Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
faithtransforms said:jasoncran said:this is correct, the jw says the micheal the archangel is the messiah that comes to save men from their sins.faithtransforms said:I think the jw's actually think Jesus was an incarnation of the archangel Michael. I think its the mormons that say he was "a god." But I could be wrong.
Wow, that's just crazy. And its so odd too because I worked with two jw's at my last job and one of them knew the bible at least as well as I do. How on earth can they draw such conclusions, knowing the bible that well? I don't think they have an additional book like the book of mormon or anything like that. They're conjuring this stuff up from the bible and I just DO NOT get it!!!
Mysteryman said:faithtransforms said:Hmmm. The third earth. Do you mean the perfect world Adam messed up as the first earth, and the earth now as the second earth, or are you into the Gap Theory?
I do not like theories, but people tend to put me in them because they feel that they understand where someone is coming from, by claiming that another is a part of a certain theory. I abhor the fact that people catagorize other people, by comparing them to something or someone else. Such as calvanism. Or gap theories. Or Lutherism.
God is going to destroy this earth, and there will be a new earth, also called the third earth. God is going to set up his throne there - Rev. chapter 21. But before this all happens, Jesus Christ needs to conguer the rulership of this earth.
MMarc said:When the Lord makes a New earth and a New Heaven, I don't believe He will destroy them and recreate them physically.
When I received the Kingdom in 2000 I was changed from the inside out, but I was the same man physically.
Likewise the Lord makes all things new, He made us new creations at Passover when He redeems us. But when the Lord fulfills the endtime feasts He then makes ''All things new''
Rev 21
5 Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.†And He said to me,[a] “Write, for these words are true and faithful.â€
6 And He said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. I will give of the fountain of the water of life freely to him who thirsts. 7 He who overcomes shall inherit all things,[c] and I will be his God and he shall be My son.
So just like Jesus said it is finished, the Lord when He returns will say, IT IS DONE.
So this is why I believe, the Lord makes all things new from the inside out, meaning at a spiritual level.
In rev 12, notice the earth helps the woman and open it's mouth to swallow the demonic flood.
It's like the earth comes ''alive''. All knees shall bow under the earth, as in Heaven and on earth.
Just like you have principalities which are territorial. The Lord takes away the curse from the earth.
Hope it makes sense.
faithtransforms said:Mysteryman said:Well, I didn't mean to ruffle any feathers either. I just wanted to explain that if a person is going to ask a question, that the question should not be attached to another persons theory .
And yes, this earth was created by God way before God put Adam on this earth. Many ,many years had passed before Adam was put upon this earth. Some people call it a gap theory, I kow. I just can stand when people call something by a theory. A theory is a wild guess by someone. And there is no room for theories when it comes to the Word of God. Either something happened in such a way or it didn't.
The first earth, was before Genesis 1:2. The Word of God never talks about the second earth, but it does talk about the new earth being the third earth. That is because the second earth is the first earth renewed. This is why God states in Genesis 1:28 for man to "replenish" the earth and subdue it.
This earth is going to be destroyed by God. And God is going to make all things new.. hence a "new earth", where righteousness will dwell forever.
I'm not sure what you mean by "I just wanted to explain that if a person is going to ask a question, that the question should not be attached to another persons theory." Honestly it just seems a little weird to me. If a scientist asked another scientist "What do you think, string theory or supersymmetry?" I doubt the other scientist would be offended by it. But anyway, I didn't mean to do anything wrong by it.
Since you do believe essentially what some call the gap theory, would you mind giving me some scriptures? I'm not challenging you, I'm just curious about it.
faithtransforms said:The bible clearly teaches that Jesus' kingdom is an eternal kingdom, and that He will rule and reign forever. But these verses seem to contradict that:
1 COR 15:22-28
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
23But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
24Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
25For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
This seems to suggest that the Kingdom will be delivered back to the Father to rule and reign.
Help!
Mysteryman said:Genesis 1:2 tells us that the earth became without form and void. God didn't create the earth without form and void of life, just the opposite is true.
faithtransforms said:Mysteryman said:Genesis 1:2 tells us that the earth became without form and void. God didn't create the earth without form and void of life, just the opposite is true.
Yes, I've heard that the word interpreted as without form and void actually means something like destroyed (can't think of a better word right now but there is one). And yes, creating it without form and void does seem a little odd.
Gen. 1:2 said:And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
Genesis 1:2 (Young's Literal Translation) said:the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness [is] on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters,
Mysteryman said:The Hebrew word for "was" is -- "ha ya" < and it is # 1933 - to become or became
However, in verse 2, the Hebrew word describing the earth being formless, empty and covered in
darkness is haya, which means to become, to happen, to occur.
faithtransforms said:The bible clearly teaches that Jesus' kingdom is an eternal kingdom, and that He will rule and reign forever. But these verses seem to contradict that:
1 COR 15:22-28
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
23But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.
24Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.
25For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
26The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
This seems to suggest that the Kingdom will be delivered back to the Father to rule and reign.
Help!
faithtransforms said:jasoncran said:that refers to the end of the millenial reign.
Yeah, that's kind of what I thought. But I think the bible also teaches that Jesus would reign for all eternity. Hebrews 1:8: "But unto the Son he (God) saith Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom."
jasoncran said:how, the cessation of the son? a return to the preincarnate days.
even then the bible uses elohim, a plural, word for the Lord meaning the strong ones have sworn.
faithtransforms said:jasoncran said:this is correct, the jw says the micheal the archangel is the messiah that comes to save men from their sins.faithtransforms said:I think the jw's actually think Jesus was an incarnation of the archangel Michael. I think its the mormons that say he was "a god." But I could be wrong.
Wow, that's just crazy. And its so odd too because I worked with two jw's at my last job and one of them knew the bible at least as well as I do. How on earth can they draw such conclusions, knowing the bible that well? I don't think they have an additional book like the book of mormon or anything like that. They're conjuring this stuff up from the bible and I just DO NOT get it!!!
SonByAdoption said:Proving that Jesus is Michael the Archangel from the Bible is the easiest thing to do.
Theselonias somewhere says that the dead will be woken up with the trump of God and "the voice of the archangel" But Christ said that "the voice of the Son of God" was going to wake the dead so then the voice of the archangel must be the voice of the Son of God. Although I must admit if the archangel can wake the dead than that is proof that He is not a created being. I really don't understand JW's. they say that a created being helped God create the world. That just doesn't make sense. God would never give a created being the power to create the universe. That just is dumb thinking. Also archangel means ruler of the angels and this phrase is used in the O.T. Christ told Joshua that He was Captain of Yahweh's armies and we all know that's Yahweh's armies is angels. So the Captain of Yahweh's armies and ruler of the angels must be the same person. but proving once again this is no created being because Joshua worships Him in the OT joshua 5.
archangel_300 said:SonByAdoption said:Proving that Jesus is Michael the Archangel from the Bible is the easiest thing to do.
Theselonias somewhere says that the dead will be woken up with the trump of God and "the voice of the archangel" But Christ said that "the voice of the Son of God" was going to wake the dead so then the voice of the archangel must be the voice of the Son of God. Although I must admit if the archangel can wake the dead than that is proof that He is not a created being. I really don't understand JW's. they say that a created being helped God create the world. That just doesn't make sense. God would never give a created being the power to create the universe. That just is dumb thinking. Also archangel means ruler of the angels and this phrase is used in the O.T. Christ told Joshua that He was Captain of Yahweh's armies and we all know that's Yahweh's armies is angels. So the Captain of Yahweh's armies and ruler of the angels must be the same person. but proving once again this is no created being because Joshua worships Him in the OT joshua 5.
I think I should have chose a different login name.
i am a hebrew christian i have acees to some of my HEBREW RELATIVES, THAT CAN READ AND TALK in that toungue.SonByAdoption said:jasoncran said:how, the cessation of the son? a return to the preincarnate days.
even then the bible uses elohim, a plural, word for the Lord meaning the strong ones have sworn.
The Bible says that Jesus was God's only born Son when He was pure Divinity before He ever came down to earth as God's human only born Son. "God sent His only Born Son into the world"1st John 4:9
Elohim doesn't mean trinity my friend. It's funny how Gentile Christians try and tell Hebrew people what their words mean. God said that He would make Moses an Elohim to Israel and my friend Moses was no trinity he was a single solitary individual just like God the Father is. Elijah was mocking the false god Bal and saying that he was sleeping and calling him an Elohim and my friend baal was a single solitary false god and not a trinity.
I was raised a trinitarian and I know that when we see God said let us make man in our image we assume that it is a trinity speaking but did you ever try testing your assumptions by the word of God. When you look at all the other creation accounts in the rest of the Bible it's always only two Divine beings talking about creating the world not three. "...who has established the ends of the earth.What is His name and what was HIS SON'S name.Surely you know!"
God was not talking to a trinity. One God the Father was talking to His One Son