Jesus must have been O-Negative

[Fedusenko]

He must have been O-negative because his blood was equally acceptable to save everyone. What's up to all my fellow O-Negs out there!

...this is sound logic so don't argue it. Right? Right?

 

[Jman96]

I think that its a bit crazy to think about but whatever floats your boat.

 

[FrMattCH]

Not sure how to respond

 

[Classik]

O -ve = zero negative
No one wants zero and no one wants negative

Just kidding ya, dude.

 

[Mike]

I think that its a bit crazy to think about but whatever floats your boat.

I'm not sure if you get the point, which was that O-negative blood can be transfused with anyone, regardless of their blood type. It was a symbol of His Precious blood being for all men. Feddy wasn't suggesting that Jesus literally had O-negative blood.

I literally do have it. :yes

 

[D4Christ]

Not that we can truly know the mind of God the Father, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Christ really had O negative blood. 1. What would the harm be and 2. It would shut up "modern" day people who would try to claim Christ blood can't help them.

Cool observation. :

Dee

 

[Mike S]

There is power in the blood.

 

[reba]

YIKES i too am o neg.... this brother hood is getting scary

 

[Pizzaguy]

Not that we can truly know the mind of God the Father, but it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Christ really had O negative blood. 1. What would the harm be and 2. It would shut up "modern" day people who would try to claim Christ blood can't help them.

Cool observation. :

Dee

Agreed on all counts.