Scenario: An athiest investigated ex Christians beliefs and asked what they thought they had against the Bible. Here are some arguments:
"So, if we accept God's Gift of salvation that He offers to all, then we are doing a WORK!! ACCEPTING is the work!
Or, is free will gone at some point??"
"If God is not the Author of confusion, why did He confuse the Babel people's language! And then explain Genesis 1:2! "
"If God desires ALL to be saved, then why did He harden pharoah's heart??"
"Can God make a better way to be saved than by the Gospel He laid out in the NT? If not He would not be Omnipotent, and if He could but refused to, would He be morally bad? Again, your Book says that HE DESIRES ALL TO BE SAVED. All! Btw, better way means more quantity of people saved!"
"So, if we accept God's Gift of salvation that He offers to all, then we are doing a WORK!! ACCEPTING is the work!
Or, is free will gone at some point??"
"If God is not the Author of confusion, why did He confuse the Babel people's language! And then explain Genesis 1:2! "
"If God desires ALL to be saved, then why did He harden pharoah's heart??"
"Can God make a better way to be saved than by the Gospel He laid out in the NT? If not He would not be Omnipotent, and if He could but refused to, would He be morally bad? Again, your Book says that HE DESIRES ALL TO BE SAVED. All! Btw, better way means more quantity of people saved!"