according to USA today.

To the man being lustful;
No, it is her that is the seducer working against the poor man’s weakness. Pro 7:21 With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him.

Gen 3:16 Unto the woman he said, . . . thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. The whole problem seems to boil down to the submission of the wife.
:poke
 
How’s about we calling it what it appears to be: LUST. It appears some are driven by desires of the flesh instead of God, they have not learned to believe God for their deliverance; does that make them an unbeliever? Hmmmm? Are they lost at that moment? Oh those of little faith.

Oh yeah, Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves - -

to fasting; What’s this for? Forty days or more without sustenance will do wonders in changing your priorities? (Don’t see this in most bibles.)

and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency (self restraint). A Christian has problems with self restraint? Oh my? Could they really be a Christian?

To the question of birth control:
Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply (There is no excuse). Those weak in faith start counting the cost of one child; what? $245,340 according to USA today.

To the man being lustful;
No, it is her that is the seducer working against the poor man’s weakness. Pro 7:21 With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him.

Gen 3:16 Unto the woman he said, . . . thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. The whole problem seems to boil down to the submission of the wife.
:poke
You have just removed all the concealing meat and have laid the bone bare. Much to consider!
 

Gen 3:16 Unto the woman he said, . . . thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. The whole problem seems to boil down to the submission of the wife.
:poke
I can think of easier and less painful ways to become a martyr for the faith. :lol
 
Back
Top