StoveBolts said:
I understand the 'need' for these weapons...
As do I - at least that is my present position. I am not saying that we do not need these things. And I am not saying that it is wrong for people to be trained to use them. And, as people who know me will know, I have
tremendous respect for those who put themselves forward as soldiers, as long, of course, if their motivation is to protect.
As I have already stated in another thread, I actually work in the defence industry, designing defence systems, so I have no substantial objection to the concept of a defensive military.
However, the use of deadly force is not a glorious thing, it is, at best, a dreadful necessity that thankfully will someday be a forgotten nightmare. Those people, such as yourself, who are willing to do "the tough and sad work" deserve respect and recognition. Politicians who start wars without need are another matter.
I know that it is hard to both accord respect to soldiers, which they deserve, and yet "mute" or "suppress" discussion of the technical marvels that they use. But I think that is the path we must take. We need to "cure" ourselves of the "power-rush" that the thought of these weapons engenders. And yet, it seems that we still need to have them. It is a difficult balance.
To repeat, I embrace the necessity for a defensive military. And I respect soldiers and recognize the need for them to train to use weapons. I think you guys have an even greater responsibility - to somehow do your important self-sacrificial job without glorifying the tools you use. And I have nothing but admiration for those who are willing to do so. Of course, I need to apply that same standard to myself as well.