Bob,
The purpose of Christ was to bring glory to the Father and teach the gospel. The purpose of the Holy Spirit is to bring glory to Christ. There really was no more need for Jesus to speak of the Holy Spirit then he did.
But isn't the Father spirit? This would mean that no one can see him, just as they couldn't see the Holy Spirit. When speaking of seeing the Father, it is most likely referring to the glory of the Father, not the Father himself.
God's "right" and "left" hands are anthropomorphisms - giving something that isn't human, human charateristics so that it can be better understood. Also, the "right hand" person of a king or ruler was next in command to them; it is a place of honor and power.
Matt. 28:19. I am curious as to why Christ would say to baptize in the "name" of two persons and one non-person? How does a force share a name with two persons? There are also other passages which speak of all three.
Again, after a quick look at that site, that author uses poor reasoning and ignores essential Scriptures which prove them wrong. I am curious as to why you keep ignoring the points I made a couple of points back.
The Holy Spirit as a person is conspicuously absent from Christ’s teaching in general. Of particular interest in this regard are His many statements about Himself and the Father, especially when He never makes similar statements about Himself and the Holy Spirit.
The purpose of Christ was to bring glory to the Father and teach the gospel. The purpose of the Holy Spirit is to bring glory to Christ. There really was no more need for Jesus to speak of the Holy Spirit then he did.
We should also consider that, in visions of God’s throne recorded in the Bible, although the Father and Christ are seen, the Holy Spirit is never seen
But isn't the Father spirit? This would mean that no one can see him, just as they couldn't see the Holy Spirit. When speaking of seeing the Father, it is most likely referring to the glory of the Father, not the Father himself.
Jesus is repeatedly mentioned as being at the right hand of God, but no one is mentioned as being at the Father’s left hand.
God's "right" and "left" hands are anthropomorphisms - giving something that isn't human, human charateristics so that it can be better understood. Also, the "right hand" person of a king or ruler was next in command to them; it is a place of honor and power.
Nowhere are three divine persons pictured together in the Scriptures.
Matt. 28:19. I am curious as to why Christ would say to baptize in the "name" of two persons and one non-person? How does a force share a name with two persons? There are also other passages which speak of all three.
Again, after a quick look at that site, that author uses poor reasoning and ignores essential Scriptures which prove them wrong. I am curious as to why you keep ignoring the points I made a couple of points back.