My points in making those factual observations are these:
A. Man does not sway or change what the tempter does...and that starts via the insertion of various forms of lawbreaking into mind which is and remains A SIN of the tempter that transpires 'in man' but is not 'of man.'
B. No man stops the tempter from performing that sin in them.
C. No man changes what the tempter does.
Your attempt and that of another poster was to make sexual action holy. I find no such justifications.
Your point c contradicts your point a which defines 'sin' 'as various forms of law breaking' if sin is to be taken by your definition then please explain what law people break when they have sex in a marriage covenant?
???
Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is
neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
There are spiritual matters and there are fleshly matters. I relegate sex act to the latter. Spiritually speaking there is no male or female in Christ. And I would add that 'lust' is an ingredient of the mind regardless as it relates to sex actions.
'Lust' does not just relate to sex actions, it can be borne of a number of different desires.
Nothing you have written here furthers your case. Neither male nor female nor will men and women in Heaven as they will be like the angels 'eternal' there will be no more need for procreation.
Does not further your case in any way shape or form.
Go find me two instances of sexual activity deemed 'holy' by the scriptures and you'll have your point.
Don't try to side sweep the issue raised here.
Show us some scripture that says sex within marriage is a sin! I can find you many scriptures, many indeed that show that marriage is an institution of God therefore it is HOLY by it's very tenants.
I'll relegate the subject matter to lustful thoughts at this point as that form of temptation SIN inserted by the tempter is vastly more common. What any man does with that from there only determines his further level of slaveship to sin....by transferring it from thought to word to deed.
What you do with your spouse is none of my business.
I'll maintain that lust is an ingredient of all sexual activity, yes.
And your still have not linked that LUST to the TEMPTER!
What you do is one thing. What the tempter does is another. That is my point. When the tempter inserts SIN THOUGHTS of lust it is A SIN, period.
I am well aware of the tempter and his insensate pestering. But I think you may have a bit of dificulty understanding that the fallen man or 'flesh' is in fact part of his body.
Jesus amplified or magnified THE LAW of ADULTERY exactly to make this fact known that our mutual adversary is ACTIVE in our MINDS and it is there that the battle begins.
s
Jesus repealed this law so that none may consider themselves righteous and put away a wife so they can get another!
He did this so that we can understand how
SERIOUSLY GOD TAKES MARRIAGE
Let us not forget how the conversation started :
3The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? 4And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
5And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
6Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
7They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?
8He saith unto them, Moses
because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
Men where putting away there wives to trade in for a new model. He was refining the law of divorce to include only one acceptable reason for application.
It was exactly as it is today! hard hearts, divorce new model.
Even looking at a woman like that today is a sin, forget about writing out a letter to absolve yourself of culpability.
Marriage is serious business, divorce is not righteous and legal except under one tenant.