[__ Science __ ] Male Lawmaker Claims He Is “Every Bit as Biologically Female” As a Woman

[Tim Broom]

What do you want? Jon Oliver punished? He has free speech too. What do you want?

Recognition that there is a problem would suffice.

 

[Milk-Drops]

Recognition that there is a problem would suffice.

What exactly is the problem?

 

[Barbarian]

Nancy Mace, another congress member wants sarah barred from the woman's bathroom because she is not comfortable with McBride using it and is using her sexual assault as the reason.

The irony is, Mace is statistically much, much safer with a trans person than with others. She could be indoctrinated to the point that she can't think rationally about it, or she could be playing the victim card for political gain.

Who knows?

 

[Tim Broom]

What exactly is the problem?

I've reiterated the concern several times from a few different angles as well as posting articles, videos, and quotes to demonstrate my points. I've listed examples of specific laws, specific people, and what happened to them specifically. I even posted the video links at the current time-stamp for the point I was making so you didn't have to find it yourself, as well as selecting quotes from the articles just to make it that much clearer.

Rather than me going through and typing it out all again, maybe you could try to articulate what you think I'm trying to say. Because, if you're not able to grasp the argument even after all the effort I've already made, I doubt any more explanation will make a difference.

 

[Milk-Drops]

I've reiterated the concern several times from a few different angles as well as posting articles, videos, and quotes to demonstrate my points. I've listed examples of specific laws, specific people, and what happened to them specifically. I even posted the video links at the current time-stamp for the point I was making so you didn't have to find it yourself, as well as selecting quotes from the articles just to make it that much clearer.

Rather than me going through and typing it out all again, maybe you could try to articulate what you think I'm trying to say. Because, if you're not able to grasp the argument even after all the effort I've already made, I doubt any more explanation will make a difference.

Sorry, I was visiting family and busy with projects the last few days.

From what I gathered from your posts is that you are concerned with people accusing you and others as hateful if you criticize them or refuse to use their preferred pronouns.

Considering in both the UK and Canada accidentally using the wrong pronouns and debating/disagreeing with a person on pronouns is still fully legal and not something that will get you into any legal trouble as long as its not provable and illegal harassment. So the only angle I can see this is that some people might call you hateful and that is something you can not really control.

As I already mentioned, this is just the latest culture war and when it gets boring the grifters and fear mongers will move on to the next topic. I think its invitro fertilization and HB1 visas.

 

[Tim Broom]

So the only angle I can see

I asked you to describe what you think my angle is.

 

[Milk-Drops]

I asked you to describe what you think my angle is.

I don't know, that is why I keep asking you. I am flumuxxed as to what you actually want

 

[Tim Broom]

I don't know, that is why I keep asking you.

Here is the conundrum as I explained above; I've posted links to laws, to articles, to quotes and to videos. For the videos, I even posted the specific time code so that there was no need to scrub through footage, as well as a summary of the text I was referring to and an interpretation for it.

I have spent pages articulating my concerns and illustrating my point. I do not believe you cannot understand. I believe you are choosing not to understand as part of an overall strategy to minimize the issues, like putting your head in the sand.

The problems don't go away simply because you insist that you cannot understand what others are saying.

 

[Milk-Drops]

Here is the conundrum as I explained above; I've posted links to laws, to articles, to quotes and to videos. For the videos, I even posted the specific time code so that there was no need to scrub through footage, as well as a summary of the text I was referring to and an interpretation for it.

I have spent pages articulating my concerns and illustrating my point. I do not believe you cannot understand. I believe you are choosing not to understand as part of an overall strategy to minimize the issues, like putting your head in the sand.

The problems don't go away simply because you insist that you cannot understand what others are saying.

I have asked you multiple times what you want done about your concerns. What do you want done about it?