T
thespunk
Guest
Disappear! Oh please disappear!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Brutus/HisCatalyst said:Yes. A source is a source. You may want to check it's credibility.
cubedbee said:Yes, a peer-reviewed source is a peer-reviewed source. Christian scientists that get published have valid scientific opinions. Christian fraud's like Kent Hovind do not have valid scientific opinions, but twisted and distorted pseudoscience.
thespunk said:I do believe quoting Christian sources for scientific information is valid. But, I encourage keeping a healthy degree of skepticism about any source one reads. What do you guys and gals think?
Hovind has an opinion, but it is not a scientific one. He is not a scientists and does not utilize the scientific method. He is a charlatan who can scam money out of fundamentalists who are eager to believe anyone masquarading as a scientists who will affirm their preconceived beliefs.bibleberean said:cubedbee said:Yes, a peer-reviewed source is a peer-reviewed source. Christian scientists that get published have valid scientific opinions. Christian fraud's like Kent Hovind do not have valid scientific opinions, but twisted and distorted pseudoscience.
Each scientific opinion needs to be weighed. Even Kent Hovinds.
cubedbee said:Hovind has an opinion, but it is not a scientific one. He is not a scientists and does not utilize the scientific method. He is a charlatan who can scam money out of fundamentalists who are eager to believe anyone masquarading as a scientists who will affirm their preconceived beliefs.
Sara929 said:cubedbee said:Hovind has an opinion, but it is not a scientific one. He is not a scientists and does not utilize the scientific method. He is a charlatan who can scam money out of fundamentalists who are eager to believe anyone masquarading as a scientists who will affirm their preconceived beliefs.
I believe I must agree with you there. A friend of mine ordered his lecture series on dvd.
That was one of the most grievous things I've ever heard from someone proclaiming to be a Christian. I don't even think it bothers my friend that he wasted a hundred, its just sad that we basically tossed out 18 hours of our lives.