Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New HIV Drug

Lewis

Member
Panel recommends approving Truvada to prevent HIV infection

It Will cost $1,200 a month

CNN
Thu May 10, 2012

120511022029-truvada-story-top.jpg

A FDA advisory committee recommended on Thursday approving a new drug, Truvada, for pre-exposure prophylaxis.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Advisory committee recommends Truvan be approved as a preventive
  • The FDA does not have to follow the recommendations of its advisory committees
  • The panel looked at safety and efficacy data from 3 clinical trials


(CNN) -- A drug already approved for treatment of AIDS might one day be approved for prevention of the deadly disease in individuals at high risk.
A U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory committee recommended Thursday that the agency approve the drug, Truvada, for pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP.
The committee voted 19-3 in favor of approval for the prevention indication -- PrEP for HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men and 19-2 with one abstention for HIV-uninfected partners in couples where the other partner is infected. The committee recommended by 12-8 with two abstentions in favor of approving the drug for individuals who engage in risky sexual behavior that could result in their contracting the virus.

Truvada, manufactured by Gilead Sciences, Inc., is a once-a-day pill used in combination with other HIV drugs. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor does not rid the body of HIV. Instead, it prevents the virus from replicating in the body.
The FDA doesn't have to follow the recommendations of its advisory committees, but it often does.
Most of the more than 40 health care professionals, AIDS advocates and patients who addressed the committee implored its members not to recommend the drug for the new indication.

"There is no question that, if efforts on using PrEP is widespread, condom use and other means of preventing HIV infection will decrease," said Robert Elliott, a registered nurse. "At this point we simply don't know enough about how to increase adherence rates to work with the PrEP or how to counteract the risk compensation and the use of PrEP. Until then, PrEP is not and cannot be considered safe and effective for preventing HIV infections."

AIDS Activist Miki Jackson agreed. "A recommendation for the use of Truvada as PrEP is akin to issuing an engraved invitation for lawsuits," she said. "To knowingly recommend a drug as powerful as Truvada with such serious serious side effects and given to people who are perfectly healthy is frightening."
Michael Weinstein, president and founder of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, said he was concerned that approval could lead a decrease in condom use. "Approving PrEP would be a reckless act," he said.

The FDA panel looked at safety and efficacy data from three clinical trials:
-- iPrEx, a study of men who have sex with men, found 43.8% fewer infections in men who got the drug versus those who got placebo;
-- in a Truvada study carried out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Botswana, infection rates were reduced by 63% overall in healthy men and women considered to be at high risk of infection;
-- the University of Washington's Partners in PrEP study of serodiscordant couples in Kenya saw 62% fewer infections in those taking Truvada and a 73% reduction in those who took a combination of Truvada and the HIV drug tenofovir.

Committee members also heard concerns about the drug's side effects, which can include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, loss of appetite and diarrhea, liver and kidney toxicity and loss of bone density.
But, after assessing the data, they concluded that Truvada is safe for men and women and effective in preventing infection.
And they had supporters. "What we need currently is additional tools for our powerful tool box," said Dr. Richard Elion, director of clinical research at the Whitman Walker Clinic in Washington. "We are not winning the battle. Please, were asking today to allow a modality that's still being developed to be added to our toolbox."

Kirk Myers, founder and CEO of Abounding Prosperity Inc., made a plea on behalf of African-Americans. "People need to be given the option to choose," said Myers, who is HIV-positive. "This drug is wanted. Another tool we can use. The right thing to do. Without this option, desperation will continue to drive up statistics of new incidents."
Chris Collins, vice president and director of public policy for the American Foundation for AIDS Research, said the data on the drug's prophylactic use were compelling and urged the committee not to limit access to it. "We need new tools to fight this epidemic that include treatment, condoms and education," Collins said. "PrEP is certainly not for everyone, but it may have a role in bringing HIV-infection rates down. It's time to learn how PrEP may be useful in the real world."

According to Dr. Peter S. Miele, a medical officer in the agency's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Truvada's safety and efficacy for the prevention of HIV-1 infection in high-risk individuals is supported by two large clinical trials. "Regular HIV testing, adherence and behavioral counseling on safer sex practices, including condom use, are essential components of healthcare delivery around PrEP," he said.
Truvada is not cheap. A month's supply costs about $1,200.
 
I second that. It's amazing what people will pay to partake in a certain "lifestyle".
Well you don't have to get it from sex all the time. And also a cheating husband or wife can give it to you. And there are other ways to get it. Drug use and on and on.
 
Well you don't have to get it from sex all the time. And also a cheating husband or wife can give it to you. And there are other ways to get it. Drug use and on and on.
I was coming back here to clarify, Lewis has just about done it for me...

There are some real victims of HIV. My first thought is babies.... Little ones many will not touch....:shame There are committed partners who trust the other half.... I am sure there are a few more.

Those who engage in certain life styles are not victims in my eyes but perpetrators. Promiscuous sex and drug users....
 
This is for you, Tim. A buddy of mine pulls all sorts of quotes from the great Ether and I have pulled one of them for you.


“Medicaid is government-monopolized socialized medicine for the nation's poor. …

The program cost taxpayers $118 billion in 2000. By 2010 it was almost $300 billion and is projected to reach almost $500 billion by 2020.

Forty percent of physicians won't see Medicaid patients because the reimbursements they get don't cover their costs.

According to studies reported in the “Wall Street Journal,†the chances of a Medicaid patient dying in the hospital are double that of patients on private insurance and Medicaid patients are 59 percent more likely to have complications after heart surgery than privately insured patients.

Now it's about to get worse. Despite over 60 million Americans on this program that is bankrupting states and delivering substandard healthcare, ObamaCare expands it to add another 16 million.â€

- Star Parker – U.S. syndicated columnist w/the Scripps Howard News Service, social critic, book author, political activist, candidate for California's 37th congressional district, & Founder/President of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education [CURE]; taken from her article entitled "NAACP plantation masters play race card again" [http://www.onenewsnow.com/​Perspectives/​Default.aspx?id=1511970]
 
This is for you, Tim. A buddy of mine pulls all sorts of quotes from the great Ether and I have pulled one of them for you.


“Medicaid is government-monopolized socialized medicine for the nation's poor. …

The program cost taxpayers $118 billion in 2000. By 2010 it was almost $300 billion and is projected to reach almost $500 billion by 2020.

Forty percent of physicians won't see Medicaid patients because the reimbursements they get don't cover their costs.

According to studies reported in the “Wall Street Journal,†the chances of a Medicaid patient dying in the hospital are double that of patients on private insurance and Medicaid patients are 59 percent more likely to have complications after heart surgery than privately insured patients.

Now it's about to get worse. Despite over 60 million Americans on this program that is bankrupting states and delivering substandard healthcare, ObamaCare expands it to add another 16 million.â€

- Star Parker – U.S. syndicated columnist w/the Scripps Howard News Service, social critic, book author, political activist, candidate for California's 37th congressional district, & Founder/President of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education [CURE]; taken from her article entitled "NAACP plantation masters play race card again" [http://www.onenewsnow.com/​Perspectives/​Default.aspx?id=1511970]
she is a black woman. the irony the founders of scripps signed the humanist manifesto.
 
I'm torn. On the one hand, we live in a Fallen World, and people do sinful things. I did until God chose to save me. So, maybe somebody made mistakes, got HIV, and stayed healthy and wanted to have a good life with a spouse/partner--this drug could help make it happen.

On the other hand, I can't get over how expen$ive it is and I can't even imagine the side effects. ARV drugs are notorious for making life hell on patients who must take them. Just practically speaking, I don't know if the prevention is worth the side effects for all people. Then again...I'm not one of those people.

Personally, I think AIDS is more a lifestyle disease anyway. I read this book by Celia Farber--http://www.amazon.com/Serious-Adverse-Events-Uncensored-History/dp/1933633018/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337651163&sr=8-1--and I'm convinced.

In Farber's book, she writes about how there's evidence that very promiscuous, drug-abusing people have *always* had immune system problems and premature death. Some scientists (including one dude at UC Berkley whose name escapes me) think HIV doesn't do a whole lot--its all the drugs, sex, malnutrition, and stress that does the body in. The drugs do, however, kill people. I think that might explain why HIV is so very deadly (supposedly...) but there are thousands upon thousands of people who don't know their status. Why aren't they dropping like flies?

Other scientists think HIV needs "co-factors"--other problems, like drug abuse and promiscuous sex--to flourish and destroy the body. The French doc who co-discovered HIV apparently thinks something along those lines.

But the $$$ is in drugs and PSAs and feel-good campaigns for people in Africa who are probably dying from poverty, not AIDS.
 
HIV attacks and infect white blood cells and t cells. Viruses use living cells to replicate themselves by hijacking the cell and using the cell's reproduction system to create more of the virus. Since HIV destroys the cells that make up our immune system. Our bodies barely have a chance to recognize and stop the virus. What usually Jill's the person who has AIDS is another virus or disease that takes over because the immune system has been compromised.
 
HIV attacks and infect white blood cells and t cells. Viruses use living cells to replicate themselves by hijacking the cell and using the cell's reproduction system to create more of the virus. Since HIV destroys the cells that make up our immune system. Our bodies barely have a chance to recognize and stop the virus. What usually Jill's the person who has AIDS is another virus or disease that takes over because the immune system has been compromised.
Everything you said is true. Now one of the big problems is the cost of medication in this country. Do you know that some 3rd world countries have a better health care system than the USA. People here were trying to buy cheaper medicine from Canada, and and that alarmed the medication industry in this country, so the big companies pulled the right political strings, to slow it way down. I have not even heard about it lately. But this greedy country puts profit in front of saving lives.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cuba has some of the best health care in the entire world... But they are communists!
 
there is greed in the medical system but the solution isnt the goverment as we cant mandate a man to give to another man like we think we can.

@lewis, i have paid for my own treatments and diagnoses for what the goverment has asked me to do! if you want socialised mecidine just ask the local tribes near you how that is working for them.
 
there is greed in the medical system but the solution isnt the goverment as we cant mandate a man to give to another man like we think we can.

@lewis, i have paid for my own treatments and diagnoses for what the goverment has asked me to do! if you want socialised mecidine just ask the local tribes near you how that is working for them.
Jason what are you talking about ? I am talking about how the medication industry in this country over charge and it really hurts old and poor people. I know people who are affected by this right now.
 
Jason what are you talking about ? I am talking about how the medication industry in this country over charge and it really hurts old and poor people. I know people who are affected by this right now.
Lewis im on tricare for free and they refuse to pay for meds too! tricare and medicare are on the same rules and are controlled by the goverment. my wife is pre-diabetic and needs a medicine that is approved by the fda but is new. its called victoza. it has reduced her weight and it will save the goverment money in the long run.BUT NOOOO. i have to pay cash now for that all 350 bucks of it a month. so dont think the govt doesnt ration. it does.well then how do you propose that the pharmacies do reasearch? for free? or when they do give away meds here(which my pharmacy does) for certain drugs whom will pay for that?
 
Lewis im on tricare for free and they refuse to pay for meds too! tricare and medicare are on the same rules and are controlled by the goverment. my wife is pre-diabetic and needs a medicine that is approved by the fda but is new. its called victoza. it has reduced her weight and it will save the goverment money in the long run.BUT NOOOO. i have to pay cash now for that all 350 bucks of it a month. so dont think the govt doesnt ration. it does.well then how do you propose that the pharmacies do reasearch? for free? or when they do give away meds here(which my pharmacy does) for certain drugs whom will pay for that?
I am talking about the over charging only
 
that is what im addressing and why. remember all them trials cost them. if the goverment didnt pay for some of that reasearch. costs would be passed on the consumers. remember if the drug isnt found in nature but sythentic it will be way more to make.
 
Poor people die because their HMO's won't pay for certain medication, I am a victim of this. It is a good thing that I can go to the VA, because my civilian health insurance will not pay for certain stuff.
 
Poor people die because their HMO's won't pay for certain medication, I am a victim of this. It is a good thing that I can go to the VA, because my civilian health insurance will not pay for certain stuff.
tricare is an hmo! and well its what the govt controls. so im not much better then the poor as they have done me like this. this is why when we look at $$ we always loose on mecidine. the goverment and the private sector do it.

google tricare and who runs it and well then talk. tricare wont pay for my wifes med nor my chiropractic.so i i couldnt afford her med which i cant, they will treat her type 2 diabietes and possible surgeries. gotta love them govt of ours!
 
Back
Top