Name the Blab and grab the take it. Amazing Word Of Faith message!

[Rollo Tamasi]

How about offerings, sacrifices, and first fruits?
Are they New Testament orders?

 

[Rollo Tamasi]

How about the Trinity?
Are you a modalist?
a partialist?
an arianist?

 

[Rollo Tamasi]

What about something else that I can't think of right now?

 

[Brother Mike]

Yes to all that, We sacrifice people who don't pay us tithes as a first fruit offering through our new Testament orders, so that others may modal themselves after us, by making the thieves examples.

Now, how about blab it and grab it? That is interesting. right?

 

[Free]

Some theme's you might Associate WOF teaching with:

1) God wants you rich, and God wants to bless you making the preacher even more rich.
2) We are little gods, not just mere mortals. We have authority in heaven and earth.
3) God wants you healed, and faith can get you healed. No faith, no healing.
4) You have what you say, good or bad. Your words carry power.

Other common things would be what Pentecostals believe in general. WOF Groups are a branch from the Pentecostal Church.

The sad thing is, there is truth in every single one of those statements.

I can't tell if you're being serious or if this is satire. There are some grains of truth in those statements, but they are taken out of context from the entirety of Scripture and made into completely unbiblical doctrines that appeal to the flesh. Christians would do well to avoid such beliefs.

 

[Brother Mike]

I can't tell if you're being serious or if this is satire. There are some grains of truth in those statements, but they are taken out of context from the entirety of Scripture and made into completely unbiblical doctrines that appeal to the flesh. Christians would do well to avoid such beliefs.

I am thinking that once again you did not bother to read through everything I posted. Those statements were just some things you might hear, and what I wrote was serious.

I don't cover all the statements but the blab it and grab it doctrine.

 

[Free]

I am thinking that once again you did not bother to read through everything I posted. Those statements were just some things you might hear, and what I wrote was serious.

I don't cover all the statements but the blab it and grab it doctrine.

I'm not sure what you mean by "once again," but as I said, I can't tell if you are serious or not. Your posts are too long so I thought I would cut to the heart of the matter, and that is that WoF doctrine is not biblical.

 

[Brother Mike]

I'm not sure what you mean by "once again," but as I said, I can't tell if you are serious or not. Your posts are too long so I thought I would cut to the heart of the matter, and that is that WoF doctrine is not biblical.

To long...... Ok you busted me, The WOF doctrine is not biblical. Thank you for pointing that out.

He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.
(Pro 18:13)

 

[Free]

To long...... Ok you busted me, The WOF doctrine is not biblical. Thank you for pointing that out.

You're welcome.

 

[JLB]

How about the Trinity?
Are you a modalist?
a partialist?
an arianist?

Please don't get him started on the "Trinity".

 

[JLB]

I'm not sure what you mean by "once again," but as I said, I can't tell if you are serious or not. Your posts are too long so I thought I would cut to the heart of the matter, and that is that WoF doctrine is not biblical.

Could you post an example of WOF doctrine, not being biblical?


JLB

 

[Free]

Could you post an example of WOF doctrine, not being biblical?


JLB

The statements made in the OP which I have already quoted.

 

[Brother Mike]

The statements made in the OP which I have already quoted.

Could you point out in my post something not scriptural? Of course that means you would have to actually read both post, God forbid.

Could you post an example of WOF doctrine, not being biblical?


JLB

Did you read my Post JLB? I miss something? I not break it down? Did I not present the doctrine of Blab it and grab it according to scripture, and not refute some of the catch phrase sayings such as our words create matter?

Or is it Free just did not actually read my post before drawing conclusions based on his own thinking,?

Please don't get him started on the "Trinity".

Ya, let's start YET another Trinity thread........ Let me load the cannons!!!!!

 

[Rollo Tamasi]

Could you point out in my post something not scriptural? Of course that means you would have to actually read both post, God forbid.



Did you read my Post JLB? I miss something? I not break it down? Did I not present the doctrine of Blab it and grab it according to scripture, and not refute some of the catch phrase sayings such as our words create matter?

Or is it Free just did not actually read my post before drawing conclusions based on his own thinking,?



Ya, let's start YET another Trinity thread........ Let me load the cannons!!!!!

I believe that careful reading of Brother Mike's 1st 2 posts make sense.
But I did have to read them carefully to fully understand what he was saying.

 

[JLB]

I'm not sure what you mean by "once again," but as I said, I can't tell if you are serious or not. Your posts are too long so I thought I would cut to the heart of the matter, and that is that WoF doctrine is not biblical.

I read through the entire thread again, because I thought that I missed your post where you have shown the WOF doctrine to be unbiblical.

There is no such post.

You have only stated an opinion, with no scripture.

On the other hand, Brother Mike uses scripture in his OP to validate what he believes is the truth.

Myself, I'm not too big on WOF preachers and their unbiblical motives, with all the multi million dollar homes, and Bently's and extravagance... It is rather sickening to be honest.

However, the doctrine is based on biblical truth.

Mark 11:23 says you can have what so ever you say.

That is the foundational scripture.

Salvation itself operates on this principle of faith.

Believe and confess with your mouth. Romans 10:9-10

Please share with me what it is you find unbiblical about the Word of Faith doctrine.

Please use scripture.

JLB

 

[Rollo Tamasi]

 

[Brother Mike]

Would Jesus wear a Rolex?

http://www.flcbranson.org/listseries.php?xml=rss/WouldJesusWearARolex.xml

if you want super balanced teaching on the Property doctrine, what is right as we are the seed of Abraham, then give it a listen.

A few things from a faith perspective we have to consider.

1) Our Father owns the planet, though He gave it to men to run. The Gold and the cattle on the hills belongs to our Father.

2) Our Father lives on streets paved with Gold. Now what kid who has super wealthy parents is not normally also wealthy?

3) God did not create everything for the devil and his bunch. We would rather see jets with Jesus is Lord on the side, than Jets with Playboy on the side.

Our Dad is not broke, and has no limit in power. When People get a revelation that God is actually Dad, father, they tend to look at prosperity a bit different.

Since we receive the Kingdom like a child, any child knowing their parents were extremely wealthy would not question if it was their Fathers will if they should be destined to poverty.

If God is just God, some distant being you don't know, then it won't make sense to you, and millions of believers are in that boat, they don't know God as their Father, it's not a reality to them. This is why we come up with doctrines that God (MY FATHER) wants you sick. What Father would want that for their children? I know my Father, he would rather you feel well, and be fit to do what He says do.

Wealth, was designed to establish God's covenant. It was not designed to line our pockets to do with it what we want. In fact Jesus said an acid Test if you will be faithful in Money (things) "Mammon" you will be faithful in true riches. The Anointing, and power. They are connected.

Long enough.

http://www.flcbranson.org/listseries.php?xml=rss/WouldJesusWearARolex.xml

 

[JLB]

What does a secular magazine's opinion have to do with biblical truth.

I am beginning to see where all the resistance to truth is coming.


JLB

 

[JLB]

Here is some more truth.

32 Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul; neither did anyone say that any of the things he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common.
33 And with great power the apostles gave witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And great grace was upon them all.
34 Nor was there anyone among them who lacked; for all who were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the proceeds of the things that were sold,
35 and laid them at the apostles' feet; and they distributed to each as anyone had need.
Acts 4:32-35


In order to be able to give lands or houses, or the money from the sale of lands or houses, one must first HAVE POSSESSION of said lands or houses to sell.

The First Church Community, and on going Revival was not funded by broke people.


JLB

 

[Brother Mike]

Here is some more truth.

32 Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart and one soul; neither did anyone say that any of the things he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common.
33 And with great power the apostles gave witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And great grace was upon them all.
34 Nor was there anyone among them who lacked; for all who were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the proceeds of the things that were sold,
35 and laid them at the apostles' feet; and they distributed to each as anyone had need.
Acts 4:32-35


In order to be able to give lands or houses, or the money from the sale of lands or houses, one must first HAVE POSSESSION of said lands or houses to sell.

The First Church Community, and on going Revival was not funded by broke people.


JLB

Jesus preached to the Poor, and the good news for the poor, is that you don't have to be poor no more.