I'm sorry to see that you still do not understand my position Jethro. I have nothing against any peaceful religion and even my introductory post described how I loved my Christian heritage. Repeatedly attacking me with falsehoods does not make them facts. As you have attacked me yet again, I hope I will be allowed to stray a little off-topic and respond in some detail. Maybe you can then leave your animosity behind and learn from non-Christians - much in line with the OP.:yes
Christianity has been a wonderful inspiration to countless millions and has done enormous good. Why would anyone want to '
tear it down'? Conversely, Christianity has been used and abused by people who distort the teachings of Jesus for their own ends. Those who have been given 'power' by Christianity have (usually) been corrupted by that power. I have certainly written against that corruption and I can see nothing wrong with doing so.
My understanding is that you believe that all of the bible has been divinely inspired and therefore feel that it should all be followed without question. However, I have witnessed arguments between you and other forum members who share that view but who nevertheless interpret things differently from you. From this is should be clear to all that the bible is subject to interpretation. It is not a simple instruction manual.
Given the multiplicity of Christian denominations, all of whom feel that they are interpreting scripture correctly, it should be clear that no one person can be certain that they are 'right' no matter how often they hear voices telling them what to do. Those who repeatedly call others 'sinners' and feel themselves above those others are on dangerous ground. Love and tolerance was taught by Jesus and it is the prime, almost unique, lesson that should not be forgotten by any of us.
I have from time to time quoted the bible simply to emphasize that there are other interpretations. I know that you did not like me doing that but those are the words in the bible! Even if certain words are more generally accepted, if there are words which contradict the generally accepted words, and there usually are, we need to consider everything and NOT disregard the less popular words. If you choose to regard such practice as subversive, there is nothing I can do about that. I am simply trying to make people think for themselves rather than continue with damaging knee-jerk reactions.
Probably the only area where we really differ is that I see the Bible as basically a history book. A great deal of the Bible is confirmed by other sources to be correct but some of it is shown by other sources to be incorrect or highly questionable. It is based on the understanding of people millenia ago. They did not
necessarily know they were wrong but in some cases they clearly were. If we then add in tens of thousands of translation and copying errors, the bible becomes, to me, a very interesting book but not a book of absolute, reliable fact. Finally, I can not make myself ignore that this 'history book' was written on the instructions of Constantine to try to get the different strains of Christianity to stop fighting each other. I hardly need to tell you that it did not work, we now have far more Christian denominations than Constantine knew. ALL denominations think that they and they alone are right - but they can't all be right - can they?
I am truly sorry if these facts upset you but they are facts.