StoveBolts said:The said:7017 and 7014 cleard this up,,,there is no mention of Canaan,,,,,,,no-matter how much you try to stick Cannan in ,,,it doesnt fit........Its like you have trouble understanding Cains bloodline is listed in Genesis 4 ,,,,,then later in Genesis 9 we have Canaan's line.........
To Genesis 2 and 3?????/
The,
We only need proper english to understand 7014...
7014 is a list broken into two parts.
1st part is talking about Cain, the person.
2nd part is talking about Cain, the city...
Stop jumping around and lets talk basic grammer in regard to 7014...
Yes all we need is proper english to understand hebrew,,,,,
Im not jumping around,,,stop avoiding Genesis 3.....GOd wrote it for us to read and study not to avoid...........
How about looking at 7017 first...........Your study habits are horrible bro,,,,all you do is avoid everytihng that proves you wrong,,,,,,,NOt only are you running from Genesis 3 and maybe 2 ,,,your running from 7017 in the strongs dictionary......
Does it make you mad or something that Dr strongs knows is Hebrew better then us,,,,,and has shown that Cain is the father of the kenites.......Im comparing your writtings to his and there is no contest bro give it up.......Your words begat confusion,,, more school grammer then actual biblical insight......
So when I look up the word "kenite" it says
#H7017: Qeyniy - pronounced Kay-nee - and means: Patronymic (derived from either the father or paternal ancestor) from 7014, a kenite or member of the tribe of kajin: kenite
-----------------------------------------------
Here is one of the problems bro,,,,,,,,,,The name of the thread is Kenite/flood correct......
Now when you look up the word kenite,,,you get 7017..........DO you remember what you told be about 7017 ,,,let me refresh your memory....
No need to bring 7017 into the equation... The text is clear enough. Why muddle it with Strongs?
See here we have you running again,,,,your running form a scholar that is showing you err....So instead of faceing your error,,,you tell me we dont need the strongs ,,we dont need 7017...
Ok well wehn God blesses you with the understand to make a concordance your-self ,,! will consider not using the strongs.......
No need to bring 7017 into the equation
The name of the thread is kenites/flood ,,,,the definition of Kenite is found under 7017 ,,,and you tell me we dont need 7017.........Are you ready to Go to Genesis 3 or not we need to step back.....
We can go verse by verse which make for a clear easy read discussion.............